Download INSTITUTIONAL DIMENSIONS AFFECTING MAINSTREAMING OF

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
WHAT HAPPENED TO PARTNERING
INSTITUTIONAL DIMENSIONS AFFECTING MAINSTREAMING OF SO&M
(Revised post-Panel Mtg)
AGENCY EXECUTIVE LEVEL
I. PROGRAM MATURITY (what)
II. PROCESS MATURITY (how)
III. INSITUTIONAL MATURITY (who)

Improvements Rationale




Culture Supportive of SO&M
 Technical appreciation of SO&M
 Leadership/championship
 Mission/program status (formality)
 legal authorities
 performance improvement ethic
Sharing/synergism across applications
functional integration

Necessary Systems and
Technology

Organizational Alignment
 Organizational status/level
 Organizational structure
 Accountability system
 Partnerships (internal, external)

Workforce Capabilities
 Core competencies
 Training
 Incentives (R & R)
 Outsourcing

Resource Allocation Integration
 Program-level budget estimate
 Formalized budget line item
 Sustainable resourcing from state funds
 Project Investment trade offs
Applications Aggressiveness



Supporting Business Processes
 Planning
 Programming/budgeting
 Procurement
 Operations
 Maintenance
Supporting Infrastructure




Customer needs based
Transp. network/context related
 Regional architectures
 Project Systems engineering
(design) process
 Standards/interoperability
 Testing and validation
Technology/procedures balance
Benchmarking
Program Comprehensiveness and
Consistency


Applications consistency
Application range

Performance Basis
 Measures definition
 Data acquisition management
 Measures utilization
DISTRICT/REGIONAL LEVEL
I. PROGRAM MATURITY (what)

Improvements Rationale



Supporting Infrastructure



Sharing/synergism across applications
functional integration

Applications Aggressiveness



Customer needs based
Transp. network/context related
II. PROCESS MATURITY (how)
 Supporting Business Processes
 Planning
 Programming/budgeting
 Procurement
 Operations
 Maintenance
 Regional architectures
 Project Systems engineering
(design) process
 Standards/interoperability
 Testing and validation
Technology/procedures balance
Benchmarking
Program Comprehensiveness and
Consistency


Applications consistency
Application range
Necessary Systems and
Technology

III. INSITUTIONAL MATURITY (who)

Culture Supportive of SO&M
 Technical appreciation of SO&M
 Leadership/championship
 Mission/program status (formality)
 legal authorities
 performance improvement ethic

Organizational Alignment
 Organizational status/level
 Organizational structure
 Accountability system
 Partnerships (internal, external)

Workforce Capabilities
 Core competencies
 Training
 Incentives (R & R)
 Outsourcing

Resource Allocation Integration
 Program-level budget estimate
 Formalized budget line item
 Sustainable resourcing from state funds
 Project Investment trade offs
Performance Basis
 Measures definition
 Data acquisition management
 Measures utilization
PROGRAM/FACILITYI LEVEL
I. PROGRAM MATURITY (what)

Improvements Rationale



Supporting Infrastructure



Sharing/synergism across applications
functional integration

Applications Aggressiveness



Customer needs based
Transp. network/context related
II. PROCESS MATURITY (how)
 Supporting Business Processes
 Planning
 Programming/budgeting
 Procurement
 Operations
 Maintenance
 Regional architectures
 Project Systems engineering
(design) process
 Standards/interoperability
 Testing and validation
Technology/procedures balance
Benchmarking
Program Comprehensiveness and
Consistency


Applications consistency
Application range
Necessary Systems and
Technology

III. INSITUTIONAL MATURITY (who)

Culture Supportive of SO&M
 Technical appreciation of SO&M
 Leadership/championship
 Mission/program status (formality)
 legal authorities
 performance improvement ethic

Organizational Alignment
 Organizational status/level
 Organizational structure
 Accountability system
 Partnerships (internal, external)

Workforce Capabilities
 Core competencies
 Training
 Incentives (R & R)
 Outsourcing

Resource Allocation Integration
 Program-level budget estimate
 Formalized budget line item
 Sustainable resourcing from state funds
 Project Investment trade offs
Performance Basis
 Measures definition
 Data acquisition management
 Measures utilization
Related documents