Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING N. gonorrhoeae T. pallidum C. trachomatis Molecular diagnosis and techniques for bacterial STIs in a West-European Reference Laboratory Magnus Unemo, Assoc. Professor, WHO Collaborator National Reference Laboratory for Pathogenic Neisseria Örebro University Hospital, Sweden ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) • Latest one-two decades, NAATs revolutionized diagnostics of infectious diseases, including STIs • Dramatic improvement in sensitivity, and mostly specificity • Allow automation, non-invasively collected specimens and screening of asymptomatic individuals ⇒ reliable population based studies, determine incidence/prevalence, and eliminate the reservoir of infection • All NAATs are not equal ⇒ crucial with strict selection, validation (sampling report), and quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC; internal and external) • NAATs do not solve all the problems, and phenotypic methods remain essential for several issues! ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Diagnosis of gonorrhoea (Unemo. Swedish Ref. Meth., ~internationally) • Clinical: only suggestive for bacterial STIs! Laboratory diagnostics • Microscopy of Gram-stained smear: mainly presumptive (if not urethral specimen from symptomatic male)! • Culture (optimized and quality assured): Gold standard for definitive diagnosis (”100%” specificity and AMR testing!)! • DNA/RNA-based assays: Confirmation required for definitive diagnosis of all samples (specificity problem and no AMR data)! Effective NAAT (NEW GENERATION!), confirmation, where suboptimal culture, screening, asympt...!!! ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Internationally validated commercial DNA/RNA-based diagnostic assays Genetic target Method Manufacturer 16S rRNA Probe hybridisation Gen-Probe Chromosomal and plasmid sequences Probe hybridisation Digene Corporation cytosine DNA methyltransferase gene (single-copy) PCR Roche Diagnostics PCR (m2000) LCR (LCx) Abbott Laboratories Abbott Laboratories NASBA Organon teknika/BioMerieux))) TMA Target capture Gen-Probe SDA Becton Dickinson opa genes (multi-copy) opa genes (((16S rRNA (multi-copy) 16S rRNA (multi-copy, different segment for confirmation) pivNG gene (multi-copy) N. subflava, N. cinerea, N. flavescens, N. lactamica, N. sicca, etc genetically very similar ⇒ false positives ⇒ confirmation using other target(s) mainly needed! In house targets: PCR: cppB gene, porA pseudogene, opa genes, LCR: pilin gene ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) Advantages mostly superior sensitivity compared to culture, especially for pharyngeal and rectal specimens rapid and possibilities to high automation non-invasive specimens, e.g. urine (⇒ screening) opportunities for self- and home-sampling, and even cost-efficient pooling if the prevalence is not too high (e.g. screening and epidemiological surveillance) (Lindan, et al. 2005. JCM:1674-7) no requirements of viable bacteria (only DNA/RNA) opportunities for simultaneous detection of several agents, e.g. Chlamydia trachomatis and GC ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Positive Predictive Value (%) The specificity problem ⇒ several NAATs have exceedingly low PPVs in low prevalent populations (relate to prevalence)! 100 Test sensitivity 90% 90 1% (still high) infection prevalence 80 70 Sensitivity 88.1% and specificity 99.2% Specificity = 99.0 (mean results for men in Cook, et al. 2005. AIM:914-25) ⇓ Specificity = 98.0 Positive predictive value (PPV) of only ≈53% Specificity = 97.0 Confirmation needed! 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Prevalence (%) ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Disadvantages Specificity problems with many methods (e.g. false positive samples especially in pharyngeal and rectal specimens, confirmative assay(s) required!) Sensitivity problems with some mainly in house methods (due to the choice of target and/or presence of inhibitors]) Expensive equipment and reagents Risk of amplicon (DNA/RNA) contamination, present all over the sampling clinic and laboratory (Meader, et al. 2008. STI:107-10)?, additional well-designed studies are needed! Not effective?! and licensed for extragenital specimens! Comprehensive and reliable AMR testing not possible! NEW generation NAATs (APTIMA Combo 2, Abbott m2000, Cobas 4800, BD Viper, [Siemens]): higher specificity, currently introduced by the companies! ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Diagnosis of genital chlamydia (C. trachomatis) - Clinical: only suggestive (even if symptomatic)! Laboratory diagnostics • NAATs • • • • • • • Culture in viable cell lines (McCoy, Hela 229, BGMK – fluorescence labelled antibodies [MOMP/LPS]) 100% specificity? Direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) tests [MOMP/LPS] Enhanced enzyme immunoassay (EIA) tests [MOMP/LPS] EIA [MOMP/LPS] Rapid tests (”Point-of-care”) [MOMP/LPS] Serology Microscopy Decreased sensitivity Unemo, Papp. Atlas of STDs and AIDS. 2010 ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Swedish new variant of CT (nvCT) - Deleted plasmid target in the Roche and Abbott PCRs (Ripa. Euro Surveill. 