Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Author: Robinson & Cole LLP Date: February 26, 2016 Pfizer to Pay $784.6 Million in False Claims Act Settlement Drug manufacturer Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”) recently agreed to pay $784.6 million to settle False Claims Act (“FCA”) suits alleging that it failed to provide to state Medicaid programs the same price discounts for heartburn drug Protonix that it provided to certain nongovernment customers between 2001 and 2006. The settlement concludes a long-running U.S. government investigation of Pfizer. It will resolve the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2009, as well as allegations contained in two earlier whistleblower lawsuits filed against the company. The FCA claims were specifically alleged against Pfizer’s Wyeth unit, a pharmaceutical company purchased by Pfizer in 2009. The crux of the lawsuit was that discounts offered to hospitals that purchased oral and intravenous versions of Protonix were not also offered to Medicaid, thereby violating the program’s “best price” provision. “Wyeth undermined the fundamental objective of the [Medicaid Drug Rebate Program] by reporting best prices for Protonix Oral and Protonix IV that did not reflect the deep discounts on those drugs that Wyeth made available to thousands of hospitals nationwide through a bundled pricing arrangement,” the complaint said. Court documents also allege that the discounts helped Wyeth gain physician loyalty and keep patients on Protonix’s oral version after discharge, thereby generating more prescriptions with inflated prices. “Wyeth used the bundled hospital discounts as a marketing tool to drive ‘spillover’ retail sales of Protonix Oral, which Medicaid and other insurers then covered at much higher prices,” the complaint states. Pfizer has reported that the settlement does not require any admission of wrongdoing on its part, since the alleged misconduct occurred before its 2009 acquisition of Wyeth. The settlement is currently just an “agreement in principle,” subject to a final settlement agreement and court approval.