Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
METAL BINDING TO MODIFIED BASES AND NUCLEOSIDES Iskra Muhamedagic North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University PRESENTATION OUTLINE • INTRODUCTION -tRNA and importance of metals in tRNA -Pharmacological/medical applications of modified nucleosides • METHODS -UV/VIS and Job’s plot method -LC/MS -1D/2D NMR -Restrained Molecular Dynamics of U-S4U-U oligonucleotide • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION -UV spectra, Job’s plots, and LC/MS data discussion -1D NMR of monomers -1D/2D NMR and RMD of U-S4U-U • CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK INTRODUCTION • tRNA is polynucleotide chain of 75 to 90 units long that folds • • into native L shape Most common modifications are S4U and S2U at positions 8 and 34, respectively S4U controls tRNA folding, S2U provides binding site for metal ions Bases and nucleosides modifications can take place in sugar or base C1’―N1 is b-glycosyl bond there are five metal binding sites S4 OH O P 5 6 - O 5' O Torsion Angle Atoms involved (n-1)O3’-P-O5’-C5’ b P-O5’-C5’-C4’ O5’-C5’-C4’-C3’ C5’-C4’-C3’-O3’ C4’-C3’-O3’-P C3’-O3’-P-O5’(n+1) O4’-C1’-N1-C2 0 C4’-O4’-C1’-C2’ 1 O4’-C1’-C2’-C3’ 2 C1’-C2’-C3’-C4’ 3 C2’-C3’-C4’-O4’ 4 C3’-C4’-O4’-C1’ 4 1 N 3NH 2 S4U O2 O 1' 4' O 2' 3' O OH NH nucleotide unit • • • • O P - O O O O S N S2U O O P - O OH OH Sugar puckering and base’s orientation • relative to sugar base can • adopt anti or syn orientation S2U puckers into C3’endo/anti form; S4U prefers C2’-endo/syn conformation 3E 3 2E 2T 3T 2 • sugar can pucker into anti syn C3’-endo or C2’-endo form with either twist or envelope conformation METHODS • UV/VIS (Ultraviolet/ Visible Spectroscopy) -absorbance was monitored in 200 – 400 nm range -for S2U and 2TU, lmax = 272 nm -for S4U and 4TU, lmax = 332 nm -binding stoichiometry was determined by modified Job’s plot • LC/MS (Liquid Chromatography/ Mass Spectroscopy) -1 mM solutions of ligands and mercury acetate were prepared in deionized H20 and in 50% H20/50% ACN -binding stoichiometry and charge is obtained from m/z ratio • NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) -NMR data (1D and 2D DQFCOSY and ROESY) were acquired on 500 MHz DRX spectrometer at 25°C at The School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut or at North Carolina State University, Department of Chemistry by Dr. Mufeed Basti Restrained Molecular Dynamics (RMD) of U-S4U-U -energy minimization and molecular dynamics was performed using Discover (Accelrys) -distance constraints generated from ROESY NMR data were used in molecular dynamics simulation -force constant: 1000 kcal mol-1 deg-2 at 298 K RESULTS AND DISCUSSION • UV spectra of ligands and complexes 0.90 0.70 0.50 2TU-Hg 10th step 2TU-Hg 15th step 0.30 0.10 Absorbance Absorbance 1.10 2TU 2TU-Hg 5th step -0.10 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 1.50 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.50 0.30 0.10 -0.10 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 Wavelength (nm) 0.90 0.70 0.50 S2U S2U-Hg 5th step S2U-Hg 10th step S2U-Hg 15th step 0.30 0.10 -0.10 Wavelength (nm) Absorbance Absorbance 1.10 4TU 4TU-Hg 5th step 