Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Surface Analysis Technology Vacuum Components Surface Analysis System Software Computer Technology Optimizing the operation of X-Ray sources Technical Note The sensitivity of the XPS analysis depends on the luminosity of the used energy analyzer and the density of the characteristic X-ray at the sample position. The X-ray density hitting the sample surface depends on the X-ray power and the distance between the anode surface and the sample. The X-ray intensity depends strongly on the distance (I ∝ r2), see figure 1. Relative XPS signal intensity dependency on sample-anode distance 0.005 0.004 Signal (arbitrary units) Depending on the anode type there is a specific working voltage of the X-ray source, at which there is a maximum yield of the characteristic X-rays. On the basis of this dependency it is also possible to check the surface condition of the anode. Standard distance for specification 0.003 -2.18 y=x 0.002 0.001 0 0 20 40 Distance Sample-Anode in mm Figure 1 Ag 3d5/2 FWHM XR 50 @ 10 mm RQ 20/63 @ 22 mm 0.85 eV 2500 kcps 625 kcps 0.90 eV 3700 kcps 925 kcps 1.00 eV 6700 kcps 1675 kcps 1.40 eV 17600 kcps 4400 kcps Typical signal (intensity above background) versus FWHM of the Ag 3d5/2 peak measured using the PHOIBOS 100 MCD-5 analyzer with the Large Area Mode (achieved data). Excitation with XR 50 X-ray source at 10 mm anode working distance (Mg Kα at 300 W, 15 kV) or RQ 20/63 at 22 mm anode working distance. 60 The anode voltage of the X-ray source influences the X-ray density, too. Below the ionisation energy (i.e. for Al about 1500 eV), also for high anode power, no characteristic X-rays can be excited. On the other hand the ionization cross section decreases with increasing energy. The maximum, where the highest yield of the characteristic X-rays is achieved, has to be found between these two extremes. This maximum X-ray yield was measured for an Al and a Mg anode (Fig. 2). The maximum yield was found for Mg at nearly 10 kV and for Al at nearly 14 kV. Figure 2 The graph shows a flat maximum. Within this flat region the amount of changes in X-ray intensity induced by fluctuations of the anode voltage are smallest (1% yield variation for 10% variation of the anode high voltage). Coating of the anode with carbon or other materials caused by the degassing of organic samples or operation of the anode under poor vacuum conditions will decrease the X-ray yield. This effect can be distinguished from other effects (i.e. aging of the multiplier), by measuring the curve shown in figure 2. The maximum will shifted to higher voltages, if the anode is coated by residual material. If the contamination layer exceeds a given thickness no maximum will be found within the typical working range of the X-ray source. SPECS GmbH Surface Analysis and Computer Technology Voltastrasse 5 13355 Berlin Germany Phone: +49 30 467824-0 Fax: +49 30 4642083 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.specs.de C o m p e t e n c e i n S u r f a c e A n a l y s i s