Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
COMMON CARDIAC SCENARIOS What do we know and how do we treat? FRED C. BREWER IV, DVM, DACVIM (CARDIOLOGY) OVERVIEW ¨ ¨ ¨ INCIDENTAL MURMURS CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE AND THE COUGHING DOG SYNCOPE AND ARRHYTHMIAS WHAT DO WE KNOW? MURMURS INCIDENTAL MURMURS Sources of murmurs REYNOLD’S NUMBER= V X D X D PATHOLOGIC: VISCOSITY ¨ Myxomatous degeneration ¨ Pulmonic stenosis ¨ Sub aortic stenosis ¨ Dysplastic valves AUSCULTATION CLUES: ¨ Endocarditis 1) Harsh (plateau) murmurs ¨ 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 3/6 or greater (anywhere) Diastolic Continuous Right sided murmurs Left/Right apical INCIDENTAL MURMURS Sources of murmurs FUNCTIONAL VS. INNOCENT (NO echo evidence) REYNOLD’S NUMBER= V X D X D ¨ Anemia VISCOSITY ¨ Bradycardia ¨ Hyperthyroidism ¨ Athletic heart ¨ DRVOTO (cats) AUSCULTATION CLUES: 1) 2/6 systolic or less ¨ Aortic hypoplasia (Boxers) ¨ 2) Basilar 3) Localized, Soft 4) Changes w/respiration or HR INCIDENTAL MURMURS Grading ¨ SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT MURMUR GRADES: 1- soft focal; audible in quiet room 2- soft easier to auscult; localized 3- moderate intensity; easily ausculted in multiple chest regions 4- Loud and radiating 5- Palpable Thrill 6- Stethoscope off chest INCIDENTAL MURMURS DIFFERENTIALS-PATHOLOGIC MURMURS SYSTOLIC MURMURS Left Right Apex Base Apex Base MMVD PS(PULMONIC STENOSIS) MTVD VSD MVDysplasia SAS(SUBAORTIC STENOSIS) TVDysplasia SAS/PS IE VSD PH(PULMONARY HYPERTENSION) (VENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECT) (MYXOMATOUS MITRAL VALVE DEGENERATION) (infective endocarditis) DCM INCIDENTAL MURMURS DIFFERENTIALS-PATHOLOGIC MURMURS DIASTOLIC MURMURS Left Right Apex Base MVStenosis Apex Base AI(AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY) TVStenosis AI(AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY) PI(PULMONIC INSUFFICIENCY) PI(PULMONIC INSUFFICIENCY) IE (INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS) CONTINUOUS MURMURS: THINK PDA! INCIDENTAL MURMURS: Scenario 1-PEDIATRIC (CANINE) MURMUR: FUNCTIONAL 2/6 Left basilar systolic murmur intensity increases after exercise MURMUR: PATHOLOGIC 3/6 or greater Diastolic, Continuous Right/Left Apex ASYMPTOMATIC 6 WEEKS-6 MO (TOY BREED) (Root Kustritz 2011) 6 WEEKS – 1+ YR (GIANT BREED) Echocardiogram Wait and Watch-Functional vs. Trivial Congenital Defect Thoracic radiographs?Correct diagnosis for congenital defects is on differential list 37-40% (Lamb et al, JSAP 2001) INCIDENTAL MURMURS: Scenario 2-ADULT (CANINE) Small Breed MURMUR:(PATHOLOGIC) 3/6 left apical systolic SYMPTOMATIC ASYMPTOMATIC TREAT CHF + THX RADS + ECHO + BLOODWORK THX RADS + ECHO BLOODWORK ECHOCARDIOGRAM THORACIC RADIOGRAPHS NT-Pro BNP WATCHFUL WAITING INCIDENTAL MURMURS: Scenario 2-ADULT (CANINE) Small Breed MURMUR:(PATHOLOGIC) 3/6 left apical systolic ECHOCARDIOGRAM ACCURATE (Tse et al JVECC 2013) DISEASE SEVERITY CONCURRENT DISEASE PROGNOSIS CKCS MMVD VHS: 11 at 3.5-4yr before CHF 11 at 2.5-3yr before CHF 11.25 