Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ssia and !apán: Industrialization Outside the West THINKING HISTORICALLY: The Separate Paths of Japan and China Russia's Reforms and lndustrial Advance DOCUMENT: Conditions for Factory Workers in Russia's lnd ustria lization VISUALIZING THE PAST: Two Faces of Western lnfluence Protest and Revolution in Russia GLOBAL CONNECTIONS: Russia and Japan in the World Japan: Transformation Without Revolution l-ukuzawa Yukichi (le¡+-tgo+) was one of the most ardent þeducational reforÀers in late 19th-century Japan. Very soon I after Japan began to have greater contact with the West, he concluded thatJapan needed to change. He began to travel to the United States and Europe as early as 1860. He was not uncriticalhe did not like the outspokenness of Western women or divisive debates in parliaments. But he firmly believed that, in key respects, Western education surpassed Japanese. As he put it in his autobiography, in 1899: "When I compare the two . . . as to wealth, armament, and the greatest happiness for the greatest number, have to put the 0rient below the Occident." (Figure 27.1) The problem in Japanese education, according to Fukuzawa, I was Confucianism. The Confucian tradition, he believed, undervalued science and mathematics. lt also suffered from a "lack of the idea of independence." Although independence was hard to de- fine, Fukuzawa argued that it was essential if "mankind [was] to thrive" and if Japan was to "assert herself among the great nations of the world." Japanese conservatives were deeply offended by this enthusiasm for Western education. Fukuzawa, a member of the elite and family friend of key conservatives, was sensitive to their critici ln a letter to one observer, he seemed to back down. He talked his commitment to "the teaching of filial piety and brotherly mony." He said he worried that he was not being faithful to memory of his own parents (who had been Confucianists). He mitted that he jumped into "Western studies" at a young age did not know as much as he should about Confucianism. He argued that (by the late 1870s) the traditions had recon "Western and Confucian teachings have now grown into one, no contradiction is seen." Fukuzawa's dilemma was a common one for reformers: to prompt real change in a Western direction without und fending traditionalists and without wanting to become Western. Russian reformers, though different from the Japa faced similar problems, and handled them less su Fukuzawa himself bent but did not break in his reformist his autobiography he returned to defiance: "Again and agai to rise up and denounce the all-important Chinese i even though "it was not altogether a safe road for my spirit to follow." r This chapter deals with two important nations that defied the common pattern of domination during the 19th century. By 1914 Russia and japan had managed to launch their Programs of industrialization and to make other changes designed !o strengthen social systerns. Russia and |apan differed from the Pattern of halting reforms characteristic and the Middle East in the 19th century. Theirs were the only societies outside the West wholesale process of industrialization before the 1960s. In the process, |apan other Asian societies, while Russia ultimately enhanced its power in world affairs. Russia and Iapan did have some common characteristics, which help explain maintain economic and political independence during the West's century of power' prior experience of imitation: Japan from China, Russia from Byzantium and then knew that learning from outsiders could be profitable and need not destroy their Both had improved their political effectiveness during the 17th and lSth centurles' Tokugawa shogunate and the tsarist empire, respectively. Both nations could use the sor changes that, in the West, had rested in part with private businesses. At the sarne took distinctive directions in each society: Russia's road to industrialization 626 tarian traditions: it was marked by political re_ pression and harsh conditions for workers that undercut social stability. Meanwhile, Japan's long experience with cultural adaptation in the face of change helped it manage the same tran- sition from a feudal to an industrial society while retaining a great deal of political and socohesion. Industrialization outside the complicated economic power relationbut it also illustrated the growing roles of capitalism and the new forms of inte_ capital and labor. Reforms Industrial Advance s rulers, beginning with Catherine the in her later years, sought ways to protect country from the contagion of the French The sense that Western policies serve as models for Russia faded dramatiNapoleon's 1812 invasion of Russia also a new concern with defense. Conservative supported the move toward re- isolation. In the eyes ofthese aristocratic Russia knew the true meanirlg of comand stability. The system of serfdom ignorant peasants with the guidance of paternalistiç ¡¡4s1s¡s---:-¿¡ i¡- social analysis but a comforting one. Before Reform changeless. To resist Napoleons earþ in the 19th century the governsome improvements in butraining. A new tsar, Alexander I, liberal rhetoric, but at the Congress Figure 27.1 Japdnese children at school. Showing children the latest in naval technology suggests sponsored the HolyAlliance idea. relationship between educatiôn and other aspects ofJapanese development in the later tgth century. the conservative monarchies of and Austria would combine in defense of religion and the established order. The lair- - in a Europe gone mad was appealing, although in fact the al- (@1. tBG1, Russia the stood our among European powers by the extent of its political conservatism. The nation's reform period began in l86l with the emancipation of the serfs. Russian leaders tried to combine change with continued tsarist autocracy. j; HolyAllimce Alliance among Rusia, Prusia, defense of religion and the estab- md Austria i¡ lished order; formed at Congres ofVienna by most conseruative monachies of Euope. Decembrist uprising Political revolt in Russia in f825; led by middleJevel army oftcers who advocated reform; put down by Tmr Nickolas I. 627 628 PartV 1700 ' The Dawn of the Industrial Age, 1750-1914 1800 c.E. 1825 c.E. 1850 c.E, 1875 c.E. 1900 c.E. c.e. 1825 Decembrist 1853 Perryexpedition '1875-1877 Russian- 1902 Loose alliance Revolt, Russia to between Japan and '1854 Follow-up American and British Ottoman War; Russia wins new territory 1877 Finalsamurai nsrng .lapanese War; Japan 1878 Bulgaria gains defeats Russia Western books in 1800-1850 Growth of "Dutch Studies" in Japan Japan 1762-1796 Reign of 1812 Failure of 1825-1855 Heightening of repression by Catherine the Great Napoleon's invasion Tsar Nicholas 1773-1775 Pugachev of Russia 1Bt5 Russia reacquires 1829-1878 Serbia fleet visit 1854-1856 Crimean gains increasing War independence 1905-1906 autonomy in '1856 Romania gains 1881 Anarchist Revolution results in Ottoman Empire, assassination then independence 1830-1831 Polish virtual independence l860-1868 Civilstrife in Russia 1881-1905 Growing duma (parliament) 1910 Japan annexes, nationalist revolt I B60s-1 B70s repression and attacks Korea repressed Alexander ll on minorities in Russia 1BB4-1887 New Russian gains in 1912 Growing strife in Russian 1912-1918 Balkan Wars conquests in central central Æia 1 884-1 91 4 Asia Beginnings of 1867 Mutsuhito, ind ustria emperor ofJapan near-completion of 1867 Russia sells Alaska to United States 1868-1912 Meiji trans-Siberian railway holdings in (fulllinkage and China 1720 End ban on Rebellion 1772-1795 Partitioning of Poland Poland through Treaty of Vienna; Alexander I and the Holy Alliance 183] I Greece wins Edo Bay reforms 1861 Russian independence after emancipation of serfs revolt against Ottomans 1833, '1853 Russian- 1855-1879 Russian Ottoman wan 184'l-1843 Brief shogun reform effort of Alexander ll 1904-1905 Russo- Russian peasant reforms and 1914 World War Russian lization; 1916) lndustry established 1890 New constitution and legal code 1892-1903 Sergei Witte, Minister of in Japan Finance 1870-1940 Population growth in Rusia Japanese War 1872 Univenal military service of Marxist Social established in Rusia Democratic 1872 Education Act, Russia period in Japan 1870 Ministry of Britain I begins 1916-1918 Japan seizes former 1917 Russian Revolution Bolshevik 1894-1895 Sino1898 Formation Pafi Japan elements of the Russian elite, but its failure was more significant. Repression of political stiffened, and the secret police expanded. Newspapers and schools, already confined to a norit¡ were tightly supervised. 