Download AE1123 - Defra Science Search

Use of Continuous Plankton Recorder information in support of
marine management: applications in fisheries, environmental
protection, and in the study of ecosystem response to environmental
change.
K. M. Brander a,* , R. R. Dickson b , M. Edwards c
a
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Palaegade 2-4, Copenhagen, DK-1261,
Denmark
b The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield
Road, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, UK
c Sir Alister Hardy Foundation for Ocean Science, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1
2PB, UK
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 0045-33154225; fax: 0045-33934215
E-mail address: [email protected] (K.M. Brander)
Abstract
The Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) survey was conceived from the outset as a programme of applied
research, designed to assist the fishing industry. Its survival and continuing vigour after seventy years is a
testament to its utility, which has been achieved in spite of great changes in our understanding of the marine
environment and in our concerns over how to manage it. The CPR has been superseded in several respects by
other technologies such as acoustics and remote sensing, but it continues to provide unrivalled seasonal and
geographic information about a wide range of zooplankton and phytoplankton taxa. The value of this coverage
increases with time and provides the basis for placing recent observations into the context of long-term, largescale variability and thus suggesting what the causes are likely to be. Information from the CPR is used
extensively in judging environmental impacts and producing Quality Status Reports (QSR); it has shown the
distributions of fish stocks which had not previously been exploited; it has pointed to the extent of ungrazed
phytoplankton production in the North Atlantic, which was a vital element in establishing the importance of
carbon sequestration by phytoplankton.
The CPR continues to be the principal source of large-scale, long-term information about the plankton ecosystem
of the North Atlantic. It has recently provided extensive information about the biodiversity of the plankton and
about the distribution of introduced species. It serves as a valuable example for the design of future monitoring of
the marine environment and it has been essential to the design and implementation of most North Atlantic
plankton research.
Keywords: Continuous Plankton Reorder survey, climate change, marine management, fisheries change,
eutrophication, biodiversity and long-term
Contents
1. Introduction
2. The growth of understanding
3. Support for fisheries
4. The issue of eutrophication
1
D:\840950845.doc
5. Biodiversity and global change
6. The role of the CPR within biological oceanography
1. Introduction
In the summer and autumn of 1921 and spring of 1922, an advanced multidisciplinary study in fisheries
oceanography took place in the west-central North Sea. In three issues of the ICES Publications de Circonstance
(Nos. 78, 79 and 80), published together in 1923, we read of a curiously modern attempt by Hardy (1923),
Carruthers (1923) and Lumby (1923) to explain the relative failure of the English herring fishery in that year as
the joint effect of abnormal conditions in the plankton, currents and hydrography. In the end, the attempt was
almost bound to fail. As E.S. Russell notes in his Introduction to this paper:
“Conclusions as to the effects of hydrographic conditions in any one year can be drawn with complete confidence
only when the extent of their departure from normal conditions can be determined; and the period over which
regular observations have been made in the North Sea on a large scale is at present insufficient to furnish a
norm”.
The inadequacies of the data set on which the 25 year-old Hardy was compelled to depend on that occasion sparse tow-net hauls and no adequate baseline - do much to explain the applications for which the CPR was
subsequently conceived and justified. And the CPR was plainly an applications-led development, designed from
the start to provide improved scientific support for the fishing industry. First, in his earliest description of the
‘New Method of Plankton Research’, Hardy (1926) is concerned to resolve the highest time-space scales of
plankton variability (‘patchiness’) which were obscuring his view of larger-scale and longer-term variability:
“For a long time I have felt the need of an instrument which by giving a continuous record, ….would enable one
to study and compare the uniformity or irregularity of planktonic life in different areas, to measure the size,
varying internal density and frequency of patches and to indicate…whether any correlation exists between
different species”. Then, three years later, in his Civic Week lecture at the University College Hull, Hardy returns
once more to the original aim of his 1921 study - the provision of interpretative and predictive support for the
fishing
industry
on
the
scales
important
to
them
(Hardy,
1930):
“The experiment I want to make from this College consists of running a number of these instruments on definite
steamship routes across the North Sea…. When these charts are examined and the results compared with the
positions of herring shoals from year to year, we shall know whether or not we can forecast the position of the
fish from the distribution of the plankton…. These varying movements of fish must have a definite ascertainable
cause, and once ascertained, forecasting cannot be difficult”.
In seeking financial support from the Industry, Hardy was prudent enough not to promise results, yet confident
enough to suggest that “If it fails to yield useful results, it will not be science that has failed; it will be because
the experiment is not big enough, bold enough, for the problem concerned”. He got his money, though the
enthusiasm of the Hull Fishing Vessel Owners Association was expressed no bolder than £100 per year, with £50
from the Fishmongers’ Company.
By the time the first of the familiar ‘Hull Bulletins’ began to appear in 1939, his focus was firmly and
appropriately on the largest scales of variability, using the technique to develop a baseline against which
anomalies in plankton distribution and abundance might be recognised and explained.
“The similarity of the methods to those of meteorology has already been stressed: we are aiming at producing,
month by month, charts of the broad changes in the distribution of the more important plankton forms. It is then
our aim to correlate these changes with the fluctuations in the fisheries, both the drift-net herring fisheries and
the trawl fisheries, and also with hydrological and climatic changes. The correlation with the herring fisheries
was one of the first economic results that was expected from such a survey ”. (Hardy,1939, p6)
Hardy was clearly far ahead of his time in realising the significance of spatial differences in the kinds and
abundance of plankton and in devising the means to study them. As Platt and Stuart (1997) remind us:
“Until the advent of satellite remote sensing, the CPR provided the only means of collecting plankton data
at large spatial scales: it was the remote sensing of the day. Further, by recognising [from an overflight of
the English Channel from Plymouth to the western mackerel grounds in the early 1920s] that colour
differences in the ocean contained important biological information that could be surveyed rapidly with
aircraft … he became a true pioneer of remotely-sensed ocean-colour science”.
