Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Networks Version for 1st Expert Group Meeting ACER Gas Working Group FGC-2011-G-003 28 October 2011 Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators Trg Republike 3 1000 Ljubljana - Slovenia This Document contains the draft Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Networks, which the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) has developed pursuant to Articles 6 of Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 and of Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 and on the basis of a request from the European Commission. Related Documents - Framework Guidelines on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms for the European Gas Transmission Network; FG-2011-G-001; 3 August 2011, adopted by ACER. - Framework Guidelines on Gas Balancing in Transmission Systems; FGB-2011-G-002 ; 18 October 2011, published by ACER. - EC draft guidelines on congestion management procedures; Commission proposal for guidelines to be adopted via a comitology procedure; 18th Madrid Forum of 27 & 28 September 2010. - Commission Decision of 10 November 2010 amending Chapter 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks. - European Commission Mandate to CEN for standards for biomethane for the use in transport and injection in natural gas pipelines. (M/475), 8 November 2010. - European Commission Mandate to CEN for standardisation in the field of gas qualities (M/400), 16 January 2007. - ENTSOG Interoperability WA - Harmonisation of Maintenance Publication (INT047-11_rev0) - ENTSOG Technical paper on the injection of biogas into the natural gas networks (INT010-10_Rev FINAL) - EASEE-gas CBP 2005-002/02 Interconnection Agreement EASEE-gas CBP 2005-001/02 Gas Quality Harmonisation EASEE-gas CBP 2003-002/02 Harmonisation of Nominating and Matching Process EASEE-gas CBP 2007-006/01 Harmonisation of the Allocation Information Exchange EASEE-gas CBP 2003-003/02 EDIG@S Protocol EASEE-gas CBP 2005-003-01 Constraints EASEE-gas CBP 2003-001-01: Harmonisation of units. 2/13 Table of Contents 1. General Provisions .............................................................................................................4 1.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................4 1.2. Definition of Interoperability ...........................................................................................4 1.3. Objective .......................................................................................................................5 1.4. Definitions .....................................................................................................................5 1.5. Scope of application ......................................................................................................6 1.6. Implementation .............................................................................................................7 2. Nomination and re-nomination regime .............................................................................7 3. Interconnection Agreements .............................................................................................8 4. Harmonization of Units ......................................................................................................9 5. Gas Quality .......................................................................................................................10 6. Data Exchange..................................................................................................................10 7. Capacity Calculation ........................................................................................................11 7.1. Technical Capacity Calculations..................................................................................11 7.2. Calculation of Available Capacity ................................................................................11 7.3. Updating of Available Capacity Calculations ...............................................................12 7.4. Consistency of Available Capacity Calculations ..........................................................12 8. General provisions ...........................................................................................................12 9. Cross-border cooperation ...............................................................................................13 10. Compliance .......................................................................................................................13 3/13 1. 1.1. General Provisions Introduction Operational, technical, communications-related as well as business procedures can strongly influence the development of markets. The existence of technical and operational barriers at European borders constitutes an obstacle to the creation of an integrated, competitive internal European market for energy. The European Council of 4 February 2011 calls for the completion of such a market “by 2014 so as to allow gas and electricity to flow freely” 1. In the light of the ongoing existence of barriers to the free flow of gas in Europe, the Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Networks (Framework Guidelines) identify areas where increased harmonisation of technical, organisational and communication rules and practices will foster market integration and will facilitate and enhance cooperation between transmission system operators (TSOs) as well as between TSOs and system users. The Framework Guidelines aim at setting clear and objective principles for the development of a network code on interoperability (network code), pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 (the “Gas Regulation”)2. The scoping process which provided the basis for the present draft Framework Guidelines included bilateral meetings with stakeholders as well as a workshop on scoping and an informal consultation organised by ACER. ACER received the invitation to start with the Framework GuidlineGuideline on xx November 2011. An ad hoc Expert Group was set up as a result of an open procedure to assist in the development of the Framework Gudieline. 