'vVhat political criticism there was flourished mainlY places such as Paris and London; it had little impact on Russia. ' Partly because of political repression, Russia largely avoided the wave of spread through Europe in 1830 and in 1848. In its role as Europe's conservative even intervened in 1849 to help Austria put down the nationalist revolution in in favor of monarchy but also a reminder of Russia's eagerness to flex its muscles in pean affairs. While turning more conservative than it had been in the 18th centur¡ Russia tradition of territorial expansion. Russia had confirmed its hold over most of gress ofVienna in 1815 after Napoleon briefly sponsored a separate Polish duchy. ment, inspired by the growth ãf romantic nationalism in Poland and backed landowners with ties to western Europe, roused recurrent Polish opposition to rising occurreä in tS¡O and 183 t, triggered by news of the revolutions in the West aristocrats and loyal Catholics who chafed under the rule of an Orthodox Power' put down this revolt with great brutality, driving many leaders into exile. , chapter 27 ' Russia and fapan: Industrialization outside the west 629 At the same time, Russia continued its pressure on the Balkans, including the Greek independence war in the lg20s; to cut back the Turks outweighed Russia,s com_ fnitment to conservatism. Overall, although no massive ac_ quisitions marked the earþ 19th centur¡ Russia continued be a dynamic diplomatic and military fo rce (Map 27 .t), here, a desire and Social Problems: Peasant Question economic position did not keep pace with its diploaspirations. As the West industrialized and central Eupowers such as Prussia and Austria introduced at the beginnings of industrialization, including some rail Figure 27 .2 lhe 1B2s Decembrist revott in St. Petersburg arose when there was a Russia largely stood pat. This meant that it began to fall disagreement over the successor to Tsar Alexander l, who had no son. While the leaders of the behind the West in technology and trade. RuS_ revolt were well educated aristocrats fighting for I iberalization, many of their followers were landlords eagerly took advantage of Western markets for but they incrçased their exports not by lmProvrng techniques but by tightening the labor obligations on serfs. This was a common pattern in much of eastern the earþ lgth centur¡ as polish and Hungarian increased labor service to gain ground in the ex_ In return for low-cost grain exports, Russia and illiterate and ill_informed subjects of the authorita rian regime. Soldiers who supported the of the dead tsar's liberal brother, Constantine, marched through the streets, chanting, "Constantine and Constitution." Many of these soldiers later admitted that they had assumed Constitution was the name of Constantine's wife. The revolt failed, and its leaders accession were executed or exiled to Siberia. Nicolas l, who became tsar, was even morerepressive than his predecessor, but the courage of the Decembrists provided inspi ration to future generations of reformers. (Federal State Entity of Culture, thc St¿te Histor¡cal Museum_Moscow, Russian Federation.) east European areas imported some Western machinery and other costly equipment as well as goods for the great aristocrats to display as badges of cultured respectability. A few isolated that used foreign equrpment were opened up in imitation of western European industrialbut there was no significant change in overall manufacturing or transportation mechanisms. remained a profoundly agricultural society based mainly on serf labor, but it was now a visisociety as well. widening gap between Russia and the West was driven hqme dramatically by a minor war between 1854 and 1856. Nicholas I provoked conflict with the Ottoman Empire in among other things that Russia was responsible for protecting Christian interests in the This time, however, France and Britain were not content with diplomatic maneuverings to gains but came directly to the sultan's aid. Britain was increasingly worried about any advance in the region that might threaten its hold on India, whereas France sought diploand also represented itself as the Western champion of Christian rights. The resultant War was fought directly in Russia's bacþard on the Black Sea, yet the Western forces won, Russian armies from their entrenched positions. (Each side lost about 250,000 troops in a struggle.) The loss was profoundly disturbing to Russian leadership, for the Western this little \4¡ar not because of great tactics or inspired principles but because oftheir in_ They had the ships to send masses of military supplies long distances, and their ar_ weaPOns were vastly superror to Russia's home-produced models. This severe blow to prided itself on militaryvigor was a frightening portent for the future. for a War helped convince Russian leaders, including the new tsar, Alexander II, that change. Reform was essential, not to copy the West but to allow sufficient eco_ for Russia to keep pace in the military arena. First and foremost, reform meant Russia's leading social issue, the issue that most distinguished Russian society serfdom. Only if the status of serfs changed could Russia develop a more vrglabor force and so be able to industrialize. Russian concern about this issue paralthe Americas in the same period, reflecting a desire to meet Western need for cheap, flexible labor. C¡imeanWar Fought between lg54 and lg56; began as Russian attempt to attack Ottomm Empire; Russia opposed by Frmce and Britain as well; resulted in Russian defeat in the face ofWestern ildustrial technology; led to Russian reforms under Tsar Alexmder II. 630 PartV ' The Dawn of the IndustrialAge, 1750-1914 ARCTIC' OCEAN Map27.1 RussianExpansion, lBlS-1914 Russiacontinuedtopushtothewest,south,andeast.Atfirst,itsmalnconflictswere Ottoman Empire. Later, however, conflicts in east Asia loomed larger. for two decades Russia returned to a policy of reform, based on Western amples; serfdom had been abolished in western Europe after 1789 and in east central as Prussia and Hungary in the aftermath of the revolutions of 1848. As before, however' tion was not to duplicate Western measures fuþ but to protect distinctive Russian cluding the landed aristocracy and tightþ knit peasant communitiå. The result was an series of changes that, with tragic irony, created more grievances than they resolved the way to further economic change. So The Reform Era and Earþ Industrialization. se¡fs Tsa¡ /tlexander II ended rigorous serfdom in Russia in 1861; serfs obtained no political rights; required to stay in villages untl they could repay aristocracy for lmd. emancipation of the the same time The final decision to emancipate the serfs in 1861 came at serfdom suited rigorous nor slavery Neither free slaves. to States and Brazil decided world Western-dominated position in independent an needs of a society seeking accepted new of them also some concerns, sian reformers had specific spreading globaþ that attacked systems of unfree labor. In some ways, the emancþation of the serfs was more generous than the in the Americas. Although aristocrats retained part ofthe land, including the most the serfs got most of it, in contrast to slaves, who received their freedom but chapter 27 ' Russia and fapan; Industrialization outside the west Russian emancipation was careful to preserve essential aristoçratic power; the tsar was not interested in destroying the nobilit¡ who remained his post reliable political allies and the source of most bureaucrats. Even more, smancipation was designed to retain the tight grip of the tsarist state. The serfs obtained no new political rights at a national Ìevel. They were stijl tied to their villages until they could pay for the land they were given. The remoney went to the aristocrats to help preserve this class. Re_ payrnents added greatly to peasants'material hardship ( Figure .3), and peasants thought that the land belonged to them with no need to for its return. t¡ms-Siberianrailroad Constructed i¡ 1870s to connect Europem Russia with the pacific; completed by the end ofthe 1880s; brought Russia into a more active Asian role. 63r Conditions for Factory Workers in Russia's Industrialization Russia passed several laws protecting workers, but enforcement was minimal. The Ministry of Finance established a factory inspectorate in the 1880s, which dutifuþ reported on conditions; these reports usually were ignored. The following passages deal with a number of Moscow factories in the 1880s. In the majority of factories there are no special quarters for the workers. This applies to workers in paper, wool, and silk finishing. Skilled hand craftsmen like brocade weavers can earn good wages, and yet most of them sleep on or under their looms, for lack of anything else. Only in a few weaving factories are there special sleeping quarters, and these are provided not for the weavers, but for other workers-the winders and dyers, etc. Likewise, the velveteen cutters almost always sleep on the tables where they work. This habit is particularþ unhealth¡ since the work areas are always musty and the air is saturated with dye fumes-sometimes poisonous ones. Carpenters also generally sleep on their workbenches. In bastmatting factories, workers of both sexes and all ages sleep together on pieces and mats of bast which are often damp. Only the sick worke¡s in these bast factories are allowed to sleep on the single stove' . . , Work at the mill never stops, day or night. There are two twelve-hour shifts a da¡ which begin at 6:00 ¡.u, and 6:p0 p'tn'r. The men have a half-hour for breaKast (8:30-9:00) and one hour for dinner (1:00-2:00). The worst violations of hygienic regulations were those I saw in . . . AJ- most of the flax-spinning mills where linen is produced. though in western Europe all the dust-producing carding and combing machines have long been covered and well ventilated, I saw only one Russian linen mill where such a machine was securely covered. Elsewhere, the spools of these machines were completely open to the air, and the scutching apparatus is inadequatelyventilated. . . ' In many industrial establishments the grounds for fines and the sizes of fines are not fixed in advance. The factory rules may contain only one phrase like the following: "Those found violating company rules will be frned at the discretion of the mønager." The degree of arbitrariness in the determination of fines, and thus also in the determination of the worker's wages' was unbelievably extreme in some factories. In Podolsk, for instance' in factories No. 131 and No. 135, there is a ten-ruble forfeit fo¡ leaving the factory before the expiration of one's contract. But as applied' this covers much more than voluntary breach of contract on the worker's part. This fine is exacted from every worker who for any reason has Eafy Russian Factory H Witte, Sergei Russian minister of finance from I892 to 1903; economic mode¡nizer responsible for high tariffs, improved banking system; encouraged Western investors to build factories in Russia. 