1.5-2yr before CHF 11.7 0.5-1yr before CHF 13.25 at time of CHF (Lord et al JVIM, 2011) ASYMPTOMATIC THORACIC RADIOGRAPHS NT-Pro BNP WATCHFUL WAITING MURMUR INTENSITY AND DISEASE SEVERITY CARDIOMEGALY= 634pmol/L (284-2007pmol/L) LOUDER=MORE SEVERE NO CARDIOMEGALY= (Lungvall et al AJVR 2009) 378pmol/L (175-1101pmol/L) (Chetboul et al, JVIM 2009) INCIDENTAL MURMURS: Scenario 3-ADULT (CANINE) Large Breed 2/6 LEFT APICAL SYSTOLIC MURMUR FUNCTIONAL VS. PATHOLOGIC OVERLAP THINK: CHRONIC VALVE DISEASE VS. DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY (LESS LIKELY: INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS) AUSCULTATION: UNRELIABLE THORACIC RADIOGRAPHS: LACKS DETAIL TO ASSESS SEVERITY NT-Pro BNP-DOBERMAN- >550pmol/L suggest occult DCM (Sen (78.6%), Sp (90.4%)) (Wess et al AJVR 2011) ECHOCARDIOGRAM INCIDENTAL MURMURS: Scenario 4-GERIATRIC Large/Small Breed MEDIUM TO LARGE BREED DOGS SMALL BREED DOGS LEFT APICAL SYSTOLIC MURMUR >20kg THORACIC RADIOGRAPHS + ECHOCARDIOGRAM <20Kg THORAX RADIOGRAPHS THINK: MMVD VS. DCM (RARELY INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS) ECHO THINK: MMVD INCIDENTAL MURMURS: Scenario 5-PEDIATRIC (FELINE) UP TO 6 MONTHS OF AGE (Root Kustritz 2011) ANEMIA (LOW HCT AND THIN CHEST WALL) INDUCIBLE MURMURS DRVOTO HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY ANTERIOR MOTION (DLVOTO, SAM( SYSTOLIC ) OF THE MITRAL VALVE CONGENITAL DEFECTS (VSD) DRVOTO (DYNAMIC RIGHT VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT OBSTRUCTION) (DYNAMIC RIGHT VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT OBSTRUCTION) SOFT, MUSICAL HIGH FREQUENCY MID-SYSTOLIC <2/6 USUALLY SYSTOLIC >3/6 AUSCULTATION-LIMITED VALUE THORACIC RADIOGRAPHS-R/O SEVERE DISEASE-ALSO LIMITED NT-Pro BNP-NO PUBLISHED DATA ECHOCARDIOGRAM-RECOMMENDED INCIDENTAL MURMURS: Scenario 6-ADULT/GERIATRIC (FELINE) ANEMIA (LOW HCT AND THIN CHEST WALL) INDUCIBLE MURMURS DRVOTO (DYNAMIC RIGHT VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT OBSTRUCTION) HYPERTHYROIDISM SYSTEMIC HYPERTENSION HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY ANTERIOR MOTION (DLVOTO, SAM( SYSTOLIC ) OF THE MITRAL VALVE CONGENITAL DEFECTS (VSD) DRVOTO (DYNAMIC RIGHT VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT OBSTRUCTION) INCIDENTAL MURMURS: Scenario 6-ADULT/GERIATRIC (FELINE) SYSTOLIC MURMURS ARE COMMON: 1) OVERTLY HEALTHY CATS (16-44%)1 2) ASYMPTOMATIC, MURMUR, HEART DISEASE (31-77%)2 3) HCM AND INCIDENTAL MURMURS (18-62%)3 4) DRVOTO AND INCIDENTAL MURMURS (19-35%)3 5) MURMURS ARE DYNAMIC4 CATS DO WHAT THEY WANT! 1) 2) 3) 4) Cote et al JAVMA 2004, Drourr et al JVIM 2010, Paige et al JAVMA 2009, Wagner et al JVIM 2010 Bonagura 2011,Cote et al JAVMA 2004, Dirven et al JVIM 2010, Paige et al JAVMA 2009, Wagner et al JVIM 2010, Nakamura 2011 Bonagura 2011, Rishniw 2002, Cote et al JAVMA 2004, Allen et al JVIM 2009, Paige et al JAVMA 2009, Wagner et al JVIM 2010, Nakamura et al JVFS 2011 Paige et al JAVMA 2009 INCIDENTAL MURMURS: Scenario 6-ADULT/GERIATRIC (FELINE) 1) AUSCULTATION-LIMITED VALUE 2) THORACIC RADIOGRAPHS-HELPFUL