1.2. Definition of Interoperability For the purpose of these Framework Guidelines, the term “interoperability” refers to the ability of diverse transmission systems to work together (inter-operate) in a technical system / operational sense in order to facilitate the functional and economic exchange of gas across networks, taking into account organisational factors that impact system to system performance as well as the simple and reliable exchange of information between system operators as well as between system operators and system users. 1 2 European Council of 4 February 2011, Conclusions Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1775/2005, OJ L 211/36 14/08/2009. 4/13 The overall aim of interoperability is to ensure that users of transmission systems in Europe do not face higher technical, commercial or operational or communications-related barriers than might be expected if the relevant networks were efficiently operated by a single entity. Interoperability results from the cooperation between system operators as well as between system operators and system users agreeing on technical parameters, common written operational procedures and protocols used for information exchange. 1.3. Objective The over-arching objective of the network code on interoperability is to promote the harmonisation of rules for the operation of transmission systems in order to encourage and facilitate efficient gas trading and transport across systems within the EU and thereby move towards greater market integration. The specific objective for the network code on interoperability is to define consistent harmonized technical, operational and communication-related rules that shall allow reaching the overall objective of the Framework Guideline and the 3rd energy package, including on nomination processes, interconnection agreements, unit harmonisation, gas quality, capacity calculation and data exchange. The scientific and technological principles underlying the rules to be harmonized with a view of improving the level of interoperability in transmission networks are subject to constant change, review and improvement by science and experience. New scientific findings and technological expertise might change the state of the art in the operation of gas transmission networks. The Framework Guidelines will thus be limited to setting out broad general requirements, leaving flexibility and space for the inclusion of new technological findings to the network code and its possible future revisions. Once drafted, the network code on interoperability is submitted to the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) for a reasoned opinion. Taking into account its degree of compliance with the Framework Guidelines and the fulfilment of the overarching objectives (maintaining security of supply, supporting the completion and functioning of the internal market in gas and cross-border trade including delivering benefits to the customers), ACER submits the network code to the European Commission and may recommend that it be adopted within a reasonable time period via comitology. 1.4. Definitions For the purpose of these Framework Guidelines, the definitions of the Directive 2009/73/EC3 (the “Gas Directive”) and the Gas Regulation apply in addition to the following definitions: 3 Directive 2009/73 of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and prpealing Directive 2003/55/EC, OJ L 211/94, 14/08/2009 5/13 Interface points – the physical entry and exit points on a transmission system where gas sale/purchase/trade/transfer may be taking place; Data exchange – the exchange of all necessary information between TSOs as well as between TSOs and system users and between TSOs and operators of adjacent distribution systems according to the provisions of the network code. Infrastructure operators – transmission system operators, storage system operators, LNG terminal operators and producers; Interconnection Agreement – an agreement established between at least two infrastructure operators whose systems are connected, covering rules and principles on information exchange, operational and technical procedures concerning the delivery or withdrawal of gas at the particular connection. Interconnection Point – means a cross-border interconnection point, whether it is physical or virtual, between two or more Member States as well as interconnection between adjacent entry-exit-systems within the same Member State, in so far as these points are subject to booking procedures by network users. Operational constraint – an unplanned event occurring, for a limited period of time, as a consequence of a failure in the transmission system or a problem linked to gas quality and causing available transport capacity at an interconnection point to be unexpectedly less than aggregated confirmed quantities during the nomination or re-nomination regime. Network user – a party that uses the transmission system to transport gas from one location to another or to trade gas at the virtual trading point. Gas Day - 5:00 to 5:00 UTC/GMT, or any other time period harmonised across the EU as defined in the network code on capacity allocation mechanisms by ENTSOG. Operational Balancing Agreement – an agreement established between two system operators whose systems are linked at a particular IP to handle day-to-day variations in the gas flow that are due to operational factors. 