* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The SMRD subdetector at the T2K near detection station
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
The SMRD subdetector at the T2K near detector station Marcin Ziembicki representing the SMRD working group of the T2K collaboration SMRD working group members J. Brinson, B. Ellison, R. Gould, B. Hartfiel, N. Kulkarni, T. Kutter, J. Liu, W. Metcalf, M. Nauman, J. Nowak, J. Reid, D. Smith Department of Physics & Astronomy, Louisiana State University, USA D. Warner Department of Physics, Colorado State University, USA I. Danko, D. Naples, D. Northacker, V. Paolone Department of Astronomy and Physics, University of Pittsburgh, USA L. Golyshkin, A. Izmaylov, M. Khabibullin, A. Khotjantsev, Y. Kudenko, O. Mineev, E. Shabalin, N. Yershov Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow, Russia S. Aoki, T. Hara, A.T. Suzuki, T. Yano Kobe University, Japan D. Kielczewska, M. Posiadala Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Warsaw, Poland M. Dziewiecki, R. Kurjata, J. Marzec, K. Zaremba, M. Ziembicki Institute of Radioelectronics, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland J. Blocki, A. Dabrowska, M. Sienkiewicz, M. Stodulski, A. Straczek, J. Swierblewski, T. Wachala, A. Zalewska H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Poland T. Kozlowski, J. Lagoda, P. Mijakowski, P. Przewlocki, E. Rondio, R. Sulej, M. Szeptycka A. Soltan Institute of Nuclear Studies, Poland J. Holeczek, J. Kisiel, T. Szeglowski Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, Poland J. Sobczyk, J. Zmuda Institute of Theoretical Physics, Wroclaw University, Poland T2K Overview Kamioka Super-K 22.5 kt (FV) 295 km Tokai J-PARC Main Ring 750kW 30 GeV PS • Measurement of 13 through e appearance • Precise measurement of 23 and Δm223 through μ disappearance ND280 Off-Axis Detector • UA1/NOMAD CERN magnet operated at ≤0.2 T magnetic field • Fine Grained Detector (FGD) – – – – • Time Projection Chamber (TPC) – SMRD • ALL detectors installed (except barrel ECAL) Status: COMMISSIONING Optimized for NC 0 measurement Measure e contamination Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) – • Measure charged particle momentum, particle ID via dE/dx Pi-Zero Detector (P0D) – – • Measure beam flux, E spectrum, flavor composition through CC -interactions Backgrounds CC-1 Measure backgrounds/pion cross section Water and scintillator target Photon detection (from 0) in P0D and tracker Side Muon Range Detector (SMRD) – – Measure momentum for lateral muons Cosmic rays trigger TRACKER SMRD SMRD – Concept & Tasks • Measure muon momenta and angle from interactions (with large angle to the beam) • • Cosmic trigger for the calibration of the inner detectors Beam monitor function is being studied • Background rejection 1.5E+6 interactions expected in the first year 100k will give events with hits in SMRD Modules: • Horizontal (4 counters each) • Vertical (5 counters each) • Total of 440 modules (2008 counters) 875mm SMRD Counters Scintillator: Polystyrene 1.5% PTP 0.01% POPOP Chemical reflector S-shaped grooves with WLS fibers (Kuraray Y-11, S-type, 2.12 m length) Special end-caps on both ends Light-tight enclosure & stainless steel containers Cosmic muon tests Light Yield (single counter) p.e. cm • L.Y. (sum of both ends) 25-50 p.e. (center, T=20-22 C) • Spatial resolution x = 6.1 0.8 cm • MIP detection efficiency > 99.9% SMRD Limit: L.Y.(sum of both ends) > 20 p.e./MIP at 20 C cm Time Resolution & Delay (single counter) TDC cm L.Y. (center, 1000 counters) cm TDC step 50 ps SMRD Modules Optical connector with MPPC: - Hamamatsu 667-pixel device, - active area: 1.3x1.3 mm2, - pixel size 50x50 μm2, - bias voltage ~70 V, - gain ~7.5x105 Aluminum profiles & fixing springs Scintillators in light tight, stainless steel enclosure Temperature sensor (DS18B20), (2 per module, opposite sides) Installation UA1 Magnet: • 16 C-shaped elements (8 rings) • 16 48-mm thick iron plates for each C • 17-mm air gaps 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 48 17 Installation tools 48 Springs Aluminum profiles Fixing Requirements: • Feasible installation • No movement once installed • Protection from earthquakes Installation (cont’d) 1) Installation summary: • March July 2009 • All modules tested after installation 99.8% WORKING 2) 3) 4) 5) Signal Readout Trip-t HV Bias High gain channel Cal. pulse CHi Cg Mini-coax Low gain channel CLo MPPC HV Trim Trip-t Front-End Board (TFB) Four Trip-t chips 64 channels per board HV for sensors Timestamping Possibility of channel pairing Global trigger primitives signaling FPGA • • • • • • Used by SMRD MPPC Issues Signal proportional to light intensity, single photon ‘steps’ 2 p.e. APD pixel in Geiger mode Example response 0 p.e. 1 p.e. Quenching resistor Gain 105106 Small, insensitive to magnetic fields Relatively new sensor extensive testing was necessary (revealed excellent sensor quality) nobody used it for long period (several years) • Parameters highly dependent on temperature Monitoring required Gain vs Voltage vs Temp. x 10 Electron Gain • • 15 10 5 T = 0C T = 10C T = 20C T = 30C T = 40C T = 50C 5 0 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Supply Voltage (V) On-Line Monitoring Basic requirements • Real time information analysis • Raising diagnostic (Audio-visual) alarms • Providing preliminary help for non-experts On-going work o o o o o Channel histograms Gain & dark rates Temperature data Per-channel history Detailed alarms Threshold settings Physics data quality monitoring Reconstruction • Select pairs of hits in coincidence window ~25ns (max. time of the signal propagation through the fibre, plus est. time readout uncertainty) • Reconstruct hit position (only z-axis, along the scintillator, based on the time difference) • Cosmic tracks – 3D fit to the reconstructed hits • (Principal Component Analysis, straight line) Various reconstruction approaches are being pursued for beam events. all hits ND280 software v7r5 hits in coincidence Monte Carlo Study no. of tracks Reconstruction Reconstruction Error (maximum distance of the reconstructed track to the real track) m track bent, poor fit distance (mm) Straight m track, good fit Example 1 Side view ND280 software v6r1 Front view Example 2 Cosmic muon trigger Purpose: Based on signals from SMRD Test and calibration (SMRD & inner detectors) Also the downstream ECAL and first layers of P0D are used Trigger algorithm: Signals from both sides of the scintillator (coincidence gate: 30 ns) At least two such coincidences from one tower Signals from two (or more) towers from different walls (coincidence gate: 200 ns, because of the flight time) Cosmic Muon Trigger Simulation Steps of the simulation: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Muon flux on the Earth surface Propagation through the rock surrounding the pit ND280 simulation package Propagation through the detector based on GEANT 4 Simulation of the electronic signals Applying of the trigger conditions Preliminary studies show cosmics simulation and data to agree well Simulation can be used for both closed and open magnet positions Summary • Installation complete in July 2009 • On-line monitoring partially done • Data taking seems to work, already reconstructed cosmic muons tracks • Current efforts: – – – – – – Monitoring beam structure Reconstruction (different approaches) Simulation Cosmic trigger Calibration Slow control