2
D:\840950845.doc
However, although enthusiasm, optimism and foresight can initiate concepts, they can rarely sustain them.
Duarte, Cebrian & Marba (1992) show that: “long-term monitoring programs are, paradoxically, among
the shortest projects in marine science: many are initiated but few survive a decade”. As Grove (1992)
concludes in his review of the ‘Origins of Western Environmentalism’, survival comes with utility: “If a
single lesson can be drawn from the early history of conservation, it is that states will act to prevent
environmental degradation only when their economic interests are shown to be directly threatened.
Philosophical ideas, indigenous knowledge and people and species are, unfortunately, not enough to
precipitate such decisions”.
The implication is clear: that to survive for seven decades, the CPR data set must have had some continuing
utility for marine resource management or policy. In the remainder of this chapter we aim to describe both
our increasing understanding of variability in the marine ecosystem with time as the CPR record has
lengthened and the changing preoccupations that have justified its continued survival. Four main
applications develop with time: the issues of Fisheries, Eutrophication, Biodiversity and Global Change.
2. The growth of understanding
It is increasingly difficult to fund long period measurements. The quotation above from Duarte et al. (1992)
still applies. One reason for this may be the mistaken perception of ‘diminishing returns’ from long-term
monitoring and it is worth making the case that there is in fact an increasingly valuable and complex
scientific return with time.
When the major papers based on the CPR record are classified by type and date (arrowed in Fig. 1), we find
that the elaboration of our understanding of the Atlantic plankton and its ecosystem grows steadily with
time. Initially, these papers provide description. Then the samples become adequate to contribute to the
systematics of the plankton; then successively to comment on variability at increasing time scales, from
seasonal change through seasonal dynamics to interannual change and lastly to ecosystem change, involving
a complex of variability across decades and trophic levels. Papers anticipating the planktonic signature of
global change have begun to appear. Thus, over seven decades, the value of the time series has grown in
terms of the breadth of understanding that we can mine from it.
It is as well that it is so. As Fig. 2 also shows, the management issues supported by these data have also
become more elaborate and complex with time as a range of actual or potential anthropogenic impacts begin
to affect our thinking. In each case, the requirement has been - in advance of their onset - to anticipate the
likely chain of responses that will arise through the marine environment and its ecosystem, to deploy
unambiguous and practical means of detecting these impacts, and to develop appropriate policies for
managing them. To develop such criteria and policies in ignorance of the ‘natural’ envelope of variability in
both the ecosystem and its environment is to risk implementing measures that are costly and do not work.
The longest time series give us access to the broadest spectrum of ocean variability. That, in short, is why a
70-year record of the planktonic ecosystem is of importance and why its value has increased with time. The
following sections are intended to illustrate this point.
3. Support for fisheries
Hardy's aim in setting up the CPR survey was to provide a service, similar to that provided by
meteorologists for the atmosphere, which would enable fishermen to locate their target species and
eventually have some predictive capability. He was a realist and he recognised that this would be a long
haul:
“It must take many years before we have enough knowledge of this changing plankton to establish what may
be considered the normal state of distribution for any one time of year; only when this has been done can we
see in which particular ways the different years have been abnormal. Not until then can we safely think of
trying to predict the effects of such changes on a fishery.”
3
D:\840950845.doc
The aim of providing fishermen with operational information from the CPR to locate target species and
improve their catches has not been realised in the way in which Hardy intended, or rather it has not been
attempted for several reasons. For one thing the time-lag between sampling by the CPR and the availability
of the information makes short-term application impossible. For another, new technologies, particularly
acoustics, proved to be highly effective for real-time location and tracking of herring shoals. These
techniques have made fishing operations for pelagic species, such as herring, so efficient, that there is far
more concern now about how to restrain catches than enhance them.
The CPR has however proved useful in locating significant fishery resources, e.g. blue whiting, which have
subsequently been explored and developed. The CPR showed the location of the blue whiting stock west of
the British Isles (Fig. 3) at a time when only Spain recorded any landings of blue whiting and these were
from areas south of 52oN (average 13,500 tonnes from 1958-1966). After 1967 the international fishery
increased to over one million tonnes in 1979-80 (average 465,400 tonnes from 1967-1998). Another
example is the redfish stocks in the Irminger Sea (Henderson, 1964b).
The utility of surveying plankton was based not only on what it was expected to reveal about the
distributions of zooplankton and their fish predators, but also on the insight it would give into the dynamics
of lower levels of the food chain leading to fish, with the expectation that changes in plankton production
must have consequences for the higher trophic levels. Hardy's investigations resulted in a very detailed and
complex food web for herring (Fig. 4) and now, with a sixty-year time series of variability in both the
herring stock and their major prey items, we can see remarkable correlations between them (Reid, Battle,
Batten & Brander, 2000). The rich detail of processes and interactions between all the components of the
food chain and the influence of physical and biological factors at many stages make it difficult to distinguish
between possible and actual causal relationships that give rise to the observed correlations between fish and
plankton. Even the basic question of whether correlations between predators and prey demonstrate topdown or bottom-up control cannot be resolved unequivocally (Reid et al., 2000) and both types of control
probably occur at different times and ecosystem states.
