Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Ordered Set: An order on a set S is a relation, denoted by < with the following properties: (i) If x, y ∈ S then one and only one of the following statements is true: x < y, x = y y < x. (ii) If x, y, z ∈ S such that x < y and y < z then x < z. An Ordered Set is a set S in which an order is defined. Definition: Suppose S is an ordered set, and E ⊂ S. If there exists a β ∈ S such that x ≤ β for every x ∈ E we say that E is bounded above, and call β an upper bound of E. Lower bounds are defined similarly. Definition: Suppose S is an ordered set, E ⊂ S and E is bounded above. Suppose there exists an α ∈ S such that: (i) α is an upper bound of E (ii) If γ < α then γ is not an upper bound of E. Then, α is called the least upper bound of E and write α = supE. The greatest lower bound or infimum, of a set E that is bounded below, is an element α ∈ S such that (i) α is an lower bound of E (ii) If γ > α then γ is not a lower bound of E. Then, α is called the greatest lower bound of E and write α = inf E. An ordered set S is said to have the least upper bound property if the following is true: If E ⊂ S, E is not empty, and E is bounded above, then supE exists in S. Theorem 1: Suppose S is an ordered set with the least upper bound property, B ⊂ S, B is not empty, and B is bounded below. Let L be the set of all lower bounds of B. Then, α = supL exists in S and α = inf B. Proof: Let L = { y ∈ S|y is a lower bound of B}. Since B is bounded below, there exists at least one y ∈ S such that y is a lower bound of B. Thus, L is a non empty subset of S. And, since each y ∈ L is a lower bound of B, we have that, y ≤ x for every x ∈ B. Thus, each x in B is an upper bound of L. Hence, L is bounded above. Since S has the l.u.b. property, this implies sup L exists in S. Let α = supL. Now, to show that α = infB. We first show that α is a lower bound of B. 1 That is to show that α ≤ x for every x ∈ B. If not, there must be a γ ∈ B such that γ < α. Since α is the least upper bound, γ cannot be an upper bound of L. Hence γ ∈ / B. (Why?) This is a contradiction. Hence, α ≤ x for every x ∈ B and is hence α a lower bound of B. (Thus, α ∈ L.) Now, to show that α is the greatest lower bound of B. If there is a β ∈ S such that α < β, then such a β ∈ / L. (Why?) Thus, α is an lower bound of B but no β > α is a lower bound of B. Hence, α = inf B. Fields: A field is a set F with two operations, called addition and multiplication that satisfy the following axioms: Axioms for Addition: (A1) If x, y ∈ F then their sum x + y ∈ F . (A2) Addition is commutative: x + y = x + y for all x, y ∈ F . (A3) Addition is associative: (x + y) + z = x + (y + z), for all x, y, z ∈ F. (A4) F contains an element 0 such that 0 + x = x for every x ∈ F . (A5) To every x ∈ F corresponds an element −x ∈ F such that x + (−x) = 0. Axioms for multiplication: (M1) If x ∈ F and y ∈ F, then their product xy is in F . (M2) Multiplication is commutative: xy = yx for all x, y ∈ F . (M3) Multiplication is Associative: (xy)z = x(yz) for all x, y, z ∈ F . (M4) F contains an element 1 6= 0 such that 1x = x for every x ∈ F . (M5) If x ∈ F and x 6= 0 then there exists an element x1 ∈ F such that x.( x1 ) = 1. Distributive Law: x(y + z) = xy + xz, for all x, y, z ∈ F . Proposition 1: The axioms for addition imply the following statements: (a) If x + y = x + z then y = z. (b) If x + y = x then y = 0. (c) If x + y = 0 then y = −x. (d) −(−x) = x. Proposition 2: The axioms for multiplication imply the following statements: (a) If x 6= 0 and xy = xz then y = z. (b) If x 6= 0 and xy = x then y = 1. (c) If x 6= 0 and xy = 1 then y = x1 . (d) −(−x) = x. 2 Proposition 3: The field axioms imply the following statements for x, y, z ∈ F . (a) 0x = 0. (b) If x 6= 0 and y 6= 0 then xy 6= 0. (c) (−x)y = −(xy) = x(−y). (d) (−x)(−y) = xy. Definition: An ordered field is a field F is an ordered set such that: (i) x + y < x + z if x, y, z ∈ F and y < z (ii) xy > 0 if x ∈ F, y ∈ F, x > 0 and y > 0. If x > 0 then x is called positive and if x < 0 it is called negative. Proposition 4: The following statements are true in any ordered field. (a) If x > 0 then −x < 0 and vice versa. (b) If x > 0 and y < z the xy < xz. (c) If x < 0 and y < z then xy > xz. (d) If x 6= 0 then x2 > 0. In particular, 1 > 0. (e) If 0 < x < y then 0 < y1 < x1 . Theorem 1: There exists an ordered field IR which has the least upper bound property. IR contains Q as a subfield. Theorem 2: (a) (Archimedean Property) If x, y ∈ IR and x > 0 then ethere exists a positive integer n such that nx > y. (b) (Density of Rationals in IR): If x, y ∈ IR and x < y then there exists a p ∈ Q such that x < p < y. (c) For every real x > 0 and evevry integer n > 0 there is one and only one positive rel y such that y n = x. 1 1 1 (d) If a, b are positive real numbers and n is a positive integer, then (ab) n = a n b n . 3