Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 52, No. 3, March 2005, pp 916–923 DOI 10.1002/art.20935 © 2005, American College of Rheumatology Febuxostat, a Novel Nonpurine Selective Inhibitor of Xanthine Oxidase A Twenty-Eight–Day, Multicenter, Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Response Clinical Trial Examining Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Gout Michael A. Becker,1 H. Ralph Schumacher, Jr.,2 Robert L. Wortmann,3 Patricia A. MacDonald,4 William A. Palo,4 Denise Eustace,4 Laurent Vernillet,4 and Nancy Joseph-Ridge4 Objective. Gout affects ⬃1–2% of the American population. Current options for treating hyperuricemia in chronic gout are limited. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of febuxostat, a nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, in establishing normal serum urate (sUA) concentrations in gout patients with hyperuricemia (>8.0 mg/dl). Methods. We conducted a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 153 patients (ages 23–80 years). Subjects received febuxostat (40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg) or placebo once daily for 28 days and colchicine prophylaxis for 14 days prior to and 14 days after randomization. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects with sUA levels <6.0 mg/dl on day 28. Results. Greater proportions of febuxostattreated patients than placebo-treated patients achieved an sUA level <6.0 mg/dl at each visit (P < 0.001 for each comparison). The targeted sUA level was attained on day 28 in 0% of those taking placebo and in 56% of those taking 40 mg, 76% taking 80 mg, and 94% taking 120 mg of febuxostat. The mean sUA reduction from baseline to day 28 was 2% in the placebo group and 37% in the 40-mg, 44% in the 80-mg, and 59% in the 120-mg febuxostat groups. Gout flares occurred with similar frequency in the placebo (37%) and 40-mg febuxostat (35%) groups and with increased frequency in the higher dosage febuxostat groups (43% taking 80 mg; 55% taking 120 mg). During colchicine prophylaxis, gout flares occurred less frequently (8–13%). Incidences of treatment-related adverse events were similar in the febuxostat and placebo groups. Conclusion. Treatment with febuxostat resulted in a significant reduction of sUA levels at all dosages. Febuxostat therapy was safe and well tolerated. Uric acid is the end product of purine degradation in humans. Hyperuricemia, a serum concentration of urate that exceeds the limit of urate solubility (⬃7.0 mg/dl), is a common biochemical abnormality (1). Aberrations in any of the multiple mechanisms involved in the production and/or excretion of uric acid may increase serum urate (sUA) concentrations, and persistent hyperuricemia is a marker of monosodium urate (MSU) supersaturation in extracellular fluid (2). As such, hyperuricemia is a necessary (but often not sufficient) risk factor for MSU crystal deposition in tissues, the fundamental pathophysiologic process underlying the clinical manifestations of gout (3). Gout can thus be defined as MSU crystal deposition disease. 1 Michael A. Becker, MD: Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; 2H. Ralph Schumacher, Jr., MD: University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 3Robert L. Wortmann, MD: University of Oklahoma, Tulsa; 4Patricia A. MacDonald, BSN, NP, William A. Palo, MS, Denise Eustace, BA, Laurent Vernillet, PhD, Nancy Joseph-Ridge, MD: TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., Lake Forest, Illinois. Drs. Becker, Schumacher, and Wortmann have received consulting fees from TAP Pharmaceutical Products. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Michael A. Becker, MD, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC0930, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail: [email protected]. Submitted for publication June 30, 2004; accepted in revised form December 13, 2004. 