Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Learned Helplessness Learned helplessness is a perceived absence of control over the outcome due to previous experiences which have felt inescapable. 1. Learned Helplessness: A perceived loss of control can lead to despair and hopelessness. In a now famous study, Martin Seligman and his colleagues discovered that when dogs were put in cages and shocked randomly without being able to escape the shocks, these dogs soon learned to be helpless and exhibited symptoms similar to chronic clinical depression. However, not all of the dogs in Seligman's experiments became helpless. About one-third seemed to cope positively despite their past experience with inescapable shock. The corresponding characteristic in humans has been found to correlate highly with optimism. With regard to psychological disorder, learned helplessness theory is the view that clinical depression and related mental illnesses may result from a perceived absence of control over the outcome of a situation. The condition of a human or animal that has learned to behave helplessly, failing to respond even though there are opportunities for it to help itself by avoiding unpleasant circumstances or by gaining positive rewards. Learned helplessness is a condition in which an individual has learned to behave helplessly when circumstances become limiting to the individual's goals. This behavior persisits even when the opportunity is restored for them to help themselves by avoiding an unpleasant or harmful circumstance to which he has been subjected. With regard to psychological disorder, learned helplessness theory is the view that clinical depression and related mental illnesses may result from a perceived absence of control over the outcome of a situation. In a classic animal experiment by Martin Seligman and his colleagues, the reseachers put three groups of dogs in harnesses. Group one dogs were simply put in the harnesses for a period of time and later released. Groups two and three consisted of "yoked pairs." A dog in group two would be intentionally subjected to pain by being given electric shocks, which the dog could end by pressing a lever. A group three dog was wired in parallel with a group two dog, receiving shocks of identical intensity and duration, but his lever didn't stop the electric shocks. To a dog in group three, it seemed that the shock ended at random, because it was his paired dog in group two that was causing it to stop. For group three dogs, the shock was apparently "inescapable." Group one and group two dogs quickly recovered from the experience, but group three dogs learned to be helpless, and exhibited symptoms similar to chronic clinical depression. In the second part of the Seligman and Maier experiment, these three groups of dogs were tested in a shuttle-box apparatus, in which the dogs could escape electric shocks by jumping over a low partition. For the most part, the group three dogs, who had previously learned that nothing they did had any effect on the shocks, simply lay down passively and whined. Even though they could have easily escaped the shocks, the dogs didn't try. However, not all of the dogs in Seligman's experiments became helpless. Of the roughly 150 dogs in experiments in the latter half of the 1960s, about one-third did not become helpless, but instead managed to find a way out of the unpleasant situation despite their past experience with it. The corresponding characteristic in humans has been found to correlate highly with optimism: an explanatory style that views the situation as other than personal, pervasive, or permanent. This distinction between people who adapt and those who break down under long-term psychological pressure was also studied in the 1950s in the context of brainwashing.