Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Outline of Neurodevelopment Fertilization Induction of Neuroectoderm Neurulation Segmentation Embryonic morphogenesis Differentiation: 1. Formation and placement of neuroblasts 2. Axonal outgrowth 3. Growth cones, selective migration 4. Selective fasciculation 5. Target selection 6. Synaptogenesis 7. Etc…(cell shape, neurotransmitter, ionic channels, receptors) Adult neuronal plasticity (Activity-dependent?) Physical forces of surface contacts largely determine cell shape: Drosophila cone cell morphology modeled by soap bubbles! WT Drosophila retina (4 cells) (1 cell) Soap bubbles (5 cells) (2 cells) (3 cells) Drosophila Rough eye (Roi) mutants (6 cells) (Hayashi and Carthew, 2004) Selective Adhesion Determines Specificity of Tissue and Cellular Associations Selective Aggregation of dissociated embryonic tissues (vertebrate and invertebrate) suggests ancient (surface) Adhesion Molecules Epidermis + Mesoderm 1. Sponges (Wilson, 1907) 2. Amphibians (Townes and Holtfretter, 1955) 3. Chick (Moscona, 1952) (Townes and Holtfretter, 1955) Experimental recreation of morphogenesis by mixing cells expressing low and high levels of one surface adhesion gene (N-cadherin) +4 hrs Green = high N-cadherin Red = low N-cadherin +24 hrs (Foty and Steinberg, 2004) Retinotectal Mapping Visualized by Dye Injection in Zebrafish N T D V T D V N (Friche,et al. 2001) Do Molecular Cues Determine the Retinotectal Spatial-topic Map? L(V) Optic tectum M(D) dorsal temporal ventral A P (T) (N) nasal A (T) D T N M L (D) (V) V P Retina (N) Optic Tectum Retinotectal Map is Preserved Despite Experimental Rotation of the Eye: “Chemaffinity Hypothesis” (Sperry, 1956) (T) D T Subjective “down” N Subjective “up” V Rotate Eye 180o (V) (D) (N) Retina Optic Tectum (T) V Subjective “down” N T D (V) (D) (N) Early Embryonic Insect Neurons form a Repeated Segmental Scaffold: Favorable preparation for studying axonal guidance Longitudinal Tracts MP1 Q1 aCC pCC MP1 Q1 MP1 Q1 Grasshopper embryo Commissural Tracts aCC pCC Identified Neurons Q1 (Meyers and Bastiani, 1993) Pioneer Neurons Create the Early Scaffold of the Adult Nervous System growth cone pioneer neuron guidepost cells selective fasciculation Pioneer neuron and guidepost cells may die after pathway is pioneered, by apoptosis Pioneer Neurons and Guidepost Cells guide the initial path of peripheral nerve tracts in embryonic grasshopper limbs Guidepost Cells CT1 Photoablated Growth Cone Pioneer Neurons Control (Bentley and Caudy, 1983) Growth Cones are Dynamic Sensory Organelles that Guide the Growth of Embryonic Axons filapodia F-actin Tubulin lamellipodia Sensing and Transducing: • Diffusible Cues • Contact-dependent Cues • Trophic Factors • Neurotransmitters Extracellular Cues (Forscher lab) 2nd Messengers Ca+2 Intracellular Signaling Pathways GTP cAMP (Play GFP-Actin Growth Cone Movie) Dr. Andrew Matus Friedrich Miescher Institute, Switzerland Cytoskeletal Rearrangment Identification of Molecules Mediating Axonal Guidance using Model Systems 1. Biochemical approach: Friedrich Bonhoeffer, retinotectal culture assay. Observe Neuronal Specificity Functional Assay Fractionate Native Factors Temporal Nasal Purify and Identify Factor (Ephrins...) Temporal Axons Nasal Axons Identification of Molecules Mediating Axonal Guidance using Model Systems 2. Molecular genetic approach: Corey Goodman, Drosophila screens for neurodevelopmental defects. Observe WT Neuronal Specificity Screen for Mutants of Neuronal Specificity Clone Mutant Genes Identify Factors (Semphorins, Slit, Robo, Commissureless...) Conserved Structural Classes of Axonal Guidance Molecules: Modular Construction and Multifunctionality 1. Laminin, fibronectin and extracellular matrix proteins. 2. Cadherins and catenins. (Ca+2 dependent) 3. Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) (containing IgG domains). 4. Receptor tyrosine kinases and receptor phosphatases. Functional Classes of Axonal Guidance Molecules (Secreted) (sema, slit) (netrin) (fas) (eph) (Membrane Associated) Molecules may function for both: 1. Selective adhesion 2. Intracellular signaling Axonal Guidance Cues diffusible repellant diffusible attractant Contact-dependent attractant Contact-dependent repellant selective fasciculation (Timing is critical) Axonal Guidance 1. Pioneer neurons construct the earliest scaffold of the nervous system, following chemical cues. 2. Multiple chemical cues guide growth cones, including long-range diffusible cues (secreted molecules) and short-range contact mediated cues (membrane associated). 3. Chemical cues may be attractive or repulsive. 4. Chemical cues mediate both selective adhesion and intercellular signaling. 5. Axonal guidance molecules are ancient conserved molecules, including a large class with structural similarity to immunoglobulins. 6. Final axonal pathways likely specified by unique combinations of molecular cues expressed by growing neurons and targets (Sperry’s Chemoaffinity Hypothesis). 7. Human mutations of axonal guidance genes may underlie many hereditary neurological conditions affecting complex cognitive functions. Zebrafish ROBO Mutant (astray) Disrupts Midline Retinotectal Axonal Projections WT WT WT ast ast WT ast WT (Fricke, et al. 2001) Robo acts as a receptor for a midline repulsive cue Drosophila robo disrupts longitudinal tract formation Human ROBO Mutation causes HGPPS (Horizontal Gaze Palsy with Progressive Scoliosis) HGPPS Normal (horizontal gaze palsy) (reduced hindbrain volume) (scoliosis) (Jen, et al., 2004) Drosophila robo disrupts longitudinal tract formation The Axon Guidance Receptor Gene ROBO1 Is a Candidate Gene for Developmental Dyslexia Katariina Hannula-Jouppi1, Nina Kaminen-Ahola1, Mikko Taipale1,2, Ranja Eklund1, Jaana Nopola Hemmi1,3, Helena Kaariainen4,5, Juha Kere1,6* 1 Department of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Finland, Molecular Biology Laboratory, Gene Expression Programme, Heidelberg, Germany, 3 Department of Pediatrics, Jorvi Hospital, Espoo, Finland, 4 Department of Medical Genetics, The Family Federation of Finland, Helsinki, Finland, 5 Department of Medical Genetics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland, 6 Department of Biosciences at Novum and Clinical Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden 2 European PLOS Genetics (2005) 1: 0467 Development Proceeds by Progressive Developmental Restrictions (pluripotent) (differentiated)