Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Constantino S. Pena, MD: Low contrast volume abdominal CTA May 15, 2008- 3:20 PM Low Contrast Volume Abdominal CTA All Iodinated contrast media sold in the US are not approved for CTA by the FDA Constantino S. Peñ Peña, M.D. Interventional Radiologist Director of Vascular Imaging The Journey to MDCT • • • • • All Gadolinium contrast media sold in the US are not approved for MRA by the FDA MDCT technology has provided the coverage to allow development of CT Angiography Single helical scanners 1989 4-Slice scanners 1999 16 Slice scanners 2002 64 slice scanners 2004 256 slice/ 320 slice scanners 2008 Continuous patient motion in order to allow the imaging the ability to follow a contrast bolus through h h an iimaging i volume. • Allows more longitudinal coverage with each rotation • Slow pitch (multiple thinly collimated images) Post processing techniques allowed for the evaluation of the vessels in multiple projections. Ideal Imaging Time Contrast Optimization Patient’s Cardiac Output Rate of Injection Contrast Volume Enhan cement Iodine Concentration IODINE FLUX Stanford Radiology 10th Annual Multidetector CT Symposium Time 1 Constantino S. Pena, MD: Low contrast volume abdominal CTA May 15, 2008- 3:20 PM Abdominal CTA CTA is the study of choice to evaluate aortoiliac segments-- Inflow vessels segments Reliable and reproducible High spatial resolution Assessment of calcium and non calcified plaque Not directly visualized with ultrasound Indication for both occlusive disease and aneurysmal disease Why can we use less contrast? Have we used reduced contrast volumes before? Why Reduce Contrast Use? Decrease the risk of contrast induced nephropathy Higher CIN rates in patients receiving more than 100 mls of contrast Many patients receive a multiple contrast enhanced scans within several days of hospitalization Cost Faster scanning volumes Greater spatial and temporal resolution Better ability to follow the bolus (speed of scanner)) Ability to give a compact contrast bolusbolus- better injectors and injection protocols (CT PICC lines) Ability to follow bolus with saline YES Can we reduce the amount of contrast media injected without decreasing contrast enhancement? Gadolinium CTA (usually triple dosedose- < 60mls) Used routinely prior to NSF Used in patients with renal insufficiency unable to tolerate MR, those necessitating the spatial resolution of CT but unable to receive contrast (allergy or renal insufficiency) MDCTPA with Gadolinium Gadolinium Chelate; 3cc/sec;120kv Stanford Radiology 10th Annual Multidetector CT Symposium 60 pts; 16 detector scanner Iodine allergy and/or renal insufficiency 0.3 or 0.4 mmol/kg; at 6ml/sec dual phase Threshold triggering 50 HU 80--10080 100-120 kV Remy-Jardin, Behapar, et al. Radiology 2006; 238:1022-1035. 2 Constantino S. Pena, MD: Low contrast volume abdominal CTA May 15, 2008- 3:20 PM Patients Studied 45 patients (72 + 6 years) undergoing abdominal pelvic CTA 22 patients underwent 50 mls protocol 23 patients i underwent d 100mls 100 l protocoll 22 patients (10/12) had EVAR Methods All patients on same Philips Brilliance 64 CT scanner 18 gauge IV using multiphase injector R l time Real i b bolus l tracking ki triggering i i iin the h proximal aorta 22 patients (10/12) had EVAR Image quality Methods Contrast injected at 3.5mls/sec Saline flush at 3.5cc/sec for 30 cc Bolus trigger in the proximal aorta at 200 HU 6 second delay before scanning Pitch at 50 cccc- 0.89 with 0.75 sec rotation Pitch at 100cc 0.89 with a 1 sec rotation 0.625mm x 64 detector, 140 KvP, 400mA Image quality Reduced contrast dose 64-detector CTA in a 72-year-old male with a 55 mm AAA using 100 ml of contrast medium. Arterial attenuation: 201.5 Hounsfield units Stanford Radiology 10th Annual Multidetector CT Symposium 82-year-old female with a 48 mm abdominal aortic aneurysm using 50 ml of contrast medium. Arterial attenuation: 195.7 Hounsfield units 3 Constantino S. Pena, MD: Low contrast volume abdominal CTA Image Evaluations May 15, 2008- 3:20 PM 69 yo F AAA EvaluationEvaluation- 50mls Quantitatively via ROI in 8 locations Qualitatively using three reviewers No significant difference in attenuation between the groups What we do not know? 89 YO Diabetic S/P EVAR EVAR-- 50cc Will using 50 mls instead of 100mls limit CIN? Need large g number of patients p Standardize hydration and premedication Establish creatinine clearance 24, 48, 72 hours post What we do not know? Will using 50 mls instead of 100mls limit endoleak detection? Delayed Scan Stanford Radiology 10th Annual Multidetector CT Symposium 4 Constantino S. Pena, MD: Low contrast volume abdominal CTA Plenty for Future Study 54 year old female with HTN Lower voltage scanning May 15, 2008- 3:20 PM Increases contrast effect May increase noise S Spectral l CT scan Dual Energy Scanning Possibility of minimizing both contrast media use and radiation dose 54 year old female with HTN Conclusions 100 mls Chest to Ankle CTA Thank You • A 64-detector CTA protocols using low volumes of CM provides uniform attenuation and excellent visual depiction of the anatomical details in aortoiliac imaging. • A reduction in CM may offer improved imaging options in AAA patients with borderline renal function and renal insufficiency. • Further research is warranted to assess the ability of the low-volume CM protocol in depiction of endoleaks and prevention of contrast nephropathy. Stanford Radiology 10th Annual Multidetector CT Symposium 5