916 FEBUXOSTAT IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT Under conditions of persistent urate crystal deposition, gout may progress from episodic attacks of acute inflammatory arthritis to a disabling chronic disorder characterized by deforming arthropathy, destructive deposits of urate crystals (tophi) in bones, joints, and other organs, structural and functional impairment of the kidney due to interstitial urate crystal deposition, and urinary tract stones composed entirely or partly of uric acid crystals (1–3). Increasing levels of hyperuricemia are paralleled by increasing incidences of gouty arthritis and uric acid urolithiasis (4,5), suggesting that long-term management of gout should address hyperuricemia and urate/uric acid crystal deposition. Management of gout requires long-term treatment aimed at lowering sUA levels to a subsaturating range (usually, ⬍6.0 mg/dl) at which urate crystal formation and deposition are prevented or reversed. Treatment of gout, although frequently successful, remains largely based on decades-old observational studies rather than on randomized controlled trials or validated clinical guidelines (6,7). During the initiation of treatment with antihyperuricemic agents, gout flares may occur. In one study, the incidence of gout flares was 40% within the first month and 27% within the second month, with fewer attacks (6–11%) noted during the following 3–6 months (8). Prophylaxis with colchicine or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs has thus been recommended. Despite the frequency of acute flares of gout early in treatment, several benefits in long-term outcomes have been attributed to persistent maintenance of the sUA level below the solubility limit (1,2,9–14). These include reduced frequencies of acute gouty attacks and uric acid urolithiasis and decreased prevalence of chronic gouty arthropathy and tophaceous gout (9–14). Febuxostat (2-[3-cyano-4-isobutoxyphenyl]-4methylthiazole-5-carboxylic acid) is an orally administered nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase (XO), the enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of uric acid from hypoxanthine and xanthine (15). In vitro studies have shown that febuxostat is a potent ligand for, and inhibitor of, both the oxidized and reduced forms of XO (15–17). In contrast, allopurinol, a purine analog, weakly inhibits only the oxidized form of XO (2), and its oxidized derivative, oxypurinol, binds only to the reduced form of XO. Although oxypurinol binds to XO with high affinity and is a potent inhibitor, the binding and inhibition are reversed over several hours as a result of auto-oxidation of the molybdenum-pterin moiety of the enzyme. Indeed, in animal studies, febuxostat has shown more potent and longer-lasting hypouricemic 917 activity than allopurinol (17–19). Previous clinical studies have also shown that febuxostat produces significant dose-dependent decreases in sUA levels as a result of inhibition of uric acid production (20). In addition, febuxostat has minimal effects on other enzymes of purine and pyrimidine metabolism (16). Febuxostat is primarily metabolized by hepatobiliary conjugation, unlike allopurinol and oxypurinol, which are excreted primarily via the kidneys. A study of subjects with renal impairment indicated that the serum urate–lowering effect of febuxostat was unaltered in patients with mild-to-moderate renal failure (21). To date, no effect of febuxostat on renal tubular function has been detected, whereas with allopurinol treatment, dosage reduction in patients with renal insufficiency is advised (22). In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of febuxostat in reducing sUA concentrations in patients with hyperuricemia (ⱖ8.0 mg/dl) and gout. PATIENTS AND METHODS Study population. This 28-day, multicenter, phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response clinical trial assessed the safety and efficacy of once-daily oral febuxostat (40 mg, 80 mg, or 120 mg) in reducing sUA levels in adult patients with gout and hyperuricemia (sUA ⱖ8.0 mg/dl). All patients met the American College of Rheumatology preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout (23). Exclusion criteria were as follows: serum creatinine level ⬎1.5 mg/dl (calculated creatinine clearance ⬍50 ml/ minute); pregnancy or lactation; concurrent therapy with urate-lowering agents, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or medications containing aspirin (⬎325 mg) or other salicylates; a body mass index ⬎50 kg/m2; a history of xanthinuria, active liver disease, or hepatic dysfunction; changes in thiazide or steroid therapy (within 1 month of study) or in hormone replacement/oral contraceptive therapy (within 3 months of study); or a history of alcohol abuse or intake of ⱖ14 alcoholcontaining drinks per week. Study design. The study was conducted at 24 centers in the US. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, and all subjects provided written informed consent. Subjects receiving urate-lowering therapy underwent a 2-week washout period preceding randomization. Colchicine prophylaxis, 0.6 mg twice daily, was provided during the washout period and the first 2 weeks of double-blind treatment. Acute flares of gout occurring after the prophylaxis phase were treated at the investigator’s discretion. Weekly visits focused on laboratory testing (purine metabolism, renal function, and safety monitoring), adverse events, gouty arthritis flares, concomitant medications, compliance, and changes in physical examination findings or vital signs. Electrocardiograms (EKGs) and 24-hour urine collections for measurement of uric acid were obtained (without special dietary preparation) prior to randomization and the final visit (day 28). Subjects were classified as either underex- 918 BECKER ET AL compared between each febuxostat group and the placebo group by Fisher’s exact test. Percentage reductions from baseline in sUA levels and daily urinary uric acid excretion and changes from baseline in serum xanthine and hypoxanthine concentrations were summarized and comparisons were made using a t-test. The final efficacy analysis was performed at an adjusted significance level of 0.049, since an administrative interim analysis was performed at the 0.001 significance level. All safety analyses were performed at the significance level of 0.05. Statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Figure 1. Flow diagram of the enrollment and conduct of the study. SUA ⫽ serum urate; Cr ⫽ creatinine. cretors (ⱕ800 mg/24 hours) or overproducers (⬎800 mg/24 hours) of uric acid (3). Randomization and end points. Of 269 subjects screened, 153 were randomized to daily febuxostat treatment at 40 mg (n ⫽ 37), 80 mg (n ⫽ 40), or 120 mg (n ⫽ 38) or to daily placebo treatment (n ⫽ 38) and received at least 1 dose of the study drug (Figure 1). Efficacy analyses were based on an intent-to-treat population (140 subjects with a day –2 sUA level ⱖ8.0 mg/dl); the additional 13 subjects were excluded because the baseline sample for measuring sUA was collected outside the day –2 window. All 153 randomized subjects were, however, included in analyses of treatment safety and gout flares. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects in each treatment group with sUA levels ⬍6.0 mg/dl on day 28. Secondary efficacy end points included the proportion of subjects with sUA levels that had decreased to ⬍6.0 mg/dl on days 7, 14, and 21, the percentage reduction in sUA from baseline at each visit, and the percentage reduction in daily urinary uric acid excretion from baseline to day 28. The incidence of gout flares was determined, and safety assessments included treatment-related adverse events and changes from baseline in serum concentrations of xanthine and hypoxanthine, laboratory parameters, vital signs, and EKG findings. Statistical analysis. The proportions of subjects achieving sUA levels ⬍6.0 mg/dl at each visit were summarized and comparisons were made using Fisher’s exact test. Additional analyses were performed on the proportions of subjects achieving sUA levels ⬍4.0 mg/dl and ⬍5.0 mg/dl on day 28. Adjustments for multiple comparisons for the primary and secondary efficacy end points were made using Hochberg’s procedure (24). Subgroup analyses were conducted for the primary efficacy end point on day 28 for the baseline sUA level. Incidences of gout flares were summarized by study period. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was Characteristics of the study subjects. The age, sex, race, baseline sUA level, presence of tophi, and uric acid production status in the study subjects did not vary greatly among treatment groups (Table 1). Comorbidities were prevalent in all groups. Nearly one-half of all randomized subjects had a history of hypertension (49%) or hyperlipidemia (46%). Obesity (27%), cardiovascular disease (23%), hypercholesterolemia (16%), and diabetes (13%) were also common. The rate of discontinuation was similar among the study groups (3–8%) (Figure 1). Findings of the efficacy evaluation. Significantly greater proportions of subjects in each febuxostat group achieved sUA levels ⬍6.0 mg/dl at each visit, as compared with those in the placebo group (P ⬍ 0.001 for each comparison) (Figure 2). The majority of subjects in each febuxostat group attained the targeted sUA concentration as early as day 7, and maintained this targeted level at subsequent visits. When day 28 sUA values were analyzed according to the levels at baseline, patients with the highest baseline sUA levels were less likely to reach an sUA level ⬍6.0 mg/dl with 40 mg/day of febuxostat than with either 80 or 120 mg/day (data not shown). The urate-lowering efficacy was further demonstrated by the significantly greater proportions of febuxostat-treated patients than placebo-treated patients achieving an sUA level ⬍5.0 mg/dl or ⬍4.0 mg/dl on day 28 (Figure 3). The mean percentage reductions in sUA from baseline levels at each visit (range of mean change 35–59%) were significantly greater in each febuxostat group than in the placebo group (range of mean change 1.6% increase to 2.2% decrease; P ⬍ 0.001 for each comparison), with the greatest reductions in the febuxostat group receiving 120 mg/day (range of mean change 53–59%) (data not shown). The mean percentage reductions in daily urinary uric acid excretion from baseline to day 28 were significantly greater in each febuxostat FEBUXOSTAT IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT Table 1. 919 Baseline characteristics of randomized subjects* Febuxostat Age, mean ⫾ SD years % male % Caucasian Uric acid production, %† Underexcretors Overproducers Undetermined Tophus present, % Comorbidities, % Cardiovascular disease Diabetes Hypercholesterolemia Hyperlipidemia Hypertension Obesity Baseline serum UA in ITT population No. of ITT subjects Serum UA, mean ⫾ SD mg/dl Placebo (n ⫽ 38) 40 mg/day (n ⫽ 37) 80 mg/day (n ⫽ 40) 120 mg/day (n ⫽ 38) 52.4 ⫾ 12.6 84 84 52.2 ⫾ 14.0 89 87 55.2 ⫾ 13.1 95 88 56.2 ⫾ 10.8 87 89 79 21 0 24 78 22 0 16 73 23 5 25 79 18 3 29 29 5 8 45 53 26 19 16 16 43 41 14 20 20 20 50 50 40 24 11 18 47 53 29 35 9.87 ⫾ 1.33 34 9.24 ⫾ 0.94 37 9.92 ⫾ 1.30 34 9.58 ⫾ 1.11 * None of the differences in baseline characteristics among treatment groups were statistically significant. UA ⫽ uric acid; ITT ⫽ intent-to-treat (n ⫽ 140 patients with a serum urate concentration ⱖ8.0 mg/dl on day ⫺2). † Based on uric acid measurements in 24-hour urine collections at baseline. Underexcretors had ⱕ800 mg/day of uric acid; overproducers had ⬎800 mg/day of uric acid. group (range of mean change 44–47%) than in the placebo group (5.9% increase; P ⬍ 0.001 for each comparison), and significant percentage reductions between each of the febuxostat groups and the placebo group were observed regardless of baseline urinary uric acid production (data not shown). The overall incidences of flares of gouty arthritis were similar in the placebo and 40-mg/day febuxostat groups (37% and 35%, respectively) (Table 2). With Figure 2. Proportion of the intent-to-treat population (140 patients with a serum urate concentration ⱖ8.0 mg/dl on day –2) with a serum urate level ⬍6.0 mg/dl at each study visit, by treatment group. Figure 3. Proportion of intent-to-treat population (140 patients with a serum urate concentration ⱖ8.0 mg/dl on day –2) with a serum urate (sUA) level ⬍5.0 mg/dl or ⬍4.0 mg/dl on day 28, by treatment group. 