Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
OUTPUT SPS Table 1. Immunoexpression of ER A distribution, intensity and histoscore with grade of phyllodes tumor Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Missing Percent N Total Percent N Percent Distribution_ER_A * grade 62 100,0% 0 0,0% 62 100,0% Intensity__ER_A * grade 62 100,0% 0 0,0% 62 100,0% Distribution ER_A * Grade Crosstab Grade Benign Count 0-20% Expected Count % within Grade Count Distribution ER_A 20-50% Expected Count % within Grade Count >50% Expected Count % within Grade Count Total Expected Count % within Grade borederline df 1 4 9 5,8 1,6 1,6 9,0 10,0% 9,1% 36,4% 14,5% 1 0 2 3 1,9 ,5 ,5 3,0 2,5% 0,0% 18,2% 4,8% 35 10 5 50 32,3 8,9 8,9 50,0 87,5% 90,9% 45,5% 80,6% 40 11 11 62 40,0 11,0 11,0 62,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 11,500a 4 ,021 Likelihood Ratio 9,777 4 ,044 Linear-by-Linear Association 5,985 1 ,014 Pearson Chi-Square N of Valid Cases 62 a. 5 cells (55,6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,53. Malignant 4 Chi-Square Tests Value Total Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Errora Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,313 ,142 -2,555 ,013c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,295 ,139 -2,391 ,020c N of Valid Cases 62 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. NPar Tests Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Frequencies grade_1 Distribution_ER_A Intensity__ER_A N Benign 40 borederline-malignant 22 Total 62 Benign 40 borederline-malignant 22 Total 62 Test Statisticsa DistributionER_A Intensity__ER_A Absolute ,193 ,423 Positive ,000 ,000 Negative -,193 -,423 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z ,728 1,593 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,665 ,013 Most Extreme Differences a. Grouping Variable: kelompok_1 NPar Tests Intensity__ER_A * Grade Crosstab Grade Benign Count Weak Expected Count % within Grade Count Intensity_ER_A Moderate Expected Count % within Grade Count Strong Expected Count % within Grade Count Total Expected Count % within Grade borederline df 1 5 10 6,5 1,8 1,8 10,0 10,0% 9,1% 45,5% 16,1% 10 6 5 21 13,5 3,7 3,7 21,0 25,0% 54,5% 45,5% 33,9% 26 4 1 31 20,0 5,5 5,5 31,0 65,0% 36,4% 9,1% 50,0% 40 11 11 62 40,0 11,0 11,0 62,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 15,779a 4 ,003 Likelihood Ratio 15,661 4 ,004 Linear-by-Linear Association 12,584 1 ,000 Pearson Chi-Square N of Valid Cases 62 a. 4 cells (44,4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,77. Malignant 4 Chi-Square Tests Value Total Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Tb Asymp. Std. Approx. Sig. Errora Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,454 ,114 -3,949 ,000c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,441 ,112 -3,809 ,000c N of Valid Cases 62 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Grade Case Processing Summary Grade Cases Valid N Histoscore_ER_A Missing Percent N Total Percent N Percent Benign 40 100,0% 0 0,0% 40 100,0% borederline 11 100,0% 0 0,0% 11 100,0% Malignant 11 100,0% 0 0,0% 11 100,0% Descriptives Group Statistic 4,8000 Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 4,2063 Upper Bound 5,3937 5% Trimmed Mean 5,0000 Median 6,0000 Variance Benign 3,446 Std. Deviation 1,85638 Minimum ,00 Maximum 6,00 Range 6,00 Interquartile Range 2,00 Skewness Kurtosis Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean -1,489 1,170 4,0909 Lower Bound 2,8722 Upper