Download Macro Vision

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Economic growth wikipedia , lookup

Recession wikipedia , lookup

Post–World War II economic expansion wikipedia , lookup

Gross domestic product wikipedia , lookup

Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Macro Vision
June 20, 2016
Spending ceiling may stabilize public debt below 80%
of GDP
• As a strategy to reverse the fiscal imbalance, the government proposed a constitutional reform to limit the annual
growth of federal spending to the previous year’s inflation.
• The measure represents a structural reform of the Brazilian economy that would be capable of reversing the
deterioration of the public accounts.
• With a ceiling for spending growth, we estimate that public debt could stabilize below 80% of GDP and decline until
2025.
• By implying a better outlook for the trajectory of public spending, the reforms would create conditions for a cyclical
recovery of the economy, with gains in confidence and interest-rate cuts. Real interest rates would have room to fall to
historically low levels as public spending as a percentage of GDP declines. These implications for the overall balance
of the economy are important, and allow public debt to stabilize before the primary surplus reaches the level that
would stabilize it in the long run.
• For the spending ceiling to be viable, social security reform is essential.
I – A ceiling for spending growth
As a first step of the fiscal reform, the new economic team proposed a constitutional limit for total
growth of federal primary expenditures. The proposal restricts total federal primary spending growth to the
previous year’s inflation. Thus, spending would decline as a percentage of GDP as the economy resumes
growth. The limit’s main merit would be to reopen discussions of the public budget, which is largely earmarked –
90% of expenses are considered mandatory. With the ceiling, if a given expenditure (e.g., social security) posts
real increases, it would have to be offset by real declines in other expenditures.
The measure is important, given the continuous real increase in public spending seen over the last 20
years. Between 1998 and 2015, the central government’s primary spending grew by 6% per year on average in
real terms, rising from 14.8% to 19.6% of GDP in the period. This was made possible by the rapid growth of
federal tax revenues, reflecting tax increases, structural changes (such as the increase in labor-force
formalization), increases in commodity prices and strong economic growth. These factors are unlikely to
materialize again going forward, which reinforces the need to reduce spending and ease the public budget.
The limit will reduce spending as a percentage of GDP as the economy resumes growth. With total
federal government spending close to 20% of GDP, for every 1% of economic growth, the federal primary
expenditure reduces by about 0.2% of GDP per year. With growth at 4% per year for four years, for example,
the primary expenditure would be 2.9% of GDP lower at the end of the four-year period. The fundamental
change is to impose a countercyclical fiscal policy during economic expansion, when the political temptation to
spend is heightened and long-term budgetary constraints are less evident.
Please refer to the last page of this report for important disclosures, analyst and additional information. Itaú Unibanco or its subsidiaries may do or seek
to do business with companies covered in this research report. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that
could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should not consider this report as the single factor in making their investment decision.
Macro Vision – June 20, 2016
II – Public debt dynamic with the spending ceiling
From a general equilibrium model, we simulate the fiscal trajectory, as well as the trajectory of other
1
economic variables, with the spending limit .
We assume that the spending limit is implemented from 2017 onwards. We forecast a primary deficit of
2.4% of GDP in 2016 and 1.5% of GDP in 2017, which includes some other measures in addition to the
2
spending limit . From 2018 onward, we only assume the spending limit. We consider a primary result of zero for
states, municipalities and state-owned companies throughout the simulation.
The main simulation results for the macroeconomic variables are:
1 - The economy undergoes a cyclical recovery between 2018 and 2020. We estimate an average GDP growth
of 3.3% in the period.
2 - From 2020 onwards, GDP growth gradually returns to its potential (around 2.0%).
3 - The real interest rate declines while the spending limit is in force. We estimate an average real interest rate
of 4.1% between 2017 and 2025.
Is it reasonable to expect a cyclical recovery and real interest-rate reduction with the approval of the
spending ceiling? We believe that it is. The measure is a structural change that would bring a better outlook for
the fiscal trajectory, generating a positive shock of expectations. This positive shock would be reinforced by the
adoption of a social security reform, which is necessary to make the spending limit feasible (see discussion
below). Additionally, with the reduction in public spending, the real interest rate would have room to fall,
especially as public spending as a percentage of GDP declines. With all these effects, economic growth would
be above potential for a few years, helping to close the output gap, which we currently estimate at around 6%.
This recovery and the interest-rate cuts that would follow the adoption of reforms, as we discuss below, are
important drivers for the improvement in debt dynamics over the coming years.
Spending ceiling: zero primary result in 2020 and
onward improvement until 2025
21%
5%
% of GDP
20%
4%
19%
3%
18%
2%
17%
1%
16%
0%
15%
14%
13%
-1%
Central government net tax revenues
Central government primary expenditure
Consolidated primary result (rhs)
12%
-2%
-3%
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
Source: National Treasury, Itaú
1 The results presented from 2018 onward are a simulation that takes into account the approval of the spending limit and
may differ from official forecasts released by Itaú in other reports.
