Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
REVIEW ARTICLE Angle Recession Glaucoma Sunil Ganekal1, Syril Dorairaj2 ABSTRACT Traumatic glaucomas are a very heterogeneous group of entities due to a variety of mechanisms which increase the intraocular pressure in the early or late phase after traumatic injury. Glaucoma after closed globe injury is a major concern because many cases may go unnoticed and are diagnosed many years later as having irreversible glaucomatous optic nerve damage.[1,2] Angle recession is one of the causes for late onset posttraumatic glaucoma; this condition may be underdiagnosed because the onset is often delayed and because a history of eye injury may be distant or forgotten. KEY WORDS: Blunt trauma, Angle recession, Glaucoma INTRODUCTION Eyes with an underlying tendency for open-angle glaucoma will develop a late increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) following blunt trauma.[3] Glaucoma after blunt trauma appears to have two peaks of incidence, at <1 year and about 10 years after [4] trauma. A review of data from the eye injury register found increasing age, poor baseline visual acuity, angle recession, hyphema, and lens injury to be independent risk factors for developing posttraumatic glaucoma.[5] Angle recession glaucoma is classified as a type of traumatic secondary open-angle glaucoma.[6] Angle recession, with or without glaucoma, is a common sequel of blunt ocular trauma and one characterized by a variable degree of cleavage between the circular and the longitudinal fibers of the ciliary muscle.[7] Treacher Collins based the first report of this postcontusional angle deformity on gross examination of enucleated eyes in 1892. In 1944, D’Ombrain observed the association of ocular trauma and chronic unilateral glaucoma, suggesting abnormalities in the region of the trabecular meshwork as the underlying cause. This theory was substantiated by the classic histologic findings of angle recession published in 1962 by Wolf and Zimmerman, reported the presence of monocular glaucoma in 6 patients who had histories of blunt trauma to the eye with gonioscopic evidence of angle recession. In addition, they described the pathological findings of angle recession in enucleated eyes of patients with a previous history of ocular contusion.[7] Since then, numerous investigators have studied the epidemiological, clinical, and histopathological findings of this disease entity. Although a relatively uncommon phenomenon, angle recession glaucoma may be overlooked in the management of blunt eye trauma.[1] Long-term follow-up care of patients with recognized contusional angle abnormality is warranted because of the risk of delayed asymptomatic onset. It is desirable to identify individuals at risk of developing angle recession glaucoma so that appropriate follow-up examinations and treatment can be done at an early stage, long before the vision becomes seriously impaired. Epidemiology Advancing age has been reported as an independent predictive factor for the risk of developing glaucoma after ocular contusion injury. Angle recession glaucoma is most likely diagnosed in mid or late adulthood due to the potential delay or late onset after a blunt injury. It may be misidentified as primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) because late angle abnormalities may be subtle on examination. A distant or even forgotten history of eye trauma may Access this article online Department of Ophthalmology, Jagadguru Jayadeva Murugarajendra Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India, 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Florida, USA 1 Quick Response Code: Website: *** Address for correspondence: Dr. Sunil Ganekal, Department of Ophthalmology, Jagadguru Jayadeva Murugarajendra Medical College, Davangere - 577 004, Karnataka, India. Phone: +91-0819222565. [email protected] Journal of Vision Sciences/May-Aug 2015/Volume 1/Issue 2 28 Ganekal and Dorairaj: Angle recession glaucoma following blunt trauma result in the condition being overlooked, especially in the elderly persons. No sex predilection for angle recession glaucoma has been reported. A strong predominance of eye trauma exists in men, with a male-to-female ratio of 4:1. Therefore, it may be assumed that angle recession and angle recession glaucoma occur most frequent in men. Among children, eye injuries occur more frequent in boys than girls. Investigators have reported that more than 60% of eyes with blunt trauma will have some degree of angle recession.[4,8-11] Although traumatic angle recessions may occur without hyphema, a strong correlation between hyphema and angle recession has been established. Careful gonioscopy has revealed that between 56% and 100% of patients with traumatic hyphema has some degree of angle recession (Table 1).[4,8-12] The most frequent cause of injury-inducing angle recession occurred as a result of sports or other recreational accidents (55.6%; 114 of 205) in the series of Canavan and Archer[13] and as a result of assault (65%; 57 of 87) in the series of Mermoud et al.[14] Less common causes were automobile or industrial accidents, projectiles from toy guns or slingshots, and other leisure activities.[14-18] A small percentage of people will deny any previous episode of ocular trauma despite the presence of obvious eyelid scars and pupillary sphincter tears.[14] Very rarely ocular surgical procedure like cataract surgery and penetrating keratoplasty can cause angle recession.