Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CYCLING MULTI-KINASE INHIBITORS IN IMATINIB-RESISTANT GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS TO MAXIMIZE DISEASE CONTROL: PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL RATIONALE César Serrano, Grant Eilers, Meijun Zhu, Anu Gupta, George D. Demetri, Suzanne George, Sebastian Bauer, Brian P. Rubin, Jonathan A. Fletcher Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Lerner Research Institute and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany CTOS 18th Annual Meeting Oct 30 - Nov 2, 2013 New York Paper 037 Background • KIT and PDGFRA are primary drivers of oncogenic signaling in GISTs. • KIT inhibition with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs)improves outcomes in most GIST patients. • Resistance to TKIs eventually emerges in virtually all GIST patients. • KIT secondary resistance mutations are the main mechanism of TKI failure. Secondary resistance in GIST SECONDARY MUTATIONS Exon 13 V654 FREQUENCY 40% ATPbinding pocket 30% Activation Loop Exon 14 Exon 9 Exon 11 D816 Exon 17 Debiec-Rychter M, 2005 Antonescu CR, 2005 Wardelmann E, 2006 Heinrich MC, 2008 Liegl B, 2008 D820 N822 Y823 Secondary resistance in GIST SECONDARY MUTATIONS Exon 13 V654 FREQUENCY 40% ATPbinding pocket 30% Activation Loop Exon 14 Exon 9 Exon 11 D816 Exon 17 Debiec-Rychter M, 2005 Antonescu CR, 2005 Wardelmann E, 2006 Heinrich MC, 2008 Liegl B, 2008 D820 N822 Y823 Secondary resistance in GIST SECONDARY MUTATIONS FREQUENCY DRUG SENSITIVITY Imatinib Sunitinib Exon 13 V654 40% Exon 14 Exon 9 Exon 11 D816 Exon 17 Debiec-Rychter M, 2005 Antonescu CR, 2005 Wardelmann E, 2006 Heinrich MC, 2008 Liegl B, 2008 D820 N822 Y823 30% Sensitive Resistant Secondary resistance in GIST SECONDARY MUTATIONS FREQUENCY DRUG SENSITIVITY Imatinib Sunitinib Exon 13 V654 40% Exon 14 Exon 9 Exon 11 D816 Exon 17 Debiec-Rychter M, 2005 Antonescu CR, 2005 Wardelmann E, 2006 Heinrich MC, 2008 Liegl B, 2008 D820 N822 Y823 30% Sensitive Resistant Second- and third-line treatment in GIST • Regorafenib (REGO) has recently obtained FDAapproval in GIST patients after failure of imatinib (IM) and sunitinib (SU). • There is substantial heterogeneity of secondary KIT resistant mutations between and within metastases from individual patients after progression on TKIs. • Progression-free survival after imatinib failure is 4 to 6 months irrespective of the second- or third-line TKI used. Aims We investigated novel strategies to overcome heterogeneity of resistant clones in TKI-resistant GIST patients. Imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib are active against primary KIT exon 11 mutation IM nM 50 100 REGO SU 500 50 100 500 50 100 500 p-KIT (Y703) p-AKT S473 p-S6 (S235/236) Actin Imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib are active against primary KIT exon 11 mutation IM nM 50 100 REGO SU 500 50 100 500 50 100 500 p-KIT (Y703) p-AKT S473 p-S6 (S235/236) Actin Imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib are active against primary KIT exon 11 mutation IM nM 50 100 REGO SU 500 50 100 500 50 100 500 p-KIT (Y703) p-AKT S473 p-S6 (S235/236) Actin Sunitinib and regorafenib have complementary activity against imatinib-resistant GIST cell lines KIT Mutation IC50 (nM) Cell line Primary Secondary SU REGO GIST430/654 Ex 11 Ex 13 (V654A) 194 