2 Our forecast for 2016 is higher by 0.2% of GDP compared to the fiscal target of -2.6% of GDP, reflecting a better scenario
for economic activity (-3.5%) than is forecasted in the target (-3.8%) and extraordinary revenues. In 2017, we consider
reduction efforts of 0.2% of GDP in spending and a revenue increase of 0.8% of GDP.
Page 2
Macro Vision – June 20, 2016
The main simulation results for the fiscal variables are:
1 - The primary spending recedes from 19.4% of GDP in 2017 to 17.8% of GDP in 2020 and 15.8% of GDP in
2025.
2 - The primary result equals zero in 2020 (see chart above) and reaches a surplus of 1.9% of GDP in 2025.
3 - Gross debt would stabilize at around 80% of GDP until 2020 and decline until 2025 (see chart). The
improved dynamics occur even before the primary surplus reaches the level that stabilizes debt in the long
run.
Spending ceiling may revert public
debt upward trend
85%
% of GDP
80%
80%
75%
70%
77%
General government
gross debt
65%
60%
55%
50%
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Source: Central Bank, Itaú
In order to understand how the public debt stabilization takes place, we break down the factors that
determine its evolution. The change in public debt (Δb) is determined by the difference (r-g) between the real
interest rate (r) and GDP growth (g), the primary surplus (s) and other factors (e), such as currency swaps, fiscal
skeletons, asset sales and rebates, according to the following simplified equation:
(
)
Between 2014 and 2015, gross debt increased by 14.6% of GDP, with negative contributions from all
factors (see chart). The difference between the real interest rate and GDP growth contributed 5.7%; the
primary deficit’s contribution was 2.2%, while other factors such as losses on currency swaps contributed 6.7%.
Between 2016 and 2017, the deterioration in the primary deficit and in the growth-interest rate
differential is the main factor raising debt by 9.4% of GDP. Other factors such as the reversal of part of the
loss on FX swaps will likely contribute to a decline in debt growth.
Between 2018 and 2020, the cyclical recovery significantly reduces the growth/interest-rate ratio and
allows debt to start stabilizing at a level close to 80% of GDP (see chart). The difference between real
interest rates and economic growth drops to an average of 1.2%, compared to 6.6% between 2014 and 2017.
This reduction and the gradual decline of the primary deficit start to stabilize gross debt.
Between 2021 and 2025, gross debt starts declining as a percentage of GDP. The spending ceiling
continues to reduce public spending as a percentage of GDP, keeping real interest rates at low levels. GDP
growth gradually converges toward its potential rate of 2%. Thus, the difference between the interest rate and
growth starts going up, but maintaining reduced levels. The primary result turns positive, but is likely to still be
below 2.5% of GDP, a level that we estimate as necessary to keep debt at a balanced level. Nonetheless, gross
debt already starts declining.
Page 3
Macro Vision – June 20, 2016
Favorable cyclical effect helps to
improve the public debt dynamic
10%
Contribution to the annual increase in gross public
debt - % of GDP
8%
Primary result
Real interest rate - GDP
Other factors
Total debt delta
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
Source: Central Bank, Itaú
Skeletons are a risk to this simulation. We don’t consider any payment of contingent liabilities such as an
eventual capitalization in state-owned companies. In case of any payment of fiscal skeletons in the period, there
would be no change in the public debt trend, but only a parallel increase in the debt level.
III – Is a spending limit feasible?
The social security reform is essential. Expenditures related to social security will increase in real terms over
the coming years due to growth in the number of beneficiaries and the minimum wage adjustment rule. Thus, to
maintain total spending constant in real terms, as provided in the rule that limits spending growth, the remaining
expenses have to grow below inflation. Without the social security reform, we estimate that this expenditure,
which in 2016 represents 40% of total spending (8% of GDP), would correspond to 50% of costs (9% of GDP) in
2020 and 65% of spending (10% of GDP) in 2025 (see chart). A social security reform, which increases the
minimum age and unlinks the benefits from the minimum wage, would decrease the pace of real increases of
this expense, reducing the need for cuts in the rest of the budget.
Without a reform, social security would
represent a large part in the budget and make
the spending ceiling unviable
100%
90%
80%
% of central government primary expenditure
Social Security expenditure
70%
60%
50%
40%
65%
30%
20%
40%
50%
10%
0%
2016
2020
Source: National Treasury, Itaú
Pedro Schneider
Julia Gottlieb
Page 4
2025
Macro Vision – June 20, 2016
Macro Research – Itaú
Tel: +5511 3708-2696
Click here to visit our digital research library.
Relevant Information
1.
This report has been prepared and issued by the Macro Research Department of Banco Itaú Unibanco S.A. (“Itaú Unibanco”). This report is not a product of the Equity Research
Department of Itaú Unibanco or Itaú Corretora de Valores S.A. and should not be construed as a research report (‘relatório de análise’) for the purposes of the article 1 of the CVM
Instruction NR. 483, dated July 06, 2010.
2.
This report aims at providing macroeconomics information, and does not constitute, and should not be construed as an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell
any financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading strategy in any jurisdiction. The information herein is believed to be reliable as of the date on which this report was
issued and has been obtained from public sources believed to be reliable. Itaú Unibanco Group does not make any express or implied representation or warranty as to the
completeness, reliability or accuracy of such information, nor does this report intend to be a complete statement or summary of the markets or developments referred to herein.
Opinions, estimates, and projections expressed herein constitute the current judgment of the analyst responsible for the substance of this report as of the date on which it was issued