Bound 5,3096 5% Trimmed Mean 4,1566 Median 4,0000 Variance Histoscore_ER_A borederline 1,81409 Minimum 1,00 Maximum 6,00 Range 5,00 Interquartile Range 4,00 Skewness Kurtosis Mean Malignant -,409 -1,075 2,3636 Lower Bound 1,0793 Upper Bound 3,6479 5% Trimmed Mean 2,2929 Median 2,0000 Variance Std. Deviation ,661 1,279 ,57640 3,655 1,91169 Minimum ,00 Maximum 6,00 Range 6,00 Interquartile Range 3,00 Skewness Kurtosis ,374 ,733 ,54697 3,291 Std. Deviation 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Std. Error ,29352 ,518 -,519 ,661 1,279 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnova Grade Statistic Histoscore_ER_A df Shapiro-Wilk Sig. Sig. ,366 40 ,000 ,678 40 ,000 borederline ,217 11 ,153 ,859 11 ,056 Malignant ,212 11 ,181 ,919 11 ,307 Kruskal-Wallis Test Ranks grade_1 N Mean Rank benign 40 36,29 borederline-malignant 22 22,80 Total 62 Test Statisticsa,b Histoscore_ER_A Chi-Square df Benign a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Histoscore_ER_A Statistic 9,144 df Asymp. Sig. a. Kruskal Wallis Test b. Grouping Variable: grade_1 1 ,002 Table 2 Immunoexpression of PR Distribution, Intensity and Histoscore with grade of phyllodes tumor Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Missing Percent N Total Percent N Percent DistributionPR * Grade 62 100,0% 0 0,0% 62 100,0% Intensity_PR * Grade 62 100,0% 0 0,0% 62 100,0% Distribution_PR * Grade Crosstab Grade Benign Count 0-20% Expected Count % within grade Count Distribution_PR 20-50% Expected Count % within grade Count >50% Expected Count % within grade Count Total Expected Count % within grade Total borederline Malignant 28 6 7 41 26,5 7,3 7,3 41,0 70,0% 54,5% 63,6% 66,1% 9 3 2 14 9,0 2,5 2,5 14,0 22,5% 27,3% 18,2% 22,6% 3 2 2 7 4,5 1,2 1,2 7,0 7,5% 18,2% 18,2% 11,3% 40 11 11 62 40,0 11,0 11,0 62,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2sided) Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association 1,960a 4 ,743 1,896 4 ,755 ,932 1 ,334 N of Valid Cases 62 a. 5 cells (55,6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,24. Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Errora Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,124 ,133 ,965 ,339c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,118 ,130 ,921 ,361c N of Valid Cases 62 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. NPar Tests Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Frequencies grade_1 Distribution_PR Intensity_PR N benign 40 borederline-malignant 22 Total 62 benign 40 borederline-malignant 22 Total 62 Test Statisticsa Distribution PR Intensity_PR Absolute ,109 ,025 Positive ,109 ,020 Negative ,000 -,025 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z ,411 ,094 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,996 1,000 Most Extreme Differences a. Grouping Variable: grade_1 Intensity_PR * Group Crosstab Grade Benign Count Weak Moderate 11 60 38,7 10,6 10,6 60,0 97,5% 90,9% 100,0% 96,8% Count 0 1 0 1 Expected Count ,6 ,2 ,2 1,0 0,0% 9,1% 0,0% 1,6% Count 1 0 0 1 Expected Count ,6 ,2 ,2 1,0 2,5% 0,0% 0,0% 1,6% 40 11 11 62 40,0 11,0 11,0 62,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Expected Count % within grade Count Total Expected Count % within grade Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2sided) Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases 5,239a 4 ,264 4,389 4 ,356 ,120 1 ,730 62 a. 6 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,18. Malignant 10 % within grade Strong Borederline 39 % within grade Intensitas_PR Total Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Tb Asymp. Std. Approx. Sig. Errora Interval by Interval Pearson's R Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,044 ,073 -,343 ,733c ,019 ,108 ,144 ,886c N of Valid Cases 62 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Grade Case Processing Summary Grade Cases Valid N Histoscore_PR Missing Percent N Total Percent N Percent Benign 40 100,0% 0 0,0% 40 100,0% borederline 11 100,0% 0 0,0% 11 100,0% Malignant 11 100,0% 0 0,0% 11 100,0% Descriptives Grade Statistic ,5000 Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Benign Lower Bound ,1603 Upper Bound ,8397 5% Trimmed Mean ,3333 Median ,0000 Variance 1,128 Std. Deviation 1,06217 Minimum ,00 Maximum 6,00 Range 6,00 Interquartile Range 1,00 Skewness Kurtosis Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean 3,851 18,548 ,8182 Lower Bound ,2311 Upper Bound 1,4053 5% Trimmed Mean 1,0000 Variance borederline ,764 Std. Deviation ,87386 Minimum ,00 Maximum 2,00 Range 2,00 Interquartile Range 2,00 Skewness Kurtosis Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Malignant ,409 -1,621 ,6364 Lower Bound ,0928 Upper Bound 1,1799 5% Trimmed Mean ,5960 Median ,0000 Variance Std. Deviation ,661 1,279 ,24393 ,655 ,80904 Minimum ,00 Maximum 2,00 Range 2,00 Interquartile Range 1,00 Skewness Kurtosis ,374 ,733 ,26348 ,7980 Median Histoscore_PR Std. Error ,16794 ,847 -,764 ,661 1,279 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnova Grade Statistic Histoscore_PR df Shapiro-Wilk Sig. df Sig. Benign ,356 40 ,000 ,501 40 ,000 borederline ,280 11 ,016 ,785 11 ,006 Malignant ,330 11 ,001 ,754 11 ,002 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction NPar Tests Kruskal-Wallis Test Ranks grade_1 Histoscore_PR Statistic N Mean Rank benign 40 29,24 borederline-malignant 22 35,61 Total 62 Test Statisticsa,b Histoscore_PR Chi-Square 2,360 df Asymp. Sig. a. Kruskal Wallis Test b. Grouping Variable: grade_1 1 ,125 Tabel 3. Perbandingan WNTS Distribusi, Intensitas dan Histoskor dengan Gradasi Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Distibusi_WNTS * kelompok_non Intensitas_WNTS * kelompok_non Missing Percent N Total Percent N Percent 62 100,0% 0 0,0% 62 100,0% 62 100,0% 0 0,0% 62 100,0% Distribusi_WNT5a Crosstab kelompok_non Benign Count 20-50% Expected Count % within kelompok_non Total Borederline Malignant 5 0 0 5 3,2 ,9 ,9 5,0 12,5% 0,0% 0,0% 8,1% 35 11 11 57 36,8 10,1 10,1 57,0 87,5% 100,0% 100,0% 91,9% 40 11 11 62 40,0 11,0 11,0 62,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Distibusi_WNT5a Count >50% Expected Count % within kelompok_non Count Total Expected Count % within kelompok_non Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 2,991a 2 ,224 Likelihood Ratio 4,621 2 ,099 Linear-by-Linear Association 2,511 1 ,113 Pearson Chi-Square N of Valid Cases 62 a. 3 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,89. Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Tb Asymp. Std. Approx. Sig. Errora Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,203 ,049 1,605 ,114c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,214 ,051 1,701 ,094c N of Valid Cases 62 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Intensitas_WNT5a Crosstab kelompok_non Benign Count lemah Expected Count % within kelompok_non Count Intensitas_WNT5a sedang Expected Count % within kelompok_non Count kuat Expected Count % within kelompok_non Count Total Expected Count % within