Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
5/14/2013 Morning Report: An Interactive Case Presentation Mark Wurth MD/PhD May 18, 2013 Clinical Presentation 14 y/o male presents with 3 day history of progressive low back pain, now limiting his i l b k i li iti hi ability to walk. 1 5/14/2013 HPI details • Right sided • Progressively worsening Progressively worsening • No preceding injury, remembered, but child plays multiple contact sports • Some knee pain initially, but now resolved • No fevers at home, though mom has checked repeatedly because she was concerned about him • Denies numbness, tingling, weakness, or incontinence • ROS: negative other than per above. More History • PMHx: – Vaccines UTD Vaccines UTD – No chronic medical problems/No medications • PSH: – Freshman – Participant in contact sports – Denies sex/drugs/rock’n roll • FHx: – Hashimoto’s thyroiditis in parent – No hx of other rheumatologic disease 2 5/14/2013 Differential Diagnosis Differential Diagnosis eo pl as tic us 25% 4. N fla 2. In 25% fe ct io om na t 1. A 25% m m at or y ic 25% 3. In 1. MSK 1. MSK 2. Inflammatory 3. Infectious 4. Neoplastic 3 5/14/2013 • Adolescent Athletes – Skeletal Immaturity – High Rates of Growth – Organized Sports • Fewer activities • Intensive training – Identifiable Causes MSK Continued • Strains, Sprains and Contusions – Should be a diagnosis of exclusion – Most common – Management: • • • • Icing NSAIDs Activity modification Rehabilitation 4 5/14/2013 Disks • Approximately 11% of lumbar pain • Epiphyseal Ring Fractures E i h l Ri F • Indications for surgery – Progressive neurological defects – Cauda equina syndrome – Persistent pain with severe limitation of activity • Treatment generally g y conservative – Activity modification – NSAIDS – Progressive rehab including core strengthening Spondylo‐lysis/listhesis – Peaks in adolescence – Up to 47% of back pain in Up to 47% of back pain in athletes – Only 40% will report specific trauma – Mechanism: (hyper)extension • • • • • Gymnasts Dancers Divers Weight lifters Football linemen 5 5/14/2013 Spondylo‐lysis/listhesis • Screening – AP/Lateral/Obilque • MRI/SPECT • Treatment – – – – Activity modification Pain control Rehabilitation Bracing is controversial • 10 10‐15% will become 15% will become bilateral • Few will go on to have neurological impairment 6 5/14/2013 Anatomic‐ Skeletal • Scheuermann’s disease – 13‐17 year old – Male predominance – 80% are painless – Compensatory lordosis • Increased pain I d i • Increased listhesis • Scoliosis Inflammatory‐ Axial Skeleton • • • • Reactive Arthritis (Reiter’s syndrome) IBD Associated Psoriatic Arthritis Ankylosing Spondylitis 7 5/14/2013 Commonalities • Insidious • Enthesitis • Gelling phenomenon • Family Hx • HLA‐B27 association Infectious • Discitis <‐> Vertebral Ot Osteomyelitis liti • Osteomyelitis • Pyomyositis • Septic Arthritis • Sacroiliitis 8 5/14/2013 Neoplastic • • • • Ewing Sarcoma Osteosarcoma Leukemia Metastatic disease Physical Exam VS T: 36.8 P:81 R:16 BP:88/44 SpO2:97% RA Gen: Uncomfortable, still Gen: Uncomfortable, still Skin: Warm, dry, no rashes or other eruption CV: S1 S2, no murmur Resp: CTAB GI: SNTND normally active BS MSK: No joint effusion, ROM full except some tenderness on external rotation of right hip Focally TTP near right SI on external rotation of right hip. Focally TTP near right SI joint. Some paraspinal muscle spasm present R > L. Neuro: downgoing toes bilaterally, normal ankle and patellar reflexes, sensation grossly intact 9 5/14/2013 Differential Diagnosis eo pl as tic us 25% 4. N fla 2. In 25% fe ct io om na t 1. A 25% m m at or y ic 25% 3. In 1. MSK 1. MSK 2. Inflammatory 3. Infectious 4. Neoplastic Workup? CBC with diff BMP ESR CRP LDH Uric Acid PA/Lateral Spine PA/Lateral Spine CT Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis MRI L‐spine and Sacrum Bone Scan Other 10 5/14/2013 Data 10.3 13.0 91 9.1 277 39.0 136 98 11 4.3 25 0.58 111 77N 14L 9M 0E 0B CRP: 8.7 ESR: 85 LDH: 111 Uric Acid: 4.5 MRI L‐spine/Sacrum: Right paraspinal muscle strain. No spine infection seen. Differential Diagnosis eo pl as tic us 25% 4. N fla 2. In 25% fe ct io om na t 1. A 25% m m at or y ic 25% 3. In 1. MSK 1. MSK 2. Inflammatory 3. Infectious 4. Neoplastic 11 5/14/2013 Data 10.3 13.0 91 9.1 277 39.0 136 98 11 4.3 25 0.58 111 77N 14L 9M 0E 0B CRP: 8.7 ESR: 85 LDH: 111 Uric Acid: 4.5 MRI L‐spine/Sacrum: Right paraspinal muscle strain. No spine infection seen. 12 5/14/2013 Data 10.3 13.0 91 9.1 277 39.0 136 98 11 4.3 25 0.58 111 77N 14L 9M 0E 0B CRP: 8.7 ESR: 85 LDH: 111 Uric Acid: 4.5 MRI L‐spine/Sacrum: Right paraspinal muscle strain. No spine infection seen. Data 10.3 13.0 91 9.1 277 39.0 136 98 11 4.3 25 0.58 111 77N 14L 9M 0E 0B CRP: 8.7 ESR: 85 LDH: 111 Uric Acid: 4.5 MRI L‐spine/Sacrum: Right paraspinal muscle strain. No spine infection seen. 13 5/14/2013 Missing Something? • Referred pain? – Missed Appendicitis – Pancreatitis – Biliary Disease – Renal Disease Repeat Imaging CT Neck/Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis with contrast: Subarticular erosions in the SI joints, suspicious for early changes of sacroiliitis. No evidence of narrowing of the joint space. Questionable osteolytic areas in the S3 segment as discussed. areas in the S3 segment as discussed 14 5/14/2013 Diagnosis • CT guided Aspiration – S. aureus – Started on vanc, transitioned to kefzol • Rehabilitation and home with PICC for IV Abx Infective Sacroillitis • 1‐2% of osteomyelitis/septic arthritis cases • Treated like osteomyelitis with 4‐8 weeks of antibiotic therapy • Most common the result of hematogenous spread • S. aureus S aureus most common organism identified most common organism identified 15 5/14/2013 Questions? 16