and are, therefore, subject to change without notice. Itaú Unibanco Group has no obligation to update, modify or amend this report and inform the reader accordingly.
3.
The analyst responsible for the production of this report, whose name is highlighted in bold, hereby certifies that the views expressed herein accurately and exclusively reflect his or
her personal views and opinions and were prepared independently and autonomously, including from Itaú Unibanco, Itaú Corretora de Valores S.A. and other group companies.
4.
This report may not be reproduced or redistributed to any other person, in whole or in part, for any purpose, without the prior written consent of Itaú Unibanco. Additional information
on the financial instruments discussed in this report is available upon request. Itaú Unibanco and/or any other group companies is not, and will not be liable for any investment decisions
(or otherwise) based on the information provided herein.
1.
Additional Note to reports distributed in: (i) U.K. and Europe: This material has been prepared by Itau BBA International plc (IBBAI) for information purposes only. The sole
purpose of this material is to provide information only, and it does not constitute or should be construed as a proposal or request to enter into any financial instrument or to par ticipate in
any specific business strategy. The financial instruments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors, and are directed solely at Eligible Counterparties and
Professionals as defined by the Financial Conduct Authority. This material does not take into consideration the objectives, financial situation or specific needs of any particular client.
Clients must obtain financial, legal, accounting, economic, credit and market advice on an individual basis, based on their personal characteristics and objectives, prior to making any
decision based on the information contained herein. By accessing the material, you confirm that you are aware of the laws in your jurisdiction relating to the provision and sale of financial
service products. You acknowledge that this material contains proprietary information and you agree to keep this information confidential. IBBA UK exempts itself from any liability for any
losses, whether direct or indirect, which may arise from the use of this material, from its content and is under no obligation to update the information contained in this
document. Additionally, you confirm that you understand the risks related to the financial instruments discussed in this material. Due to international regulations not all financial
instruments/services may be available to all clients. You should be aware of and observe any such restrictions when considering a potential investment decision. The information
contained herein has been obtained from internal and external sources and is believed to be reliable as of the date in which this material was issued, however IBBA UK does not make
any representation or warranty as to the completeness, reliability or accuracy of information obtained by third parties or public sources. Additional information relative to the financial
products discussed in this material is available upon request. Itau BBA International plc registered office is 20th floor, 20 Primrose Street, London, United Kingdom, EC2A 2EW and is
authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority (FRN 575225) – Itau BBA International plc
Lisbon Branch is regulated by Banco de Portugal for the conduct of business. Itau BBA International plc has representative offices in France, Germany, Spain which are authorised to
conduct limited activities and the business activities conducted are regulated by Banque de France, Bundesanstalt fur Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin), Banco de España
respectively. For any queries please contact your relationship manager; (ii) U.S.A: Itau BBA USA Securities, Inc., a FINRA/SIPC member firm, is distributing this report and accepts
responsibility for the content of this report. Any US investor receiving this report and wishing to effect any transaction in any security discussed herein should do so with Itau BBA USA
Securities, Inc. at 767 Fifth Avenue, 50th Floor, New York, NY 10153; (iii) Asia: This report is distributed in Hong Kong by Itaú Asia Securities Limited, which is licensed in Hong Kong by
the Securities and Futures Commission for Type 1 (dealing in securities) regulated activity. Itaú Asia Securities Limited accepts all regulatory responsibility for the content of this report. In
Hong Kong, any investors wishing to purchase or otherwise deal in the securities covered in this report should contact Itaú Asia Securities Limited at 29th Floor, Two IFC, 8 Finance
Street – Central, Hong Kong; (iv) Japan: This report is distributed in Japan by Itaú Asia Securities Limited – Tokyo Branch, Registration Number (FIEO) 2154, Director, Kanto Local
Finance Bureau, Association: Japan Securities Dealers Association; (v) Middle East: This report is distributed by Itau Middle East Limited. Itau Middle East Limited is regulated by the
Dubai Financial Services Authority and is located at Suite 305, Level 3, Al Fattan Currency House, Dubai International Financial Centre, PO Box 482034, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
This material is intended only for Professional Clients (as defined by the DFSA Conduct of Business module) no other persons should act upon it; (vi) Brazil: Itaú Corretora de Valores
S.A., a subsidiary of Itaú Unibanco S.A authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil and approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil, is distributing this report. If
necessary, contact the Client Service Center: 4004-3131* (capital and metropolitan areas) or 0800-722-3131 (other locations) during business hours, from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m., Brasilia time.
If you wish to re-evaluate the suggested solution, after utilizing such channels, please call Itaú’s Corporate Complaints Office: 0800-570-0011 (on business days from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.,
Brasilia time) or write to Caixa Postal 67.600, São Paulo-SP, CEP 03162-971.* Cost of a local call.
Page 5