Download Serum Antibodies in Ovarian Cancer

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Serum autoantibodies in ovarian cancer
Isabel K
1Oncimmune
1*
Macdonald ,Celine
1
Parsy-Kowalska ,
Jane
1
McElveen ,
1
Allen ,
Jared
Caroline
2
Chapman
& Andrea
1
Murray
Ltd, Nottingham, United Kingdom; 2 Division of Medical Sciences and Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Graduate Entry Medicine, Nottingham, UK
*Corresponding author; [email protected]
1. Ovarian Cancer
4. Methodology
 Patient Population:  225,000 new cases & 140,000 deaths per year worldwide
 Recombinant
Proteins:
 1-2% life time risk in developed world
 High risk groups?:
 Early Detection:
 Current Clinical
path:
 Tumour associated antigens
 Identified through literature review and scoring
 >50 years old
 Human cDNA sequences
 Family History
 Gibson cloned into vector (assay and His6 purification tags)
 Genetic risk groups e.g. BRCA1&2
 >70% present at late stage
 Recombinant proteins overexpressed in E.coli
 FPLC purification & characterisation
 >90% 5 year survival for Stage I&II
 ELISA:
 10-30% 5 year survival for Stage III&IV
 Symptomatic presentation, no screening programme
 5 point titration of antigen; captures sera autoantibodies
 Pilot Study I:
 NY-ESO-1, CAGE, p53, SOX2, GBU4-5 & Annexin I
 63 malignant Ovarian Cancer samples10
 High risk offered CA125 &/or HE4 on request
 Imaging for patients with abnormal Hx, exam or CA125/HE4:
 Diagnosis by surgery/removal of ovaries (6% mortality)
 68% early stage (I&II)
 Pilot Study II:
 22 antigens including NY-ESO-1, CAGE, p53 & SOX2
 78 malignant ovarian cancer sera samples10
 Disease monitoring following treatment (CA125/HE4)
 78 age matched healthy control sera samples
 68% early stage (I&II)
2. Autoantibodies
 Antibodies raised against ‘self’ proteins by host immune response:
5. Results
 Autoimmune disorders: abnormal immune response to normal protein
 Pilot Study I:
 Tumours: abnormal proteins detected
 Panel Sensitivity for ovarian Cancer of 33%
 Panel Specificity set at 90%
N y e s o - 1 B IR A : 5 0 ( c ir c le ) & 1 6 0 n M ( s o lid c ir c le )
Normal
cell
2 .0
Normal host protein
Tumour
Cell
Abnormal ‘tumour associated’
antigen
Tumour
genesis
O D @ 650nm
1 .5
Autoantibodies specific for TAA
 Produced early in tumour genesis prior to clinical symptoms
1 .0
0 .5
 Biological amplifiers :
 Increase the detectable signal for the corresponding tumour antigen
0 .0
 Absent or low concentrations in healthy & benign cohorts
 Stable unlike antigens which can degrade rapidly
 Half-lives ≤ 30 days
N
l
r
r
n
n
a
e
e
Ovarian
Benign
Healthy
g
g
i
i
c
c
n
n
rm
n
n
e
e
a
a
o
Cancer
B
.B
.cohort
.C
. Ncontrol . C
O
O
O
O
O
S
S cohortS
S
S cohort
E
E
E
E
E
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
E
S
O
.N
o
rm
a
l
N
Dot plots of ELISA signal for NY-ESO-1: separated by cohort
 Detection is minimally invasive and cost effective
A n t ig e n ( S a m p le G r o u p )
 Pilot Study II:  Confirmed pilot study I findings
 Identified additional markers with high sensitivities of 8-16% per
marker
3. EarlyCDT
 Diagnostic aid for lung cancer already in clinical use (EarlyCDT-Lung1-5)
 Autoantibody levels for a benign cohort (n=66) were comparable to
healthy control populations
 ELISA to measure a panel of 7 tumour associated serum autoantibodies
Substrate binding; colorimetric output
Enzyme (HRP)
6. Conclusions
Anti-human antibody
Patient sera autoantibody
Tumour associated antigen
ELISA plate
 Highly reproducible
 Both pilot studies strongly support previous findings suggesting autoantibodies are
suitable biomarkers for ovarian cancer
 Early stage disease detected
 Patients with benign tumours, like healthy patients, have low levels of autoantibodies
compared to those with malignant ovarian tumours
 A preliminary EarlyCDT-Ovary panel of 6 autoantibody assays was determined resulting
in a combined sensitivity of 41% and specificity of 93.6% for malignant ovarian cancer
 Detection up to 4 years before CT (current diagnosis pathway)
 Technically & clinically validated on numerous high risk case control cohorts6&7
 92% accuracy
 ~40% sensitivity & 93% specificity for all stage disease
 Launched 2012 & clinical performance as expected:
 >100,000 tests performed in US
 Diagnostic aid for high risk patients
 Patient stratification of nodules identified by CT8
 NHS prospective randomised controlled clinical screening trial ongoing (UK)9
 US health insurance companies reimburse use
7. Future perspectives
 Autoantibody panels can detect early stage ovarian cancer, distinguishing malignant from
benign disease with a very high specificity
 Research is ongoing at Oncimmune to identify additional autoantibody markers to
improve EarlyCDT-Ovary test performance
 Identifying suitable cohorts is a major obstacle to this work: several large independent
cohorts containing a high proportion of early stage disease are needed. Aggressive and
treatment resistant sub types must also be represented.
 Autoantibody panels have the potential to meet requirements for nationwide
screening programmes for ovarian cancer
References
1. Lam, S., et al. EarlyCDT-Lung: an immunobiomarker test as an aid to early detection of lung cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 4, 1126-1134 (2011); 2. Healey, G.F., et al. Signal stratification of autoantibody levels in serum samples and its application to the early detection of lung cancer. J Thorac Dis
5, 618-625 (2013); 3. Chapman, C.J., et al. EarlyCDT(R)-Lung test: improved clinical utility through additional autoantibody assays. Tumour Biol 33, 1319-1326 (2012); 4. Macdonald, I.K., et al. Application of a high throughput method of biomarker discovery to improvement of the EarlyCDT((R))Lung Test. PLoS One 7, e51002 (2012); 5. Boyle O, W.D., Khuu A, Jett J, Detterbeck F, Kennedy T, Miller D, Fritsche H, Wood W, Hamilton-Fairley G, Robertson J, Edelsberg J. An autoantibody test to aid in early detection of lung cancer in high-risk patients is likely to be cost-effective. in CHEST, Vol.
138 4 (2010). Tammemagi, C.M., et al. Lung cancer risk prediction: Prostate, Lung, Colorectal And Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial models and validation. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 103, 1058-1068 (2011); 6. Boyle, P., et al. Clinical validation of an autoantibody test for lung cancer. Ann
Oncol 22, 383-389 (2011); 7. Murray, A., et al. Technical validation of an autoantibody test for lung cancer. Ann Oncol 21, 1687-1693 (2010); 8. Massion, P. Biormarker-driven programs for lung cancer screening. in World Conference of Lung Cancer, Vol. 8 S6 (Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Sydney,
Australia, 2013); 9. Hume, C. Detection in Blood of Autoantibodies to Tumour Antigens as a Case-finding Method in Lung Cancer using the EarlyCDT-Lung test (ECLS). in ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US), Vol. 2014 (University of Dundee, 2014); 10. Clinical
Research Centre Cape Cod.
For more information: www.oncimmune.com or +44(0)1158231869