3,341 GIST-T1/816 Ex 11 Ex 17 (D816E) 3,111 395 GIST-T1/820 Ex 11 Ex 17 (D820A) 2,599 368 *IC50s: Green = predictive of clinical efficacy Red = predictive of clinical resistance Sunitinib and regorafenib have complementary activity against imatinib-resistant GIST cell lines KIT Mutation IC50 (nM) Cell line Primary Secondary SU REGO GIST430/654 Ex 11 Ex 13 (V654A) 194 3,341 GIST-T1/816 Ex 11 Ex 17 (D816E) 3,111 395 GIST-T1/820 Ex 11 Ex 17 (D820A) 2,599 368 *IC50s: Green = predictive of clinical efficacy Red = predictive of clinical resistance Sunitinib and regorafenib have complementary activity against imatinib-resistant GIST cell lines KIT Mutation IC50 (nM) Cell line Primary Secondary SU REGO GIST430/654 Ex 11 Ex 13 (V654A) 194 3,341 GIST-T1/816 Ex 11 Ex 17 (D816E) 3,111 395 GIST-T1/820 Ex 11 Ex 17 (D820A) 2,599 368 *IC50s: Green = predictive of clinical efficacy Red = predictive of clinical resistance Progression of KIT Exon 13 imatinib-resistant subclone on regorafenib KIT exon 13 (V654A). Radiographic and metabolic progression on regorafenib Baseline C12D21 Resection biopsy exon 11 + exon 13 (V654A) Response of KIT Exon 17 imatinib-resistant subclone on regorafenib KIT exon 17 (D820Y). Radiographic and metabolic response on regorafenib Baseline Pre-regorafenib exon 11 + exon 17 (D820Y) C4D21 Sunitinib and regorafenib have complementary activity against IM-resistant KIT mutations KIT Mutation Primary Secondary Activity IM SU REGO Ex 11 Sensitive Sensitive Sensitive Ex 11 Sensitive Sensitive Sensitive Ex 11 Ex 13 (V654A) Resistant Sensitive Resistant Ex 11 Ex 17 (D816) Resistant Resistant Sensitive Ex 11 Ex 17 (D820) Resistant Resistant Sensitive Targeting TKI-resistance heterogeneity in GIST SUNITINIB REGORAFENIB ATP-binding pocket Activation Loop Cycling sunitinib and regorafenib might suppress a broader spectrum of imatinib-resistant GIST clones and achieve prolonged long-term disease control Time-frame for restoration of kinase signaling and proliferation after TKI withdrawal TKI withdrawal Phosphorylation of KIT Phosphorylation of downstream signal intermediates (AKT and ERK) Increase of Cyclin A expression Increase of Ki-67 expression Mitotic activity Sunitinib washout: reactivation of KIT, downstream pathways, and cell cycle GIST430/654 exon 11 + exon 13 Sunitinib treatment SU 500nM Days of drug withdrawal pKIT Y703 pAKT S473 pRB S795 Cyclin A Actin Sunitinib washout: reactivation of KIT, downstream pathways, and cell cycle GIST430/654 exon 11 + exon 13 Sunitinib treatment SU 500nM Days of drug withdrawal pKIT Y703 pAKT S473 pRB S795 Cyclin A Actin Sunitinib washout: reactivation of KIT, downstream pathways, and cell cycle GIST430/654 exon 11 + exon 13 Sunitinib treatment SU 500nM Days of drug withdrawal pKIT Y703 pAKT S473 pRB S795 Cyclin A Actin Sunitinib washout: reactivation of proliferation GIST430/654 exon 11 + exon 13 Untreated Sunitinib treatment Day 0 KI-67 expression Day 1 Mitotic Count (per 5 mm2) UT 100nM 500nM Day 0 62 4 1 Day 1 60 3 0 Day 3 63 45 1 Day 7 68 65 11 Day 3 Day 7 SU 100nM SU 500nM Sunitinib washout: reactivation of proliferation GIST430/654 exon 11 + exon 13 Untreated Sunitinib treatment Day 0 KI-67 expression Day 1 Mitotic Count (per 5 mm2) UT 100nM 500nM Day 0 62 4 1 Day 1 60 3 0 Day 3 63 45 1 Day 7 68 65 11 Day 3 Day 7 SU 100nM SU 500nM Regorafenib washout: reactivation