Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CANCER OF THE BREAST Introduction Incidence: Low in Africa, Japan; intermediate in India, high in USA, UK and Europe Commonest cancer in women and second in Africa (after Ca cervix) Incidence increases with age from 20 years upwards Peak incidence at 45-55 years; a decade earlier in Africa Commonest site is the UOQ (50%) May be multifocal, multicentric or bilateral Bilateral disease is commoner with infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Many women have micrometastases at time of diagnosis Classification: Histological Types Carcinoma Non-invasive Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) 2-3% Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) 2-3% Infiltrative Ductal- Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) 70-80% Medullary 5-8% Mucinous/colloid 2-4% Tubular 1-2% Papillary 1-2% Signet ring, clear cell, squamous cell, juvenile (Rare) Lobular 6-8% Sarcoma Cellular intracanilicular fibroadenoma Other types of sarcoma Special Clinical Forms Paget’s Disease Inflammatory Carcinoma Risk Factors for Ca Breast Sex (F:M= 10:1) Age- Increases with age Family history- Mother or sister x 2-3 risk Oncogenes: Familial <5% -BRCA-1 (Ca develops in 50%), BRCA -2 Sporadic- Approximately 25% of Ca. over express erb B (HER-2) Early menarche (<12 y), late menopause (>55y) Nulliparity or age >30 years at first delivery Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) Atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia on biopsy x 9 Low dose radiation 1 Diagnosis Commonly presents as a painless palpable lump or mass Suspicious lesion on screening mammography Pain is uncommon but may be present with advanced disease Occasionally presents as bleeding per nipple (usually duct papilloma) Skin changes ( dimpling, nipple retraction, ‘peau d orange’ eczema of nipple in Paget’s disease, ulceration, satellite nodules, ‘mastitis carcinomatosis’ Nodal spread to axillary, internal mammary and supraclavicular nodes Hematogenous metastases to lungs, liver or bone Transcelomic spread to ovaries (Kruckenberg) and pelvis (Blummer’s shelf) Diagnosis is by Triple Assessment Clinical Evaluation – Lump and regional nodes Imaging (ultrasound <35 years old or mammography >35 years old) Cytology or Biopsy Cytology is reported as: C1 = Inadequate sample C2 = Definitely benign C3 = Probably benign C4 = Suspicious of malignancy C5 = Definitely malignant TNM Staging for Breast Cancer Tumour Size (T) Tis Cancer in situ T1 Tumour <2 cm (T1a <0.5 cm, T1b >0.5-1 , T1c >1-2 cm) T2 2 cm-5 cm T3 Tumour >5 cm T4a Involvement of chest wall T4b Involvement of skin (includes, direct infiltration, ulceration, peau d'orange and satellite nodules) T4c T4a and T4b together T4d Inflammatory cancer Regional Lymphnodes (N) N0 No regional node metastases N1 Palpable mobile involved ipsilateral axillary nodes N2 Fixed involved ipsilateral axillary nodes N3 Ipsilateral internal mammary node involvement (rarely clinically detectable) Distant Metastases (M) M0 No evidence of metastasis M1 Distant metastasis (includes ipsilateral supraclavicular or cervical nodes) 2 Correlation of Stage (UICC-1987) and TNM Classification I T1, N0, M0 II A II B III A III B IV T0, N1, T1, N1; T2, N0, M0 T2, N1; T3, N0, M0 T0, N2; T1, N2; T2, N2; T3, N1, N2, M0 T4, Any N; Any T, N3, M0 Any T; Any N, M1 MODALITIES OF TREATMENT SURGERY Historical. Halsted described 50 patients treated by Radical Mastectomy in 1894 Patey described Modified Radical Mastectomy in 1967 Auchincloss (1970) and Scanlon (1975) described modifications Cope (1976) and Crile (1986) described Local Excision+Radiation 1. Breast Conserving Surgery + Radiotherapy (BCS+R) Wide Local Excision (WLE), segmentectomy or quadrantectomy Usually combined with axillary node surgery Radiation to the breast (40-50 Gy + ‘boost’ to tumour bed 10-20 Gy) Criteria for BCS Small single tumours < 4cm with no fixity to skin, chest wall or muscle No fixity of lymph nodes No multicentric cancer (mammogram) For tumours suitable for breast conservation, no difference in local recurrence or overall survival when BCS + radiotherapy is compared to mastectomy 2. Mastectomy Simple Mastectomy/ Total Mastectomy and axillary node excision or radiotherapy Modified Radical Mastectomy (Patey, Scanlon, Auchincloss) Radical Mastectomy (Described by Halsted; of historical interest) Breast reconstruction is an option and may be immediate or delayed Surgery for axillary nodes 30-40% of patients with early breast cancer have nodal involvement Clinical evaluation of axilla unreliable (30% false +ve , 30% false-ve) ? Role of sentinel node biopsy : Scintigraphy, (T1, T2) The aims of axillary surgery is to eradicate local disease and determine prognosis 3 Surgical evaluation should be considered for all patients with invasive cancer Levels of axillary clearance are assessed relative to pectoralis minor Level 1 - below pectoralis minor Level 2 - up to upper border of pectoralis minor Level 3 - to the outer border of the 1st rib Axillary