A) VHS > 9.3 SUGGEST CARDIAC CAUSE FOR DYSPNEA (Sleeper et al JAVMA 2013) B) 28-72% accuracy (Schober et al JVIM 2007) 3) NT-Pro BNP- HAS VALUE <50pmol/L cardiomyopathy unlikely (Fox et al JVIM 2011) >100pmol/L suggests structural heart disease 4) ECHOCARDIOGRAM-DIAGNOSTIC TEST OF CHOICE INCIDENTAL MURMURS CLINICAL PEARLS FUNCTIONAL VS. PATHOLOGIC WHEN TO PURSUE DIAGNOSTICS: 1) 2) 3) 4) CLINICAL SIGNS ANESTHESIA BREEDING CONCERNED OWNER USE YOUR TOOLS: 1) SIGNALMENT PROFILING 2) BLOODWORK 3) THORACIC RADS 4) NT-Pro BNP INCIDENTAL MURMURS AND ANESTHESIA HEALTHY PATIENTS: DOG: BEGIN <10ML/KG/HR THEN 5ML/KG/HR CAT: BEGIN <10ML/KG/HR THEN 3ML/KG/HR 2013 AAHA/AAFP Fluid Therapy Guidelines for Dogs and Cats* CARDIAC COMPROMISE PATIENTS: DOG: 2-5ML/KG/HR, THEN STOP CAT: 1-2ML/KG/HR, THEN STOP (ANECTDOTAL) OVERVIEW INCIDENTAL MURMURS ¨ CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE AND THE COUGHING DOG ¨ SYNCOPE AND ARRHYTHMIAS ¨ CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Scenario 1- GERIATRIC DOG COUGH AND A MURMUR WHICH ONE IS A CARDIAC COUGH? CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Scenario 1- GERIATRIC DOG COUGH AND A MURMUR COUGH = NOT ALWAYS A SPECIFIC FINDING CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Scenario 1- GERIATRIC DOG WHICH ONE IS A CARDIAC COUGH? PHYSICAL EXAM CLUES AIRWAY COUGH No murmur (or soft murmur in small breed) Sinus arrhythmia (HR<140bpm) RR<40breaths/min CHF COUGH Murmur (soft vs. loud) Tachypneic (RR>40breaths/min) Tachycardic (HR>140bpm) +/- Crackles Dyspnea CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Scenario 1- GERIATRIC DOG WHAT ABOUT RESPIRATORY RATES? AT HOME RESP RATES 1) OUTPERFORM LABORATORY (BIOMARKERS) AND DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC VARIABLES (Schober et al, JAVMA 2011) 2) PREDICT CHF WITH HIGH ACCURACY MMVD: RR >40 BREATHS/MIN (100%SP/100%SEN) DCM: RR >26 BREATHS/MIN (Schober et al, JAVMA 2011) MMVD: RR >41 BREATHS/MIN (96%SP/92%SEN) DCM: RR >34 BREATHS/MIN (100%SP/100%SEN) (Schober et al, JVIM 2010) IN CLINIC RESP RATES YES, THERE’S AN APP FOR IT! CARDALIS BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CALCULATOR SLEEPING RESPIRATORY RATES NORMAL HEALTHY DOGS 40 35 114 dogs Breaths/min 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 average SD Max Min Rishniw et al, RVS 2011 SLEEPING RESPIRATORY RATES NORMAL VS SUBCLINCAL HEART DISEASE Subclinical MMVD and DCM 60 Ohad D et al JAVMA 2013 190 dogs 114 dogs 40 Breaths/min 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 Average Rishniw et al, RVS 2011 50 50 NORMAL 60 SD Max 93% of dogs had RRRmean<30 98% of dogs had RRRmean<35 Min average SD Max Min RESPIRATORY RATES IN CATS HEALTHY AND SUBCLINICAL HEART DISEASE SLEEPING AND RESTING RESPIRATORY RATES < 30 BREATHS/MIN Respiratory rate (breaths/min) 50 CATS 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 SRR mean EN SRR mean SHD RRRmean EN RRRmean SHD Ljungvall et al, JFMS 2013 RESPIRATORY RATES (SSR AND RRR) DOGS AND CATS CLINICAL PEARLS SINGLE MOST SENSITIVE AND SPECIFIC DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR IDENTIFYING LEFT SIDED CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE SRR AND RRR <30 BREATHS/MIN (I STILL USE 40 BREATHS/MIN) (TRENDS MAY BE MORE IMPORTANT) CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Scenario 1- GERIATRIC DOG COURTESY OF MARC KRAUS (DVM, DACVIM) COURTESY OF MARC KRAUS (DVM, DACVIM) CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE ACUTE AND CHRONIC THERAPY O2 -PREVENT HYPOXIA FUROSEMIDE PRELOAD DIURETICS SPIRONOLACTONE A C TORSEMIDE M An CATS=THINK THORACOCENTESIS! CRI-0.77-1mg/kg/hr DOG: 2-4MG/KG (4-6mg/kg if needed) CAT: 1-2MG/KG (VENODILATORS) DOG: 1-2MG/KG BID CAT: 1MG/KG BID USE REMAINS EMPIRICAL WHY?à 69% REDUCTION IN RISK OF CARDIAC RELATED DEATHS (Bernay et al JVIM 2010) 1/10TH THE DAILY FUROSEMIDE DOSE BID CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE ACUTE AND CHRONIC THERAPY O2 -PREVENT HYPOXIA PRELOAD VENODILATORS AFTERLOAD ARTERIODILATORS C M An NITROGLYCERINE PASTE ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE MIXED ACE-INHIBITORS-ENALAPRIL/BENAZEPRIL AMLODIPINE NITROPRUSSIDE HYDRALAZINE CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE ACUTE AND CHRONIC THERAPY O2 -PREVENT HYPOXIA PRELOAD “INODILATOR” AFTERLOAD CONTRACTILITY PIMOBENDAN M PROTECT TRIAL: An CATS? YES. AND NO. CATS TOLERATE SIMILAR CANINE DOSES. (Gordon et al JAVMA 2012) (Macgregor et al JVC 2011) PIMO LASTS LONGER (Hanzlizek et al JVC 2012) QUEST TRIAL: (Haggstrom et al JVIM 2008) DIGOXIN 260 DOGS (MMVD+CHF+CONVENTIONAL THERAPY) DOBUTAMINE PIMO VS BENAZEPRIL DOPAMINE (267 VS. 140 DAYS) (Summerfield et al JVIM 2012) 76 DOBIES OCCULT DCM PIMO VS. NO PIMO (623 VS. 466 DAYS) CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE ACUTE AND CHRONIC THERAPY O2 -PREVENT HYPOXIA WHAT ABOUT HCM CATS? PRELOAD AFTERLOAD CONTRACTILITY HEART RATE MYOCARDIAL OXYGEN DEMAND CONTRACTILITY SYSTEMIC VASCULAR An RESISTANCE ATENOLOL HAD NO EFFECT ON 5YR SURVIVAL IN SUBCLINICAL HCM CATS (Schober et al JVC 2013) ATENOLOL AMLODIPINE CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE ACUTE AND CHRONIC THERAPY O2 -PREVENT HYPOXIA ANTI-ANXIETY PRELOAD AFTERLOAD ANTI-ARRHYTHMICS CONTRACTILITY ANTI-THROMBOTICS MYOCARDIAL OXYGEN DEMAND An BUTORPHANOL: 0.2-0.25MG/KG IM/IV MIDAZOLAM: 0.2MG/KG IM/IV ACEPROMAZINE: 0.005-0.01MG/KG IM/IV DEXMEDITOMIDINE: (CATS) 3MCG/KG (GRUMPY) 5MCG/KG (FRACTIOUS) 7MCG/KG (EVIL) 18.75MG SID LIDOCAINE MEXILETINE PROCAINAMIDE SOTALOL 81MG EVERY 3 DAYS PLAVIX VS. ASPIRIN HEPARIN (UF VS LMWH) WARFARIN tPA VS STREPTOKINASE CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE ACUTE AND CHRONIC THERAPY CATS CLINICAL PEARLS ACUTE CHF: DON’T FORGET SEDATION! DOGS FUROSEMIDE (1-2MG/KG) SID-BID ACE-INHIBITOR SID-BID +/- ANTI-THROMBOTICS CARDIAC TRIFECTA: FUROSEMIDE (2-4MG/KG) BID (PLAVIX) ACE-INHIBTOR SID-BID PIMOBENDAN (0.25-0.3MG/KG BID OVERVIEW INCIDENTAL MURMURS ¨ CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE AND THE COUGHING DOG ¨ SYNCOPE AND ARRHYTHMIAS ¨ SYNCOPE VS. SEIZURES DOGS AND CATS 1) TRIGGER-SITUATIONAL SYNCOPE 1) EXTENSOR RIGIDITY 2) ORAL MUCOSA BLANCHING 2) URINATION/DEFECATION 3) TREMORS/TWITCHING 1) POST-ICTAL PERIOD 2) SEEKING WATER/FOOD AFTER AN EPISODE CATS!