[19] Although recession of the iridocorneal angle is common after blunt trauma, only 6-8%[4,9,20] of these eyes will eventually develop glaucoma (Table 2). In a 10 years prospective study by Kaufman and Tolpin[9] involving 31 eyes with angle recession, they observed that 6% of the patients developed glaucoma. Similarly, retrospective analysis by Blanton[4] found nine individuals (7%) with uniocular glaucoma in his review of 130 cases of angle recession. In a 1994 population-based survey on gonioscopy in individuals older than 40 years in a community in South Africa, the authors reported a cumulative prevalence of angle recession of 14.6%. Among eyes with 360° of angle recession, 8% had glaucoma, and the overall Table 1: Presence of angle recession in patients with traumatic hyphema Authors Number of patients with hyphema Number of patients with angle recession (%) Blanton[4] 182 71 Tomjun 160 100 Kaufman and Tolpin[9] 50 94 Filipe et al. 45 56 Spaeth 43 60 Herschler[12] 17 100 Total 497 405 (81) [8] [10] [11] prevalence of glaucoma of eyes with any degree of angle recession was 5.5%.[20] Five patients were diagnosed within 3 years after injury, and the remaining 4 patients developed glaucoma more than 10 years after the injury. There appear to be two peak incidences of glaucoma after angle recession. The first peak occurs within the first few weeks to years after the trauma, and the second peak occurs 10 or more years after the injury.[4] Alper[21] reviewed a series of 27 cases of angle recession, and 14 of these had unilateral glaucoma. Eight received diagnoses within 4 years after the injury, and the remaining six had diagnoses more than 14 years after the original trauma. Some investigators have even reported cases of angle recession glaucoma developing more than 50 years after the initial injury.[1,15] There is also an association between the extent of angle recession and the development of glaucoma. Tonjum[8] found a significant correlation between the extent of angle recession and decrease in the outflow facility in the injured eyes. Alper[21] observed that 13 of 14 patients with angle recession glaucoma in his study had angle recessions extending approximately 240° or greater, whereas the remaining case had 150° of recession. Likewise, Blanton[4] found that all his angle recession glaucoma cases that developed 10 years after injury had more than 180° of recession. It appears that those eyes with <180° of recession are unlikely to develop glaucoma,[11,22] whereas most investigators agree that patients with 180-360° of angle recession will have a greater risk of developing late-occurring glaucoma.[1,4,7,8,19,23] In eyes that do develop angle recession glaucoma, the contralateral nontraumatized eye has been reported Journal of Vision Sciences/May-Aug 2015/Volume 1/Issue 2 29 Ganekal and Dorairaj: Angle recession glaucoma following blunt trauma Table 2: Incidence of glaucoma in patients with angle recession Authors Number of patients Duration (years) Kaufman and Tolpin[9] 31 10 Prospective 6 Blanton[4] 130 10 Retrospective 7 Salmon 987 ‑ Population based survey 8 [20] to have a 50% chance of developing open-angle glaucoma, sometimes years after the pressure rise was noted in the traumatized eye.[22] After topical corticosteroid provocative testing, the fellow eye has also been observed to respond in a manner similar to that in eyes with POAG.[15] The results of the aforementioned studies bring into play some possible theories with regard to the relationship of angle recession and open-angle glaucoma. It may indicate that the angle recession itself is probably not the cause of elevated IOP but, rather, that it may accelerate the appearance of glaucoma in patients who are already predisposed to develop POAG.[9,10] This predisposition may render an eye more susceptible to developing an increase in IOP after traumatic angle recession due to some genetically determined structural or functional abnormality in the aqueous outflow pathway of the eye.[16] Alternatively, it is also conceivable that angle recession, through some yet unknown feedback mechanism, may alter neural factors that affect IOP in both eyes.[15] CLINICAL PRESENTATION The diagnosis of angle recession is made by history and clinical examination. Although nonpenetrating eye trauma invariably precedes angle recession, the patient may forget details of the injury or the entire episode after a number of years have passed. In addition, patients with angle recession glaucoma, like patients with other forms of glaucoma, may present with no specific eye, or visual complaints. In cases of unilateral glaucoma or traumatic hyphema or after blunt trauma, angle recession should always be considered.[4,12,24,25] A unilateral cataract in a young or middle-aged adult should raise the suspicion of remote trauma, even when the history is negative. Angle recession is typically diagnosed by means of gonioscopy (Figure 1). The clinical appearance Type of study Patients developing glaucoma (%) of the affected angle varies with the depth of the tear in the ciliary body and with the amount of time passed after the injury. Slit-lamp gonioscopy with indirect gonioscopy lenses (e.g. Zeiss or Goldman lenses) provides a detailed view of the angle structures with good magnification.