The CPR has provided immensely valuable information concerning the scale and nature of the processes
affecting fish stocks. One of the first attempts to analyse the large-scale impact of environmental change on
seasonal and interannual patterns of biological variability in the North Atlantic (Garrod & Colebrook, 1978)
concluded:
"Convincing as these are, the mechanisms of the link between climatic/hydrographic changes and their
biological effects has, in most cases, yet to be established. This paper does not come any closer to defining
such links but shows that similar variation in plankton and fish communities are contemporary and on a
geographic scale which suggests a common origin in pan-Atlantic environmental effects rather than in
strictly localized phenomena.”
Subsequent analysis of the spatial scales of variability in cod (e.g. Myers, Mertz & Barrowman, 1995)
confirms the importance of this work and many recent studies (e.g. Corten, 1998; Fogarty, Myers & Bowen,
2001; Ottersen, Plangue, Belgrano, Post, Reid & Stenseth, 2001; Brander in press) have confirmed the
conclusion concerning large-scale geographic pattern. We continue to study the processes and to develop
tools for making use of the information about large scale variability in relation to fisheries management.
CPR data have been applied in many specific studies of recruitment variability, with results which are
tantalising, encouraging, but so far incomplete. For example Cushing (1984) tested the match-mismatch
hypothesis on North Sea cod, using data on Calanus in the NE North Sea from the CPR survey to show both
the interannual variability in abundance and also in the timing of spring production. He obtained a
significant correlation between number of cod recruits and Calanus timing and abundance, but the
relationship did not hold up in a later analysis (Brander, 1992) using more years and more information on
Calanus. The relationship being modelled here may be fundamentally correct, but it depicts only a part of
the dynamics needed for adequate representation of Calanus variability. Other case studies have shown
both positive and negative relationships between zooplankton abundance from the CPR and recruitment of
cod, haddock and herring (Drinkwater, Frank & Petrie, 2000; Reid et al., 2000). Thus empirical analyses
and biological reasoning give us good grounds for expecting that the information from the CPR will become
useful in understanding and assessing variability in fish stocks, but it is not clear whether the utility will
derive mainly from the long-term, large-scale overview of ecological "regime shifts" which it provides, or
4
D:\840950845.doc
from direct operational application at short time scales for improved year-to-year forecasting (Brander, in
press).
Fisheries management has become more concerned about the impact of fishing on the marine ecosystem as a
whole and this is now articulated in the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and in numerous
Ministerial declarations about future fisheries policy. Turning this general concern into an operational
process, with measurable indicators, against which progress towards ecological objectives and compliance
with statutory instruments can be measured, is by no means simple. It is evident that plankton is a key part
of the marine ecosystem in this respect, since trophic calculations show that the fish removed by fisheries
consume a very significant proportion of the production of phytoplankton and zooplankton (Pauly &
Christensen, 1995) and that fisheries therefore have a major impact on plankton (Reid et al., 2000).
Quantifying this effect, providing observational evidence, evaluating whether the effects are deleterious and
designing procedures for mitigating such effects are in their infancy. Here the CPR has a special role to
play, not least because it provides a unique example of the problems and pay-offs which such a spatially,
temporally and taxonomically detailed time series gives rise to. The rationale, history and operation of the
CPR over 70 years provides many useful lessons for the design of any future monitoring which is intended
to provide ecosystem indicators.
4. The issue of eutrophication.
The early 1970s saw the beginning of a series of measures on either side of the Atlantic designed to detect then
check the potential eutrophication of coastal seas. In the US, the Clean Water Act has included such
responsibilities since 1972. In waters of the European Community, the health of our coastal seas has been
regulated through a series of Directives [Surface Water Directive (1975), Dangerous Substances Directive (1976),
Shellfish Waters Directive (1979), Urban Waste Water Directive (1991), and Nitrate Directive (1991)], many of
which assign responsibilities for the nutrient status of our seas, the nutrient inputs to these seas or the activities
and practices that give rise to them. From December 2003, a new Water Framework Directive will begin the
process of rationalising, modernising and in some cases replacing the existing regulatory structure. Yet the
common thread of assessing the nutrient balance and eutrophic status of our coastal waters will remain a
fundamental issue for the science and policy that underpin marine management. By the end of 2002, for example,
the eutrophication status of all parts of the OSPAR Maritime Area have to be established using the OSPAR
‘Common Procedure’. However as the QSR (OSPAR 2000) states “The situation concerning nutrients and
associated eutrophication effects is rather complex”.
Though the concept of eutrophication may seem clear enough, a consensus definition has proved elusive.
That adopted by the QSR of the 1987 Ministerial North Sea Conference might seem unexceptionable: “the
process of enrichment of sea water with nutrients, especially of nitrogen and phosphorus, leading to
increased production of phytoplankton.” Yet the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive of 1991 adds the
idea also that eutrophication must imply some undesirable change, thus making a clear distinction between a
cause - nutrient enrichment (not in itself an ecological problem) - an effect - increased plant growth - and a
consequence - some undesirable change in organisms or water quality. Much the same definition was
adopted by OSPAR in 1998.
Developing agreement on whether particular areas of shelf are actually or potentially eutrophic is of course
the vital point and in the absence of any direct measure, nations have differed as to which proxy criteria
might be appropriate to determine the issue. Possible criteria on the input side include increase in nutrient
inputs or increase in nutrient concentrations in coastal waters. On the uptake or effects side they include
exceptional algal blooms, oxygen deficiency, fish and shellfish kills, changes in macrophyte growth, scum
on beaches etc. However, although these considerations are not irrelevant to the problem, they (or any
similar mix) suffer two main defects. First they may arise from ‘natural’ as well as anthropogenic causes.
