Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
REPOLARIZATION RESERVE AND SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY András Varró Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy University of Szeged, Hungary Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical Center 2005 Torsades de pointes RARE: with terfenadine 1/50000 Developmental cost Withdrawal cost: ~ 800 million USD ~ 500 - ? million USD Due to Torsades de pointes: Withdrawn drugs Terfenadine Astemizole Grepafloxacin Cisapride None approval or suspended development several Complicated approval Moxifloxacin Ziprasidone Approved with QT cautions in labeling numerous Re-labeling Thioridazine Droperidol „If you remember, I did mention possible side-effects.” Current clinical view of drug induced torsade pointes arrhythmia Primary drug effect (IKr IHERG blockade) Secondary risk factors (effect amplifiers) – High doses or rapid administration – Metabolic inhibition – Impaired elimination – Bradycardia – Hypokalemia ; hypomagnesemia – Heart disease (CHF, LVF, diabetes) – Female gender 70 % E. Kevin Heist et al. Heart Rhythm 2005;2:S1–S8 – Concomittant ion-channel modifier – Undetected ion channel polymorphisms or mutation( LQT) Moxifloxacin (fluroquinolone) as positive control 6 – 10 ms QT prolongation QT lengthening Important antiarrhythmic mechanism Sign of dangereous side effect of various drugs The demonstration of the arrhythmogenic effect of the early afterdepolarization (EAD) in canine heart preparations Control Purkinje fibre Ventricular muscle electrical stimulation electrical stimulation Ventricular muscle Purkinje fibre electrical stimulation Varró and Lathrop, J Cardiovasc Pharmacol (1990) 16:557-67 The demonstration of the arrhythmogenic effect of the repolarization inhomogeneity in canine heart preparations F.G. Akar, G-X Yan, C. Antzelevitch, D.S. Rosenbaum, Circulation. 2002;105:1247-1253. regular beat regular beat Extrasystole DAD or EAD Extrasystole DAD or EAD 1 2 3 7 4 6 5 Repolarization reserve Role of IKs in the repolarization reserve in the dog ventricle Varro et al. J Physiol, 2000, 523: 67-81 Role of IKs in the repolarization reserve in the human ventricle Jost et al., Circulation. 2005; 112:1393-1400. Multiple K+ channel block and repolarization reserve Dofetilide + Chromanol 293B 0 mV 50 mV Chromanol 293B IKs CL = 5000 ms IKr 0 mV 200 ms EAD 50 mV 200 ms IKr+ IKs 50 mV 0 mV Dofetilide + BaCl2 0 mV 0 mV IK1 CL = 5000 ms 200 ms IKr 50 mV 50 mV BaCl2 200 ms IKr+ IK1 200 ms Bilicki et al. Br J Pharmacol 2002; 137: 361-368 Repolarization reserve rabbit dog Control RR = 357 ms QT = 277 ms QTc = 267 ms 0 mV 50 mV + BaCl2 (10 µM ) Eliprodil (1 µM ) Control RR = 363 ms QT = 313 ms QTc = 302 ms + Eliprodil (1 µM) 200 ms RR = 460 ms QT = 377 ms QTc = 349 ms 1 mV TdP 1s Lengyel et al; Br J Pharmacol 2004; 143: 152−158 Conclusion from our experiments Cardiac muscle has strong safety margin of repolarization („REPOLARIZATION RESERVE”). Decrease of this repolarization reserve does not necessarily lead to marked change of repolarization but makes hearts susceptible to arrhythmias. Multiple K+ channel block may result excessive repolarization lengthening and therefore it can associate with increased proarrhythmic risk. “Are you sure about this, Dave? It seems odd that a pointy head and long beak is what makes them fly.” The role of repolarization reserve in patients Sotalol test Kääb et al. 2003; Eur Heart Journal The role of repolarization reserve in patients Number of Subjects Ibutilide test Ibutilide test Change in QTc (msec) Kilborn et al. Circulation 2000. 102: II-673 Combined IKr plus IKs block in the ventricular myocyte: beat-to-beat variability of repolarization Circulation. 2003 Effect of IKr block (dofetilide) on the short term APD variability in single isolated myocites obtained from dog after chronic A-V block induced hypertrophy Thomsen et al. Circulation 2004;110:2460-2466. Effect of IKr block on the APD variability after cardiac hypertrophy in dog Morten B. Thomsen et al, Circulation. 2004;110:2453-2459. Effects of IKr-block (dofetilide) and IKs-block (HMR-1556) on QT-interval variability in conscious dog Dog 3 0.5 0.4 0.3 Control Dofetilide (0.025 mg/kg) Dofetilide (0.025 mg/kg) + HMR-1556 (1 mg/kg) 0.2 0 QT-interval n (s) QT-interval n (s) 0.5 Dog 9 0.4 0.3 Control HMR-1556 (1 mg/kg) 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.3 0.4 QT-interval n-1 (s) 0.5 0 0.2 0.3 0.4 QT-intervaln-1 n-1(s) (s) QT-interval 0.5 Effects of IKr-blocker dofetilide and IKs-blocker HMR-1556 on QT-interval variability in conscious dogs TdP + Dog 1 QT-interval n (s) 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,2 Dog 2 Dog 3 Dog 4 Dog 5 0.5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0.4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0.3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,3 0.2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0 0 0,1 0.2 0.3 0.4 QT-interval n-1 (s) 0 0.5 0 0,1 0.2 0.3 0.4 QT-interval n-1 (s) 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0.2 0.3 0.4 QT-interval n-1 (s) 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0,5 0,1 0,2 0,3 0.5 0 0.2 0.3 0.4 QT-interval n-1 (s) 0 0 0,4 0,1 0,1 0,5 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,1 0.5 0 0.2 0.3 0.4 QT-interval n-1 (s) 0 0 0,5 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0 0,5 0,1 0,2 0,3 TdP – Dog 7 Dog 6 QT-interval n (s) 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,2 Dog 8 0.5 0,5 0.4 0,4 0.3 0,3 0,3 0.2 0,2 0,2 Control 0,5 Dofetilide (0.025 mg/kg) 0,4 Dofetilide (0.025 mg/kg) + HMR-1556 (1 mg/kg) 0 0 0,1 0.2 0.3 0.4 QT-interval n-1 (s) 0 0 0.5 0,1 0.2 0.3 0.4 QT-interval n-1 (s) 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0 0.2 0.3 0.4 QT-interval n-1 (s) 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 0,1 0 0,5 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0.5 0,5 0,4 0,5 Effect of IKr-blocker dofetilide and IKs-blocker HMR-1556 on QT-interval in conscious dog Dog 3 Control Dofetilide (0.025 mg/kg) Dofetilide (0.025 mg/kg) + HMR-1556 (1 mg/kg) RR: 537 ms QT: 243 ms QTc: 331 ms RR: 618 ms QT: 333 ms QTc: 423 ms RR: 663 ms QT: 392 ms QTc: 481 ms Drug indrustry Development if life saving drugs (antiarrhythmics, cardiotonics, AIDS drugs etc.) Endpoint: mortality Development of quality of life improving drugs (pl. antihistamins, CNS and GI drugs etc.) Endpoint: not mortality „I guess we should have tried it on the rats first.” General conclusion 1. We should first reach a concensus what degree or any kind of mortality can be tolerated. 2. Before treatment we should assess the susceptability of the patients regarding possible QT lengthening (repolarization reserve) 3. In the future during drug development, to design and control safety pharmacology studies deeper cardiac electrophysiological background required.