Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Paediatric cardiomyopathy: new developments and insights Cardiomyopathies Definition ! WHO definition (1996): “Diseases of the myocardium associated with cardiac dysfunction” – Dilated cardiomyopathy – Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy – Restrictive cardiomyopathy – Unclassified: Arrhythmogenic RV dysplasia, LV non-compaction Dilated cardiomyopathy: overview ! Characterised by dilatation and impaired ventricular contraction ! May be familial, genetic, post-viral, drug or toxin induced, metabolic, mitochondrial, connective tissue associated or due to HIV ! Anomalous coronary origin from a pulmonary artery must be excluded ! Histology non-specific ! Usually presents with heart failure ! Accompanying diastolic dysfunction may include impaired ventricular relaxation and non-compliance Dilated cardiomyopathy: echocardiogram Dilated cardiomyopathy genetic mutations ! Up to 25% of dilated CM is caused by genetic mutations ! 1st gene identified was dystrophin (X-linked CM); others include actin, desmin and lamin A/C (dominant and recessive) ! Actin, desmin and dystrophin are cytoskeletal proteins with roles in force transmission, cytoskeletal stability, calcium homeostasis, myocyte differentiation, myofibrillogenesis ! Lamin is a nuclear protein; commonest mutation and is associated with conducting system disease ! Dystrophin, desmin and lamin mutations can be associated with skeletal muscle disease Dilated cardiomyopathy: viral disease ! Common pathogenic viruses include adenovirus, enterovirus, CMV, influenza ! About 20% of subjects with dilated CM have virus by PCR ! In subjects with myocarditis, 35-40% viral yield ! Mechanisms of damage are both acute (dystrophin cleavage) and delayed (lymphocytic infiltrate) ! Adenovirus typically causes little lymphocytic infiltrate Myocarditis: mouse model Subacute myocarditis Acute myocarditis Viral infection Chronic myocarditis Myocyte necrosis Macrophage activation Infiltrating mononuclear cells Natural killer cells Cytotoxic T lymphocytes B lymphocytes Cytokines Nitric oxide Viraemia 4 days Viral clearing Neutralising antibodies 14 days Fibrosis Dilatation Death Viral absence Myocarditis – histologic variation Diffuse mononuclear infiltrate Myocardial oedema – no infiltrate Focal mononuclear infiltrate Myocardial fibrosis and hypertrophy Dilated cardiomyopathy investigations ! ECG, CXR, cardiac ultrasound ! Serum carnitine, pyruvate, lactate, urine metabolic screen ! Viral PCR and culture of available tissues/fluids ! Metabolic consults; consider liver and skeletal muscle biopsy ! Screen first degree relatives ! Genotype and skeletal muscle biopsy if no improvement Mitochondrial diseases typical organ involvement Brain: seizures, dementia, infarcts, leukoencephalopathy Eye: optic atrophy, pigmentary degeneration, cataracts Ear: deafness Muscle: skeletal myopathy Heart: cardiomyopathy (HCM, DCM), conduction defects Kidney: tubular dysfunction Liver: hepatic dysfunction, bile stasis Bone marrow: pancytopaenia, specific cell line failure Blood, urine, CSF: increased lactate Mitochondrial diseases Respiratory chain Complex 1 deficiency cardiomyopathy % % Muscle % Liver 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 Heart 240 240 220 220 200 200 180 180 160 160 140 140 120 120 100 100 80 80 60 60 60 40 40 40 20 20 20 0 0 0 I II II+III III IV CS I II II+III III IV CS I II II+III III IV CS Dilated cardiomyopathy Drug therapy ! Diuretics: provide symptomatic relief ! Digoxin: small effect on symptoms and heart failure admissions; no benefit with respect to mortality ! ACE inhibitors: Reduce both hospitalisation and mortality; higher doses more effective; greatest effect in mild CHF ! Beta-blockers: good evidence for reduction in mortality and improvement in ventricular function Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ! Primary cardiac disorder with a heterogeneous expression and diverse clinical course ! Characterised by left ventricular hypertrophy in the absence of dilatation, or conditions capable of producing LVH ! Non-obstructive in around 75% of cases ! Prevalence in the general population is around 0.2% Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: echocardiogram Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy morphological characteristics ! Distribution of hypertrophy is usually asymmetric ! Any pattern possible but anterior ventricular septum predominantly involved ! Spontaneous LV remodeling with increase in wall thickness during adolescence, and a decrease in wall thickness with aging Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy genetic defects ! Mendelian trait with autosomal dominant inheritance ! Mutations involve genes that encode for sarcomeric proteins ! 