Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Presentation FZ4201 Slide 1 Slide 2 The sample of the study consisted of 400 males which were typed for their minimal haplotype. 200 of these were typed for an additional 7 Y-STR’s. 2 -13 alleles maximum were observed and 146 different haplotypes were observed using only the minimal haplotype. The geographical distribution for 22 individuals of known paternal origin was also determined. Slide 3 From these 146 haplotypes, 90 or 22.5% from the whole sample were identical. Especially when you look at 3 subpopulations in the South of Finland namely Savo with 53%, Pokjanmaan with 42% and Karlaja with 37%. With the 7 additional loci, 120 haplotypes were identified and individuals sharing the most common haplotype decreased to 13%. Slide 4 In comparison with other populations from Europe, the Finnish population showed a significant decrease in genetic diversity when the number of different minimal haplotypes was divided by the sample size. 36.5% for the Finnish population compared to 83.7% on average in a European population. These numbers strongly support the earlier hypothesis on which this study was based, of individual isolated Ychromosomal lineages and population substructuring in Finland. Slide 5 Power of exclusion was tested for the Finnish population. 200 real cases were examined. Of these 200 cases, 100 provided an inclusion and 100 an exclusion. Of these 100, 92 had one or more allele difference, 8 showed no difference and 20% had 2 or less differing Y-STR alleles. Slide 6 What has caused this decrease in genetic diversity compared to other European populations? Finland has a special population history: because of its geographical boundaries, it is relatively isolated and population numbers have been, and still are, very low, with very little migration. Now it has an estimated population of 5.100.000. About 4000 years ago a small number of founders, separated and isolated themselves from the larger population and settled more in the South of Finland where more cultivative land was available and where they could avoid the increasing taxation of the Swedish Crown. Slide 7 This internal migration caused a Founder Effect where genes occurring at a certain frequency in the larger population will occur at a different frequency in a small subset of that population. This phenomenon taken together with random inbreeding increased the frequency of some rare diseases and in some, a regional clustering can be observed, reflecting the regional origins of the founders. Other disease alleles became almost non-existent. And this is what they call the Finnish disease heritage and why researchers are so interested in this population. Another probable cause of this drop in genetic diversity and increase in specific genetic diseases is suggested by the authors to be a bottleneck. They base their theory upon the figures we showed you earlier of 36.5% and 83.7%. No explanation is given nor any reason why they think it is a bottleneck which caused this and not the founder effect. Personally we think it might be both as there was a famine around that time too and this might in turn have led the founders away from the larger population. Slide 8 The researchers from this article divided their 20 minimal haplotypes in 6 geographical regions from which the donor had family roots in that area. The most common haplotype was found in 25.6% of the samples. Black: most common haplotype. Low GD in Savo for minimal and 16-loci. This shows the reduced local male gene pool. Slide 9 What are the dangers for the DNA analysis of Finnish forensic cases? We think it is quite obvious from the number of common haplotypes I showed you. Applying a general population database in forensic & paternity testing cases especially in the regions shown in the diagram would be a big big mistake.