clearance Axillary clearance both stages and treats the axilla Sampling potentially misses nodes and understages the axilla Surgical clearance possibly gains better local control Avoids complications of axillary radiotherapy Avoids morbidity of axillary recurrence Axillary sampling Axillary samplings removes > 4 nodes Only stages the axilla Must be followed by axillary radiotherapy The 60% of patients with node negative disease have unnecessary surgery Avoids morbidity of axillary surgery The combination of axillary clearance and radiotherapy is to be avoided since it produces unacceptable rate of lymphoedema Prognostic factors 50% women who receive locoregional treatment alone will die from metastatic disease. Prognostic factors have three main uses: To select appropriate adjuvant therapy according to prognosis To allow comparison of treatment between similar groups of patients To improve the understanding of the disease Age Younger women have poorer prognosis of equivalent stage Tumour size Diameter of tumour correlates directly with survival Lymph node status Single best prognostic factor Correlation between number and level of nodes involved and survival Metastases Distant metastases worsen survival Histological type Some histological types associated with improved prognosis: Tubular, cribriform, mucinous, papillary, micro-invasive Histological grade Three characteristics allow scoring of grade into 1.2.3: Tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic frequency Lymphatic / vascular invasion 25% operable breast cancers have lympho-vascular invasion Double risk of local relapse Higher risk of short term systemic relapse Hormone and growth factor receptors ER positivity predicts for response to endocrine manipulation EGF receptors are negatively correlated with ER and poorer prognosis 4 Oncogenes Tumours that express C-erb-B2 (HER-2) oncogene likely to be resistant to CMF chemotherapy resistant to hormonal therapy respond to anthracycline and to taxols Proteases Urokinase and cathepsin D presence confers a poorer prognosis CHEMOTHERAPY 1. Primary (Neoadjuvant) systemic therapy prior to locoregional treatment 2. Adjuvant therapy following locoregional treatment Decision depends primarily on presence of poor prognostic factors Age (young). Menopausal status ( premenopausal)) Size (>2cm). Nodal status, (positive nodes) Other high risk factors (HR –ve, aneuploid, poor grade, high S-phase fraction) Combination chemotherapy more effective than single drug Regimes: CMF, AC/EC, ECF (Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, 5 FU, Adriamycin) Given as 6 cycles of CMF or 4 cycles of CA, @ monthly intervals No evidence that more than 6 months treatment is of benefit Greatest benefit is seen in premenopausal women Newer options CA x 4 T x 4 (Docitaxel); ECF (Epirubicin, Cisplatin, 5FU) High -dose therapy + stem cell rescue produces no overall survival benefit Higher toxicity and may be poorly tolerated in the elderly/debilitated Primary (Neoadjuvant) chemotherapy Chemotherapy prior to surgery for large or locally advanced tumours (Stage III) Shrinks tumour and may allow breast conserving surgery rather than mastectomy 70% tumours show a clinical response In 20–30% this response is complete 80% of these patients still have histological evidence of tumour The addition of preoperative docetaxel (4 cycles) to conventional neoadjuvant AC therapy improves the pathologic response rate in stage I-IIIA disease, Surgery required even in those with complete clinical response Primary systemic therapy has not to date been shown to improve survival HORMONAL THERAPY Adjuvant therapy in HR +ve pre and post menopausal women, node positive and high risk node negative patients 1. (SERM /SERD: Anti-oestrogen) treatment of choice: Tamoxifen Effective in both the adjuvant setting and in advanced disease Tamoxifen 20 mg per day Duration of treatment is 5 years Value of treatment beyond 5 years is unknown Risk of contralateral breast cancer reduced by 40% Greater benefit in ER/PR receptor rich tumours (78%) Benefit still seen in ER/PR receptor negative tumours (10%) Newer drugs: Terimifene, Fulvestrant 5 2. 3. 4. 5. Progestins (Megestrol acetate- Megace) GnRH agonist (Goserelin- Zoladex) in advanced cancer in premenopausal Aromatase Inhibitors (Anastrozole, Letrozole) in postmenopausal Oophorectomy (surgical/radiation) in premenopausal with advanced disease IMMUNOTHERAPY Trastuzumab (Herceptin) Monoclonal antibody binds to HER-2 SUMMARY OF TREATMENT BY STAGE Stage I and II (Locoregional disease) Lumpectomy and Radiotherapy Modified Radical Mastectomy/ Total Mastectomy+ Node excision Adjuvant systemic therapy for micrometastases (Chemotherapy/Hormonal therapy) 5 year survival: I – 95%. II – 60-70% Stage III (Locally advanced disease) Multimodal therapy includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery 5 year survival : 30-55% Stage IV (Systemic Metastases) All treatment is aimed at palliation of symptoms Goal is locoregional and systemic control of disease 5 year survival 5- 10% 6