632 to leave the factory. Cases are known of persons who have had to pay this fine three times. Moreover, fines are levied for so many causes that falling under a severe fine is a constant possibility for each worker. For instance, workers who for any reason came into thq 6ffìce in a group, instead of singl¡ would be fined one ruble. After ¿ second offense, the transgressors would be dismissed-leaving behind, of course, the ten-ruble fine for breach of contract. In factory No, 135 the workers are still treated as serfs. are paid out only trvice a year' even then not in full but only enough to pay the workers'taxes (other necessities are supplied by the factory store). Furthermore this money is not given to the workers directl¡ but is sent by mail to their village elders and village clerks. Thus the workers are without money the year around. Besides are also paying severe fines to the factor¡ and these sums will subtracted from their wages at the final year-end accounting. Extreme regulations and regimentation are very our factories-regulations entangle the workers at every step burden them with more or less severe fines which are from their often already inadequate wages. Some factory tors have become real virtuosos at thinking up new grounds fines. A brief description of a few of the fines in factory No. 172 excellent example of this variety: on October 24,1877 , an ment was posted of new fines to be set at the discretion of the for fourteen different cases of failure to maintain silence and of minor fines prescribed for on August 4, 1883, a huge fine for example, offenses: dividual rubles was set for singing in the factory courtyard after any time in any unauthorized place. On June 3, 1881, a fine levied from workers who took tea and sugar, bread, or any ness. There were also dozens foodstuffs into the weaving building, "in order to avoid insects or vermin." On May 14, 1880, a fine was set for wrote with pencil, chalk, or anything else on the walls in the or weaving buildings. QUESTIONS Were rope during early why? How did create a about the nature ment sPonsor of such a report early industrial Western machinery. The railroads also opened Siberia up to new development' brought Russia into a more active and contested Asian role. By the 1880s, when Russia's railroad network had almost quintupled since 1860', tories were beginning to spring up in Moscow, St. Petersburg, and several Polish urban working class was growing rapidly. Printing factories and metalworking shoPs skilled artisanry in the cities, and metallurgy and textile plants recruited a still newer dustrial labor force from the troubled countryside. Under Count Sergei Witte, minister of fìnance from 1892 to 1903 and an modernizer, the government enacted high tariffs to protect new Russian industrY' banking system, and encouraged Western investors to build great factories with our ogy. As Witte put it, "The inflow of foreign capital is . . . the only way by which chapter 27 ' Russia and lapan: Industrialization outside the west 633 to supply our country quickly with abundant and cheap products." By 1900 approximately half Russian industry was foreign owned and much of it was foreign operated, with British, German, French industrialists taking the lead. Russia became a debtor nation as huge industrial developloans piled up. Russia had surged to fourth rank in the world in steel production and was secto the United States in the newer area of petroleum production and refining. Russian textile was also impressive. Long-standing Russian economic lags were able beginning to yield. This industrial revolution was still in its early stages. Russia's world rank was a function more its great size and population, along with its rich natural resources, than of thorough mechaniza_ Many Russian factories were not up to Western technical standards, nor was the labor force trained. Agriculture also remained backward, as peasants, often illiterate, had neither capital motives to change their ways. other reforms also produced ambiguous results. Russia remained a traditionar peasant sociin many ways. Beneath the official military reorganization, discipline and military efficiency lax. Even more obvious was the absence of a large, self-confident middle class of the sort that arisen earlier in the West. Businesspeople and professionals grew in numbers, but often they dependent on state initiatives, such as zemstvo employrnent for doctors and economic guidfor businesspeople. They were not as assertive as their Western counterparts had been ( for exin challenging aristocratic power and values). and Revolution in Russia II's reforms, as well as economic change and the greatr'r population mo bility it involved, minority nationalities to make demands of the great empire. Intellectuals explored the traditions of Ukrainians and other groups. Nationalist beliefs initially were imported from Europe, but here and elsewhere in eastern Europe, they encouraged divisive minority agitamultinational states, such as Russia and Austria- Hungar¡ found very hard to handle. Napressures were not'the main problem in Russia, but given Russia's mainstream nationalist on the distinctive superiorities of a Russian tradition, they did cause concern. protest was more vigorous still, and it was heightened not only by the limitations of reby industrialization itself. Recurrent famines provoked peasant uprisings. peasants â\. @ù. and also the timits of change destabilized Russian society. Marxist leaders helped focus unrest. deeply redemption payments and taxes and often seized and burned the records that indicated owed. to Revolution discontent among the masses, many educated Russians, including some aristocrats, also revolutionary change. Two strands developed. Many business and professional people, aggressive, began seek a fuller political voice afid new rights such as greater freeschools and press; they argued for liberal reforms. At the same time, a group of radical Russian term for articulate intellectuals as a class-became increasingly active. As as well, and many were impatient with Russia's on political activity. Women students played I the protest current, and some specificaþ feminist demands (for example, toward opportunity) emerged as well. later toned down their goals as they entered the bureaucracy or business inspired by radical doctrines, and more than a few devoted their lives to a cause. This kind of intellectual alienation rested on some of the principles that had in the West, but it went deeper in Russia. It was the first example of a kind of incapable of motivating terrorism, which would characterize other societies transitions during the 20th century. The Russian intelligentsia wanted political freesocial reform while maintaining a Russian culture different from that of the West, materialistic. Their radicalism may have stemmed from the demand.attacking key Russian institutions while building a new society that injustices and crippling limitations of the Western world. radicals were anarchists, who sought to abolish all formal government. Alwas not unknown in the West, it took on particular force in Russia in opposition I ; mùchists Political groups seeking abolition of all formal goverment; forned in mmy parts of Europe i¡ late 19th and euly20th centuries; prevalent in Russia, opposing twist and,¿tmeriø paticululy autocrary md becoming sponsible for a msination terrorist movement reof A.lmder II in 1881. 