[11] Comparison with the angles in the injured and uninjured eyes is important, particularly in cases with subtle findings. Documented asymmetry supports the diagnosis. Ipsilateral anterior chamber depth may be increased following a contusion injury even if other signs of angle recession are absent. With milder injuries, the examiner may have to compare the gonioscopic appearance of both eyes simultaneously with a Koeppe lens or compare two parts of the angle of 1 eye to identify subtle changes in the injured angle.[11] The appearance varies greatly, depending on the degree and extent of the recession and on the particular eye.[26] Minor angle damage can be recognized as a disruption of the regular pattern of insertion of the iris fibers into the ciliary body or scleral spur.[4] This leaves the ciliary body bare in comparison with other quadrants of the angle or with the angle of the opposite eye.[23] Small tufts of uveal tissue may be observed bunching up on the iris root and on the trabeculum above the sclera spur.[21] The more difficult cases are those in which there is a question of a 360° recession, and comparison between the two eyes is especially helpful in these cases.[4,11] Alternatively, the recession may be limited to one small area, and careful gonioscopy should be performed to detect subtle changes in the anterior chamber angle.[4] The combination of localized deepening with change in color and texture of the angle provides a valuable clue to the presence of recession.[7,8] Signs of trauma should be sought: Corneal scars, tears in the Descemet’s membrane, pigmentary deposits, a space between the iris and the lens that is wider in one segment of the pupil than elsewhere, ruptures of the iris sphincter, presence of a vossius ring on the anterior lens capsule, iridodialysis, iridodenesis, iridoplegia, torn iris Journal of Vision Sciences/May-Aug 2015/Volume 1/Issue 2 30 Ganekal and Dorairaj: Angle recession glaucoma following blunt trauma Moderate tears are characterized by a definite cleft into the fibers of the ciliary muscle, and the angle appears deeper than that of the opposite eye. Deep tears are characterized by a fissure in the ciliary body, and the apex of the fissure cannot be seen gonioscopically. Figure 1: Gonioscopy in patient with angle recession (widening of the ciliary body band) processes, phacodenesis, localized opacities, or dislocation of the lens, old vitreous hemorrhage, retinal or choroidal atrophy, pigmentation, or tears.[11] In more severe injuries, the cleft extends into the ciliary body, the light gray portion of the ciliary band appears broadened, and the scleral spur is more distinctly prominent.[23,26] Small peripheral anterior areas of synechiae frequently appear at the lateral limits of an angle recession and may extend into the peripheral areas of the recession. This may hide areas in the angle that were previously recessed.[9,12] A large series of blunt injuries among soccer players found that angle recession is more likely to occur in the superotemporal quadrant.[27] Patients with significant angle recession should be advised to have annual eye examinations for an indefinite period to detect lateoccurring glaucoma.[23] A classification of angle recession with regard to the depth of ciliary muscle tears has been proposed by Howard et al.[26] In shallow tears, separation of the processes of the uveal meshwork is present so that the ciliary body band and the scleral spur are more plainly visible than the fellow eye. The separation of the processes may leave pigmented tags on the anterior surface on the peripheral iris, on the ciliary body band, on the scleral spur, and on the posterior portion of the trabecular meshwork. The ciliary body band appears darker and wider, whereas the scleral spur appears whiter than does the opposite eye. In shallow tears, no actual cleft into the face of the ciliary body is present. Ultrasound biomicrosopy (UBM) can also be used to detect the presence of moderate to severe angle recession when visualization of the angle structures is limited owing to some form of corneal opacity or associated injury.[28] An angle anomaly that may be confused with angle recession is cyclodialysis, in which a sector of the ciliary body is detached from the sclera. The cleft or separation occurs between the longitudinal muscle of the ciliary body and the sclera itself. In contrast, the cleft in angle recession occurs between the circular and longitudinal muscles of the ciliary body.[24,25] Cyclodialysis can be clinically recognized by the presence of an area of white sclera visible posterior to the scleral spur. Other differential diagnoses for angle recession include iridodialysis, trabecular tears, and angle abnormalities secondary to previous ocular surgery.[25] Other causes of unilateral or asymmetrical glaucoma should also be ruled out (e.g. uveitis, anterior segment tumors, lensinduced glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and glaucoma secondary to elevated episcleral venous pressure).[29] These other conditions can be clinically differentiated from angle recession after a complete ocular examination and review of the patient’s medical and ocular history. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY The mechanism of glaucoma associated with angle recession appears to involve following processes. There are two related mechanisms that require discussion in angle recession glaucoma. The first is the physical force that produces the ciliary body cleft, and the second is the pathogenesis of the elevated IOP seen in this disease entity. It should be emphasized that the presence of a ciliary body tear is only an indicator of previous ocular trauma and is not the cause of subsequent glaucoma.