Second, even as proxies, their space-time resolution tends to be poor, weighted towards observations in
particular rivers or at isolated points around the ocean margin.
Thus we have a situation where (to quote Longhurst, Colebrook, Gulland, Le Brrasseur, Lorenzen & Smith,
1972) “Man’s chemical invasion of the ocean does, we believe, pose a real threat to marine life despite the
great volume of the oceans, despite their chemical buffering systems, and despite the probable elasticity of
5
D:\840950845.doc
their complex food webs”; where, accordingly, we have introduced a regulatory framework to guard against
the undesirable types of change in the marine ecosystem or its environment that fit our definition of
‘eutrophication’. Whereas the penalties for non-compliance are real enough e.g. the large cost of moving to
tertiary treatment (nutrient stripping) to restore normal water status under the Urban Waste Water Directive,
or the imposition of Good Agricultural Practice where nitrate-vulnerable zones are defined, but where, in the
changeable waters of our estuaries, coast and shelf, almost any of the defining criteria may have arisen
naturally.
In such a situation, if ambiguity and contention are not to be perpetuated, the need is as much for the long
time series that will resolve the natural space–time variability of the shelf and its ecosystem as for the
inventories and trends of anthropogenic inputs. Longhurst et al. (1972) reached this conclusion three
decades ago in their review of “The instability of ocean populations”: “This review demonstrates several
basic principles that have to be understood if man is to measure his influence on the ocean environment.
Perhaps most important, it is evident that the ocean is a restless and changing environment and that its
changes may either be sudden and dramatic, or covert and sustained for very long periods; it is also
obvious that, by their nature, these changes can only be revealed and measured by deliberately mounted
and well-sustained ocean monitoring operations. .…..there seems to be a real lack of understanding that
pollution monitoring schemes, in the ocean or elsewhere, can only succeed if the natural effects of the
changing physical environment are both understood and monitored continuously and indefinitely. Natural
fluctuations in animal populations have already been ascribed incorrectly to the effects of pollutants, and it
would be easy for a serious impact on the environment to pass unnoticed through ignorance of natural
population instability or a lack of monitoring….…..”
This quotation neatly explains the special nature of the CPR contribution to the eutrophication debate.
Though still a proxy and still a partial measure (limited, for example, in its fixed-depth coverage; myopic in
the near-shore zone; partial in not recording elements of the micro- and macro-plankton), the CPR data set is
nonetheless unique in its length of record, in its (largely) unchanging technique, in its monthly timeresolution, in its full ocean coverage, in the spatial resolution of that coverage (18.5 km of tow, but
traditionally aggregated into 1 x 2 rectangles on the shelf) and in its ecological scope (over 400 separate
planktonic species or entities recorded). The fact that the new Water Framework Directive will draw a
particular focus on the issue of ‘good ecological quality’ can only enhance the value of its contribution even
though this criterion will initially be restricted to the near-shore zone.
Once again it is worth stressing that the CPR data set cannot referee the eutrophication debate, but it can
most usefully help to tip a balance of probabilities. Two examples, one general, one more specific, will
illustrate these capabilities in action.
The first, one of the clearest and most useful conclusions from the entire CPR programme, was instrumental
in persuading UK Government Departments of the value of continuing to fund the Survey in the late 1980s,
when its existence was threatened. The result was a simple one, namely that a single long-term trend of
zooplankton abundance has affected all areas of the eastern Atlantic and European shelf since 1948, but it
represents the painstaking distillation by Mike Colebrook’s team, of thousands of route-miles of tow over 4
decades. This result is illustrated in Fig. 5 for a single band of latitudes from Rockall to the German Bight.
The full result is described by Colebrook (1986), is augmented with data on seabird abundance by
Colebrook (1989) and is the basis for the first description of parallel long-term trends across four trophic
levels by Aebischer, Coulson & Colebrook (1990).
Since this long-period change was found to be present, with variations, in all 12 CPR Standard Areas, this
was taken as a strong indication that the trend was real, not merely some artefact of the CPR method. Since
the common trend extended into the eastern Atlantic where no significant anthropogenic influence could be
claimed, its cause was accepted to be large-scale and natural, rather than simply a local factor, such as
increased nutrient input.
We continue today to use CPR data from the eastern Atlantic as an open-ocean benchmark or point-ofreference for plankton conditions in the inner shelf. Edwards, Reid & Planque (2001a), for example, report a
range of remarkable and widespread changes in the phytoplankton of the European shelf over the last decade
which at first sight would seem to offer clear evidence of eutrophication: a considerable increase in
phytoplankton biomass to 3-4 standard deviations above the long-term (1950-95) mean, from CPR ‘colour’
6
D:\840950845.doc
data; a change in the timing of primary production, with many species occurring one or two months earlier
than their normal seasonal cycle and a decrease in the ratio of diatoms to dinoflagellates.
However since “the exact same pattern and increase was also seen in oceanic waters to the west of the
British Isles” the conclusions are quite different: “that a strong overriding climatic signal is apparent in the
phytoplankton data recorded by the CPR survey, which is not only evident in regional areas of the northeast Atlantic but also in coastal areas of the North Sea. Even in restricted areas of the North Sea close to
the coastal zone, where adverse effects associated with elevated nutrient concentrations are believed to
occur, the over-riding long-term signal also appears to be climatic in origin….from the virtually identical
trends in phytoplankton biomass from all regional areas of the North Sea including the coastal zone of the
Danish coast and the German Bight”. On the basis of this analysis and these conclusions, they suggest it is
essential that natural hydro-climatic variability and wider Atlantic influences on regional seas are fully taken
into account when developing the criteria and methods to be applied to the OSPAR Common Procedure.
