Download Mantle plumes do not exist

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
The Generation of Melting
Anomalies by Plate Tectonic
Processes
Gillian R. Foulger
University of Durham
.... based on ideas developed over several years by a
working group that includes ....
Don Anderson, Warren Hamilton, Jerry Winterer,
Jim Natland, Dean Presnall, Peter Vogt, Anders
Meibom, Hetu Sheth, Seth Stein, Mike O’Hara &
Alan Smith .... etc
for more see www.mantleplumes.org
Two key elements:
1. Variations in lithosphere stress
2. Mantle inhomogeneity
•
•
Simply put
Stress governs location of volcanism
Fusibility governs volume of magma
Mantle dehomogenising
• ridges
MELT
experiment
EPR
Mantle dehomogenising
• ridges
• subduction zones
• eclogitisation of
subducted crust
Eclogite is fusible
Pyrolite
A 30/70 eclogite-peridotite
mixture can generate several
times as much melt as
peridotite
Eclogite
Yaxley (2000)
Mantle dehomogenising
• metasomatism of
oceanic and
continental mantle
lithosphere
• delamination of
thickened lithosphere,
including lower crust
• erosion of continental
lithosphere during
breakup
Cantal basalts model, Massif Central,
France
Pilet et al. (2005)
Mantle dehomogenising
• metasomatism of
oceanic and
continental mantle
lithosphere
• delamination of
thickened lithosphere,
including lower crust
• erosion of continental
lithosphere during
breakup
QuickTime™ and a GIF decompressor are needed to see this picture.
Schott et al. (2000)
Mantle dehomogenising
• metasomatism of
oceanic and
continental mantle
lithosphere
• delamination of
thickened lithosphere,
including lower crust
• erosion of continental
lithosphere during
breakup
Mantle dehomogenising
adapted from Meibom & Anderson (2003)
Variations in stress
• Lithosphere cooling
• Spatial and temporal
variations in plate
boundary type &
tectonics
• Variations in
lithosphere strength
Variations in stress
• Lithosphere cooling
• Spatial and temporal
variations in plate
boundary type &
tectonics
• Variations in
lithosphere strength
From Natland, 2004
Variations in stress
• Lithosphere cooling
• Spatial and temporal
variations in plate
boundary type &
tectonics
• Variations in
lithosphere strength
adapted from Lundin & Doré (2005)
Proposal
“Hot spot” volcanism occurs where
– stress is extensional
– mantle is highly fusible
Examples
“Hot spots” on MORs
• 1/3 of all “hot spots” are on or near MORs
East African Rift
• Afar
• Other EAR “hotspots”?
Basin & Range Province
• Broad, intraplate
extensional
region
• Associated with
subduction of
“Farallon slab”
• Widespread
volcanism
NAVP & Iceland
• Formed when
continent rifted along
Iapetus suture
• Diverse data suggest
not hot
• Recycled Iapetus crust
can explain
geochemistry & melt
volume
Closure of
the Iapetus
Azores
–
–
–
–
Kinematic models
EQ focal mechanisms
bathymetry
suggest Azores branch is:
– oblique, ultra-slow
spreading (3-4 mm/yr)
– diffuse plate boundary
– dextral differential
shear motion
Lourenço et al. (1998)
Time-progressive volcanism
Predictions
• Melt volumes can be explained by
lithosphere extension + source fertility
• Vertical motions related to shallow tectonic
processes
• Upper mantle is inhomogeneous
• Migration of volcanism = migration of
locus of extension
Predictions
• Seismic tomography anomalies indicate
composition and melt, not only temperature
• “Hot spot” lavas not required to be hot
• Geochemistry can be explained by
inhomogeneities in the shallow mantle
That’s all folks!
Example: mantle potential
temperature, Iceland
Temperature (Tp) from petrology
• mid-ocean ridges: ~1280 - 1400˚C
• Iceland:
~1280 - 1460˚C
• Hawaii:
~1560˚C
The only place on Earth hot enough for a weak
upper-mantle plume is Hawaii
Seismology does not reliably
detect them in the lower mantle
Vertical exaggeration x 10
DT ~ 200˚C
DT ~ 60˚C
Iceland
Ritsema & Montagner (2003)
Example:
whole-mantle
tomography:
Iceland
Ritsema et al. 1999
Please read our book:
Plates, Plumes & Paradigms
Iceland: A plume from the
core-mantle boundary?
Hudson Bay plume?
Bijwaard & Spakman (1999)
Resolution of the “whole-mantle plume”
The data used by
Bijwaard &
Spakman have no
resolution in the
lower mantle
(courtesy of Karason & van
der Hilst)
From Foulger et al. (2001)
Related documents