[7,12] Blunt force delivered to the globe initiates an anterior to posterior axial compression with equatorial expansion. Sudden indentation of the cornea may be a key factor in angle trauma, creating a hydrodynamic effect by which aqueous is rapidly forced laterally, Journal of Vision Sciences/May-Aug 2015/Volume 1/Issue 2 31 Ganekal and Dorairaj: Angle recession glaucoma following blunt trauma deepening the peripheral anterior chamber and increasing the diameter of the corneoscleral limbal ring. This transient anatomic deformity results in a shearing force applied to the angle structures, causing disruption at the weakest points if the force applied exceeds the elasticity of the tissues. Although multiple anterior segment structures can be damaged by the above mechanism, a common site of avulsion involves the ciliary muscle. In angle recession, the ciliary body is torn in a manner such that the longitudinal muscle remains attached to its insertion at the scleral spur,[7] while the circular muscle, with the pars plicata and the iris root, is displaced posteriorly.[13,26] In addition, the presence of angle recession can disrupt the tension exerted by the ciliary muscles on the scleral spur and trabecular meshwork, which may further compromise aqueous drainage.[12] but evidence suggests an increased incidence of POAG in the other eye of affected patients. If there is only minimal recession of the angle, the cleft often heals with little or no scarring.[7] In the presence of more significant injury, advanced degeneration, atrophy, fibrosis, and scarring of the trabecular meshwork and Schlemms canal may occur years after the initial trauma.[7,12,25,30] Variable obliteration of the intertrabecular spaces and Schlemm’s canal accompanied by atrophy of the inner circular muscles of the ciliary body is a common finding.[7,12,30] In addition, a hyaline membrane may be present on the inner trabecular meshwork.[7,30] With the reduction in aqueous drainage brought about by the aforementioned events, the IOP can rise with time as the outflow facility gradually decreases with increasing age.[4] HISTOPATHOLOGY During this process, shearing of the anastomotic branches of the anterior ciliary arteries can occur, resulting in a hyphema.[26] The anterior chamber typically becomes abnormally deep in the meridians of recessed angle due to posterior deviation of the relaxed iris-lens diaphragm. Subsequently, a fissure representing the separation of the longitudinal and circular fibers may be visible by gonioscopy or by histologic examination. In some cases, angle recession progresses to glaucoma. The contusional deformity, when extensive, may result in trabecular dysfunction, which may lead to early or delayed loss of outflow facility and elevation of IOP.[8,12] The mechanism is not well-understood, One theory suggests that patients with angle recession glaucoma have an independent, perhaps genetic, predisposition to chronically diminishing trabecular function in both eyes.[31] A finite portion of the trabecular meshwork in eyes with angle recession is initially rendered dysfunctional by the injury and/or the healing process. With time, the outflow capacity of the remaining meshwork is gradually reduced because of preexisting innate factors; the ultimate result is elevated IOP. Chronic elevation of IOP leads to optic neuropathy characterized by progressive optic cupping and visual field loss. Histopathologic findings of eyes with angle recession deformities have been well described and include features of both light microscopy and electron microscopy (EM). Gross pathology Yanoff suggested a diagnostic method in sections of the eye that involves drawing a line through the optic axis (black line in picture) and then drawing a second line (white lines in picture) parallel to the first, but which includes the scleral spur. If the angle recess is located posteriorly to the line (as the white arrow indicates) then there is angle recession (Figure 2). The changes noted on light microscopy (Figure 3) include a tear extending into the anterior ciliary body, separating the longitudinal and circular fibers but the longitudinal muscle remains attached to the scleral spur. Other findings include the retroplacement of the iris root and ciliary processes. Overtime with healing of the ciliary body laceration, atrophy of the circular muscle at involved sites, resulting in a fusiform contour of the ciliary body, as seen on axial sections. Associated findings such as iridodialysis, rupture of the trabecular meshwork, and cyclodialysis may be noted. Histopathologic findings in late cases like marked degeneration of the trabecular meshwork, abnormal corneal endothelial proliferation posterior to the Schwalbe ring with secretion of a Descemet like Journal of Vision Sciences/May-Aug 2015/Volume 1/Issue 2 32 Ganekal and Dorairaj: Angle recession glaucoma following blunt trauma abnormal hyaline membrane covering the meshwork, sometimes extending further onto the anterior iris surface provided clues to the mechanism of glaucoma in angle recession.