Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
TreadClimber Research Summary Background Walking is the #1 fitness activity in the world. Unfortunately, walking is limited in how much exercise benefit it can provide, and participants can plateau relatively quickly. The traditional ways to make walking more challenging – add speed, add incline – have drawbacks that make them not possible for many. The result: a large pool of people who walk for exercise, that would benefit from more, but don’t have a viable way to add intensity. The TreadClimber is the answer to this dilemma – it takes walking, and makes it a more effective exercise without adding the biomechanical stress of impact or incline. Research Results Multiple exercise studies conducted over the past several years have compared the TreadClimber modality to other cardio exercise options. Collectively these studies have shown that the TreadClimber: Burns calories faster – Walking on a TreadClimber at the same speed as a flat treadmill burns TWICE the calories Walking 3mph Treadmill Kcal/min 5.5 (+/-1.46) TreadClimber 11.9 (+/-2.05) – Walking on a TreadClimber at 3mph burns EQUAL calories as running on a Treadmill at 6mph Kcal/min Treadmill – 6mph 11.8 (+/-0.5) TreadClimber – 3mph 11.9 (+/-2.05) It is important to note that the greatest relative benefits of TreadClimber come at lower intensity levels. This is the range where most people work out, thus TreadClimber provides more benefit to more users. Generates less buildup of muscle-restricting lactic acid – Enables exercisers to exercise more comfortably and efficiently – TreadClimber generated lower lactate levels than all other modalities Blood Lactate (mmol) Treadmill 3.05 Elliptical 4.33 TreadClimber 2.68 Quoted studies: 2013, University of Wisconsin – La Crosse – TreadClimber Comparison Study 2011, University of Wisconsin – La Crosse – TreadClimber Energy Cost Study 2006, Univeristy of California, Davis – Effects of Exercise Modality on the Physiological Response to Exercise