2006) ⇒ thousands of false negatives - nvCT plasmid characterized (Seth-Smith, et al. BMC Genomics. 2009) - Dual-target assays from Abbott and Roche in 2008 - nvCT completely characterized (genome sequenced, complete phenotypic analysis ⇒ NO enhanced biological fitness and only diagnostic selective advantage!) (Unemo, et al. Microbiology. 2010) ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Internationally validated commerical DNA/RNA-based diagnostic NAATs Genetic target Test/system Manufacturer Cryptic plasmid Cobas Amplicor Roche Diagnostics Cryptic plasmid (+ompA) Cobas TaqMan48, 4800 Roche Diagnostics Cryptic plasmid (+plasmid) m2000 Abbott Laboratories Cryptic plasmid BD ProbeTec/Viper Becton Dickinson 23S rRNA (16S confirm.) Aptima Combo 2 Gen-Probe ompA (omp1) gene artus Qiagen ompA gene + artus Plus Qiagen cryptic plasmid VERSANT Siemens CT/GC DNA 1.0, Siemens Unemo, Papp. Atlas of STDs and AIDS. 2010 ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Routine CT diagnostics in our Reference Lab. Culture (1/10 of samples, only laboratory in Sweden still using also culture) AMR testing, nvCT and other mutants, genome studies, phenotypic assays, other research PCR (9/10 of samples) TaqMan48, Cobas Amplicor, LightCycler480 (Unemo. Euro Surveill. 2007), Roche Diagnostics ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING C trachomatis multicenter 3832 patienter 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Sensitivity clinical samples (3 groups): GenProbe Aptima Combo (AC2) > AC2 Abbott m2000 >= Roche (Cobas, Taqman48) > BD ProbeTec sens Abbott m2000 BD ProbeTec spec Möller, et al. JCM. 2010; Masek, et al. JCM. 2009; Walsh, et al. DMID. 2009….. ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Diagnosis of syphilis Natural course of untreated syphilis 6 weeks to 6 months Approx. 18 months Primary (Chancre) Secondary (Rash) Many years to a lifetime Latent Syphilis (No signs of disease) Tertiary Benign gummatous Cardio-vascular syphilis Neurosyphilis Incubation period 9 – 90 days 1-2 years Many years to a lifetime Early Syphilis Late Syphilis ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING DFA-TP, direct fluorescent antibody-T. pallidum; RPR, rapid plasma reagin; MPR, microprecipitation reaction; VDRL, Venereal disease research laboratory; TPHA/TPPA, TP haemagglutation/passive particle agglutination; FTA-ABS, fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption Sokolovskiy, et al. JEADV. 2009 ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Syphilis diagnostics in our Ref. Lab., as in many other low prevalent ”western” countries • Architect CMIA* (automated ~treponemal ELISA) – screening in low prevalent population! • VDRL/RPR • TPPA + + + +/- - • PCR (bmp gene; ulcer!) - Verification and follow-up - PCR (bmp; ulcer!) • (Rapid tests) *Chemiluminiscent microparticle immunoassay - Captiva IgM - Wasserman Foto: Jens Blom, Statens Seruminstitut ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Diagnosis of M. genitalium infection • Culture: lacks sensitivity and very time consuming • Serology: lacks specificity and sensitivity • PCR and other NAATs are the only effective and practical methods - Target genes: - MgPa adhesin gene (real-time PCR in routine) - 16S rRNA gene (if required, confirm., discrepancy) - No commercially available assays ⇒ strict validation - Technically complicated (14% of urines contain <400 geq/ml) - Evidence-based choice of NAAT and strict validation, QA, and QC crucial (Shipitsyna, et al. ADV. 2010) ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Molecular additional methods for confirmation, characterization, and research in our Ref. Lab. • N. gonorrhoeae: - two in house real-time PCRs for diagnostics - five different epidemiological typing methods - methods for studying 23 different resistance determinants • C. trachomatis: - one commercial PCR, and three in house PCRs for diagnostics - three different epidemiological typing methods • T. pallidum: - one in house PCR for diagnostics - one epidemiological typing methods - one method for detection of azithromycin resistance • M. genitalium: - two in house PCRs for diagnostics - one epidemiological typing method ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING Conclusions • NAATs have dramatically improved the sensitivity, mostly the specificity, speed, and accessibility of asymptomatic patients in the STI diagnostics • All NAATs are not equal ⇒ crucial with strict selection, validation to international approved systems, and QA and QC (Detailed Guidelines!) • NAATs need to be combined with optimized, validated, and QA and QC phenotypic methods for several STIs, e.g. gonorrhoea (culture and AMR testing) and syphilis (serology) • Future?: - Broad multiplex NAATs (multiple, multicopy, housekeeping targets and/or multiple agents) - Point-of-care NAATs; diagnosis, screening of AMR mutation, and typing - Microarray technology, genome sequencing, backscatter interferometri, MaldiTof MS, and nanotechnology? ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING ÖREBRO LÄNS LANDSTING CT elementary bodies in clinical specimens (vaginal swabs: for screening but also for diagnostics) Michel, et al, JCM, 2007. More ref`s: Backen, 2005; Skidmore, 2006; Fang, 2008; Falk, 2010