The above example relies on the comparison of changes at the largest scale between ocean and shelf. Valuable
insights into the eutrophication debate have also been derived from more localised and more specific comparisons
within an area of shelf, and this forms our second example. In 1987 –1988, the CPR recorded remarkable and
unprecedented changes in the summer plankton of the North Sea (Dickson, Colebrook & Svendsen, 1992). The
main change was an increase in the abundance of certain Ceratium spp (C. furca, C. fusus and C. tripos) by > +2
SD (Fig. 6). There was no obvious change in their time of production, but a parallel increase was observed in the
neritic copepods Acartia and Temora, and in the Cladocerans Evadne and Podon.
This change was of interest for two main reasons. First the Ceratia are dinoflagellates whose shape and relatively
large size (Fig. 7) allow them to be collected quantitatively by the CPR, unlike many of the smaller dinoflagellate
species. Although not toxic themselves, they are part of the same Order of plankton as many of the nuisance
bloom species that affect our waters, giving some expectation that their fluctuations might provide insight into the
causes of such blooms. Second, the unprecedented scale of the increase was itself of interest. There had already
been some speculation (e.g. Frank, Perry, Drinkwater & Lear, 1988) that ‘global warming’ in temperate and
subarctic waters would act to favour components of the summer plankton, particularly dinoflagellates, in view of
their strong preference or requirement for stable stratified conditions (explained by Dickson et al., 1992). And
since the time of their peak occurrence coincided with the summer minimum in inorganic nutrient concentrations
it was also suspected that this dramatic increase in the plankton might reflect the relief of nutrient-limited growth
through anthropogenic nutrient inputs, in other words, that it was a result of eutrophication.
Had our observations of this change been restricted to the near-shore margins of the German Bight where the
Ceratium increase was between three and four fold, this viewpoint might well have prevailed. However, when the
CPR data-set for the whole North Sea was examined to identify the site of maximum change, it was immediately
apparent that such a cause was unlikely. This analysis showed that the locus of maximum increase (17-fold
compared with the long-term mean) lay east of the Shetlands with a tongue of lesser increase running
southeastward into the German Bight (Fig. 8). As these authors conclude, “Plainly, although it is possible to
identify some components of the plankton which exhibit some increase further south, we are dealing with a
phenomenon of the northern North Sea, remote from the zone of maximum anthropogenic nutrient loadings along
the continental coast of the German Bight”. The role of eutrophication was discounted. Instead, the close
correspondence between the distributions of near-surface (0-30m) salinity anomaly and increased Ceratium
abundance across the Northern North Sea (Fig. 8) confirmed clearly enough that the cause was the reinforcement
of haline stratification in the summer of 1987, caused by the extreme westward spread of fresh water from the
Norwegian (and Jutland) coasts. The cladocerans showed a parallel increase because they eat Ceratium.
It is easy to overlook the features of the CPR data set that have contributed to this outcome. We have used its
length of record to define the norm and identify the amplitude of the change. Its species discrimination showed
which classes of plankton were affected and which were not, thus providing clues as to the types of environmental
change that were likely to be important. Its space-time discrimination defined the locus of change and provided
enough detail on distribution to match against hydrography. And finally, the CPR record showed a reversion to
normal Ceratium abundances in the northern North Sea during the following summer - the clearest confirmation
that this remarkable change was the local effect of short-term climatic ‘noise’, not the result of slow shifts in
global climate or regional contamination. Where these features are important to the eutrophication debate, the
CPR is still the only observing system capable of providing them.
7
D:\840950845.doc
5. Biodiversity and global change
In some instances, Hardy’s initial ideas and methods have been overtaken by events. The advent of satellite
remote sensing in the late 20th century, for example, has permitted the study of plankton patchiness on a
space and a time-scale inconceivable to Hardy. However, we have other examples in which the usefulness of
the CPR technique has expanded to meet actual or potential problems which did not exist in Hardy’s day.
One such problem is the warming caused by the increase in greenhouse gases. Plankton play a significant
role in this because they fix carbon, which may subsequently be transported into the deep ocean and remain
there for very long periods of time. The CPR provided the first spatially and temporally extensive pictures
of the timing of spring phytoplankton and zooplankton blooms in the North Atlantic and, on the basis of
these distributions, Colebrook (1979) suggested that phytoplankton were not fully grazed, resulting in "a
surplus of phytoplankton in the open ocean for most of the summer". This established the existence of a
large quantity of fixed carbon which might be exported down the water column.
A second problem is the threat to ‘biodiversity’ that seems an increasingly likely outcome of global change,
and which has prompted a number of attempts to find appropriate global solutions. A Convention on
Biodiversity was one of the main outcomes of the UN Conference on Environment and Development in Rio
de Janeiro in 1992, and a global initiative known as DIVERSITAS will include marine biodiversity as a
special target area, aimed at understanding how marine biodiversity is affected by the broadest range of
human impacts including fisheries operations, eutrophication, alteration of physical habitat, invasion of
exotic species, etc. The coastal marine environment seems particularly vulnerable to man's activities and has
become a priority issue in global ecology: at the beginning of the 21st century, 60% of the world’s
population was living in or dependent on the coastal zone, and this population and its impacts seem set to
increase rapidly.