1.5. Scope of application If not further specified, the rules in these Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Networks apply to cross-border interconnection points between two or more Member States as well as to interconnections between adjacent entry-exit systems, and to all other entry and exit points of those entry/exit systems, including entry/exit points to storage, LNG, production facilities and end consumers as well as entry/exit points to the distribution sytem . 6/13 The network code on interoperability rules developed by the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSOG) and adopted according to the Framework Guidelines will be applied by TSOs. The provisions contained in the network code are without prejudice to the regulatory regime for cross-border issues pursuant to Article 42 of the Gas Directive and of the responsibilities and powers of regulatory authorities established according to Article 41(6) of the Gas Directive insofar the network code does not provide for full harmonisation. 1.6. Implementation Given the different stages of IT development across Europe and the impact that harmonised interoperability rules may have, implementation may only be achieved gradually. The network code on interoperability rules shall therefore define rules that are consistent with the ultimate goal of a common European market, but that allow for TSOs to implement compatible solutions where this may be appropriate. TSOs shall only implement such compatible solutions if the national regulatory authority (NRA) has approved this, based on an assessment of the development of the market. Member States may put in place additional gas matching or other interoperability arrangements that shall apply during an emergency (as defined in Article 10(3)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 994/20108 concerning measures to safeguard security of gas supply). Some guidance on these additional arrangements is already provided in that Regulation and more guidance will eventually be provided in the network code on operational procedures in an emergency (according to Article 8(6)(f) of the Gas Regulation). The network code on interoperability rules shall require the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSOG) to regularly review the progress towards its implementation. 2. Nomination and re-nomination regime The differences that exist in terms of nomination processes4 at or between IPs constitute a potential barrier to trade and may hamper the emergence of an efficient and integrated internal EU gas market. Harmonised nomination and re-nomination processes have to be implemented at all interface points across Europe. The network code on interoperability rules shall, if not covered by any other legal obligation, provide for a harmonisation of all nomination and confirmation deadlines so as to ensure that shippers operating in several entry-exit zones receive confirmation of all scheduled flows for the next gas day 4 Processes include the definition of deadlines and interactions between parties 7/13 simultaneously. This initial nomination and re-nomination scheme shall not restrict the possibility for shippers to sent in nominations at all times. All infrastructure operators shall cooperate together as to allow the transmission system operator to confirm the (hourly or daily) quantities of gas to his network users that will be scheduled to flow through its system on the next gas day. As mismatches on both sides of an interface point is being detected during the process of confirming nominations, the transmission system operator shall apply the ‘lesser rule’ principle, meaning that in case of different positions between a delivering and a receiving shipper at the two sides of an interconnection, and in case neither of the shippers adjusts its position, the higher of the two values will be reduced to the lower value in order to avoid a discontinuity over the intersection. As a general principle and as a minimum requirement, re-nominations should be received at the latest two full hours before becoming effective. The network code on interoperability rules can set shorter lead times, for example where different systems are operated by the same system operator. The network code on interoperability rules, when specifying the harmonised nomination and renomination process, shall set common rules on all aspects as mentioned above, including the content and format of messages and confirmation notices to be exchanged between system operators and system users. The network code on interoperability rules, when specifying the harmonised nomination and renomination process, shall define processes of cooperation between infrastructure operators in order to mitigate problems underlying operational constraints, as well as define the rules and procedures on how information on the duration, extent and handling of constraints is communicated and should also specify the content of information to be exchanged between TSOs of adjacent systems as well as between TSOs and users. The network code shall also outline the procedures to be applied to re-establish a new set of confirmed quantities for shippers at interconnection points once the constraint is successfully handled. The network code on interoperability shall, were appropriate, build on or complement the common network operation tools ENTSOG has to develop on the coordination of network operations in normal and emergency conditions, including a common incidents classification scale, and research plans, as well as recommendations relating to the coordination of technical cooperation between Community and third-country TSOs. 3. Interconnection Agreements Interconnection Agreements shall contain the information necessary to ensure a smooth exchange of information between adjacent infrastructure operators. The network code on interoperability rules shall outline a framework for interconnection agreements to be understood as a minimum set of requirements for the individual interconnection agreements to be established on a mandatory basis by all connected infrastructure operators at the connections. 