634 PartV ' The Dawn of the IndustrialAge, 1750-1914 hoped that they could triumph by winning out to teach the peasantry the beauties q¡ fanned peasant support, and a host of upper-class radicals methods and thus to the formation q¡ to violent political activism. Failure here led many anarchists to tsarist astocracy. Many early anarchists in the 1860s movement in the modern world. Given the lack of poPular support and other politiãal outlets, assassinations and bombings seemed the only way to attack the existirg order. As anarchist leader Bakunin put it, ih. fitrt large terrorist destruction. ofs We consider ', Powers to have to fruitless task that We refuse king out We d as cult the dream that we will have enough strength and knowledge for creation. Not surprisingl¡ the recurrent waves of terrorism merely strengthened the tsarist regime's solve to avoid further Political change in what became a vicious circle in l9th-century Russian By the late 1870s, Alexander II was pulling back from his reform interest, fearing that change getting out of hand. CensorshiP of newspapers and political meetings tightened; many dissidents arrested and sent to Siberia. Alexander II was assassinated by a terrorist bomb in 1881 after a series Utyano¡Vladimirlþich [VLAHD-ih-mihr IHl-lihch ool-YAH-nuhfl Better known as Lenin; most active Russian Marxist leader; insisted on importance of disciplined revolutionary cells; leader of Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. botched attempts. His successors, while increasing the effort to industrialize' continued to opPose ther political reform. New measures of repression also were directed against minority partly to damPen their unrest and partly to gain the support of upper-class conservatives. The and other groups were supervised carefully. Russian language instruction was forced on peoples Ukrainians. Persecution of the large |ewish minoritywas stepped up, resulting in many mass called pogroms-and seizures of property. As a conseçluence, many Russian ]ews emigrated. By the 1890s, the currents of protest gained new force. Marxist doctrines spread Western socialist movement to a segment of the Russian intelligentsia, who became tightly organized proletarian revolution. One of the most active Marxist leaders was IþichUlyanov (VLAHD- ih-mihr IHl-lihch ool-YAH-nuhf), known as Lenin. Lenin, a man bureaucratic family whose brother was hanged after a trial, following his arrest by the lice, introduced important innovations in Marxist theory to make it more appropriate for He argued that because of the spread of international capitalism, a Proletariat was worldwide in advance of industrialization. Therefore, Russia could have a proletarian without going through Bolshevilc Literall¡ the majorityparty; the most ¡adical brmch of the Russim Marxist movement; led byV. I. Lenin and dedicated to his concept of social revolution; actually a minority in the Russian Marxist political scheme until its triumph in the 1917 revolution. a distinct middle-class phase. Lenin also insisted on the importance plined revolutionary cells that could maintain doctrinal purity and effective action even vere police repression. Lenin's approach animated the group of Russian Marxists Bolsheviks, or majority party (though, ironicall¡ they were actually a minority in the Marxist movement as a whole). The approach proved ideal for Russian conditions. Working-class unrest in the cities grew with the new currents among the sian workers became far more radical than their Western counterparts. Thev formed conducted strikes-all illegal-but many of them also had firm political goals in mind' calism stemmed partly from the absence of legal political outlets. It arose also from for these new workers pulled in peasant grievances against the existing order-and from conditions of early industrialization, with its large factories and frequent foreign though many workers were not linked to any particular doctrine, some became shevism, and they were urged on by passionate organizers. By 1900 the contradictory currents in Russian society may have made The forces demanding change were not urlited, but the importance of mass protest tryside and city, as well as the radical intelligentsia, made it difficult to find a more, the regime remained resolutely opposed to compromise. Conservative vigorous policy of resistance and repression. The Revolution of 1905 1905 finally lit this tinderbox. Russia had maintained late 19th centur¡ in part because oftradition and in Part foreign policy through the from internal unrest. It also wanted to match the venom matic success might draw war with the Ottoman Empire in the 1870s powers. A great strides of the Western Military defeat in 1904 and chapter 27 ' Russia and Japan: Industrialization outside the west 63s tial gains' which were then pushed back at the insistence of France and Britain. Russia also successfully aided the creation in the Balkans of new slavic nations, such as serbia and Bulgaria, the "little slavic brothers" that filled nationalist hearts with pride. Some conservative writers even talked in 9økh¿lín terms of a pan-slavic movement that would unite the slavic people-under Russian leadership, of course. Russia participated vigorously in other Middle Eastern and central Asian areas. Russia and Britain both increased their influence in Persia and Afghanistan, reaching some uneasy truces that divided of activity early in the 20th century. Russia was also active in china. development of the trans-Siberian railroad encouraged Russia to incor- I¡. RUSSIA Í I / (Evacur(ed tmty of Liaodong some northern portions of Manchuria, violating the 18th-century (æded Seo of forccd River agreement. Russia also joined Western powers in obtaining CHINA -term leases to Chinese territory during the 1890s. These were important gains, but they did not satis$, growing Russian and they also brought trouble. Russia risked an overextension beits diplomatic aspirations were not backed by real increases in military The problem first came to a head in 1904. Increasingly powerful Seu became worried about further Russian expansion in northern china efforts to extend influence into Korea. The Russo-fapanese war broke in 1904. Against all expectations save fapan's, the lapanese won. Russia RsoJ¡p¿nsc Ws¡ì l90rLl905 SlnoJapal* War, not move its fleet quickly to the pacific, and its military organization ! Japanese territorial G Japansse te[itorial gains,1905 too cumbersome to oppose the more effective J apanese maneuvers gains,l895 E Japanese forces EE Japanese fo¡cq 27.2).lapan gained the opportunity to move into Korea as the balance E Major battles rn Major brttles in the Far East began to shift. E Russian flee¡ unexpected defeat in war unleashed massive protests on the home front Map 27.2 The Russo-Japanese War The Russo-Japanese war Russian Revolution of 1905 (Figure 27.4).rJrbanworkers mounted well focused on disputes over Chinese territory. Japan had acquired general strikes that were designed above all for political gains. Peasthe Liaodong peninsula after its victory over China, but Russia a series of insurrections, and liberal groups also agitated. After trying and others forced it out and then maneuvered for territory of police repression, which only infuriated the urban crowds, the tsarist their own. Japan proposed a split of Manchuria but assumed had to change course. It wooed liberals by creating a national parlianegotiations would fail, and so attacked the Russian fleet at port the duma. The interior minister Piot¡r Stoþin (pee-UH-tuhr Arthur, and later won over Russian armies in China as well. A introduced an important series of reforms for the peas- Russian fleet sent from the Baltic was humiliated at Tsushima Under the Stoþin reforms, peasants gained greater freedom from reStrait, which effectively ended the war. payments and village controls. They could buy and sell land more The goal was to create a stratified, market-oriented Peasantry in which successful farmers Russo-fapmesewar Warberween /apan and away from the peasant masses, becoming rural capitalists. Indeed, peasant unrest did die Russia (1904--1905) over territory in Manchuria; a minority of aggressive entrepreneurs, called kulaks (KOO-laks), began to increase agrr'production and buy additional land. Yet the reform packag'e quickly came unglued. Not only new workers' rights withdrawn, triggering a new series of strikes and underground actividuma was progressively stripped of power. Nicholas II, a weak man who was badly adnot surrender the tradition of autocratic rule, and the duma became a hollow institution, no one. police repressron also resumed, creating new opponents to the regime. in the diplomatic arena by the |apanese advance yet eaget to counter internal pressome foreign policy success, the Russian government turned once again to the Ottoman Balkans. various strategies to acquire new rights of access to the Mediterranean and allies in the Balkans yielded no concrete results, but they did stir the pot in this vulhelped lead to World War I. And this war, in which Russia participated to maintain standing and live up to the billing of Slavic protector, led to one of the great revolu- times. Eastern Europe patterns were paralleled in smaller eastern European states such as Hungary autonomous after 1866), Romania, Serbia, Bulgaria, and Greece. These were Russia. And emerging after long Ottoman dominance, they had no access to rnfluence of their giant neighbor. Most of the new nations established parliaments, lapan defeated the Russims, lugelybecause ofits naval power; lapan annexed Korea in 1910 as a result of military dominmce. duna National parliament created in Russia in the aftermath of the Revolution of 1905; progressively stripped ofpower duing the reign ofTsar Nicholas II; failed to forestall furthe¡ ¡evolution. Stoþin reforms Reforms introduced by the Stoþin intended to plaøte the peasantry in the aftermath of the Revolution of 1905; included reduction in redemption payments, attempt to create ma¡ket-oriented Russian interior minister Piotyr Peasantry. kulalß [KOO-lalc]Agriculturalentrepreneus who utilized the Stoþin and later NEP reforms to increase agricultural production and buy addition¿1 land. 636 Part V. The Dawn of the Industrial Age, 1750-1914 tigure 27.4 Women marching in the Russian Revolution of 1905. in imitation of Western forms, but carefully restricted voting rights and parliamentary Kings-some of them new' as the Balkan nations had set up monarchies after gaining ence from the Ottoman Empire-ruled without many limits on their power. Most eastern pean natioris abolished serfdom either in i848 or soon after Russia's move, but landlord remained more extensive than in Russia, and