While there are obvious socio-economic and perhaps ethical reasons for the protection of biodiversity, there
is also a growing body of legislation requiring compliance. These legal obligations stem from the global
Conventions on Biological Diversity and the Law of the Sea, regional conventions, such as those of the
Council of Europe or the Directives of the European Union, and national laws regulating fisheries and
nature conservation. Of particular relevance to marine biodiversity in European shelf seas is the so-called
‘Habitats Directive’ for the conservation of natural habitats and wild fauna, which inter alia, requires
member states to ‘monitor biodiversity’ and ‘promote the maintenance of biodiversity’ as a means of
assessing the health of ecosystems, and particularly with identifying habitat degradation caused by Man’s
activities. In providing information on around 450 taxonomic entities of zooplankton and phytoplankton
over many decades, the CPR is the only survey capable of defining the baseline for the planktonic ecosystem
and thus of providing a monitor of changes in regional planktonic diversity in both the open ocean and the
shelf. Thus, although Hardy can scarcely have conceived of this particular application, it is unsurprising that
the CPR survey was identified as a ‘major biodiversity monitoring programme’ in EU/EEA (European
Environment Agency) member states (Warwick, Goni & Heip, 1996).
The utility of the CPR data-set has thus evolved in line with current environmental concerns from a
fisheries and biological oceanographic perspective to a wider ecological one. Present evidence is that
planktonic populations respond extremely sensitively and quickly to ocean variability (Roemmich &
McGowan, 1995). The temperature tolerance range of many species may also delimit the geographical
distribution of a species, with populations shifting latitudinally in response to shifting climatic zones. Some
points of detail may be guessed. Since components of the plankton, especially copepods, are more diverse
further south, a warming ocean may lead to an increase in plankton diversity in temperate waters. The CPR
has already identified both a rapid rise in the incidence of sub-tropical plankton species in the North Sea
over the last decade and a strong biogeographic shift in all copepod assemblages, with a northward
extension by more than 10 in the latitude of warm-water species, associated with a decrease in the number
of colder-water species. These biogeographical shifts in plankton diversity are correlated with Northern
Hemisphere temperature, suggesting that global warming may be causally involved (Beaugrand, Reid,
Ibanez, Lindley & Edwards, 2002). Phenological changes are also evident in the CPR data, with some
species reaching their seasonal peak up to two months earlier in the 1990s compared to the long-term
seasonal mean (unpublished data). Changes in biodiversity, physiology, phenology and geographic
distributions of plankton will inevitably alter competitive interactions between species and trophic levels
8
D:\840950845.doc
and may radically alter food-web structures, carbon fluxes and nutrient recycling processes, but these
interactive and emergent properties are too complex to predict.
The trans-ocean transfer of nuisance species in ship's ballast water is a particular and extreme example of a
change in planktonic biodiversity due to Man’s activities. As Showstack (2001) reports: “The IMO
estimates that 10 billion tonnes of ballast water are transferred globally each year, and that 3000 species of
animals and plants may be transferred daily around the world. Among the suspected hitchhikers are toxic
dinoflagellates that have threatened shellfish farming in Australia, the American comb jelly that helped in
the collapse of the Black Sea anchovy fishing industry and the tropical green alga Caulerpa taxifolia that is
replacing native sea grasses in the Mediterranean. With faster ships, more trade agreements, and more
shipping, problems associated with ballast water could worsen unless the situation is addressed.” The US
National Invasive Species Act of 1996 is due for re-authorisation in 2002 by Congress, but in advance of
national or international agreement, California, Hawaii, Maryland, Virginia and Washington have already
moved to enact ballast regulations to protect their own waters.
Each such introduction is unpredictable. However, CPR data has provided a unique case-history of an
invasive plankton species (Coscinodiscus wailesii), from its initial introduction into European shelf seas
through its subsequent geographical spread over the period of a decade, to its persistence as a significant
member of the plankton community (Fig. 9, from Edwards, John, Johns & Reid, 2001b). This analysis
suggests that measuring the pattern and rate-of-spread of non-indigenous species in the marine environment
is essential if we are to establish the effectiveness of any management strategy that we may deploy to limit
such invasions. Analysing the effect of invasive species on the marine biodiversity of European shelf seas
will therefore remain a part of ongoing CPR research.
Recent marine management strategies have stressed the importance of an integrated 'ecosystem approach' to the
management of marine resources and with it an assessment of the ecological 'health' of the regional system under
management (Sherman & Duda, 1999). Though the assessment of patchiness by the CPR survey may have been
superseded by satellite imagery (see earlier), the assessment of ecological health requires data on the plankton
community which cannot be assessed remotely. Accordingly, one of the primary parameters for assessing
ecological health is suggested to be the system's biodiversity (Sherman et al., 1999). With the collection of over
70 years of community data by the CPR survey, it is now in a position to act as a baseline for changes in marine
biodiversity, to monitor the marine response to climate forcing and its extension into global change, and to
provide managers with an index for the assessment of the general health of European regional seas.
If global change proceeds at anything like the projected rate during the 21 st century, it seems likely that the CPR
survey will continue to encounter and report evidence of rapid and radical changes in planktonic populations and
in the plankton community. Without such programmes, we will simply have no knowledge of change in
ecological health over large areas of the ocean and hence no means of assessing the appropriateness, or
effectiveness, of measures designed to protect the marine ecosystem from anthropogenic impacts.
6. The role of the CPR within biological oceanography
Although this paper is primarily about the utility of the CPR in relation to issues of marine management, one
should not exclude the part which it has played and continues to play in the development of science and more
specifically in biological oceanography. The utility may be indirect in this case, but the CPR has undoubtedly
helped to strengthen and focus the application of marine science to the wider concerns of society.