-SEIZURE-LIKE EPISODES WITH INTERMITTENT HIGH GRADE AVB AND A POST-ICTAL PERIOD (Penning et al JVIM 2009) SYNCOPE DOGS AND CATS NEURALLY MEDIATED NEUROCARDIOGENIC SITUATIONAL SYNCOPE VASOVAGAL CARDIAC STRUCTURAL/FUNCTIONAL DCM/ARVC PERICARDIAL EFFUSION PULMONIC STENOSIS SUBAORTIC STENOSIS PULMONARY HYPERTENSION NON CARDIAC HYPOGLYCEMIA (INSULINOMA) ADDISONS DISEASE SEVERE ANEMIA (IMHA) EXERCISE-INDUCED-(LABS) ELECTRICAL DISEASE HIGH GRADE 2ND AVB 3RD AVB SICK SINUS SYNDROME VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA SYNCOPE NEURALLY MEDIATED SYNCOPE SINUS TACHYCARDIA HR=219BPM SINUS BRADYCARDIA HR=42BPM SYNCOPE DOGS NEURALLY MEDIATED NEUROCARDIOGENIC SITUATIONAL SYNCOPE (VASOVAGAL) SMALL BREED DOGS W/ MMVD LOUD LEFT APICAL SYSTOLIC MURMUR TRIGGER (EXCITEMENT/COUGH/MICTURITION/DOORBELL/DEFECATION) C FIBERS (MECHANORECEPTORS) TRIGGER VAGAL RESPONSE HYPOTENSION BRADYCARDIA TREATMENT? PRELOAD REDUCTION= FURSOSEMIDE! ARRYTHMIAS SUPRAVENTRICULAR UPRIGHT AND NARROW COMPLEXES +/- P WAVES VENTRICULAR WIDE AND BIZARRE COMPLEXES +/- P WAVES ARRHYTHMIAS ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (SNEAKERS IN A DRYER) THINK: A-B-C-D! A=ATRIAL FIBRILLATION B=BETA BLOCKERS (ATENOLOL) C=CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS D=DIGOXIN DILTIAZEM XR (3MG/KG BID) DIGOXIN (0.003-0.005MG/KG BID) HR<140->80% 24HR PERIOD (Gelzer et al JVIM 2009) ARRHYTHMIAS VENTRICULAR ECTOPY WHEN TO TREAT: CLINICAL SIGNS, HEMODYNAMIC STATUS, FAST, COMPLEX (POLYMORPHIC) ECTOPY IDEALLY HOLTER FIRST! IV OPTIONS: CRI: 50-80MCG/KG/MIN 1) LIDOCAINE (2MG/KG) DOSE 2-3 TIMES 2) PROCAINAMIDE (6-8MG/KG) GIVE SLOW! ORAL OPTIONS: THINK SPAM! 1) SOTALOL (2MG/KG) Q 12HR 2) PROCAINAMIDE (8-20MG/KG) Q6-8HR 3) AMIODARONE (LOAD THEN REDUCE) 4) MEXILETINE (5-8MG/KG) Q 8HR ARRHYTHMIAS VENTRICULAR ECTOPY TOP REASONS NOT TO TREAT VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS: 1) SLOW V-TACH- (ACCELERATED IDIOVENTRICULAR RHYTHM-AIVR)- HR-60-140BPM POST-OP SPLENECTOMY, SPLENIC DISEASE, GDV, MYOCARDITIS, CARDIOMYOPATHY ARRHYTHMIAS VENTRICULAR ECTOPY TOP REASONS NOT TO TREAT VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS: 2) VENTRICULAR ESCAPE BEATS: 3RD AV BLOCK AND SICK SINUS SYNDROME NO LIDOCAINE! NEEDS PACEMAKER!! ARRHYTHMIAS VENTRICULAR ECTOPY TOP REASONS NOT TO TREAT VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS: 3) SUPRAVENTRICULAR WITH ABERRANCY VT VS. SVT WITH LBBB? 90% OF THE TIME ITS VENTRICULAR IF NO RESPONSE TO LIDOCAINE/PROCAINAMIDE THINK SUPRAVENTRICULAR WITH BBB! VT VS. SINUS RHYTHM WITH RBBB? ARRHYTHMIAS: SUPRAVENTRICULAR ANDVENTRICULAR ECTOPY CLINICAL PEARLS ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (A-B-C-D) DILTIAZEM XR (3MG/KG BID) DIGOXIN (0.003-0.005MG/KG BID) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS ORAL OPTIONS: THINK SPAM! 1) SOTALOL (2MG/KG) Q 12HR 2) PROCAINAMIDE (8-20MG/KG) Q6-8HR 3) AMIODARONE (LOAD THEN REDUCE) 4) MEXILETINE (5-8MG/KG) Q 8HR FUROSEMIDE! QUESTIONS?