Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Issue Spotlight HyperSense Enables Shorter Scan Times Without Compromising Image Quality by Kevin King, Senior Scientist, GE Healthcare All digital images are compressible, meaning that after transforming the image into an appropriate domain—for example using a wavelet transform —some of the information can be discarded with little loss of image quality. This is the basis of image compression used to reduce the size of digital images. MR images are no different. In fact, studies have shown that MR images might be as much as eight-fold compressible, with higher compressibility for vascular images.1 GEHEALTHCARE.COM/MR 48 Across the MR community, there is a keen interest in improving MR efficiency. Compressed sensing (CS) is a technique similar to image compression wherein it accelerates scans by acquiring less k-space data and uses a special reconstruction algorithm to recover the missing information without an appreciable impact on image quality.2 While CS differs from parallel imaging techniques, such as ARC or ASSET that rely on multi-channel coil sensitivity, it can be combined with parallel imaging. AUTUMN 2016 B The improvement in scan efficiency reducing the overall scan time without been refined over the last few years, from CS can be applied in three ways: appreciably compromising spatial and using ASSET and ARC we can reduce scan time, increase spatial resolution or image quality. HyperSense obtain very good results. However, resolution, or increase volume coverage. is not dependent on coil geometry and there is a limitation in how far you can Compressed sensing techniques is less sensitive to image artifacts or push these conventional techniques.” can also have a benefit of “denoising” SNR loss at higher accelerations when images, but it can introduce blurring if compared to conventional parallel too much acceleration is used or the imaging techniques. image is not sufficiently compressible. While CS is a powerful technique, the acceleration needs to be tailored for specific applications. Intrinsically sparse acquisitions such as MRCP, fat saturation or MRA can utilize much higher accelerations than complex morphological imaging. GE Healthcare has developed a CS technology called HyperSense‡, which obtains images with randomly undersampled raw data, thereby HyperSense opens up new opportunities to further reduce scan time without a substantial impact on image quality, Martin J. Graves, PhD, Head of MR Physics at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and co-author of the award-winning textbook: MRI: From Picture to Proton has extensive experience in MR physics and has evaluated HyperSense in a number of research applications. “Compressed sensing is the next he adds. Dr. Graves also acknowledges that the benefit of CS varies by application. For example, for morphological evaluations such as proton density weighted 3D imaging of the knee, some image blurring may occur when the acceleration is pushed too high. An initial technical performance dimension in image acceleration,” evaluation in healthy volunteers Dr. Graves says. “Parallel imaging has demonstrates that a CS accelerated 3D MRCP acquisition can provide similar diagnostic-quality information to a standard 3D MRCP acquisition in half the acquisition time. This has the Martin J. Graves, PhD, potential to reduce motion-related Head of MR Physics at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. artifacts and improve efficiency.3 ‡At the time of publication, HyperSense and HyperBand are 510(k) pending at FDA. Not available for sale in the United States. Not yet commercially available in all regions. GESIGNAPULSE.COM 49 AUTUMN 2016 Issue Spotlight A Figure 1. 3.0T TOF images on Discovery™ MR750w. Shown are collapsed projection images through the Axial slab obtained with a 418 x 288 in-plane matrix and 2x ARC acceleration. (A) Without HyperSense and a scan time of 4:25 min. (B) With the addition of HyperSense factor of 1.5 and a scan time of 2:59 min. Notice the equivalent overall image quality, SNR, and small vessel conspicuity. A Figure 2. MRCP images on Discovery™ MR450w. Shown are collapsed 3D frFSE images obtained with respiratory triggering and a 320 x 320 in-plane matrix and 2 x 1 ARC acceleration. Without HyperSense and a scan time of 4:53 min (A). With HyperSense factor of 1.2 and at least a 1:30 min reduction in scan time (B). Note that the scans were acquired 30 minutes apart. B There is also the possibility to use CS is a high-performance computing As CS is brought to market, it will be to push image resolution higher while software library toolbox that enables important to educate users on where maintaining existing scan times. Dr. new possibilities for integration of it can be best applied. Radiologists Graves believes this application of CS advanced reconstruction elements will also need to be aware that the may be most beneficial in neuro MR such as HyperSense and HyperBand. images may have a slightly different imaging, where clinicians are interested HyperBand enables the acquisition appearance than conventional in morphologic measurements and of more slices or diffusion directions acquisitions, Dr. Graves says. segmentation of the brain. In addition, within a typical scan. Delivering Cambridge has also been utilizing enhanced productivity gains by CS to reduce the acquisition time increased image reconstruction speed for high-resolution quantitative T2 and minimizing workflow disruptions, mapping of carotid atheroma using a it is a powerful platform not only blood-suppressed 3D Cube sequence. built to support the