peâsant unrest followed. Most of the smaller European nations industrialized much less extensively than Russia, and as agricultural they remained far more dependent on Western markets. Amid all the problems, eastern Europe enjoyed a period of glittering cultural the late 19th centur¡ with Russia in the lead. Development of the romantic tradition Western styles continued. National dictionaries and histories, along with the collection of and music, helped the smaller Slavic nations gain a sense of their heritage. The Russian joyed a period of unprecedented brilliance. Westernizers such as Turgenev wrote that promoted what they saw as modern values, whereas writers such as Tolstoy and tried to poftray a special Russian spirit. Russian music moved from the Tchaikovsþ to more innovative, atonal styles of the early 20th century. Polish and posers such as Chopin and Liszt also made an important mark. Russian painters began ing in modern art currents, producing important abstract work. Finail¡ advanced at levels of fundamental importance. A Czech scientist, Gregor Mendel, derstanding of genetics, and a Russian physiologist, Ivan Pavlov, experimenting on flexes, explained unconscious responses in human beings. Eastern purope thus fully than ever before in a cultural world it shared with the West. I @'. pressure forced Japan to consider reforms beginning in the 1850s. ap an Tiansformation Witho ut Revolution On the surface, Japan experienced little change during the first half of the 19th tainly this was a quiet time compared with the earlier establishment of the (see Chapter 27) or the transformation introduced after the 1850s. Japan was able to combine existing strengths and traditions with significant reform. The Final Decades of the Shogunate During the first half of the 19th centur¡ the shogunate continued to combine a with semifeudal alliances between the regional lords, the daimyo and the military ernment repeatedly ran into financíal problems. Its taxes were based on Chapter 27 . Russia and /apan; Industrialization Outside the West growng commercialization of the fapanese economy; this was a severe constraint. At the same time, rnaintaining the feudal shell was costly. The government paid stipends to the samurai in return for their loyalty. A long budget reform spurt late in the tgth century built a successful momentum for a dme, but a shorter ef,6ort between 1841 and 1g43 was notably unsuccessful. This weakened the shogunate by the 1850s and hampered its response to the crisis induced by Western pressure. life and culture also developed under the Tokugawa regime. Neo_ continued to gain among the ruling elite /apanese intellectual at the expense of Buddhism . lapan gradu_ became more secular, particularly among the upper classes. This was an important precondifor the nation's response to the Western challenge ih that it precluded a strong religious_based to change. Various Confucian schools actively debated into the mid-l9th century, keep|apanese intellectual life fairly creative. Schools and academies expanded, reaching well below upper class through commoner schools, or terakoya, which taught reading, writing, and the of Confucianism to ordinary people. By 1859 more than 40 percent of all men and over percent of all women were literate-a far higher percentage than anywhere else in the world outthe West, including Russia, and on a par with some of the fringe areas of the West (including American South). Although Confucianism remained the dominant ideology, there were lmportant rivals. Ten_ between traditionalists and reformist intellectuals were emergmg, as in Russia in the same A national studies group praised fapanese traditions, including the office of emperor and Shinto religion. One national studies writer expressed a typical sentiment late in the lgth cen_ "The'special dispensation of our Imperial Land, means that ours is the native land of the Goddess who casts her light over all countries in the four seas. Thus our country is and fountainhead of all other countries, ,and in all matters it excels all the others." The of the national studies school grew somewhat in the early 19th centur¡ and it would help ultranationalist sentiment at the end of the century and beyond. second minority group consisted of what the Japanese called Dutch Studies. Although Western works had been banned when the policy of isolation was adopted, a group of þpankept alive the knowledge of Dutch to deal with the traders at Nagasaki. The ban on books was ended in 7720, and thereafter a grouP of fapanese scholars interested in ,.Dutch created a new interest in Western scientific advances, based on the realization that West_ texts were superior to those of the Chinese. In 1850, there were schools of Dutch Stud_ major cities, and their students urged freer exchange with the West and a rejection of medicine and culture. ,.Our general opinion was that we should rid our country of the inof the Chinese altogether. Whenever we met a young student of Chinese literature, we simfor him." as Japanese culture showed an important capacity for lively debate and fruitful internal the Japanese economy continued to develop into the 19,th century. Commerce expanded companies established monopoly privileges in many centers. Manufacturing in the countryside in such consumer goods industries as soy sauce and silks, and was organized by crty merchants. Some of these developments were comparable to changes in the West and have given rise to arguments that economically /apan had a on industrialization once the Western challenge revealed the necessity of further eco1850s, however, economic growth had stress /apan's backwardness slowed-a situation that has prompted some compared with the West. Technological limitations conexpansion and population increase. At the same time, rural riots increased in from the late lSth century onward. They were not overtly political but rather, like aimed at wealthy peasants, merchants, and landlord controls. Although the authis unrest with little difficulry the protests contributed to a willingness to conthey were joined by challenge from the outside. to Isolation had become ncreasingly worried about potential outside threats. In l79l a book a strong navy. Fears about the West's growrng power and particularly Russia's these concerns in later decades. Fear became reality in 1853 when American A Comic Dialogue, '1855 637 The Sep arate Paths of fapan and China Japan's ability to change in response to new Western pressure con- irårt.¿ strikingly with the sluggishness of Chinese reactions into the erLergy,leaving scant capital for other economic initiatives. Iapan's population stability into the 19th century pressed resources less severely. fapan's island status made the nation more sensitive to Western naval pressures. 20th century. The contrast draws particular attention because China and Japan had been part of the same civilization orbit for so long, which means that some of the assets Japan possessed in dealing with change were present in China as well. Indeed, fapan turned out to benefit, by the mid-l9th century, from having become more like China in key respects during the Tokugawa period. The link between Chinese and Japanese iraditions should not be exaggerated, of course, and earlier differ- Finally, China and Japan were on somewhat different paths when the Western ch¿llenge intruded in the mid-l9th century. China was suffering one of its recurrent dynastic de. clines. Government became less effìcient' intel lectual life stagnated, and popular surged. A cycle of renewal might have new dynasty seizing more vigorous But Western interference disrupted this complicating reform and creating various new discontents that mately overturned the imperial office, In contrast, |apan maintained political and economic with a into the 19th century. Whereas by the late 19th century needed Western guidance simply to handle such bureaucratic tariff collection and repression of peasant rebellion, fapan fered no such breakdown of authorit¡ using foreign advisors more selectively. Once a different pattern of response was established, decade increased the gap. Western exploitation of Chinese and dilution of government Power made conditions more while Japanese strength grew steadily after a very brief period certainty. By the 20th century, the two nations were to be in fapan, for the first time, the stronger-and seemed orbits. Japan enjoyed increasing industrial success and had servative state that would yield after World War II to a parliamentary form. China, after decades of revolution' its 2Oth-century political solution: communism. as them unprepared. China's power. and wealth roused Western greed and interference first, which gave ]apan some leeway' However, China surpassed Japan in some areas that should have aided it in reacting to the Western challenge. Its leadership, devoted to Confucianism, was more thoroughly secular and bureaucratic in outlook. There was no need to brush aside otherworldly commitments or feudal distractions to deal with the west's material onset ofthe 2lst centur¡ it is unclear split as PermanentlY as 19th- and earlY developments had suggested. Japan's industrial lead China's economy is beginning to soar. Common cultural Yet toda¡ at the east Asia was in responding to the West. However, that role fell to |apan' Several aspects of fapanese tradition gave it a flexibility that china lacked. It already knew the benefits of imitation, which