920 BECKER ET AL Table 2. Incidence of gout flares* Febuxostat Study period Placebo (n ⫽ 38) 40 mg/day (n ⫽ 37) 80 mg/day (n ⫽ 40) 120 mg/day (n ⫽ 38) Entire study period Colchicine/study drug cotreatment† Study drug treatment alone 37 11 34 35 8 30 43 8 40 55 13 42 * Prophylaxis was provided for 14 days before study entry for those washing out of urate-lowering therapy, and all subjects received 14 days of prophylaxis after randomization. Values are percentages. † Colchicine was not dispensed to 2 subjects, and 2 other subjects stopped colchicine prior to starting the febuxostat treatment period. increasing doses of febuxostat, however, the percentage of gout flares increased (35%, 43%, and 55% in the 40-mg, 80-mg, and 120-mg febuxostat groups, respectively). The incidences of gout flares when colchicine was administered with febuxostat or placebo were 8%, 8%, 13%, and 11% for febuxostat 40 mg, 80 mg, and 120 mg and placebo, respectively. When febuxostat or placebo was administered alone, however, gout flare incidences were higher: 30%, 40%, 42%, and 34% for febuxostat 40 mg, 80 mg, and 120 mg and placebo, respectively. Findings of the safety evaluation. Treatment with febuxostat resulted in significant dose-related increases in serum hypoxanthine and xanthine concentrations from baseline to day 28 as compared with placebo treatment (P ⬍ 0.05 for each comparison) (data not shown). Serum concentrations of hypoxanthine and xanthine were, however, always substantially below the solubility limits for these compounds in serum at pH 7.4 (115 mg/dl and 10 mg/dl, respectively) (25). Xanthine crystals were not observed in urine sediments examined by light microscopy, x-ray diffraction analysis, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis. There were no significant differences between the febuxostat and placebo groups in the overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events, with the majority of events being mild or moderate in severity Table 3. (Table 3). Treatment-related abnormalities in liver function test (LFT) results (mild-to-moderate increases in transaminases, not associated with increases in bilirubin) were observed in a total of 4 febuxostat-treated subjects (2 taking 40 mg, 1 taking 80 mg, and 1 taking 120 mg). These were temporally associated with administration of colchicine, either alone or with febuxostat. In all instances, LFT values returned to normal limits after discontinuation of colchicine. Six patients (1 each in the placebo and 40-mg febuxostat groups and 2 each in the 80-mg and 120-mg febuxostat groups) discontinued the study prematurely because of adverse events, which included diarrhea, gastrointestinal disorder, abnormal LFT results, delirium tremens, increased creatinine levels, localized angioedema, and suicide attempt. There were no deaths during the study. Three subjects reported serious adverse events. One subject (taking 80 mg of febuxostat) developed pneumonia, with delirium tremens due to alcohol withdrawal. The study medication was discontinued, and 7 days later, the subject developed GuillainBarré syndrome. The investigator considered the pneumonia and delirium tremens unlikely to be related to febuxostat, while the Guillain-Barré syndrome was considered possibly related. The serious adverse events of back pain in 1 subject and a suicide attempt in another subject while receiving 120 mg of febuxostat were re- Incidence of most frequent treatment-related adverse events* Febuxostat Adverse event Abdominal pain Diarrhea Abnormal results of liver function tests Placebo (n ⫽ 38) 40 mg/day (n ⫽ 37) 80 mg/day (n ⫽ 40) 120 mg/day (n ⫽ 38) 5 8 0 3 0 5 3 10 3 3 8 3 * Adverse events reported by at least 2 subjects in any treatment group. Values are percentages. FEBUXOSTAT IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT garded as unlikely to be related or not related to drug administration. There were no other clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters, vital signs, or EKG findings. DISCUSSION Urate-lowering pharmacotherapy is a keystone in the management of patients with gout and frequent attacks of gouty arthritis, chronic gouty arthropathy, chronic tophaceous gout, renal impairment, or uric acid urolithiasis (1–3,6,7,9–12,26). The choice of uratelowering agents has been restricted to uricosuric drugs, which enhance renal uric acid excretion, and the XO inhibitor allopurinol, which reduces uric acid production (1–3,6,9,26). Since