Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Diagnostic Methods for Avian Mycoplasmas Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin Hendrik R. Froin Mycoplasma Diagnosis Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin Diagnosis is based on the flock as a whole, not individual birds Criteria for Diagnosis • Clinical signs – Usually present in turkeys – Inconsistent in chickens • Detection of antibody – Agglutination, HI, ELISA Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin • Detection of the organism – Culture, PCR, immunohistochemistry Clinical Signs Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin • • • • • Respiratory signs Synovitis Egg production drops Increased mortality? Respiratory or leg problems in progeny Purpose of Serology • Assist in diagnosis when signs are present • Screening of breeding flocks in control programs Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin – Serology should help to identify flocks which warrant a closer look Utility of Serology Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin • Serology can be definitive if positive and associated with clinical signs or if a high % of the flock is positive with high HI or ELISA titers • In most situations positive or suspicious serology is confirmed by culture and/or PCR Sensitivity Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin Ability of a test to detect an infected animal or flock (should not give false negative results) Specificity Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin Ability of a test to detect birds or flocks which are negative (should not give false positive results) Characteristics of Agglutination Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin • Cheap and fast • Detects primarily IgM (the first class of antibody produced) • Sensitive (except in some cases of MS) • Lacks specificity (tends to give false positive results) Characteristics of HI Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin • • • • High degree of specificity Low to medium sensitivity Detects primarily IgG Reacts about 1-2 weeks later than agglutination Characteristics of ELISA • Detects primarily IgG, but also IgM – ProFLOK® Elisa’s are detecting light and heavy chain ! Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin • Highly sensitive • Specificity of newer kits is quite good – Expect about 5% of samples in suspect or low positive category in young breeders – These can be confirmed as negative by HI Reasons for Difficulties in Diagnosis • Testing early after exposure – No antibodies • Medication – Negative in culture, PCR… Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin • Mild strains of MG or MS – Weak immune response • Strains which differ antigenically Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin SYNBIOTICS ProFLOK® Mycoplasma Elisa’s • Chicken MS and MG • Turkey MS, MG and MM • USDA licensed • Reliable, consistent results • Optimized to specifically work with chicken or turkey samples ( different cojugate) • 18 month shelf-life • Detects positive, negative and suspect titer levels • High volume, easy-to-use format ProFLOK® Specificity Synbiotics Mg ELISA Average S P1,2 Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin Reference S erum Ratio Values S P Ranges3 Titer Values4 Infectious bursal disease (IBD) 0.011 - 0 Newcastle disease virus (NDV) 0.012 - 0 Avian reovirus (REO) 0.012 - 0 Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) 0.006 - 0 Infectious laryngotracheitis (LT ) 0.101 - 0 Avian encephalomyelitis (AE) 0.070 - 0 Pasteurella multocida (PM) 0.012 - 0 Staphylococcus aureus 0.055 - 0 Anti-tissue culture medium 0.017 - 0 Commercial inactivated vaccine 0.033 - 0 Mg negative control serum (NCS) 0.000 - 0 Mycoplasma meleagridis (Mm) 0.016 - 0 Mycoplasma synoviae : 40 HI (Ms) 0.000 - 0 Mycoplasma synoviae :160 HI (Ms) 0.059 - 0 Mycoplasma gallisepticum : 40 HI (Mg) 1.088 + 1781 Mycoplasma gallisepticum : 160 HI (Mg) 1.565 + 3032 1. Values are the arithmetic mean of 15 replicate samples (3 replicates/5 ELISA plates) 2 SP Ratio = OD Sample – Avg. OD NC Avg. OD PC – Avg. OD NC 3. Synbiotics Mg ELISA SP threshold ranges: Negative (-) < 0.199 Suspect (su) = 