Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Sea Level Station Monitoring Facility: examine the performance and delay of 430 tsunami warning stations Vanhoorne Bart1, Hernandez Francisco1 Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ) Belgium - Wandelaarkaai 7 – 8400 Ostend – Belgium – [email protected] 1 Keywords: real-time, satellite, network, sea-level, tsunami, Global Telecommunication System (GTS) The Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) together with the Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ) is hosting and developing a public accessible website (http://www.ioc-sealevelmonitoring.org/) that brings together more than 430 sea-level stations globally. The objective of the website is: to provide information about the operational status of global and regional networks of real-time sea level stations to provide a display service for quick inspection of the raw data stream from individual stations A sea-level station consist of one or more of sensors (pressure, radar …) that are housed near the coast or on a buoy. The sensors are measuring the sea-level on a fixed interval varying from a second to several minutes or hours. The frequency depends on various parameters like tsunami risk, power consumption, satellite cover, …. While measuring, the station transmits the data in real-time to a satellite. The Global Telecommunication System (GTS) After the data has been transmitted to a satellite, a ground station picks up the data and distributes the data through the GTS. The GTS is a global network for the transmission of meteorological data from weather stations, satellites and numerical weather prediction centers connected via various point-to-point, point-to-multipoint and multipoint-to-point circuits. The circuits are composed of a combination of terrestrial and satellite telecommunication links. Meteorological Telecommunication Centers are responsible for receiving data and relaying it selectively on GTS circuits. The use of satellites is preferred above other communication channels like the internet or cell phone networks, since they may be slow, congested or down. Also, sea-level stations are often located in very remote places where no other option then satellite is available. The Sea level Station Monitoring Facility website is one of the many receivers in the GTS network. The facility decodes and displays the data (which consists different messages) on the website in a user-friendly way. Graphs, performance and delay are generated on the fly. Very recently, the Sea level Station Monitoring Facility also became a supplier of data towards the GTS system. A number of stations are now equipped with a BGAN (Broadband Global Area Network) terminal. They are connected directly on the internet via satellite (i.e. they have an unique IP address) and they transmit their data to the Sea Level Facility via a web service (HTTP POST). The data is displayed immediately on the website and the delay is close to 0 seconds, since the database insert is triggered by an HTTP request and not based on a polling system. At the same time the data is put onto the GTS. Performance and delay For various reasons messages can get lost or corrupted. For this, the performance of each station is calculated. The performance is the ratio between the number of messages expected divided by the number of messages arrived. There is usually a delay between the data being sent by the sea level station itself, and the data being received by the Sea Level Monitoring Facility. The goal is of course to minimize this delay by looking at the different parameters and communication channels in the network. For doing this, a local database that holds the metadata of these stations is of course crucial. By allowing any station operator to update his station parameters, we can ensure that no erroneous delay or performance is reported. Usage The website has been used - and proven useful - by various authorities that issue tsunami warnings. This was clearly visible during both for the last Chilean tsunami (end Feb 2010) and a smaller Indonesian tsunami (end October 2010). The hits on the website were at least fivefold.