[32] EM of some eyes with angle recession may verify the presence of a hyaline membrane over the inner trabecular region, with an endothelial layer structurally similar to that of normal corneal endothelium. Other EM findings include loss of intertrabecular spaces and a decrease or absence of the trabecular endothelial cells. Thickening of the juxtacanicular connective tissue has been observed, with loss of vacuole lining within the endothelial cells lining the inner wall of the Schlemm canal.[32] Figure 2: Section of the eye (gross pathology) showing angle recession, black line indicates optical axis and white line indicates scleral spur, white arrow indicates angle recession Differential diagnosis POAG, primary acute and chronic angle closure glaucoma, secondary glaucoma like neovacular glaucoma, pigmentary glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome, uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome. Work up The diagnosis of angle recession is confirmed during office examination using gonioscopy. Gonioscopy A simple diagnostic test, is essential for making the clinical diagnosis of angle recession. It is usually deferred for 4-6 weeks after the acute injury. When gonioscopy is performed, asymmetry of the angle recess may be noticeable between the affected and the nontraumatized eye or in different quadrants of the involved eye. Widening of the ciliary body band may be present due to retrodisplacement of the iris root. Other signs include irregular and darker pigmentation in the angle, whitening of the scleral spur due to visibly fractured iris processes, or the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae. Gonioscopy may aid in the diagnosis of other angle abnormalities from trauma, such as iridodialysis or cyclodialysis. It’s essential to note that, in some cases, the gonioscopic findings may become more difficult to recognize with the passage of time. Imaging studies Usually, imaging is necessary only to evaluate comorbidities due to trauma. Occasionally, CT scan of the orbits is needed to evaluate for orbital fractures or foreign bodies. Emergency neuroimaging if typically indicated after major head trauma. Figure 3: Angle recession changes noted on histopathology slide of patient with angle recession glaucoma. (1) sclera spur, reveals the posterior displacement of the iris-ciliary body complex, (2) residual meridional ciliary muscle strands are seen attached to the sclera, (3) the effaced ciliary muscle shows pigment as it is reflected posteriorly, (4) angle injury to the outflow tract is indicated by pigment laden macrophages and fibrosis over the trabecular meshwork, (5) the remaining attached longitudinal ciliary muscle, (6) circular muscle fibers, (7) radial ciliary muscle fibers On occasion, gonioscopy is difficult or impossible in traumatized eyes because of corneal edema, corneal scarring, hyphema, synechia, or other opacity. In such cases, high-frequency Ultrasound biomicroscopy (as a supplemental tool to standard office examination) is effective for evaluating abnormalities of the angle in the anterior chamber.[28] UBM produces high-resolution axial images of the anterior globe, providing cross-sectional views of the angle in vivo similar to those of a histologic section. This noninvasive procedure is readily performed in Journal of Vision Sciences/May-Aug 2015/Volume 1/Issue 2 33 Ganekal and Dorairaj: Angle recession glaucoma following blunt trauma a clinical setting in an intact globe, and it provides information otherwise unavailable from convention examination. High-resolution images of angle recession (Figure 4), zonular deficiency, iridodialysis, and cyclodialysis have been described. Zonular deficiency and angle recession are the most common UBM findings in a closed-globe injury.[33] Ultrasound biomicroscopy findings of a wider angle and absence of cyclodialysis have been reported to be significant predictors for the development of traumatic glaucoma in eyes with closed-globe injury.[34] Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Figure 5) Figure 4: Ultrasound biomicrosopy showing the angle recession (marked posterior displacement of the iris and an abnormally deep chamber angle) The noncontact nature of AS-OCT makes it a valuable tool in identifying angle pathology in posttraumatic eyes Kawana et al. described the use of a prototype 3D swept-source, 1310 nm OCT to image post-traumatic angle recession.[35] Visual field test Because progressive loss of visual field is a potential outcome, formal visual field testing is the most important adjunctive diagnostic modality in detecting and following up the disorder. Tonography The previous study has described the use of tonography to evaluate patients with traumatic angle recession.[36] Loss of outflow facility, as measured on tonographic studies, is common after angle recession injuries, and this finding is statistically significant in cases of angle recession as a group. However, the role of tonography in predicting the risk of glaucoma appears to be of little value in any single case. Tonography might not be available to the average practitioner, and it is currently an unnecessary adjunct to the evaluation and management of angle recession. Optic disc photography is also important for documenting and monitoring glaucoma Fourier domain OCT Optic disc analysis and analysis of nerve fiber layers has been gaining acceptance in the diagnosis and management of all forms of glaucoma. Figure 5: Anterior segment optical coherence tomography showing hyphema and angle recession in a patient with blunt trauma Medical care The necessity of initiating treatment of angle recession glaucoma