0.200 -0.599 Positive (+) > 0.600 4. Log10 titer = (1.464 x Log10 SP) + 3.197 ProFLOK® Sensitivity Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin Log 2 Dilution Ratio Mg HI Titer Values Synbiotics Mg ELISA SP Values 1 Titer Value 1,4 SP Range 1,2 Lab A3 Lab B 1 -1 1:2 3.371 + 9326 186.7 146.7 -2 1:4 3.005 + 7881 66.7 80.0 -3 1:8 2.218 + 5062 66.7 60.0 -4 1:16 1.600 + 3132 53.3 40.0 -5 1:32 1.000 + 1574 26,7 33.3 -6 1:64 0.560 su 674 20.0 20.0 -7 1:128 0.320 su 297 13.3 13.3 1. Values are the arithmetic mean of 6 replicate samples 3. Synbiotics Mg ELISA SP threshold ranges: Negative (-) < 0.199 Suspect (su) = 0.200 -0.599 Positive (+) > 0.600 4. Log10 titer = (1.464 x Log10 SP) + 3.197 ProFLOK® Reproducibility Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin Plate Average Optical Density A CV (%) 1 .642 ± .007 7,49 2 .687 ± .033 4,81 3 .575 ± .040 6,95 4 .605 ± .005 8,73 5 6 .590 ± .005 .686 ± .005 6,05 4,44 7 .703 ± .006 5,28 8 .617 ± .005 4,75 9 .634 ± .005 4,68 10 .621 ± .006 5,68 Avg. Plate CV AValues are the arithmetic mean ± SEM of one Mg positive chicken (%) B 5,88 serum assayed 84 times per Mg ELISA plate. BValue is the mean % Coefficient of Variation (CV%) of one Mg positive chicken serum assayed 84 times per ELISA plate on each of ten Mg ELISA plates. Comparitive Study of Agglutination, HI and Elisa Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin S. H. Kleven Department of Avian Medicine University of Georgia Data are from a lecture given during the IPE congress in Atlanta, USA in January 2003 An Easy Example: Birds were challenged by aerosol by MG, MS, or negative controls ELISA’s used: • ProFLOCK® Mg or MS Elisa Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin – Using a suspect range • Commercial Elisa’s (C –Kit) – Only positive / negative ! MS Serology / Controls 14 12 10 8 Positive Suspect Negative 6 4 2 Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin 0 Plate HI Synbiotics C - Kit MG serology / Controls 14 12 10 8 Positive Suspect Negative 6 4 2 Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin 0 Plate HI Synbiotics C - Kit MG Serology / MG Infected 18 16 14 12 Positive Suspect Negative 10 8 6 4 2 Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin 0 Plate HI Synbiotics C - Kit Birds were challenged by aerosol by MG MG Serology / MS Infected 14 12 10 8 Positive Suspect Negative 6 4 2 Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin 0 Plate HI Synbiotics C-Kit Birds were challenged by aerosol by MS MS Serology / MS Infected 14 12 10 8 Positive Suspect Negative 6 4 2 Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin 0 Plate HI Synbiotics C-Kit Birds were challenged by aerosol by MS A Difficult Example: Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin Birds were challenged by contact by MG, MS, or negative controls -> Spread of infection was slow and inconsistent MS Serology / Controls 25 20 15 Positive Suspect Negative 10 5 Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin 0 Plate Control Birds HI Synbiogics C- Kit MG Serology / Controls 25 20 15 Positive Suspect Negative 10 5 Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin 0 Plate Control Birds HI Synbiotics C - Kit MS Serology / MG Infected 18 16 14 12 Positive Suspect Negative 10 8 6 4 2 Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin 0 Plate HI Synbiotics C - Kit Birds were challenged by contact by MG MG Serology / MG Infected 16 14 12 10 Positive Suspect Negative 8 6 4 2 Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin 0 Plate HI Synbiotics C - Kit Birds were challenged by contact by MG MG Serology / MS Infected Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Positive Suspect Negative Plate HI Synbiotics C - Kit Birds were challenged by contact by MS MS Serology / MS Infected 16 14 12 10 Positive Suspect Negative 8 6 4 2 Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin 0 Plate HI Synbiotics C - Kit Birds were challenged by contact by MS Conclusions Mycoplasma , Hungaria 18.03.2003 H.R. Froin The ProFLOK® MG and MS Elisa are showing: • Superior sensitivity ( No false negative !) • Excellent specificity • Better interpretation due to suspect range • High reproducibility