Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cascade Water Alliance’s 15th Anniversary Celebration Bellevue, WA May 15, 2014 Resiliency – Planning Individually and as a Region for Tomorrow Ray Hoffman Director, Seattle Public Utilities Overview • Water Supply Forum’s resiliency work • Seattle Public Utilities climate resiliency program • Conclusions Regional water system resiliency project 2014-2015 • Investigate water system vulnerabilities • Identify solutions to regional risks • Educate and communicate to build support for solutions Water system resiliency – limit damage and recover quickly from a disturbance • Earthquakes • Droughts • Water quality • Climate change SPU’s climate program Water Supply Urban Drainage Sea Level Rise Carbon neutrality Earthquake Scenario N • Estimated 1,000 pipeline failures primarily in the Duwamish Valley W E S Legend • Scenario developed with Water Research Foundation Vulnerability Scale Green - failure rate < 0.05 failures/1000ft Light Blue - 0.05 < failure rate < 0.5 Dark Blue - 0.5 < failure rate < 1.5 Purple - 1.5 < failure rate < 2.0 Red - 2.0 failures/1000ft < failure rate Primary Backbon e Pipe D iame te rs Low Vu lnerab ility Low to Mo derate Vulne ra bility Mo de rate Vuln erability Mo de rate to H igh Vuln era bility High Vu lnerab ility Se co nd ary Ba ckb one Vu lnerability Low Vu lnerab ility Low to Mo derate Vulne ra bility Mo de rate Vuln erability Mo de rate to H igh Vuln era bility High Vu lnerab ility Tertia ry D istribu tio n Vulne rab ility Low Vu lnerab ility Low to Mo derate Vulne ra bility Mo de rate Vuln erability Mo de rate to H igh Vuln era bility High Vu lnerab ility W ater Re se rvoirs W ater Tanks Tank Stan dp ipe City Lim its Reg ion al W ater Bodie s http://www.atmos.washington.edu/SPU/ All quantiles based on annual maximum series data. City (Station) Precipitation (in) for Given Duration and Frequency 30-min 60-min 24-hr 25-yr 100-yr 25-yr 100-yr 25-yr 100-yr Phoenix, AZ (Phoenix City) 1.25 1.61 1.55 2.00 2.66 3.41 Chicago, IL (Chicago WB City 2) 1.89 2.30 2.45 3.07 5.41 7.16 Newark, NJ (Newark WSO Airport) 1.74 2.06 2.30 2.83 6.18 8.34 2.26 2.73 3.02 3.76 6.36 8.32 2.01 2.53 2.68 3.49 5.96 7.35 0.53 0.68 0.70 0.89 3.35 4.08 Columbia, SC (Columbia WSFO AP) Chattanooga, TN (Chattanooga WSO AP) *Seattle, WA (SeaTac Airport) event Met desc. Max precip duration USGS landslide threshold N cso % 2011 CSO events CSO volume % 2011 CSO volume 21 Jan FROPA 1.60” 6hrs 20% 25 10% 11,178,562 15% 09 Mar FROPA 0.21” 10min 17% 38 15% 14,051,868 19% 14 Mar FROPA 0.77” 3hrs 134% 18 7% 18,279,670 25% 23 Nov AR 3.47” 48hrs 0% 28 11% 12,066,139 17% 4 significant events 109 42% 45,576,239 76% 2011 total 261 73,086,686 Mainstream Adaptation Incorporate climate change into decision making Thank You