8/13 The network code shall describe a template for interconnection agreements at least including the following points and providing clear guidelines on the level of detail and the content to be covered by each individual interconnection agreement in order to ensure consistency and a high level of harmonization across Europe: 4. o Matching: Interconnection agreements are to include detailed guidelines on how communication on the matching process shall function between TSOs with a view to ensuring confirmed quantities of gas are equal on both side of the point. The Network Code should also define rules in case of mismatch o Rules for flow control: Rules for interconnection agreements to be outlined by the network code shall ensure that infrastructure operators at the connections agree on the timing, direction and procedures for flow control. o Measurement principles of gas quantities and quality: The network code shall ensure interconnection agreements include provisions on methods and procedures including harmonised conversion factors, for the measurement of gas quantities and gas quality as well as rules for the handling of differences in measurement and measurement corrections. o Rules for the allocation of measured gas quantities: The interconnection agreements for which the network code establishes a common framework shall foresee consistent rules for the allocation of gas to each shipper. The interconnection agreements shall include Operational Balancing Agreements to ensure that minor deviations are handled by the infrastructure operators. o Exceptional events: The network code shall ensure that interconnection agreements contain provisions on how operators shall establish contact and coordinate necessary actions in case of an exceptional event. The content and timing of information to be exchanged between operators and between operators and users in case of exceptional events shall be defined. o Modification and Development of interconnection agreements: The network code shall establish how interconnection agreements are to be elaborated between TSOs and shall outline a transparent process for the modification of these agreements. Harmonization of Units A lack of harmonization with regard to the units used by actors along the gas value chain may consititute a barrier to trade and can unnecessarily complicate the trading and transporting of gas throughout Europe. Where the harmonization of units has already been covered by EU legislation, e.g. transparency guidelines5 or in a network code, the network code on interoperability rules shall not duplicate these provisions. 5 Chapter 3 of Annex I of the Gas Regulation. 9/13 The network code on interoperability rules shall thus determine the use of harmonized units for energy, volume and gross calorific value in those cases where the harmonization of units is not yet foreseen elsewhere. 5. Gas Quality The European Commission has identified differences in gas quality as a potential barrier to the trading of gas and the development of an integrated internal gas market in Europe. It has therefore requested CEN by Mandate M/400 to harmonise the gas quality parameters (H-gas) in Europe. A draft standard for all relevant parameters is expected by January 2013. The network code on interoperability shall foresee the implementation of harmonized ranges for gas quality, for all relevant gas parameters at the cross border interconnection points between adjacent entry/exit systems and EU entry points, including the exit of LNG import terminals, for high calorific gas without added odorants, and excluding areas of production and isolated systems where production, transportation and utilisation are combined.. The respective parties on a case-by-case basis should address contractual constraints with respect to the implementation of the various parameters and related values. For the avoidance of doubt, it is the common understanding that this recommendation should not limit the parties’ rights to agree on specifications outside the proposed ranges and continue their agreements on a bilateral basis. The network code on interoperability shall outline rules for the harmonization of odorization practices in transmission systems throughout Europe with the objective to facilitate cross-border trade. Furthermore, the European Commission has requested CEN to elaborate a standard for biomethane (CEN Mandate M475). The network code on interoperability shall make reference to this standard and outline additional rules on the injection of biogas in the natural gas grid to complement the standard and ensure a harmonized European approach toward the injection of biomethane. 6. Data Exchange Data exchange and settlement rules shall be treated under a separate FG pursuant to Article 8 Gas Regulation which shall be covered by (a) network code(s) to be developed by ENTSOG. As far as capacity bookings and the transfer of capacity rights between network users are concerned, the Framework Guidelines on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms do already require the respective network code to define standard communication procedures, based on coordinated information systems and compatible electronic on-line communications. Covering all areas where tansmission system operators exchange data between each other or with network users or operators of adjacent systems, the network code on interoperability rules shall foresee a common, best available technology, standardised messaging protocol and the respective technical standards for the reliable, secure and smooth exchange of information between TSOs as well as between TSOs and relevant counterparties. 