most demanding Since HyperSense—and all CS techniques—is an iterative reconstruction technique, the reconstruction time is longer applications, but also to provide clinicians with easy access to these reconstruction algorithms. “There is a range of potential than conventional reconstruction. applications, from the patient who However, Dr. Graves says the needs to be scanned as quickly as benefits far outweigh the additional possible to generating images with reconstruction time. GE’s latest higher resolution,” he adds. reconstruction platform, Orchestra, Dr. Graves has seen continued improvements in GE Healthcare’s CS technology—from an early research stage to the US 510(k)-pending HyperSense. “CS is in its infancy, and while we see academic researchers demonstrating the use of CS, the commitment from GE Healthcare to extend this technology into product—in a relatively short period of time—is admirable,”Dr. Graves adds. Initial clinical experience Richard Kijowski, MD, Professor of Radiology and a MSK radiologist at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, has Richard Kijowski, MD, collaborated with GE Healthcare for the Professor of Radiology and a MSK radiologist at University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. evaluation of HyperSense in a clinical setting. His initial findings, presented at ISMRM 2016, found that Cube with compressed sensing (Cube-CS) can GEHEALTHCARE.COM/MR 50 AUTUMN 2016 Cube Cube-CS B Images courtesy of University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. provide a 30% reduction in scan time partial-thickness cartilage lesions and images for comprehensive knee joint for imaging the knee joint without a subtle meniscus tears. While additional assessment and allow advanced decrease in SNR.4 larger clinical studies are needed cartilage thickness analysis using 3D to compare Cube and Cube-CS for segmentation software,” he adds. “We did a preliminary study on 50 patients with knee pain and found no difference in diagnostic performance between Cube and Cube-CS—that was encouraging. In most cases, there was no appreciable difference in the appearance of knee joint pathology between the accelerated and nonaccelerated images,” Dr. Kijowski says. “While ARC parallel imaging decreases SNR, Cube-CS did not.” However, Dr. Kijowski and colleagues reported increased blurring on CubeCS images, especially when visualizing low-contrast structures, which could potentially decrease the conspicuity of detecting knee joint pathology, he sees the potential to utilize CS to reduce the scan time of current Cube protocols or to acquire better quality Cube images by allowing the use of higher isotropic resolutions and decreased echo train lengths without an increase in scan time. “We acquired 0.5 mm isotropic resolution Cube-CS images with a 35 echo train length in a 5-6 minute scan, which is something that could not be done without the use of HyperSense,” Dr. Kijowski says. “A single Cube-CS acquisition could provide high-quality, high-resolution multi-planar reformat The full results of Dr. Kijowski’s Cube-CS study on the knee have been recently published in the Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.5 References 1. Maldjian et. al., “Wavelet transform-based image compression for transmission of MR data.” AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997. 169:23-26. 2. L ustig et. al. “Sparse MRI: The Application of Compressed Sensing for Rapid MR Imaging.” Mag Reson Med 2007. 58:1182-1195. 3. Reid SA, King KF, van der Wolf-de Lijster F, Graves MJ , Estkowski L, and Lomas DJ. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med Navigated 3D MRCP with Compressed Sensing 23 (2015) 1533. 4. Liu F, Rosas H, Holmes J, King K, Peters R, Kijowski R. Rapid Three-Dimensional Fast Spin-Echo Knee Imaging Using Compressed Sensing. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016). 1061. 5. L iu F, Rosas H, Samsonov A, King K, Peters R, Kijowski R. Knee Imaging: Rapid Three-Dimensional Fast Spin-Echo Using Compressed Sensing. J. Mag. Reson. Imaging. Published online October, 2016. Martin J. Graves, PhD, is Head of MR Physics and Radiology IT at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. He obtained his PhD from the University of Cambridge and is a Fellow of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and an Honorary Member of the Royal College of Radiologists. The University of Cambridge is a collegiate public research university in Cambridge, England. Founded in 1209, Cambridge is the second-oldest university in the English-speaking world and the world’s fourth-oldest surviving university. Richard Kijowski, MD, is a Professor of Radiology and MSK radiologist at University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. He received his MD from Loyola University, Stritch School of Medicine; completed his residency at Oakwood Hospital and Medical Center in Dearborn, MI; and completed his fellowship at Indiana University Hospital. Founded in 1907, the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health located in Madison, Wisconsin, is recognized as an international, national and statewide leader in education, research and service. In 2005, the school transformed into the nation’s first School of Medicine and Public Health, integrating traditional medical school principles with public health policies and approaches. GESIGNAPULSE.COM 51 AUTUMN 2016 Issue Spotlight A Figure 3. Cube (A) and Cube-CS (B) images show identical appearance of a posterior horn medial meniscus tear (small arrows) and diffuse full-thickness cartilage loss on the medial femoral condyle (large arrow).