Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
POPULATION-LEVEL EFFECTS OF PREDATION I. THE ROLE OF PREY DENSITY Coccoons O pened A. Functional Response of Predators D e e r M ic e a n d P in e S a w flie s 250 200 150 T y p e III 100 50 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 3 C o c c o o n D e n s ity (1 0 /a c re ) S o u rc e : C a u g h le y a n d S in c la ir (1 9 9 4 , W ild life e c o lo g y a n d m a n a g e m e n t) I. THE ROLE OF PREY DENSITY Predator density B. Numerical Response of Predators Num erical Response Curve Prey Density I. THE ROLE OF PREY DENSITY C. Total Response of Predators Vital Rate (%) A Mortality (+) Recruitment Mortality (-) Prey Density B K II. DO MAMMALIAN PREDATORS REGULATE PREY POPULATIONS? A. Predators of Waterfowl II. DO MAMMALIAN PREDATORS REGULATE PREY POPULATIONS? A. Predators of Waterfowl II. DO MAMMALIAN PREDATORS REGULATE PREY POPULATIONS? II. DO MAMMALIAN PREDATORS REGULATE PREY POPULATIONS? B. Wolves and Ungulates – – Declining caribou, moose, Dall sheep populations in Yukon Experimental reduction of wolves over 5 years www.frankoberle.com www.oklahoma.net Photo © Stephen Loring II. DO MAMMALIAN PREDATORS REGULATE PREY POPULATIONS? B. Wolves and Ungulates – – – Declining caribou, moose, Dall sheep populations in Yukon Experimental reduction of wolves over 5 yrs Wolf predation was » » reducing recruitment of caribou & moose calves reducing adult survival of moose II. DO MAMMALIAN PREDATORS REGULATE PREY POPULATIONS? C. Weasels – and voles in western USA – and voles in Russian crop ricks II. DO MAMMALIAN PREDATORS REGULATE PREY POPULATIONS? D. Overview III. INTERACTION OF PREDATION AND COMPETITION A. Lynx and Hares – During peak hare year: III. INTERACTION OF PREDATION AND COMPETITION B. Wildebeest and Lions-Hyenas 1. Predation-sensitive food hypothesis (PSFH) 2. Predator regulation hypothesis (PRH) 3. Surplus prey hypothesis (SPH) III. INTERACTION OF PREDATION AND COMPETITION Vital Rate (%) PRH Mortality Recruitment PSFH SPH Prey Density K IV. INDIRECT EFFECTS OF PREDATORS ON PREY Indirect effect: – Effect of one species on another is mediated through a third IV. INDIRECT EFFECTS OF PREDATORS ON PREY Example: Iberian lynx Egyptian mongoose European rabbit Rabbits preyed upon: 5-10 fold increase in absence of lynx Rabbit density: 2-4 fold lower in areas without lynx V. THE CONCEPT OF COMPENSATORY EFFECTS Compensatory – Mortality Substitution of mortality agents V. THE CONCEPT OF COMPENSATORY EFFECTS Compensatory Mortality Substitution of mortality agents – Example: deer in predator-removal area – V. THE CONCEPT OF COMPENSATORY EFFECTS Compensatory – – Mortality Substitution of mortality agents Example: woodchucks in Pennsylvania V. THE CONCEPT OF COMPENSATORY EFFECTS Other – Types of Compensation Example: woodchucks on a hunted site » increased survival of juveniles » reduced emigration of juveniles » increased fertility of yearling females