Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Italian Embassy to the Holy See Pontifical Council for Culture TOWARDS A MORE HUMAN AND JUST ECONOMY A new inclusive economic paradigm in a context of increasing inequalities. 21st September 2016, h 18.00 Palazzo Borromeo CONCEPT PAPER Economic and social inequalities represent a fundamental global challenge. Globalization and free circulation of goods and people often led to improvements of life conditions. However, the unequal distribution of wealth may compromise these results, becoming a serious threat to the social cohesion of many countries, as well as to the geo-political stability of regional and international scenarios. health; more than 50% of global wealth is owned by the richest 1 per cent of world’s population. In many countries, globalization has boosted economic growth and facilitated the access to health and education services. Life expectancy often increased; wages and incomes witnessed positive adjustments in many areas which previously were cut off from traditional economic progress routes. Moreover, ICT and World Wide Web guaranteed a greater awareness of global issues all over the world. It is important to recognize that the riskiest consequences do not derive much from the presence of inequalities per se: in fact progress and development, notably in the short term, can be followed by problems in distribution and equality. Moreover, during economic growth periods, people do not get wealthier at the same time, neither the access to the same profitable resources can be guaranteed automatically to everyone. UNDP’s studies reveal that, between 1990 and 2015, income poverty in developing countries fell by more than two thirds; the number of extreme poor people fell from 1.9 billion to 836 million; the child mortality rate fell by more than half and 2.6 billion people gained access to improved sources of drinking water, even as the global population increased from 5.3 billion to 7.3 billion. However, these aspects do not eliminate the increasing inequality in the distribution of wealth and resources. In fact, almost 800 million people in the world suffer from hunger and live with less than 2 dollars a day; around 80% of global population has only 6 per cent of the world’s Looking at inequality indicators, such as the Gini Index provided by the World Bank, it is easy to notice the global dimension of the issue: both high and low-income countries are commonly affected by the problems which stem from inequalities. Therefore, the downside is the particular kind of inequality caused by the current economic system: in recent years the GDP percentage which rewards capital (especially financial capital) is growing faster than the percentage that remunerates wages and incomes. Therefore in a context with strong uncertainty and precariousness, on the one hand, the wealth of the majority of the population seem compromised together with the future employment of the youngest generations; on the other hand, the concentration of financial wealth in fewer hands keeps growing. This trend can lead to a divergence between the interest of stock markets and big multinational groups and the rest of social economic system. Therefore, inequalities, together with the “austerity” and public debt restructuration policies, can have serious social impacts. Public opinion often does not understand the reason why in many economies showing positive GDP growth rates, employment (and in particular youth employment) rates are diminishing or stagnant. The concentration of economic power, the perceived lack of equality and inclusion in the economic system can foster various forms of populism, nationalism and protectionism. These are evident signals of a deep disease that may affect different strata of our society that, exposed to the process of widening free competition and free market, become “losers” or, in other terms, victims of the globalization process. Thus, social and intergenerational conflicts expand and can threat national and international solidarity. Consequently, new economic paradigms, capable of guaranteeing greater social justice, political stability as well as environmental sustainability, need to be defined. In fact, even when effective policies and solutions against poverty and inequalities are theoretically known, the implementation of these policies becomes extremely complex, due to governance problems and to the absence of coordination among economic, social and environmental policies. This session of the “Courtyard of the Gentiles” wants to initiate a reflection about the increasing social and economic inequalities. Thanks to excellent speakers, this event will provide useful basis for an effective action in line with the UN 2030 Agenda for a Sustainable Development. This document describes the fundamental objectives which must be reached in order to build an economic architecture able to take more care of the needs and the aspirations of the weakest and the poorest, following the way paved by Pope Francis’ encyclical letters “Caritas in Veritate” and “Laudato Si”, which represent precious contributions to the debate about an “integral ecology”, capable of placing human being at the center of economic processes.