kelompok_non Borederline df 0 0 3 1,9 ,5 ,5 3,0 7,5% 0,0% 0,0% 4,8% 7 0 1 8 5,2 1,4 1,4 8,0 17,5% 0,0% 9,1% 12,9% 30 11 10 51 32,9 9,0 9,0 51,0 75,0% 100,0% 90,9% 82,3% 40 11 11 62 40,0 11,0 11,0 62,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 4,625a 4 ,328 Likelihood Ratio 6,950 4 ,139 Linear-by-Linear Association 2,876 1 ,090 Pearson Chi-Square N of Valid Cases 62 a. 5 cells (55,6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,53. Malignant 3 Chi-Square Tests Value Total Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Errora Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,217 ,080 1,723 ,090c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,239 ,095 1,905 ,062c N of Valid Cases 62 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Frequencies Kelompok_2 Distibusi_WNT5a Intensitas_WNT5a N Benign 40 borederline-malignant 22 Total 62 Benign 40 borederline-malignant 22 Total 62 Test Statisticsa Distibusi_WNTS Intensitas_WNTS Absolute ,125 ,205 Positive ,125 ,205 Negative ,000 ,000 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z ,471 ,771 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,980 ,593 Most Extreme Differences a. Grouping Variable: Kelompok_2 Histoskor_WNTS is constant when kelompok_non = Borederline. It will be included in any boxplots produced but other output will be omitted. kelompok_non Cases Valid N Histoskor_WNT5a Missing Percent N Total Percent N Percent Benign 40 100,0% 0 0,0% 40 100,0% Borederline 11 100,0% 0 0,0% 11 100,0% Malignant 11 100,0% 0 0,0% 11 100,0% Descriptivesa kelompok_non Statistic Mean 5,1500 Lower 95% Confidence Interval for Bound Mean Upper Bound Benign 5,6649 5,3333 Median 6,0000 2,592 Std. Deviation Histoskor_WNT5a 1,61006 Minimum 1,00 Maximum 6,00 Range 5,00 Interquartile Range 1,50 Skewness Kurtosis Mean Lower 95% Confidence Interval for Bound Mean Upper Malignant Bound -1,653 ,374 1,248 ,733 5,8182 ,18182 5,4131 6,2233 5% Trimmed Mean 5,9091 Median 6,0000 Variance ,25457 4,6351 5% Trimmed Mean Variance Std. Error ,364 Std. Deviation ,60302 Minimum 4,00 Maximum 6,00 Range 2,00 Interquartile Range ,00 Skewness Kurtosis Tests of -3,317 ,661 11,000 1,279 Normalityb Kolmogorov-Smirnova kelompok_non Statistic df Shapiro-Wilk Sig. Statistic df Sig. Benign ,451 40 ,000 ,577 40 ,000 Malignant ,528 11 ,000 ,345 11 ,000 Histoskor_WNTS a. Lilliefors Significance Correction b. Histoskor_WNTS is constant when kelompok_non = Borederline. It has been omitted. Kruskal-Wallis Test Ranks Kelompok_2 Histoskor_WNT5a N Mean Rank Benign 40 29,18 borederline-malignant 22 35,73 Total 62 Test Statisticsa,b Histoskor_WNT5a Chi-Square 4,229 df Asymp. Sig. 1 ,040 a. Kruskal Wallis Test b. Grouping Variable: Kelompok_2 Tabel 4. Perbandingan HMGA Distribusi, Intensitas dan Histoskor dengan Gradasi Cases Valid N Missing Percent N Percent Total N Percent Distribusi_HMGA * kelompok_non Intensitas_HMGA * kelompok_non 62 100,0% 0 0,0% 62 100,0% 62 100,0% 0 0,0% 62 100,0% Distribusi_HMGA Crosstab kelompok_non Benign 20-50% Borederline Total Malignant Count 13 0 0 13 Expected Count 8,4 2,3 2,3 13,0 32,5% 0,0% 0,0% 21,0% 27 11 11 49 31,6 8,7 8,7 49,0 67,5% 100,0% 100,0% 79,0% 40 11 11 62 40,0 11,0 11,0 62,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% % within kelompok_non Distribusi_HMGA Count >50% Expected Count % within kelompok_non Count Total Expected Count % within kelompok_non Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9,047 a 2 ,011 Likelihood Ratio 13,231 2 ,001 7,593 1 ,006 Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases 62 a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,31. Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Errora Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,353 ,056 2,921 ,005c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,373 ,059 3,114 ,003c N of Valid Cases 62 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tes Frequencies Kelompok_2 Distribusi_HMGA Intensitas_HMGA N Benign 40 borederline-malignant 22 Total 62 Benign 40 borederline-malignant 22 Total 62 Test Statisticsa Most Extreme Differences Distribusi_HMGA Intensitas_HMGA Absolute ,325 ,339 Positive ,325 ,339 Negative ,000 ,000 1,224 1,276 ,100 ,077 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Kelompok_2 Intensitas_HMGA Crosstab kelompok_non Benign Borederline Malignant 7 1 0 8 5,2 1,4 1,4 8,0 17,5% 9,1% 0,0% 12,9% Count 12 2 0 14 Expected Count 9,0 2,5 2,5 14,0 Count lemah Intensitas_HMGA Total Expected Count % within kelompok_non sedang % within kelompok_non 30,0% 18,2% 0,0% 22,6% 21 8 11 40 25,8 7,1 7,1 40,0 52,5% 72,7% 100,0% 64,5% 40 11 11 62 40,0 11,0 11,0 62,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Count kuat Expected Count % within kelompok_non Count Expected Count Total % within kelompok_non 100,0 % Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2sided) Pearson Chi-Square 8,908a 4 ,063 Likelihood Ratio 12,420 4 ,014 7,413 1 ,006 Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases 62 a. 4 cells (44,4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,42. Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Errora Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,349 ,075 2,881 ,005c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,361 ,091 2,999 ,004c N of Valid Cases 62 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Warnings Histoskor_HMGA is constant when kelompok_non = Malignant. It will be included in any boxplots produced but other output will be omitted. Histoskor HMGA Case Processing Summary kelompok_non Cases Valid N Histoskor_HMGA Missing Percent N Total Percent N Percent Benign 40 100,0% 0 0,0% 40 100,0% Borederline 11 100,0% 0 0,0% 11 100,0% Malignant 11 100,0% 0 0,0% 11 100,0% Descriptivesa kelompok_non Statistic Std. Error Mean 4,0250 95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 3,3958 Mean Upper Bound 4,6542 5% Trimmed Mean 4,0833 Median 4,0000 Variance Benign ,31109 3,871 Std. Deviation 1,96752 Minimum 1,00 Maximum 6,00 Range 5,00 Interquartile Range 4,00 Skewness -,207 ,374 Kurtosis -1,688 ,733 Mean 5,2727 ,40656 Histoskor_HMGA Borederline 95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 4,3669 Mean Upper Bound 6,1786 5% Trimmed Mean 5,4141 Median 6,0000 Variance Std. Deviation 1,818 1,34840 Minimum 2,00 Maximum 6,00 Range 4,00 Interquartile Range 2,00 Skewness Kurtosis -1,800 ,661 2,611 1,279 a. Histoskor_HMGA is constant when kelompok_non = Malignant. It has been omitted. Tests of Normalityb kelompok_non Kolmogorov-Smirnova Statistic Df Shapiro-Wilk Sig. Statistic df Sig. Benign ,292 40 ,000 ,794 40 ,000 Borederline ,432 11 ,000 ,619 11 ,000 Histoskor_HMGA a. Lilliefors Significance Correction b. Histoskor_HMGA is constant when kelompok_non = Malignant. It has been omitted. Kruskal-Wallis Test Ranks Kelompok_2 Histoskor_HMGA 40 26,58 borederline-malignant 22 40,45 Total 62 Histoskor_HMGA df Asymp. Sig. Mean Rank Benign Test Statisticsa,b Chi-Square N 10,766 1 ,001 a. Kruskal Wallis Test b. Grouping Variable: Kelompok_2