Results from the recently completed Trans-Atlantic Study of Calanus (TASC) are an example of the application
of CPR information. The first paper in the TASC Symposium volume on Population Dynamics of Calanus in the
North Atlantic, by Planque & Batten (2000) provides the long-term large-scale context, within which the more
detailed, short-term studies making up the bulk of the programme results can be framed. They show that the
abundance of Calanus finmarchicus has declined and by 1997, which had been designated the "year of Calanus"
and in which much of the research took place, it was at the lowest level in the forty-year record for the NE
Atlantic. Many of the papers in the Symposium volume use information from the CPR and most refer to results
from it. The national and regional research programmes, which follow on from the TASC programme, have
relied heavily on CPR information for their geographic coverage and sampling design. Without this background
information there would have been large (probably infeasible) additional survey costs for the field programmes,
9
D:\840950845.doc
just to establish the basic seasonal and geographic distributions and even then there would be no knowledge of
how these compared with other years.
Reliance on the CPR to provide the geographic and seasonal frame for plankton populations throughout much of
the North Atlantic is almost taken for granted. It would be unthinkable to produce reports on the status and
changes in the marine environment, such as the Quality Status Reports, without including CPR information,
where it is available. The danger in being taken for granted is that it is often accompanied by the assumption that
no effort is needed for the activity to continue. The history, current operation and funding of the CPR shows how
far this is from reality and that even successful monitoring programmes such as this can quickly come to a halt
unless individuals and teams are prepared to make extraordinary efforts to keep them going.
There is growing awareness of the need for informed, timely and appropriate adjustment of many aspects of
human activity in relation to our natural environment. A prerequisite for such action is awareness of the
variability which natural systems undergo and some understanding of their interrelationships and responses to
change. This does not come quickly and a long, consistent, uninterrupted time series is of great value,
particularly when it is taxonomically as detailed as the CPR. The future of the CPR must be considered in the
context of other marine monitoring and ‘operational oceanography’ - it must be a sustained, temporally openended commitment, which is not immune from change and improvement, provided that comparison across the
whole of the time span is maintained. There can be little doubt that Alister Hardy would applaud this aim, since
it follows the goals which he set in establishing the survey seventy years ago.
In 1956 he wrote: “No doubt before long the old recorder will be obsolete, as it is superseded by a new
invention.” We must honour his commitment to technological progress, while preserving the continuity of the
remarkable time series which he established.
References
Aebischer, N. J., Coulson, J. C., & Colebrook, J. M. (1990). Parallel long-term trends across four marine trophic
levels and weather. Nature, 347, 753-755.
Beaugrand, G., Reid, P.C., Ibanez, F., Lindley, A.J., & Edwards, M. (2002). Reorganization of North
Atlantic Marine Copepod Biodiversity and Climate. Science 296, 1692-1694.
Brander K.M. (1992). A re-examination of the relationship between cod recruitment and Calanus
finmarchicus in the North Sea. ICES Marine Science Symposia, 195, 393-401.
Brander K.M. (in press) What kinds of fish stock predictions do we need and what kinds of information will
help us to make better predictions? Scientia Marina.
Carruthers, J. N. (1923). Investigations of non-tidal water movements north of the Dogger in October 1921.
ICES Publ. de Circ. 79, 11-17.
Colebrook, J.M. (1979). Continuous Plankton Records: Seasonal Cycles of Phytoplankton and Copepods in
the North Atlantic Ocean and the North Sea. Marine Biology, 51, 23-32.
Colebrook, J.M. (1986). Environmental influences on long-term variability in marine plankton.
Hydrobiologia, 142, 309-325.
Colebrook, J.M. (1989). Continuous plankton records: from seasons to decades in the plankton of the northeast Atlantic. In: T. Kawasaki, S. Tanaka. Y. Toba & A Tanaguchi, Long-term Variability of Pelagic Fish
Populations and their Environments. (pp 29-45). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Corten, A. (1998). Evidence from plankton for multi-annual variations of Atlantic inflow in the northwestern
North Sea. Journal of Sea Research, 42, 191-205.
10
D:\840950845.doc
Cushing, D. H. (1984). The gadoid outburst in the North Sea. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration
de la Mer. 41, 159-166.
Dickson, R.R., Colebrook, J. M., & Svendsen, E. (1992). Recent changes in the Summer Plankton of the North
Sea. ICES Marine Science Symposium. 195, 232-242.
Dickson, R.R. (1995). The Natural History of Time-series. In: T.M. Powell & J. H. Steele, Ecological TimeSeries (pp 70-98). New York: Chapman and Hall.
Drinkwater, K.F., Frank, K.T., & Petrie, B. (2000). The Effects of Calanus on the Recruitment, Survival and
Condition of Cod and Haddock on the Scotian Shelf. ICES CM 2000, 7, 18pp.
Duarte, C. M., Cebrian, J., & Marba, N. (1992). Uncertainty of detecting sea change. Nature, 356, 190.
Edwards, M., Reid, P.C., & Planque, B. (2001a). Long-term and regional variability of phytoplankton
biomass in the northeast Atlantic, 1960-95. ICES Jounal of Marine Science, 58, 39-49.
Edwards, M., John, A.W.G., Johns, D.G., & Reid, P.C. (2001b). Case-history and persistence of the nonindigenous diatom Coscinodiscus wailesii in the north-east Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological
Association of the United Kingdom, 81, 207-211.