depends on the severity of the initial injury and the somewhat variable clinical course as healing progresses. Normotensive eyes with angle recession of more than 180° should be routinely re-examined for an indefinite period to monitor for the development of late glaucoma. In patients with an abnormal elevation of IOP, the decision to begin therapy is based on the clinician’s overall assessment of the risk of vision loss. The severity of IOP elevation, optic nerve appearance, and visual field findings contribute to the decisionmaking process. Treatment almost always is indicated when the IOP is greater than an arbitrary range of 25-28 mmHg and/or when glaucomatous optic nerve or visual field changes are documented over time. After the diagnosis of angle recession is established, its management is similar to that of POAG, with Journal of Vision Sciences/May-Aug 2015/Volume 1/Issue 2 34 Ganekal and Dorairaj: Angle recession glaucoma following blunt trauma a few special considerations. Angle recession glaucoma is initially treated medically with the realization that miotics may be ineffective because of the disruption of the normal ciliary musclescleral spur relationship.[37] There have been reports that miotics may cause a paradoxical increase in IOP in patients with angle recession, possibly by decreasing the uveoscleral outflow.[38] Use of topical aqueous suppressants in the initial medical treatment is preferred; these include beta-antagonists, alphaagonists, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.[14,24,25] Prostaglandin analogs, which increase uveoscleral outflow, have a theoretical benefit in angle recession because the trabecular meshwork is thought to be dysfunctional in such cases. not recommended for the routine management of angle recession glaucoma. Other laser procedures that have shown promise are transscleral krypton laser cyclophotocoagulation, transpupillary argon laser cyclophotocoagulation, and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation. Atropine has been reported to reduce IOP in angle recession glaucoma;[39] therefore, cycloplegic agents may have a role in treatment. A trial of a cycloplegic agent should be reserved either for cases involving failure of conventional glaucoma therapy or for cases with other indications for cycloplegia (eg., inflammation). Angle recession glaucoma has a success rate lower than that of POAG (43% vs. 74%).[14,45] Bleb failure occurred a mean of 3.1 months after surgery in patients with angle recession glaucoma compared with 9.4 months in those with POAG.[14] Trabeculectomy in eyes with angle recession is associated with decreased post-operative reduction in IOP, increased rates of bleb fibrosis and bleb failure, and increased dependence on post-operative medical treatment of glaucoma.[45] The adjunctive use of antimetabolites, particularly mitomycin C, can improve the success of trabeculectomy. The response to medical therapy in angle recession glaucoma is variable - The IOP rise that occurs immediately after blunt trauma to the eye is usually self-limited and, in the majority of cases, can be controlled with medication alone.[14,21,23] The late IOP rise that occurs years after the injury is more difficult to treat medically and may require surgical intervention.[14] Laser treatment Argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) has been associated with short-term success, though the procedure has been reported to have poor long-term effectiveness, particularly in eyes with more than 180° of angle recession. IOP elevation may become worse in response to ALT.[40-43] In eyes with <180° of angle recession, ALT may be beneficial if applied to only the trabecular meshwork of the nonrecessed portions of the anterior chamber angle.[40-43] Alternative laser procedures – neodymium: Doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser trabeculopuncture (YLT) has been used with variable success. A study demonstrated a 100% failure rate in eyes with 360° angle recession.[44] Currently, YLT is Surgical care Surgical intervention in angle recession glaucoma is usually indicated when maximally tolerated medical treatment has failed and when the risk of progressive visual loss outweighs the estimated risk of the planned surgical management. Filtration surgery Artificial drainage devices (tube shunt devices) - Benefits with the implantation of tube shunt devices have been demonstrated, but outcomes are reportedly less successful in angle recession than in other types of refractory glaucoma. A study showed the superior results of trabeculectomy with antimetabolite over molteno implantation (78% vs. 69%) in the cases of posttraumatic angle recession glaucoma, but the difference was not statistically significant.