of KIT, downstream pathways, and cell cycle GIST48/820 exon 11 + exon 17 Regorafenib treatment REGO 500nM Days of drug withdrawal pKIT Y703 pAKT S473 pRB S795 Cyclin A Actin Regorafenib washout: reactivation of KIT, downstream pathways, and cell cycle GIST48/820 exon 11 + exon 17 Regorafenib treatment REGO 500nM Days of drug withdrawal pKIT Y703 pAKT S473 pRB S795 Cyclin A Actin Regorafenib washout: reactivation of KIT, downstream pathways, and cell cycle GIST48/820 exon 11 + exon 17 Regorafenib treatment REGO 500nM Days of drug withdrawal pKIT Y703 pAKT S473 pRB S795 Cyclin A Actin Regorafenib washout: reactivation of proliferation GIST48/820 exon 11 + exon 17 Untreated Regorafenib treatment Day 0 KI-67 expression Day 1 Mitotic Count (per 5 mm2) UT 100nM 500nM Day 0 42 15 1 Day 1 44 13 0 Day 3 54 63 2 Day 7 35 42 15 Day 3 Day 7 REGO 100nM REGO 500nM Regorafenib washout: reactivation of proliferation GIST48/820 exon 11 + exon 17 Untreated Regorafenib treatment Day 0 KI-67 expression Day 1 Mitotic Count (per 5 mm2) UT 100nM 500nM Day 0 42 15 1 Day 1 44 13 0 Day 3 54 63 2 Day 7 35 42 15 Day 3 Day 7 REGO 100nM REGO 500nM Once a KIT inhibitor is withdrawn: Phosphorylation of KIT 2 days Phosphorylation of downstream signal intermediates (AKT and ERK) 4 days 7 days Increase of Cyclin A expression Increase of Ki-67 expression Mitotic activity Recovery of mitotic activity in GIST patients responding to TKI therapy after withdrawal of the KIT inhibitor PATIENT DRUG #DAYS after last TKI KIT MUTATION 2ND MUTATION Mitosis 1a SU 3 Exon 11 no 0 1b SU 3 Exon 11 Exon 13 (V654A) 0 2a REGO 9 Exon 11 Exon 17 (Y823D) 13 2b REGO 9 Exon 11 Exon 17 (D820Y) 7 Rapid alternation regimen 3 days SU 4 days REGO 3 days SU 4 days REGO Rapid alternation regimen might minimize toxic effects. Alternation of complementary drugs increases the spectrum of effective inhibition of IM-resistant clones. Conclusions 1. Sunitinib and regorafenib have complementary activity against secondary KIT mutations. 2. After withdrawal of an effective KIT inhibitor, target re-activation occurs in 1 to 3 days. 3. Proliferation markers are re-activated between 3 to 7 days, and mitotic activation is observed in vitro and in clinical correlates between 4 to 7 days. 4. These observations define a rational schedule for alternation of sunitinib and regorafenib in a heterogeneous GIST population that will be shortly tested in a Phase Ib clinical trial. Co-authors / Acknowledgments Brigham and Women’s Hospital Jonathan Fletcher Lab Jonathan A. Fletcher Grant Eilers Albert Ha Adrián Mariño-Enríquez Anna Quattrone Gloria Ravegnini Inga-Marie Schaefer Derrick Tao Yue-Xiang Wang Mei-Jun Zhu Pathology Department Christopher D.M. Fletcher Leona A. Doyle Jason Hornick Division of Surgical Oncology Chandrajit P. Raut Ludwig Center at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute George D. Demetri James E. Butrynski David R. D’Adamo Suzanne George Jeffrey A. Morgan Andrew J. Wagner Lerner Research Institute and Cleveland Clinic Anu Gupta Brian P. Rubin West German Cancer Center Sebastian Bauer Vall d’Hebron University Hospital Joan Carles Galcerán ASCO Young Investigator Award Spanish Society of Medical Oncology Translational Award Faculty from the 2013 Flims Workshop GIST Cancer Research Fund, The LifeRaft Group Virginia and Daniel K. Ludwig Trust for Cancer Research