the introduction of allopurinol, use of uricosuric agents has diminished (1,3,9,26), in part because agents such as probenecid have limited efficacy and/or safety in individuals with renal insufficiency (27) or prior urolithiasis, and partly because the most potent uricosuric agent, benzbromarone (28), is unavailable in the US. Allopurinol is effective in reducing sUA levels, but achieving normal sUA levels may be difficult in patients with impaired renal function or in transplant recipients (2,6,9,26). An uncommon, but significant, limitation to the use of allopurinol is the risk, more common in elderly and renally impaired individuals, of reactions that may include rashes (some severe), hematologic cytopenias, hepatitis, vasculitis, and the potentially life-threatening allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome (1,9,26,29–34). This clinical trial demonstrated the dose-related, prompt, and persistent efficacy of febuxostat in lowering sUA concentrations in patients with hyperuricemia and gout. Both the proportions of patients with hyperuricemia who had a reduction in the sUA to clearly subsaturating concentrations (⬍6.0 mg/dl) and the degree of sUA reduction were significantly greater in all febuxostat treatment groups compared with placebo by day 7, and these differences were maintained over the 28-day study period. Consistent with the dose-related differences among the febuxostat-treated groups, patients with the highest baseline sUA levels were less likely to achieve an sUA level ⬍6.0 mg/dl with febuxostat at 40 mg/day than with either of the higher dosages, suggesting that therapeutic dosages are likely to fall in the range of 80–120 mg/day. Flares of gouty arthritis were common during treatment with febuxostat or placebo, particularly after withdrawal of colchicine prophylaxis. Flares occurred 921 more frequently in subjects receiving the higher febuxostat dosages, a finding similar to that reported in studies of other antihyperuricemic treatments (allopurinol or uricosuric agents) in the absence of colchicine prophylaxis (1,9,35,36). This phase II study evaluated the safety profile of febuxostat in patients with gout but no significant renal impairment. One potentially important role for febuxostat will be in individuals with concurrent impairment of renal function. Studies to assess long-term safety in such individuals are in progress and should supplement information from a previous 7-day phase I study, which demonstrated that the serum urate–lowering effect of febuxostat was unaffected by differences in renal function (21), in contrast to allopurinol, for which dosage reduction in the presence of renal insufficiency is advised (22). There were no significant differences between febuxostat and placebo groups with regard to treatmentrelated adverse events. The majority of events were mild-to-moderate in severity, and there were no trends toward dose-relatedness in the febuxostat-treated groups. Few serious adverse events occurred. No serious or severe neurologic adverse events were reported, other than the possibly related Guillain-Barré syndrome in 1 patient. Febuxostat-associated reductions in sUA levels and urinary uric acid excretion and increases in serum concentrations of hypoxanthine and xanthine confirm prior preclinical and clinical studies supporting XO inhibition as the primary, and perhaps sole, mechanism of febuxostat-mediated urate lowering (16,20). In fact, the kinetic and molecular mechanisms involved in febuxostat inhibition of XO have been delineated and differ substantially from those accounting for inhibition of this enzyme by allopurinol (15). Mechanistic differences with respect to XO inhibition and differences in the metabolism of purine and nonpurine analog inhibitors of XO may have clinical relevance. That is, allopurinol is closely related in structure to the purine base hypoxanthine and participates in a broader range of purine and pyrimidine metabolic reactions (37–41) than does febuxostat, the action of which appears to be selective and limited to XO inhibition (16). Allopurinol and its major active metabolite oxypurinol are substrates for the enzymes hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (37) and orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (38) and are thereby converted into the respective allopurinol-5⬘ and oxypurinol-1⬘ and oxypurinol-7⬘ nucleoside monophosphates. These drug derivatives, as well as allopurinol ribonucleoside, formed 922 BECKER ET AL by direct phosphorolysis of allopurinol, have metabolic consequences that, in humans, include inhibition of the activities of the enzymes purine nucleoside phosphorylase (39) and orotidylic acid decarboxylase (38), depletion of intracellular concentrations of phosphoribosylpyrophosphate (37), reduction of rates of purine nucleotide synthesis de novo (40), and enhanced urinary excretion of orotidine and orotic acid (41,42). To the extent that adverse consequences of allopurinol therapy may relate to actions of this purine analog compound (or its metabolic products) exclusive of XO inhibition, the selectivity of febuxostat may lessen the risk for at least some of the untoward effects of current antihyperuricemic therapy in patients with gout. We conclude that febuxostat was safe and effective in this brief phase II study. Further clinical studies aimed at evaluating the long-term safety and clinical efficacy of febuxostat in patients with gout are warranted. REFERENCES 1. Wortmann RL. Gout and other disorders of purine metabolism. In: Brunwald E, editor. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 14th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p. 2158–66. 2. Becker MA. Gout and hyperuricemia. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, editors. The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 2513–35. 3. Becker MA. Clinical aspects of monosodium urate monohydrate crystal deposition disease (gout). Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1988;14:377–94. 4. Campion EW, Glynn RJ, DeLabry LO. Asymptomatic hyperuricemia: risks and consequences in the Normative Aging Study. Am J Med 1987;82:421–6. 5. Hall AP, Barry PE, Dawber TR, McNamara PM. Epidemiology of gout and hyperuricemia: a long-term population study. Am J Med 1967;42:27–37. 6. Wortmann RL. Gout and hyperuricemia. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002;14:281–6. 7. Schlesinger N, Schumacher HR. Gout: can management be improved? Curr Opin Rheumatol 2001;13:240–4. 8. Yamanaka H, Togashi R, Hakoda M, Terai C, Kashiwazaki S, Dan T, et al. Optimal range of serum urate concentrations to minimize risk of gouty attacks during anti-hyperuricemic treatment. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998;431:13–8. 9. Emmerson BT. The management of gout. N Engl J Med 1996;334: 445–51. 10. Li-Yu J, Clayburne G, Sieck M, Beutler A, Rull M, Eisner E, et al. Treatment of chronic gout: can we determine when urate stores are depleted enough to prevent attacks of gout? J Rheumatol 2001;28:577–80. 11. Perez-Ruiz F, Calabozo M, Pijoan JI, Herrero-Beites AM, Ruibal A. Effect of urate-lowering therapy on the velocity of size reduction of tophi in chronic gout. Arthritis Rheum 2002;47:356–60. 12. Chen LX, Schumacher HR. Diagnosis and management of gout. J Clin Outcomes Management 2003;10:337–42. 13. Yu TF. Milestones in the treatment of gout. Am J Med 1974;56: 676–85. 14. O’Duffy JD, Hunder GG, Kelly PJ. Decreasing prevalence of tophaceous gout. Mayo Clin Proc 1975;50:227–8. 15. Okamoto K, Eger BT, Nishino T, Kondo S, Pai EF, Nishino T. An extremely potent inhibitor of xanthine oxidoreductase. J Biol Chem 2003;278:1848–55. 16. Zhao L, Takano Y, Horiuchi H. Effect of febuxostat, a novel non-purine, selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase (NP-SIXO), on enzymes in purine and pyrimidine metabolism pathway [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48 Suppl 9:S531. 17. Horiuchi H, Ota M, Kobayashi M, Kaneko H, Kasahara Y, Nishimura S, et al. A comparative study on the hypouricemic activity and potency in renal xanthine calculus formation of two xanthine oxidase/xanthine dehydrogenase inhibitors: TEI-6720 and allopurinol in rats. Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol 1999;104:307–19. 