[46] Consultation with a glaucoma specialist should be considered in cases with an uncertain diagnosis, with early severe IOP elevation, with a poor response to treatment, or with advanced visual field loss. Depending on the presence of other posttraumatic ocular or orbital abnormalities, consider referring the patient to subspecialists in corneal and/or external disease, oculoplastics retinal disease, or neuro-ophthalmology. Journal of Vision Sciences/May-Aug 2015/Volume 1/Issue 2 35 Ganekal and Dorairaj: Angle recession glaucoma following blunt trauma Follow up As in other types of glaucoma, follow-up depends on the degree of IOP control and the risk of progressive loss of the visual field. Patients with an early increase in IOP after blunt trauma should be reexamined every 4-6 weeks during the 1st year to monitor their condition. Some early cases are self-limited, but patients should still be observed after their condition appears to resolve. Other early cases represent a severe form of the disease that may be refractory to standard medical treatment; such cases warrant more frequent follow-up. In cases of angle recession of >180° that initially have no evidence of glaucoma, late-onset glaucoma can potentially occur, even many years after the injury. Annual examinations should be performed for an indefinite period. Prognosis No formal data indicate the long-term visual outcomes of eyes with chronic angle recession glaucoma. Eyes that develop early-onset angle recession glaucoma are thought to represent a subgroup with most extensive angle injury, but the visible degree of angle recession is not correlated with the severity of glaucoma in this group. Late-onset angle recession glaucoma almost always occurs in eyes with more than 180° of angle recession, and the risk appears to increase with the extent of angle recession. Eyes with a 360° angle recession are at greatest risk. As in most types of glaucoma, angle recession glaucoma can cause progressive visual field loss and blindness. The risk of visual loss depends on many factors, particularly the timeliness of initial diagnosis and the course of management. Response of elevated IOP to medical therapy varies, and with time, IOP control may deteriorate despite dependence on multiple medications. Favorable results have been reported for surgical intervention of angle recession glaucoma, but success rates are lower than those of other forms of glaucoma. Special concerns the long-term management of eyes that develop angle recession glaucoma because of the increased tendency for microvascular occlusions. In general, patients with sickle cell anemia require more aggressive IOP control with glaucoma treatment than other patients because their eyes have a decreased tolerance of even moderate elevations in IOP. In addition, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and hyperosmotic agents are contraindicated in patients with sickle cell disease because of the effects of acidosis and diuresis. CONCLUSION The incidence of angle recession glaucoma can be reduced by preventing the underlying trauma. Data indicate that most pediatric and adult eye injuries (eg., sports-related accidents) are preventable. Education on the use of eye, face, or head protection during high-risk activities may lower the incidence of ocular injuries. Nonglaucomatous comorbidity in eyes with angle recession increases the risk of vision loss. Gonioscopy should always be performed when a patient with a unilateral cataract is evaluated, even when his or her history is negative for trauma. REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Sickle cell anemia or trait is a systemic disorder that has multiple links to eye disease; therefore, it should be considered during the evaluation and treatment of patients with hyphema in the immediate period after blunt trauma. Sickle cell anemia is a concern during 9. 10. Sihota R, Sood NN, Agarwal HC. Traumatic glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1995;73:252-4. Sihota R, Sood NN, Agarwal HC. Secondary juvenile glaucomas in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 1991;39:94-6. Hoskins HD, Kass MA. Becker-Shaffer’s Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas. St. Louis: Mosby; 1989. p. 325-7. Blanton FM. Anterior chamber angle recession and secondary glaucoma. A study of the aftereffects of traumatic hyphemas. Arch Ophthalmol 1964;72:39-43. Girkin CA, McGwin G Jr, Long C, Morris R, Kuhn F. Glaucoma after ocular contusion: A cohort study of the United States eye injury registry. J Glaucoma 2005;14:470-3. Shields MB, editor. Glaucomas associated with ocular trauma. In: Textbook of Glaucoma. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Williams; 1988. p. 339-44. Wolff SM, Zimmerman LE. Chronic secondary glaucoma. Associated with retrodisplacement of iris root and deepening of the anterior chamber angle secondary to contusion. Am J Ophthalmol 1962;54:547-63. Tönjum AM. Intraocular pressure and facility of outflow late after ocular contusion. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1968;46:886-908. Kaufman JH, Tolpin DW. Glaucoma after traumatic angle recession. A ten-year prospective study. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;78:648-54. Filipe JA, Barros H, Castro-Correia J. Sports-related ocular Journal of Vision Sciences/May-Aug 2015/Volume 1/Issue 2 36 Ganekal and Dorairaj: Angle recession glaucoma following blunt trauma injuries. A three-year follow-up study. Ophthalmology 1997;104:313-8. 11.Spaeth GL. Traumatic hyphema, angle recession, dexamethasone hypertension, and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1967;78:714-21. 12.Herschler J. Trabecular damage due to blunt anterior segment injury and its relationship to traumatic glaucoma. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1977;83:239. 13. Canavan YM, Archer DB. Anterior segment consequences of blunt ocular injury. Br J Ophthalmol 1982;66:549-55. 14. Mermoud A, Salmon JF, Barron A, Straker C, Murray AD. Surgical management of post-traumatic angle recession glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1993;100:634-42. 