4TU-Hg 10th step 4TU-Hg 15th step 1.70 1.50 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.50 0.30 0.10 -0.10 S4U S4U-Hg 5th step S4U-Hg 10th step S4U-Hg 15th step 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 Wavelength (nm) Wavelength (nm) 0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1.0 0.0 Hg-4TU Hg-S4U 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Aobs - (G x [g]) Aobs - (G x [g]) Job’s plots and Kequilibrium Hg-2TU Hg-S2U -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 [h]t/([h]t + [g]t) 3.0 2.3 1.5 0.8 K 0.0 -0.8 -1.5 -2.3 -3.0 [h]t/([h]t + [g]t) 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 K 0.000 -0.005 -0.010 -0.015 -0.020 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Titration step Titration step LC/MS data analysis S2U-Hg in H2O #26-45 RT: 0.65-1.14 AV: 20 NL: 3.50E5 T: + c ESI Full ms [ 100.00-2000.00] 457.0 100 95 90 85 455.0 80 75 70 Relative Abundance 65 60 454.1 55 50 45 40 35 453.1 30 459.0 25 20 464.1 15 10 5 471.2 447.1 430.7 0 430 434.2 436.5 435 440.2 442.7 445.3 440 445 448.1 461.1 451.3 450 455 460 465.1 465 m/z 469.3 470 472.4 476.0 478.8 481.0 475 480 486.2 488.3 485 490 492.0 493.5 495 1D NMR analysis of S2U and S4U H6 H1' H2' H5 H6 H3' H6 H2' 8.0 7.9 Chemical Shift (ppm) H2' S2U and S2U-Hg -C3’-endo -N3 involvement 6.00 5.75 4.25 Chemical Shift (ppm) Shift (ppm) Chemical H5' H5" H5' H5" H4' H1' H5 H3' H5" H4' H1' H5 H3' H5' H4' 4.00 3.75 Chemical Shift (ppm) 3.50 Proposed model for Hg-ligand complexes H O Hg N S N S N S N H N Hg H N O N O N O S H OH HO OH HO O O N HO N S N Hg S O S OH N N O HO N O HO O OH HO N O OH Hg O N S OH 1D NMR of U-S4U-U O U1 H H N HH HO H N O O H H H 7.5 HO P O O H 7.0 6.5 Chemical Shift (ppm) H H OH O 6.0 N H H N O O H H O H H OH H HO S H P O H 4.6 O H N O H H N O O H H H U3 H OH OH 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 Chemical Shift (ppm) 4.0 3.9 3.8 2D NMR of U-S4U-U U 1 H 4 '/ H 5 " U 1 H 4 '/ H 5 ' 3.8 3.9 U 3 4.0 H 4 '/ H 3 ' H 2 '/H 3 ' 4.1 4.2 4 4.3 U H 3 '/ H 2 ' 4.4 U 1 U 1 H 4 '/ H 3 ' 4.5 H 2 '/H 3 ' U S 1 4 H 2 '/ H U H 100 J1'2' %S J1'2' J 3'4' 1 ' 2 '/ H U H 2 '/ H 5.80 5.85 1 ' 3 4.6 ppm S ppm U 3 1 ' 5.90 5.95 4.50 4.25 4.00 ppm 3.75 7.65 S 4U H3'/H6 S4U H1'/H6 7.70 7.80 U1 H2'/H6 U1 H3'/H6 ppm 7.75 S 4 U H2'/H6 U3 H3'/H6 U3 H2'/H6 7.85 7.90 U3 H1'/H6 U1 H1'/H6 7.95 5.95 5.90 5.85 ppm 5.80 5.75 5.70 4.6 4.5 4.4 ppm 4.3 4.2 0.5 0.6 H 3 '/ P 1 S S 4 U 4 U H 5 " /P 1 0.7 H 5 '/ P 1 U 3 H 5 '/ P 2 0.8 U 3 H 5 " /P 2 0.9 1.0 1.1 S 4 U H 3 '/ P 2 1.2 4.50 4.25 ppm 4.00 p p m U 1 RMD and U-S4U-U -A-stacking of bases -observed equilibrium between C3’-endo/ C2’-endo and anti/syn CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK • UV/VIS in combination with the Job’s plot method • • can be used to calculate the binding constant and stoichiometry of binding of mercury to modified nucleosides and bases method is not suitable for zinc and cadmium complexes because of lower affinity of ligand to metal as well as the formation of multiple types of complexes future studies are directed towards finding effective ligands for zinc and cadmium metal ions THANK YOU My advisors Dr. Mufeed Basti and Robert Gdanitz Dr. Nadja Cech from UNC-Greensboro