Download Mycoplasma Diagnosis

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Diagnostic Methods for
Avian Mycoplasmas
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
Hendrik R. Froin
Mycoplasma Diagnosis
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
Diagnosis is based on
the flock as a whole,
not individual birds
Criteria for Diagnosis
• Clinical signs
– Usually present in turkeys
– Inconsistent in chickens
• Detection of antibody
– Agglutination, HI, ELISA
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
• Detection of the organism
– Culture, PCR, immunohistochemistry
Clinical Signs
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
•
•
•
•
•
Respiratory signs
Synovitis
Egg production drops
Increased mortality?
Respiratory or leg problems in progeny
Purpose of Serology
• Assist in diagnosis when signs are
present
• Screening of breeding flocks in control
programs
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
– Serology should help to identify flocks
which warrant a closer look
Utility of Serology
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
• Serology can be definitive if positive and
associated with clinical signs or if a high
% of the flock is positive with high HI or
ELISA titers
• In most situations positive or suspicious
serology is confirmed by culture and/or
PCR
Sensitivity
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
Ability of a test to detect
an infected animal or flock
(should not give false negative results)
Specificity
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
Ability of a test to detect
birds or flocks which are negative
(should not give false positive results)
Characteristics of Agglutination
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
• Cheap and fast
• Detects primarily IgM (the first class of
antibody produced)
• Sensitive (except in some cases of MS)
• Lacks specificity (tends to give false
positive results)
Characteristics of HI
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
•
•
•
•
High degree of specificity
Low to medium sensitivity
Detects primarily IgG
Reacts about 1-2 weeks later than
agglutination
Characteristics of ELISA
• Detects primarily IgG, but also IgM
– ProFLOK® Elisa’s are detecting light and
heavy chain !
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
• Highly sensitive
• Specificity of newer kits is quite good
– Expect about 5% of samples in suspect or low
positive category in young breeders
– These can be confirmed as negative by HI
Reasons for Difficulties in
Diagnosis
• Testing early after exposure
– No antibodies
• Medication
– Negative in culture, PCR…
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
• Mild strains of MG or MS
– Weak immune response
• Strains which differ antigenically
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
SYNBIOTICS ProFLOK®
Mycoplasma Elisa’s
• Chicken MS and MG
• Turkey MS, MG and MM
• USDA licensed
• Reliable, consistent results
• Optimized to specifically work with chicken or
turkey samples ( different cojugate)
• 18 month shelf-life
• Detects positive, negative and suspect titer levels
• High volume, easy-to-use format
ProFLOK® Specificity
Synbiotics Mg ELISA
Average S P1,2
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
Reference S erum
Ratio Values S P Ranges3 Titer Values4
Infectious bursal disease (IBD)
0.011
-
0
Newcastle disease virus (NDV)
0.012
-
0
Avian reovirus (REO)
0.012
-
0
Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV)
0.006
-
0
Infectious laryngotracheitis (LT )
0.101
-
0
Avian encephalomyelitis (AE)
0.070
-
0
Pasteurella multocida (PM)
0.012
-
0
Staphylococcus aureus
0.055
-
0
Anti-tissue culture medium
0.017
-
0
Commercial inactivated vaccine
0.033
-
0
Mg negative control serum (NCS)
0.000
-
0
Mycoplasma meleagridis (Mm)
0.016
-
0
Mycoplasma synoviae : 40 HI (Ms)
0.000
-
0
Mycoplasma synoviae :160 HI (Ms)
0.059
-
0
Mycoplasma gallisepticum : 40 HI (Mg)
1.088
+
1781
Mycoplasma gallisepticum : 160 HI (Mg)
1.565
+
3032
1.
Values are the arithmetic mean of
15 replicate samples (3
replicates/5 ELISA plates)
2 SP Ratio =
OD Sample – Avg. OD NC
Avg. OD PC – Avg. OD NC
3.
Synbiotics Mg ELISA SP
threshold ranges:
Negative (-) < 0.199
Suspect (su) = 0.200 -0.599
Positive (+) > 0.600
4.
