Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Effect of Fluorescein dye staining of the tear film on Scheimpflug measurements of central corneal thickness Oliver Findl 1 2 1,2, Nino Hirnschall 1,2, Alja Crnej 2 VIROS Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK Financial interest: none OF is scientific advisor to Alcon, AMO, Croma & Carl Zeiss Meditec AG Background • Fluorescein dye is commonly used in routine ophthalmic examination – staining epithelial defects of the cornea – break up time of the tear film – Goldmann applanation tonometry • Correct CCT measurement needed for: – corneal refractive surgery – diagnosis of corneal diseases (keratoconus) – to correct for systematic errors of IOP measurements using Goldmann applanation. CCT measurement devices • Pentacam: rotating Scheimpflug photographic – measures the thickness from the image, which is created from the back-scattered light from the corneal tissue => Influenced by fluorescein eye drops? • ACMaster: partial coherence interferometry (PCI) – gold standard for CCT measurement – measures distances between surface interfaces with a different refractive index Methods • Prospective randomised controlled study • 30 eyes of 15 patients (8 female, 7 male) Methods 3 x rotating Scheimpflug imaging + 3 x PCI measurement Instilling 0.25% fluorescein + 0.5% proxymetacaine hydrochloride Rotating Scheimpflug imaging + PCI measurement Rotating Scheimpflug imaging + PCI after 5min, 10min, 20min, 40min, 60min, (120min) Irrigation with 2ml BSS Rotating Scheimpflug imaging + PCI Without Fluorescein With Fluorescein Results Continuous measurement group CCTScheimpflug (SD) in µm CCTPCI (SD) in µm Baseline 539.1 (32.2) 519.0 (33.1) 1min 585.7 (29.7) 520.6 (33.2) 5min 570.1 (31.6) 519.7 (33.0) 10min 560.8 (35.0) 519.8 (32.8) 20min 550.1 (33.4) 520.0 (32.7) 40min (10 patients) 545.0 (33.8) 523.2 (38.7) Irrigation group CCTScheimpflug (SD) in µm CCTPCI (SD) in µm Baseline 536.5 (34.7) 519.4 (33.9) 1min 586.5 (44.3) 521.7 (33.8) After irrigating 561.7 (39.5) 520.7 (34.0) Rotating Scheimpflug: 46.6µm difference PCI: 1.6µm difference Results CCT difference (PCI) in µm 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 CCT difference (Scheimpflug) in µm 70 Results Number of patients (%) with a fluorescein layer +5µm compared to baseline Subjects with Fluorescein layer (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 time after applying Fluorescein (min) Fluorescein layer -> more than 5µm difference to the baseline measurement Results Schirmer 2 results (sec) 20 18 16 14 Pearson= 0.72 12 10 8 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 time after applying Fluorescein (min) 140 160 Conclusion • Scheimpflug imaging • Fluorescein dye causes intense back-scatter of light resulting in a measurement error • Irrigating the eye reduces this effect only insignificantly • PCI: is not influenced by altered or higher reflectivity => Fluorescein eye drops MUST NOT be used prior to Scheimpflug imaging measurements