15. Chorich LJ 3rd, Davidorf FH, Chambers RB, Weber PA. Bungee cord-associated ocular injuries. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;125:270-2. 16. Michaeli-Cohen A, Neufeld M, Lazar M, Geyer O, Haddad R, Kashtan H. Bilateral corneal contusion and angle recession caused by an airbag. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:487. 17. Farr AK, Fekrat S. Eye injuries associated with paintball guns. Int Ophthalmol 1998-1999;22:169-73. 18. Bullock JD, Ballal DR, Johnson DA, Bullock RJ. Ocular and orbital trauma from water balloon slingshots. A clinical, epidemiologic, and experimental study. Ophthalmology 1997;104:878-87. 19. Rumelt S, Bersudsky V, Blum-Hareuveni T, Rehany U. Preexisting and postoperative glaucoma in repeated corneal transplantation. Cornea 2002;21:759-65. 20.Salmon JF, Mermoud A, Ivey A, Swanevelder SA, Hoffman M. The detection of post-traumatic angle recession by gonioscopy in a population-based glaucoma survey. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1844-50. 21.Alper MG. Contusion angle deformity and glaucoma. Gonioscopic observations and clinical course. Arch Ophthalmol 1963;69:455-67. 22. Tesluk GC, Spaeth GL. The occurrence of primary openangle glaucoma in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral angle-cleavage glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1985;92:904-11. 23.Mooney D. Anterior chamber angle tears after nonperforating injury. Br J Ophthalmol 1972;56:418-24. 24. Hoskins HD, Kass MA. Becker Shaffer’s Diagnosis and Therapy of Glaucoma. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1989. p. 324-7. 25. Herschler J, Cobo M. Trauma and elevated intraocular pressure. In: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T, editors. The Glaucomas. St. Louis: Mosby; 1989. p. 1228-32. 26. Howard GM, Hutchinson BT, Frederick AR. Hyphema resulting from blunt ocular trauma: Gonioscopic, tonographic and ophthalmoscopic observations following resolution of hemorrhage. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1965;69:294-305. 27. Capao Filipe JA, Fernandes VL, Barros H, Falcao-Reis F, Castro-Correia J. Soccer-related ocular injuries. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:687-94. 28. Berinstein DM, Gentile RC, Sidoti PA, Stegman Z, Tello C, Liebmann JM, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in anterior ocular trauma. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1997;28:201-7. 29. Miles DR, Boniuk M. Pathogenesis of unilateral glaucoma. A review of 100 cases. Am J Ophthalmol 1966;62:493-9. 30. Jensen OA. Contusive angle recession. A histopathological study of a Danish material. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1968;46:1207-12. 31. Tumbocon JA, Latina MA. Angle recession glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2002;42:69-78. 32. Iwamoto T, Witmer R, Landolt E. Light and electron microscopy in absolute glaucoma with pigment dispersion phenomena and contusion angle deformity. Am J Ophthalmol 1971;72:420-34. 33.Ozdal MP, Mansour M, Deschênes J. Ultrasound biomicroscopic evaluation of the traumatized eyes. Eye (Lond) 2003;17:467-72. 34. Sihota R, Kumar S, Gupta V, Dada T, Kashyap S, Insan R, et al. Early predictors of traumatic glaucoma after closed globe injury: Trabecular pigmentation, widened angle recess, and higher baseline intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:921-6. 35.Kawana K, Yasuno Y, Yatagai T, Oshika T. HighSpeed, swept-source optical coherence tomography: A 3-dimensional view of anterior chamber angle recession. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:684-5. 36. Bartkowska-Orlowska M, Boduch-Cieslinska K, Smogulecka E. Gonioscopy, intraocular pressure and tonography after blunt trauma to the eyeball (author’s transl). Klin Oczna 1978;48:263-5. 37. Pilger IS, Khwarg SG. Angle recession glaucoma: Review and two case reports. Ann Ophthalmol 1985;17:197-9. 38. Bleiman BS, Schwartz AL. Paradoxical intraocular pressure response to pilocarpine. A proposed mechanism and treatment. Arch Ophthalmol 1979;97:1305-6. 39.Epstein DL. Glaucoma. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1986. p. 301-7. 40. Thomas JV, Simmons RJ, Belcher CD 3rd. Argon laser trabeculoplasty in the presurgical glaucoma patient. Ophthalmology 1982;89:187-97. 41. Goldberg I. Argon laser trabeculoplasty and the open-angle glaucomas. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1985;13:243-8. 42.Robin AL, Pollack IP. Argon laser trabeculoplasty in secondary forms of open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:382-4. 43. Lieberman MF, Hoskins HD Jr, Hetherington J Jr. Laser trabeculoplasty and the glaucomas. Ophthalmology 1983;90:790-5. 44. Fukuchi T, Iwata K, Sawaguchi S, Nakayama T, Watanabe J. Nd: YAG laser trabeculopuncture (YLT) for glaucoma with traumatic angle recession. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1993;231:571-6. 45. Mermoud A, Salmon JF, Straker C, Murray AD. Posttraumatic angle recession glaucoma: A risk factor for bleb failure after trabeculectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 1993;77:631-4. 46. Mermoud A, Salmon JF, Straker C, Murray AD. Use of the single-plate Molteno implant in refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 1992;205:113-20. How to cite this article: Ganekal S, Dorairaj S. Angle Recession Glaucoma. J Vis Sci 2015;1(2):28-37. Financial Support: None; Conflict of Interest: None Journal of Vision Sciences/May-Aug 2015/Volume 1/Issue 2 37