Log10 titer = (1.464 x Log10 SP)
+ 3.197
ProFLOK® Sensitivity
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
Log 2
Dilution
Ratio
Mg HI Titer Values
Synbiotics Mg ELISA
SP Values 1
Titer Value 1,4
SP
Range 1,2
Lab A3
Lab B 1
-1
1:2
3.371
+
9326
186.7
146.7
-2
1:4
3.005
+
7881
66.7
80.0
-3
1:8
2.218
+
5062
66.7
60.0
-4
1:16
1.600
+
3132
53.3
40.0
-5
1:32
1.000
+
1574
26,7
33.3
-6
1:64
0.560
su
674
20.0
20.0
-7
1:128
0.320
su
297
13.3
13.3
1. Values are the arithmetic mean of 6 replicate samples
3. Synbiotics Mg ELISA SP threshold ranges:
Negative (-) < 0.199
Suspect (su) = 0.200 -0.599
Positive (+) > 0.600
4. Log10 titer = (1.464 x Log10 SP) + 3.197
ProFLOK® Reproducibility
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
Plate
Average Optical
Density A
CV (%)
1
.642 ± .007
7,49
2
.687 ± .033
4,81
3
.575 ± .040
6,95
4
.605 ± .005
8,73
5
6
.590 ± .005
.686 ± .005
6,05
4,44
7
.703 ± .006
5,28
8
.617 ± .005
4,75
9
.634 ± .005
4,68
10
.621 ± .006
5,68
Avg. Plate CV AValues are the arithmetic mean ±
SEM of one Mg positive chicken
(%) B
5,88
serum assayed 84 times per Mg
ELISA plate.
BValue
is the mean % Coefficient of
Variation (CV%) of one Mg positive
chicken serum assayed 84 times
per ELISA plate on each of ten Mg
ELISA plates.
Comparitive Study of
Agglutination, HI and Elisa
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
S. H. Kleven
Department of Avian Medicine
University of Georgia
Data are from a lecture
given during the IPE congress in Atlanta,
USA in January 2003
An Easy Example:
Birds were challenged by aerosol by MG,
MS, or negative controls
ELISA’s used:
• ProFLOCK® Mg or MS Elisa
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
– Using a suspect range
• Commercial Elisa’s (C –Kit)
– Only positive / negative !
MS Serology / Controls
14
12
10
8
Positive
Suspect
Negative
6
4
2
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
0
Plate
HI
Synbiotics
C - Kit
MG serology / Controls
14
12
10
8
Positive
Suspect
Negative
6
4
2
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
0
Plate
HI
Synbiotics
C - Kit
MG Serology / MG Infected
18
16
14
12
Positive
Suspect
Negative
10
8
6
4
2
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
0
Plate
HI
Synbiotics
C - Kit
Birds were challenged by aerosol by MG
MG Serology / MS Infected
14
12
10
8
Positive
Suspect
Negative
6
4
2
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
0
Plate
HI
Synbiotics
C-Kit
Birds were challenged by aerosol by MS
MS Serology / MS Infected
14
12
10
8
Positive
Suspect
Negative
6
4
2
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
0
Plate
HI
Synbiotics
C-Kit
Birds were challenged by aerosol by MS
A Difficult Example:
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
Birds were challenged by contact by MG,
MS, or negative controls
-> Spread of infection was
slow and inconsistent
MS Serology / Controls
25
20
15
Positive
Suspect
Negative
10
5
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
0
Plate
Control Birds
HI
Synbiogics
C- Kit
MG Serology / Controls
25
20
15
Positive
Suspect
Negative
10
5
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
0
Plate
Control Birds
HI
Synbiotics
C - Kit
MS Serology / MG Infected
18
16
14
12
Positive
Suspect
Negative
10
8
6
4
2
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
0
Plate
HI
Synbiotics
C - Kit
Birds were challenged by contact by MG
MG Serology / MG Infected
16
14
12
10
Positive
Suspect
Negative
8
6
4
2
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
0
Plate
HI
Synbiotics
C - Kit
Birds were challenged by contact by MG
MG Serology / MS Infected
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Positive
Suspect
Negative
Plate
HI
Synbiotics
C - Kit
Birds were challenged by contact by MS
MS Serology / MS Infected
16
14
12
10
Positive
Suspect
Negative
8
6
4
2
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
0
Plate
HI
Synbiotics
C - Kit
Birds were challenged by contact by MS
Conclusions
Mycoplasma , Hungaria
18.03.2003 H.R. Froin
The ProFLOK® MG and MS Elisa are
showing:
• Superior sensitivity ( No false negative !)
• Excellent specificity
• Better interpretation due to suspect range
• High reproducibility
Related documents