china, save for its period of attraction to Buddhism, had never acknowledged. |apans slower government growth had allowed a stronger, more autonomous merchant tradiiiorr.rr"tt as both societies became more commercial in the 17th and group cooperation and decision making remind us that ferent political systems, a fruitful shared heritage ate. The heritage is quite different from that of the West' adaptable to the demands of economic chånge' And so begin to wonder whether a Pacific centurY is about to Feudal traditions, QUESTIONS What ",1ffi*:'.t"|^; the West. In contrast, China's government probably tried to control too much by the 18th century and quashed initiative in the process' China was also hampered by rapid population growth from the 17th century onward' This population pressure consumed great 638 shared before the 19th' cal institutions more Russia also able to 19th-century China? ', ''. Chapter 27 . Russia and fapan: Industrialization Outside the Commodore Matthew Perry arrived with a squadron in Edo Bay near Tokyo and used threats of bombardment to insist that Americans be allowed to trade. The United States, increasingly an active part of the West's core economy, thus launched for fapan the same kind of pressure the Opium War had created for China: pressure from the heightened military superiority of the West and its insistence on opening markets for its burgeoning economy. In 1854 Perry returned and won the right to station an American consul in fapan; in 1856, through a formal treaty, two ports were opened to commerce. Britain, Russia, and Holland quickly won similar rights. As in China, this meant that living in |apan would be governed by their own representatives, not by Iapanese law The bureaucrats ofthe shogunate saw no alternative but to open up japan, given the superiof Western navies. Ald of course, there were |apanese who had grown impatient with strict their numbers swelled as the Dutch schools began to expand. On the other hand, the intensely conservative, were opposed to the new concessions, and their opposition forced shogun to appeal to the emperor for support. Soon, samurai opponents of the bureaucracy were appealing to the emperor, who began to emerge from his centuries-long confinement as a religious and ceremonial figure. Whereas most daimyo defended the status quo, the samurai more divided. Some saw opportunity in change, including the possibility of unseating the The fact was that the complex shogunate system had depended on the isolation policy; it not survive the stresses of foreign influence and internal reactions. The result was not immecollapse; indeed, into the late 1850S, |apanese life seemed to go on much as before. In the 1860s, political crisis came into the open. The crisis was spiced by samurai attacks on including one murder of a British official, matched by Western naval bombardments of forts. Civil war broke out in 1866 as the samurai eagerly armed themselves with American War surplus weapons, causing |apans aristocracy to come to terms with the advantages of armaments. When the samurai defeated a shogunate force, many |apanese were finally out of their traditional reliance on their own superiority. One author argued that the nawith the West and its technology, science, aird humane laws, was only half civilized. This multifaceted crisis came to an end in 1868 when the victorious reform group proclaimed ernperor named Mutsuhito whose region was commonly called "Meiji," or "Enlightened." In key samurai leaders managed to put down the troops of the shogunate. The crisis period shocking enough to allow further changes in |apan's basic political structure-changes much deeper at the political level than those introduced by Russia from 1861 onward. and Political Change in the Meiji State Meiji government promptly set about abolishing feudalism, replacing the daimyo in 1871 of nationally appointed prefects (district administratÖrs carefully chosen from differthe prefect system was copied from French practice). Political power was effectively and from this base the Meiji rulers-the emperor apd his close advisors, drawn from of the aristocracy-began to expand the power of the state to effect economic and the ]apanese government sent samurai ofñcials abroad, to western Europe and the to study economic and political institutions and technology. These samurai, deeply what they saw, pulled back from their earlier anti-foreign position and gained increasother ofÊcials in the government. Their basic goal was ]apan's domestic development, by a careful diplomatic policy that would avoid antagonizing the West. improvements in government finance soon followed. Between 1873 and 1876, introduced a real social revolution. They abolished the samurai class and the had received. The tax on agriculture was converted to a wider tax, payable in were compensated by government--backed bonds, but these decreased in value, became poor. This development sparked renewed conflict, and a final samurai in 1877. However, the government had introduced an army based on national 1878 the nation was militarily secure. Individual samurai found new opportuand business areas as they adapted to change. One former samurai, Iwasaki Yataro started his career buying weapons for a feudal lord; set up the Mitsubishi Comgovernment contracts for railroad and steamship lines designed to comcompanies in the region (Figure 27.5). Despite his overbearing personalit¡ West 639 Perry, Matthew Arnericm commodore who visited Edo Bay with Anerican fleet in 1853; insisted on opening ports to American trade on threat of naval bombardment; won rights for dmerican trade with Japan in 1854. 640PartV'TheDawnofthelndustrialAge'1750-1914 former samurai, and bY his deat\ transportation. The continued ht revolution, would Yield diverse as samurai :::ä He founded the company still known as Mitsubishi (which means fortune in Three Diamonds) in 1870 and made his shipping. ,onlf,',,yålll Eil *.J.'Jj Two Faces of Western Influence fhese pictures show an 1850s cartoon portraying American ComMatthew Perry as a greedy warlord and the first meeting of fapanese parliament in 1890 represent? attitudes toward of the of costume in a tfi .$ s å åA tl lt ffi could develop on many fronts. Measures in this arealargely copied established pracwith adaptation suitable for Japanese conditions; thus, well before any EuroTokyo Imperial University had a faculty of agriculture. enterprise quickly played a role in |apan's growing economy, particularþ in the vital texSome businesspeople came from older merchant families, although some of the great been ruined with the financial destruction of the samurai class. There were also newcomfrom peasant ranks. Shuibuzawa Eüchi (SHoo-ih-buh-zah-wah EYE-ee-chee), for a peasant, became a merchant and then an ofûcial,of the Finance Ministry. He turned 1873, using other people's money to set up cotton-spinning mills and other textile oper1890s huge new industrial combines, later known as zaibatsu (ZEYE-baht-soo), were asa result of accumulations of capital and far-flung merchant and industrial operations. Iapanese economy was fully launched in an industrial revolution. It rested on a postructure different from that of Russia-one that had in most respects changed more success in organizing industrialization, including its careful management of formodels, proved to be one of the great developments of later l9th-century history. to keep these early phases of Japanese industrialization in perspective. apan was far from the West's equal. It depended on imports of Western equipsuch as coal; for industrial purposes, ]apan was a resource-poor nation. Algrowth and careful government policy allowe d Japan to avoid Western was newly dependent on world economic conditions and was often at a disadexPorts to pay for machine and resource imports, and these in turn took hordes Silk production grew rapidl¡ the bulk of it,destined for Western markets. was based on the labor of poorly paid women who worked at home or in mechanized factories. Some of these women were sold into service by farm famiorganization or other means of protest were met by vigorous repression. äfi West, but zaibatsu [ZEYE-baht-soo] Huge industrial combines created in Japan in the 1890s as p¿rt of the process of ildust¡ialiation. 