18. Osada Y, Tsuchimoto M, Fukushima H, Takahashi K, Kondo S, Hasegawa M, et al. Hypouricemic effect of the novel xanthine oxidase inhibitor, TEI-6720, in rodents. Eur J Pharmacol 1993;241: 183–8. 19. Komoriya K, Osada Y, Hasegawa M, Horiuchi H, Kondo S, Couch RC, et al. Hypouricemic effect of allopurinol and the novel xanthine oxidase inhibitor TEI-6720 in chimpanzees. Eur J Pharmacol 1993;250:455–60. 20. Becker MA, Kisicki J, Khosravan R, Hunt B, MacDonald PA, Joseph-Ridge N. Febuxostat (TMX-67), a novel, non-purine, selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, is safe and decreases serum urate in healthy volunteers. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2004;23:35–40. 21. Swan S, Khosravan R, Mayer MD, Wu JT, Palo WA, MacDonald PA, et al. Effect of renal impairment on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of febuxostat (TMX-67), a novel nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48 Suppl 9:S529. 22. Allopurinol tablets, USP [package insert]. Spring Valley (NY): Par Pharmaceutical; 2001. 23. Wallace SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, Decker JL, McCarty DJ, Yu TF. Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheum 1977;20:895–900. 24. Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1988;75:800–2. 25. Seegmiller JE. Xanthine stone formation. Am J Med 1968;45: 780–3. 26. Terkeltaub RA. Gout. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1647–55. 27. Edwards NL. Management of hyperuricemia. In: Koopman WJ, editor. Arthritis and allied conditions: a textbook of rheumatology. 14th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 2314–28. 28. Perez-Ruiz F, Alonso-Ruiz A, Calabozo M, Herrero-Beites A, Garcia-Erauskin G, Ruiz-Lucea E. Efficacy of allopurinol and benzbromarone for the control of hyperuricemia: a pathogenetic approach to the treatment of primary chronic gout. Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57:545–9. 29. Fam AG. Difficult gout and new approaches for control of hyperuricemia in the allopurinol-allergic patient. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2001;3:29–35. 30. Stamp L, Gow P, Sharples K, Raill B. The optimal use of allopurinol: an audit of allopurinol use in South Auckland. Aust N Z J Med 2000;30:567–72. 31. Hande KR, Noone RM, Stone WJ. Severe allopurinol toxicity: description and guidelines for prevention in subjects with renal insufficiency. Am J Med 1984;76:47–56. 32. Fam AG, Lewtas J, Stein J, Paton TW. Desensitization to allopurinol in subjects with gout and cutaneous reactions. Am J Med 1992;93:299–302. 33. Arellano F, Sacristan JA. Allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome: a review. Ann Pharmacother 1993;27:337–43. FEBUXOSTAT IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT 34. Singer JZ, Wallace SL. The allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome: unnecessary morbidity and mortality. Arthritis Rheum 1986;29:82–7. 35. Fam AG. Should patients with interval gout be treated with urate lowering drugs? J Rheumatol 1995;22:1621–3. 36. Shoji A, Yamanaka H, Kamatani N. A retrospective study of the relationship between serum urate level and recurrent attacks of gouty arthritis: evidence for reduction of recurrent gouty arthritis with antihyperuricemic therapy. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:321–5. 37. Fox IH, Wyngaarden JB, Kelley WN. Depletion of erythrocyte phosphoribosylpyrophosphate in man: a newly observed effect of allopurinol. N Engl J Med 1970;283:1177–82. 38. Beardmore TD, Kelley WN. Mechanism of allopurinol-mediated 923 39. 40. 41. 42. inhibition of pyrimidine biosynthesis. J Lab Clin Med 1971;78: 696–704. Nishida Y, Kamatani N, Tanimoto K, Akaoka I. Inhibition of purine nucleoside phosphorylase activity and of T-cell function with allopurinol-riboside. Agents Actions 1979;9:549–52. Rundles RW, Wyngaarden JB, Hitchings GH. Effects of a xanthine oxidase inhibitor on thiopurine metabolism, hyperuricemia, and gout. Trans Assoc Am Physicians 1963;76:126–40. Fox RM, Royse-Smith D, O’Sullivan WJ. Orotidinuria induced by allopurinol. Science 1970;168:861–2. Kelley WN, Beardmore TD. Allopurinol: alteration in pyrimidine metabolism in man. Science 1970;169:388–90.