10 different proteins implicated and >200 described mutations (allelic heterogeneity) ! Around 50% of cases represent spontaneous mutations ! Hypertrophy may be secondary to altered sensitivity to calcium and impaired contractility Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy contractile protein mutations Paediatric HCM aetiological considerations ! Contractile protein abnormality ! Syndromes: Noonan, Beckwith-Wiedemann, LEOPARD, Friedreich’s ataxia ! Metabolic: Carnitine deficiency, Fatty acid oxidation defects, Glycogen storage disease, MPS, Mannosidosis, Fucosidosis, lipodystrophy ! Mitochondrial myopathies ! Neonatal hyperinsulinaemia Causes of sudden cardiac death in young people Maron BJ et al. Circulation. 1996;94:850-56. Congenital coronary anomalies (19%) Mildly increased cardiac mass (10%) Ruptured aorta 5% Tunneled LAD 5% Aortic stenosis 4% Myocarditis 3% Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (36%) ARVC 3% MVP 2% CAD 2% Other 6% Mortality in HCM Maron et al; Circulation 2000 16 Stroke Heart Failure Sudden % Mortality 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 5-15 16-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 66-75 Age at Death or Most Recent Evaluation (years) >75 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy substrate for SCD ! Disorganised cellular architecture ! Abnormal intramural coronary arteries with thickened walls and narrow lumens ! Replacement fibrosis adjacent adjacent to intramural vessels Maron BJ; Lancet 1997 Adult hypertrophic cardiomyopathy risk factors for sudden death Cardiac arrest/sustained VT Family history of sudden death Recurrent syncope Multiple-repetitive NSVT Exercise hypotension Massive LVH Malignant genotype? Coronary bridging? Implantable defibrillator Highest Intermediate Lowest Medical therapy (?) Relation of wall thickness to sudden death Incidence of Sudden Death (per 1000 person – yr) Spirito P et al, NEJM 2000 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 18.2 11.0 7.4 2.6 0 16 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 > 30 <15 Maximal Left-Ventricular-Wall Thickness (mm) HCM - age related penetrance Nimura et al; NEJM 1998 Cardiac beta-myosin heavy chain Cardiac troponin T Cardiac myosin-binding protein C 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 >60 Myocardial bridging Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: myocardial bridging Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: myocardial bridging Restrictive cardiomyopathy ! Basic defect unknown ! Diastolic dysfunction with normal wall thickness and systolic function ! Primary: endomyocardial fibrosis, Loeffler’s, and primary RCM ! Infiltrative: Irradiation, sarcoid, amyloid ! Metabolic: Glyocogen storage disease, Fabry’s disease, haemachromatosis ! Mixed HCM and RCM may be due to Troponin I mutation ! Relentless downhill course Restrictive cardiomyopathy: echocardiogram Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia ! Progressive fibro-fatty replacement of right ventricular myocardium with relative septal sparing ! May be autosomal dominant with incomplete penetrance or autosomal recessive ! Presentation with arrhythmias and sudden death is common, particularly in adolescents and young adults Natural history of adult HCM ! Initial reports suggested a 3-5% mortality per year in adults with HCM being followed at tertiary care institutions ! In 1989, Spirito et al (NEJM) pointed out that of 3404 subjects with HCM in a total of 78 published studies, 73% were from two referral institutions! ! More recent population based data suggests that the outcome for most subjects is good, with 10 year survival rates of 85% reported NACCS data collection ! 10 year cohort of Australian children aged 0-10 years at presentation, with primary cardiomyopathy ! Site visits to paediatric cardiology centres and hospitals ! All available data reviewed including clinical details and followup, lab results, all cardiac imaging ! Cases sought from regional paediatricians and adult cardiologists, transplant centres and coroners’ courts ! Available cardiac histology reviewed centrally NACCS - epidemiology Incidence per 100,000 at risk/year 0-<1 year 1-<2 years 2-<5 years 5-10 years Total Dilated CM 4.76 1.14 0.24 0.13 0.73 Hypertrophic CM 1.89 0.36 0.13 0.10 0.32 Restrictive CM 0 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.03 Unclassified CM 1.18 0.20 0.05 0.02 0.17 Total 7.84 1.73 0.47 0.28 1.24 Cumulative frequency histogram of age at presentation UCM 1 DCM .9 HCM .8 RCM .7 .6 .5 .4 .3 .2 .1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Age (years) 7 8 9 10 Racial differences ! Indigenous children had a higher incidence of dilated CM than remaining subjects (relative risk 2.67; 95% CI 1.42, 4.63) ! Sudden death was the presenting symptom in 11 (3.5%) cases including 4.9% of dilated CM cases, and 4.8% of unclassified CM cases ! Indigenous children had a higher rate of death as the presenting symptom 16.7% vs 2.6%; p=0.02) Proportion of DCM subjects with known/likely aetiology % 40 35 30 Myocarditis Viral Familial Consang Metabolic 25 20 15 10 5 0 Myocarditis Viral Familial Consang Metabolic Prevalence of lymphocytic myocarditis among DCM subjects Time from presentation 0–7 days 1–4 weeks 4–8 weeks >8 weeks Total Lymphocytic myocarditis 22 2 1 0 25 Total 44 10 8 8 70 Proportion (%) 50 20 12.5 0 37 p = 0.009 Kruskall-Wallis Viral aetiologies in DCM subjects A probable or definite viral aetiology was identified in 59 of 184 (32.1%) subjects, including – 30 of 44 (68.2%) subjects with available histology within 1 week of presentation – 8 of 9 subjects who presented with sudden death Dilated cardiomyopathy: risk factors for death/transplant Variable Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value Presentation above 5 years 5.6 2.6, 12.0 <0.0001 Familial cardiomyopathy 2.9 1.5, 5.6.2 0.001 F.S. Z score at presentation* 0.75 0.65, 0.87 <0.0001 Change in F.S. Z score* 0.68 0.58, 0.79 <0.0001 * Per unit Z score DCM: survival according to patient characteristics B 1 .0 0 .9 0 .9 0 .8 0 .8 Proportion surviving Proportion surviving A 1 .0 0 .7 0 .6 0 .5 0 .4 0 .3 0 .2 0 .6 0 .5 0 .4 0 .3 0 .1 0 0 0 1 N o . a t r is k 1 7 5 2 126 3 108 4 5 6 Y e a r s f r o m p r e s e n t a t io n 92 77 60 48 7 8 37 26 9 15 10 8 0 N o . a t r is k 0 -5 y rs 159 > 5 y rs 16 C 1 2 3 120 104 89 74 58 47 6 4 3 3 2 1 4 5 6 7 Y e a r s f r o m p r e s e n t a t io n 8 9 10 36 25 14 7 1 1 1 1 8 9 10 D 1 .0 1 .0 0 .9 0 .9 0 .8 0 .8 N o fa m ilia l c a r d io m y o p a th y Proportion surviving Proportion surviving P r e s e n tin g a g e > 5 y e a r s 0 .2 0 .1 0 .7 0 .6 0 .5 F a m ilia l c a rd io m y o p a th y 0 .4 0 .3 L y m p h o c y tic m y o c a r d itis 0 .7 0 .6 N o L y m p h o c y tic m y o c a r d itis 0 .5 0 .4 0 .3 0 .2 0 .2 0 .1 0 .1 0 0 0 N o . a t r is k No 149 Yes P r e s e n tin g a g e 0 -5 y e a r s 0 .7 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Y e a r s f r o m p r e s e n t a t io n 8 9 10 114 98 83 68 52 41 32 22 12 6 12 10 9 9 8 7 5 4 3 2 0 N o . a t r is k No 26 Yes 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Y e a r s f r o m p r e s e n t a t io n 20 17 14 13 10 9 6 5 2 1 13 13 12 11 8 4 3 2 2 1 Adult vs. pediatric myocarditis - comaparison Frequency Non-viral etiology Chronic symptoms Potential for recovery Speed of recovery Progression to end-stage CM Adult 5-10% Pediatric 30-40% 35% ++ <5% - + + +++ +++ 30-40% <5% Proportion of HCM subjects with known/likely aetiology % 30 25 20 Noonan Other syndrome Familial Consang Metabolic 15 10 5 0 Noonan Other syndrome Familial Consang Metabolic Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: risk factors for death/transplant Variable Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value Presentation below 1 year 6.16 1.44, 26.3 0.014 Concentric LVH 8.01 1.33, 48.2 0.02 Increase in post wall Z score* 1.36 1.03, 1.81 0.03 Fractional shortening Z at presentation* 1.32 1.08, 1.60 0.006 * Per unit Z score HCM: freedom from death and LV myectomy Surgery Survival 1 1 0.9 Proportion surviving Proportion surviving 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 22 17 14 1 2 80 66 64 56 51 44 37 26 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Years from presentation Years from presentation No at risk 3 No. at risk 80 59 53 48 42 36 28 18 17 14 11 LV non-compaction Left ventricular non-compaction ! Poorly characterised ! Persistance of foetal spongiform myocardium ! Mitochondrial basis ! Can be associated with restrictive or dilated physiology ! Undulating phenotype ! 9.2% of all paediatric cardiomyopathy cases NACCS Survival probability Survival for all CM 1 .9 .8 .7 .6 .5 .4 .3 .2 .1 0 HCM DCM LVNC RCM 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years 7 8 9 10 11 12 Paediatric cardiomyopathies: conclusions ! ! ! ! ! Heterogenous group of disorders with genetic, infectious, mitochondrial and metabolic aetiologies Behaviour can be predicted by morphological and functional characteristics, and underlying patient characteristics Sudden death may occur at presentation and during follow-up Require a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management If aetiology is unclear, remaining first degree family members should be screened periodically Paediatric cardiomyopathy underutilised investigations ! Post mortem with light and electron microscopy of the heart ! Genetic testing and DNA storage ! Viral PCR of the myocardium ! Respiratory chain enzyme assay