64t 642 PartV . The Dawn of the Industrial Age, 1750-1914 Social and Diplomatic Effects of Industrialization The Industrial Revolution and the wider extensions of manufacturing and commercial agriculture, along with political change, had significant ramifications within Japanese culture and socrety, changes also helped generate a more aggressive foreign policy. ]apanese society was disrupted massive population growth. Better nutrition and new medical provisions reduced death rates, the upheaval of the rural masses cut into traditional restraints on births. The result was steady ulation growth that strained fapanese resources and stability, although it also ensured a supply of low-cost labor. This was one of the causes of |apan s class tensions. The |apanese government introduced a universal education system, providing primary for all. This education stressed science and the importance of technical subjects along with loyaþ to the nation and emperor. Elite students at the university level also took courses that sized science, and many Iapanese students went abroad to study technical subjects in other Education also revealed fapanese insistence on distinctive values. After a heady reform in the 1870s, when hundreds of Western teachers were imported and a Rutgers Universþ brought in for highJevel advice about the whole system, the emperor and conservative stepped back after 1879. This was when reformers like Fukuzawa Yukichi began to tone down rhetoric. Innovation and individualism had gone too far. A traditional moral education was tial, along with new skills, which would stress "loyalty to the Imperial House, love of countr¡ piety toward parents, respect for superiors, faith in friends, charity toward inferiors and oneself." The use of foreign books on morality was prohibited, and intense government of textbooks was intended to promote social order. Many |apanese copied Western fashions as part of the effort to become modern. style haircuts replaced the samurai shaved head with a topknot-another example of the ization of hair in world history. Western standards of hygiene spread, and the |apanese enthusiastic toothbrushers and consumers of patent medicines. |apan also adopted the endar and the metric system. Few ]apanese converted to Christianity, however, and despite popular cultural fads, the ]apanese managed to preserve an emphasis on their own values. Japanese wanted and got from the West involved practical techniques; they planned to with a distinctively |apanese spirit. As an early Japanese visitor to the American White in a self-satisfied poem that captured the national mood, We suffered the barbarians to look upon The glory of our Eastern Empire of fapan. Western-oriented enthusiasms were not meant to destroy a distinctive fapanese spirit. |apanese family life retained many traditional emphases. The birth rate dropped population growth forced increasing numbers of people off the land. Meanwhile, the rise industr¡ separating work from home, made children's labor less useful, This trend, Iier in the West, seems inseparable from successful industrialization. There were new instability as well; the divorce rate exploded until legal changes made procedures more the more traditional side, the |apanese were eager to maintain the inferiority of home. The position of Western women States were appalled by what they saw here is like the way parents are respected in our country." Standards of Japanese trasted with the more open and boisterous behavior of Westerners; particularþ scenity is inherent in the customs of this country," noted another samurai visitor States. Certain Japanese religious values were also preserved. Buddhism lost some it remained important, but Shintoism, which appealed to the new nationalist concern distinctive mission and the religious functions of the emperor, won new interest. Traditionalism was not the only theme in the situation of fapanese lvomen ization. As in Russia, women were widely used in the early factory labor force-and also in sweatshop silk production-because their low wages were an competitive global markets. At the same time, the government carefi;lly girls, as part of its new commitment to mass education. And many upper-class had opportunities even for high education, in secondary schools or separate sion they encountered, between assumptions that women should play subservient ' chapter 27 Russia and /apan: Inclustrialization outsicle the west roles and the cxcitement of new eclucational opportunities, were particularly sharp, but not entirely different from contemporary conditions in Russia or the west. outright fèminisrn, however., was far less common than in either western or eastern Enrope. Industrialization ond urbanization eral made traditionalism impossible alnid rapid ccono Economic change, ancl the tensions as wel foreign policy. This sirift was partly an ir lit- also produced a shift in japanese reii.ved.u,n. rt.ui,r, *ithi,,1upo,r.r. ,.li.i¡ nrilitary talents elsewhe¡e. Eve' no¡e than \destern cou'tries, which ii" :nï;:.tätî:l1i:ï,i:ì: usecl similar arguments for imperialism' the Japa'ese economy also r.reecled access to markets and raw materials. Because Japan was poor iu many basic materials, including coal ancl oii for energ¡ th. p...r.,." for expa^sio' was particularly great. |apan's quick victory over Chilra in the Sino a over a sula it agains (Map 27.2). Ja iliated l¡y west l\¡as the Japanese p ,i\ 1902 allia arrival as an equal nation in thc Western_clomin e. to dent Russia's growing str.ength in eas railroad. Disputes over Russian influence in ìvlanchuria and /apanese influence in Korea lecl to the Russo-Japanese War in 1904 (Map 27.3), which /apan won handily because of its supe_ rior navy. /apan annexed Korea in 1910, enter_ ing the ranks of imperialist powers. also eager S¡ A ¡V R U ' ': ,Set o.[ klto ¡,r k ..' Lukc Þ_ ßuikt I ,lI è Strain of Modernization I O ? achievement had its costs, including living stanclards in the crowclecl cities. Many iapanese conservatives r.esentecl the Passion other-lapanese ciisplayed MONGOLIA CHURIA for Westcrn fash- Disputes between generations, with the clinging to traditional standards and the t¡ore interested in Western styles, were troubling in a society that stressed the im_ of parental authority. Some tension enterecl political life. polit- Chang.chun Þ É ? aPck ng * uqr. Se parties ll (Inchon) The government often had to cliselections, a rnore workable parliamentary the Diet and call f-or new (Ger. major- phiìosophies I Y¿l ô tt! a assassinations and a ttempted asreflected grlevances, inclucling action impulses in the samurai tradition hincl of friction emerged in inlife. Manv Japanese scholars copied u of Japatt in Iapan's parliament clashed with elrperor,s ministers over rights to deter- ,9¿u rÃz-t Ct Russta¡ U Dalltc and literary styles, ancl enough aclaptation to prevent the of a full Russian-style intelligentsia. i' E E El E E El Russian tenirory Russian sphere of influence Japanese reritory Chinese territory Japanese troop ¡ìtovemcnt Russian troop movernent (Japail, Ì895) PACIFIC OCE.4N 5M KILOMETTRS i{lap 27.3 Japane se colonial Expansion to 19r The map shows Japan,s principal gains, but also the limitations that still frustrated Japanese nationalists. 4 643 644 Part V' The Dawn of the Industrial Age, 1750-1914 conflicts such as those from which we will not be able to recover." Others dealt with more Personal in the following Poem: Always wear a Do not be loved by others; do not accept their charity, do not promise,an¡hing' ' ' ' Don t fortime' any head at on the man mask. Always be ready for a fìght-be ãble to hit the next him' with to break certain later oI sooner ale you get that when yon -uk frienãs with someone loyalty and As an antidote to social and cultural insecurit¡ Japanese leaders urged national promoted Japanese virtues of devotion to the emperor, and with some success. The official message obedience and harmony that the West lacked. School texts thus stressed, the nation is but a single famil¡ the imperial the unbroken imperial line with the same feelhis parents. . ' . The union of loyalty and filial PolitY' built on traditions of superiorit¡ cohesion, and deference to force, probably in I well as on the new tensions generated by rapid change. It became a deep in a national struggle justifring and sacrifice in role a unique played more than elsewhere, that with firm along Nationalism, world. hostile in a dignity and sion to preserve independence fapanese nationalism peril Western term for perceived th¡eat Japanese imperialism around 1900; met by inc¡eased Western imperialism in region. yellow of certainly helps explain repression of dissent and the sweeping changes of the early Meiji Years' countries after 1900. other and China, Russia, hit that pressure |apan avoided the revolutionary outside the society other No it was' unusual how us of Yet iapan s very success reminds example in its Western to responding Russia, achievements ern world was yet able to match its further that disarray social such amid but power' way, continued its growth as a world to or inevitable. Most of the rest of the world faced the more immediate concern of adjusting many when toda¡ Even prospect. remote a was mg Western dominance; industrialization of rapid are striving for greater industrialization, the ability to emulate the ]apanese Pattern the leading enough, interestingly Asia, Pack. east seems very limited-with other parts of Global Connections Russia and fapan in theWorld world role, founded on its huge size and territorial expansion, had already been established in the earþ modern period' There were, however, new twists during the 19th century' Russian troops and diplomats periodicaþ gained direct roles in western Europe. Russian forces entered France as part of the coalition that defeated Napoleon. A side result was the development of new restaurants in France, called bistros, based on the Russian word for put down the Hungarian revolution 4r.rlck. Russian armies helped in 1849. Russian involvement in Middle Eastern diplomacy resulted from its steady Pressure on the Ottoman Empire' By the later 19th century, Russia extended its influence in eastern Asia, seizing new territories in northern China and claiming a role elsewhere, in china and Korea alike. This set the collision course with in the Japan. Russia also participated somewhat more broadly internain participating glãbaüzation of the later 19th century, iional conferences and contributing to "international" styles in art. just emerging by fapan's world role was much newer, and one previous atonly 1914. Long isolated, Japan had experienced