Fogarty, M. J., Myers, R. A., & Bowen, K.G. (2001). Recruitment of cod and haddock in the North Atlantic:
a comparative analysis. ICES Journal of Marine Science 58, 952-961.
Frank, K.T., Perry, R. I., Drinkwater, K. F., & Lear, W. H. (1988). Changes in the fisheries of Atlantic
Canada associated with global increases of carbon dioxide: a preliminary report. Canadian Technical Report
for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1652, 51 pp.
Garrod, D.J., & Colebrook, J.M. (1978). Biological Effects of variability in the North Atlantic Ocean. Rapp.P.-v.
Reun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 173, 128-144.
Grove, R.H. (1992). Origins of Western Environmentalism. Scientific America, 267, 42-47.
Hardy, A.C. (1923). Notes on the Atlantic plankton taken off the east coast of England in 1921 and 1922. ICES
Publ. de Circ, 78, pp 5-10.
Hardy, A.C. (1924). The herring in relation to its animate environment. Part 1. The food and feeding habits of the
herring with special reference to the east coast of England. Fishery Investigations Service II VII, 3, 53pp.
Hardy, A.C. (1926). A new method of plankton research. Appendix 2 In S.Kemp: The Discovery Expedition,
Nature, 118, 630-632.
Hardy, A.C. (1930). Science and the fishing industry. (pp28). Hull: Brown and Sons.
Hardy, A. C. (1939). Ecological investigations with the Continuous Plankton Recorder: summary list of records,
1932-1937. Hull Bulletins of Marine Ecology, 2, 1-18.
Hardy, A. C. (1956). The Open Sea-Its Natural History, The World of Plankton. London: New Naturalist, Collins.
Henderson, G. T. D. (1964a). Young Stages of Blue Whiting over Deep Water West of the British Isles. ICES
Annales Biologiques XIX, 59-61.
Henderson, G .T .D. (1964b). Identity of larval redfish populations in the north Atlantic. Nature, 201, 419.
Longhurst A., Colebrook, M., Gulland, J., Le Brasseur, R., Lorenzen, C., & Smith, P. (1972). The instability of
ocean populations. New Scientist, (1 June), 500-502.
11
D:\840950845.doc
Lumby, J. R. (1923). The salinity and temperature of the southern North Sea and English Channel during the
period 1920-21. ICES Publ. de Circ., 80, 18-31.
Myers, R.A., Mertz, G., & Barrowman, N. J. (1995). Spatial scales of variability in cod recruitment in the
North Atlantic. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 52, 1849-1862.
Ottersen, G., Planque, B., Belgrano, A., Post, E., Reid, P.C., & Stenseth, N. (2001). Ecological effects of the
North Atlantic Oscillation. Oceanologia, 128, 1-14.
Pauly, D., & Christensen, V. (1995). Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature, 374,
255-257.
Planque, B. & Batten, S.D. (2000). Calanus finmarchicus in the North Atlantic: the year of Calanus in the
context of interdecadal change. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57, 1528-1535.
Platt, T. & Stuart, V. (1997). Sir Alister Hardy: an ocean colour pioneer. Backscatter. Feb 1997, published
by the Alliance of Marine Remote Sensing.
Reid, P.C., Battle, E.J.V., Batten, S.D., & Brander, K.M. (2000). Impacts of fisheries on plankton
community structure. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57, 495-502.
Roemmich, D., & McGowan, J. (1995). Climate warming and the decline of zooplankton in the Californian
current. Science, 267, 1324-1326.
Sherman, K., & Duda, A.M. (1999). An ecosystem approach to global assessment and management of
coastal waters. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 190, 271-287.
Showstack, R. (2001). Efforts afoot to stem the flow of invasive species from ballast water. EOS 82, (29),
318.
Warwick, R., Goni, R., & Heip, C. (1996). An inventory of marine biodiversity research projects in EU/EEA
member states. Report of the Plymouth Workshop on Marine Biodivesity, Plymouth, U.K. pp93.
12
D:\840950845.doc
7. List of Figures
Figure 1: Types of scientific understanding dealt with by papers written about the CPR. Based on the postwar bibliography by Dickson (1995).
Figure 2: Management issues become more complex.
Figure 3: Average distribution of early life stages of blue whiting Micromesistius poutassou March - May
1948-1962. Dots indicate absence; crosses are numbers up to 0.1m-3; circles are numbers up to 0.3, 1.0 and
over 1.0m-3 successively. From Henderson (1964a).
Figure 4: The food web of herring. From Hardy (1924).
Figure 5: Long term trends in plankton from 1950 to 1985 for the areas outlined in bold. From Colebrook
(1986).
Figure 6: Seasonal cycles and trends in abundance (1958-1988) of three species of Ceratium in the North
Sea. From Dickson et al. (1992).
Figure 7: Line drawing of Ceratium tripos.
Figure 8 Anomaly in abundance of Ceratium spp. (heavy lines) as a multiple of the long term mean and
near-surface (0-30m) salinity-anomaly (light lines and shading). From Dickson et al (1992), their Figure 4a.
Figure 9: Distribution of Coscinodiscus wailesii. From Edwards et al. (2001b).
13
D:\840950845.doc
14
D:\840950845.doc
15
D:\840950845.doc
16
D:\840950845.doc
17
D:\840950845.doc
18
D:\840950845.doc
62
60
20
0m
58
56
54
52
50
48
-15
0.00
-10
0.25
0.50
0.75
-5
1.00
1.25
1.50
0
1.75
2.00
Log abundance
19
D:\840950845.doc
5
10