10/13 7. Capacity Calculation Capacity calculation has become a dynamic process. The introduction of bigger entry-exit zones with a mixture of long and short term gas trading markets creates less predictability of flow patterns. Daily forecasts for entry and exit flows have to be taken into account and information on potential congestion and constraints within the system, but also from adjacent systems are to be taken into consideration. Article 16 of the Gas Regulation obliges TSOs to offer maximum capacity. This calls for: a) the calculation of technical capacity through transparent methodologies, identifying all capacity that can be physically used as well as b) the forecast of system use for the purposes of identifying technical constraints, where TSOs may also consider market trends, historical flow data and data on results of allocation processes. The network code on interoperability rules shall consequently define a transparent and consistent process for the calculation of technical capacity in order to identify all capacity that can be physically used. The procedures for capacity calculation to be defined by the network code and to be applied by TSOs shall fulfil at least the following requirements: 7.1. Technical Capacity Calculations The network code shall oblige TSOs to include parameters and assumptions in the network scenarios aiming at optimizing the technical capacity of the network. Parameters and assumptions in the network scenarios must match the particularities of the transportation services offered to and information published for the market in order to guarantee that for each transportation service the right level of technical capacity is calculated. When it comes down to the offer of interruptable capacity, the risk of interruption should be based on network scenarios giving equal statistical percentage of interruption. . Parameters and assumptions for which legislation, regulation or commitments exist are set equal (or comply) to these values (or requirements) and may not have more or less critical values for the calculation of firm capacity. For other parameters and assumptions, the values are set by the TSO in order to (a) comply with the requirements of firm capacity, (b) guarantee consistency over time and (c) guarantee at least compatibility with the adjacent TSOs. Adjacent TSOs must aim for convergence of network scenarios for the calculation of technical and available capacities in order to match capacity levels on both sides of interconnection point. The TSOs must explain any difference in available capacities. 7.2. Calculation of Available Capacity The Network Code shall define rules to oblige TSOs to guarantee consistency between technical capacity calculation and the calculation of available capacity 11/13 The calculation of available capacity shall be derived from technical capacity calculation and shall depend – according to the time horizon – on the following values: o o o o nominated capacity; booked capacity; operational margin; new/planned capacity The network code shall oblige TSOs to calculate the available capacity for each interconnection and for different capacity products/services) and for different time horizons (short,medium and long term). 7.3. Updating of Available Capacity Calculations The Network Code shall define rules that TSOs update their calculation of available and technical capacity in order to inform the market correctly. Recalculation of Technical Capacity means new simulations based on refreshed inputs (usually based on updated forecasts, market surveys, open seasons, investment plans, etc.) Technical Capacity calculations must be regularly updated, at least on a quarterly basis or as soon as a divergence is observed between the forecast market developments and the effective developments. The offered capacity is binding to the TSO meaning that any request equal or lower the published availability must be guaranteed. The Network Code shall set out rules for TSOs to coordinate the timing for updating and reevaluation of the calculation of the Technical Capacity values based on a network simulation of the network capability according to the new information gathered. 7.4. Consistency of Available Capacity Calculations The Network Code must guarantee consistency and compatibility of the AC calculations with adjacent TSOs over time. The compatibility requirement means that any differences may not hinder market access and the development of competition. In order to meet transparency requirements, TSOs must coordinate a coherent way to present capacity calculations and levels in order to make information accessible and comparable across networks for network users. 8. General provisions ENTSOG shall involve where appropriate DSOs and relevant stakeholders eg. shippers end users, Producers, SSOs, LNG Operators in the drafting of the relevant sections of the network code on interoperability rules. 12/13 9. Cross-border cooperation The network code shall require ENTSOG to regularly review interoperability within its area of application. The review will additional measures needed to harmonise rules, which may integrated internal EU market for gas. This is an additional monitoring. the progress of harmonisation of also consider whether there are facilitate the development of an requirement to ACER`s role on 10. Compliance The network code on interoperability rules shall require ENTSOG to regularly review the progress towards its implementation and report every 12 months, to begin after the entry into force of the network code, to ACER if harmonisation is not yet achieved. The report shall identify for each issue the progress made, the hurdles identified and the likelyhood that full compliance of the interoperability rules shall be obtained at the latest within three years of the entry into force of the network code. ENTSOG shall publicly consult on these reports before their submission to ACER. ACER will monitor these reports according to Article 9(1) of the Gas Regulation. The competent NRA, taking full account of ACER’s opinion, may require the relevant TSO to take action to improve implementation. ACER may request the concerned NRA to amend its decision. 13/13