century invalate-16th tempt at assertion beyond its borders, the fueled by increased, sion of Korea. Now however, ambitions and popstrength, economic needs, growing industrial and military that era |apanese leaders ulation pressure. It was during the Meiji Russia's decided to open the wave of globalization, though without distinctive identiry rather than trying to resist it' More fapan sought to be regarded as a great nation alongWestern alist lines. This brought the conflicts with China and 1914, and wider exPeriments thereafter. In the long clearþ |apans strfüng economic success that would most new place in the world. Initiall¡ the unfolding of eastern Pacific region, along with the coryPlex West, marked fapans dramatic entry as a force to The beginnings of serious industrialization fapan, and the entry of ]apan into world affairs, tant new ingredients to the global diplomatic picture 20th century. These develoPments, along with the rise States, added to the growing sense of competition lished Western Powers. faPan s surge promotedafeat newyellowperil that shotild be opposed through efforts. Outright colonial acquisitions bY the new rectly to the competitive atmosphere, particularlY Further Readings Important comParative work includes Rudra " Moder nity" : Work, CommunitY, and AuthoritY ized lapan and Russiø (2002) and Kaoru China, and the Growth of the Asian In ø chapter 27 1850-1949 (2005). A. Gerschenkron, Economic Backwardness in Perspective: A Book of Essays (1962), helps define the of latecomer industrialization. The best survey of Rusin this transitional period is Hans Rogger, Russia in the Ag, of ylodernization and Revolution, 1 88 1- 1917 (1983). See also GeofHosking, Russia: People and Empire, 1532-1917 (1997). Rusreforms and economic change are discussed in Alexander Russia in the Nineteenth Century: Autocracy, Reþrm ønd Change, 1814-1914 (2005); Sharon Hudgins, The Other Side Russia: A Slice of Life in Siberia ønd the Russian Far Eøst (2003); O'Meara, The Decembrist Povel pestel: Russia,s First Repub(2003); Sidney Harcave, trans., The Memoirs of Count Wixe ), includes a brief biographical sketch and his collected writof this influential "modernizer." On social and cultural develsee Victoria Bonnell, ed., The Russian Worker: Life and Under the Tsarist Regime (1983); Barbara Engel, Mothers Daughters: Women of the Intelligentsia in Nineteenth Century (1983); and )effrey Brooks, When Russia Learned to Read: and Popular Culture (l9BT). On another vital area of east_ Europe, see A. Stavrianos, The Balkans, 1815-1914 (1963). in the lgth century is viewed from a modernization in R. Dore, ed.., Aspects of Social Change in Modern Japan also Ian Inkster, Japønese Industrialization: Historical Perspectives and The Jøpanese Industrial Econonry: Late and CulturøI Cøusation (2001); W. W Lockwood,The Development of Japøn: Growth and Structural Change (t9sa); f. C. Abegglen, The lapanese Factory: Aspects of lts Organization, rev. ed. (1985); Andrew Gordon, The Evolution Relations in lapan (1985); and Hugh patrick, ed., lapanese and lts Social Consequences (1973). E. O. Reislapan: The Story of ø Nation (l9BL) remains a good general of the period. For more closely focused works on socloecosee Masa¡rki Tanimoto, ed.,The Role ofTradition in Another Path to Industrialization (2006); Breaking Open lapan: Commodore perry, Lord Abe, Imperialism in 185i (2006); |anet Hunger, Women Market in Jøpan's Industrializing Economy: The Texthe Pacific War (2003); S. Ericson, The Sound òf Røilroads and the State in Meiji lapøn (1996); Peter N. and Students in Industrial Society: lapan and the and E. P. Tswumi, Factory Girls: Women in the Thread Iapan (1990) Additional studies include R. H. Myers The lapanese Colonial Empire 1895-1945 Beasle¡ JaPanese ImperiøIism, 1894-1945 (1987); and Abacus and the Sword: The Japønese penetration "f r0 (1 995). On fapan and Russia, see Frederic A. Much RecordedWar: The Russo-lapønese War in His- ' Russia and |apan: Industrialization outside the west 64s ever, the riches of the tsars could not conceal the dismal world of the Russian peasantry, whose lot was little improved by Russian economic modernization. This world and how it was illuminated by the works of the Russian writer Nikotai Gogol are addressed at http ://www.kirj asto.sci. fi /gogol.htm, http ://www:sp artacus.schoolnet co, ul</RUSserfs.htm, http://www. geocities. com/Athens/Forum/4 r 23l . krimlife.htm, and h The Crimean War -grempel/courses/r is described at famous battle gogol.htm. wnec.edu/ Its most http://www.nationalcenter.orgl ChargeofthelightBrigade.hrml and http://www.lo c.govI n I ptiitl coll/251_fen.html. Russian liberalism reached its high_water mark with the äbolition of serfdom, an institution whose rise and demise is described at http I I av alon.law.yale. edu/ 1 9th_century/koval6. A copy of the Emancipation Manifesto ending serfdom can be found at http //en.wikiso urce. org/wiki/Russian_Emancip atio n_Manifesto_ of_1861: English_Translation. However, reaction soon set in. The failure of the Revolution of 1905, examined at http://mars.wnec .edu/-grempel/courses/russia/lectures/23revl 905.html, to achieve any significant degree of political and social reform paved the way for those favoring more radical change, such as the Bolsheviks, led by Madimir Iþch Uþnov, whose life and work is examined at http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/ and whose voice can be I : 2.htm. Count Sergei glimpsed athttp:ll :ï1}ii,:î.H11 intetlectuat Leon Tlorsky's brief evaluation http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/ 1 905/ch 1 0.htm, is dramatically written and full of interest, Life in Meiji lapan canbe glimpsed through an exhibition of contemporary woodblock art at http I lwww. artgallery. sb c. edu/ : ukiyoe/historyofivoodblockprints.html. A virtual tour of Meiji culture and politics is offered at http://www.virtualmuseum.cal Exhibitions/Meiji/english/html/index.html. This tour offers an examination of the Russo-Japanese War of 1905 at http://www .virtualmuseum. ml/war3.html. Meiji era -guide.comlele2 Restoration at http://www.japan kaut.ac.jplmikami/ IDEAS/home.htm. Iwasaki Yataro's role in this process is illuminated at http://www.mitsubishi.com/e/history/series/yatarolindex .html, http://wwwmitsubishi.com/e/history/series/yataro/index .html, and http://content.cdlib.orglxtf/view?docId=ft 0w1 003k0 &chunk.id=d0e8030&toc.id=d0e8010&brand=ucpress. A key to the process of modernization in fapan is the Constitution of the Empire of |apan (1889), which is reproduced at hnp://history .hanover.edu/texts/1889con.html. For further insight into this process, this document can be compared with the Constitution of I apan (19 47 ) at htt¡ I I hisrory. hanover. edu/texts/ 1 947con.html. An essay comparing the course bf "westernization" in Russia and Iapan (and China as well) can be found at http://www tsarist Russia are revealed in a virtual tour of the at lrttp://www.alexand erpala ce.orgl palacel . How- .socyberty.com/Social-Sciences/A-Comparison-of-Westernization- in-Russia-fapan-and-Chin a.67 924. 646 PartV ' The Dawn of the IndustrialAge, 1750-1914 Nineteenth-century ruling elites in Russia embraced which philosophy and ideas? (A) autocratic government, Orthodox religion, and extrene nationalism (B) liberalism, including the emancipation of serfs and British-style democracy (C) socialism, with land reform for peasants and protections for workers (D) constitutional monarchy, with an elected parliament 3. Russia's lag in economic development in the l9th-century was most dramaticaþ revealed bY (A) (B) (C) (D) 4. In Russia, the supporters of westernization and radical ideas were often (A) (B) (C) (D) land-owningelites. intellectuals and university-educated students. the ability to avoid revolution until after 1900. the Crimean War. (A) meant that imported slaves did most of the labor. (B) immediately resulted in a flood of peasant workers joining the factories or industrial worKorce for wages. (C) the Russian Orthodox clergY. the land-owning peasants and serfs' Napoleon's invasion of Russia' The emancipation of the serfs in Russia and limitations on the ruler's Powers 2. the French Revolution's impact on Russia. meant Russian agriculture was unable to produce port goods. (D) did not require the government to surrender its rial and aristocratic Power. o a chapter 27 5. The unexpected defeat bythe /apanese in the Russo_fapanese War led Russia to (A) (B) (C) (D) industrialize the military. massive protests that became the Revolution of 1905. ' 7. Russia and fapan: Industrialization outside the Prior to the arrival of the American fleet and Commodore Percy,Iapan (A) had not developed a literate and educated population. (B) was in self-imposed isolation from Europe and the U.S. (C) lacked a centralized, effective government. (D) knew little of Western developments or ideas. Response Question the abilities to respond to western pressure in two of the countries: China, Japan, Russia. 647 As a way to smooth ove¡ strains within ]apanese society caused by the Industrial Revolution, the (A) (B) the emancipation of the serfs. attack the power of the Orthodox Church. west (C) (D) government established a social welfare and retirement system. tolerated unions and radical groups iftheyworked with the government. gave the fapanese parliament (Diet) powers over minis_ ters and government. supported Japanese nationalism and devotion to the emperor.