Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Capacity Auction in Ontario: Demand Curve October 1, 2014 Demand Curve • Elements in demand curve category are important for establishing boundaries for the amount of capacity the market is willing to purchase and the price the market is willing to pay • These elements include: – Profile of Downward Sloping Demand Curve – Net Cost of New Entry – Target Capacity Requirement – Maximum Auction Clearing Price – Min/Max Cleared Capacity Limits • Each element impacts the slope and positioning of the demand curve, influencing auction prices 2 Demand Curve • Downward curve allows more or less capacity to be purchased relative to the target, depending on the cost of supply 3 Demand Curve • Downward slope reduces price volatility if supply offered is slightly below or above target • Vertical demand curve would clear at zero or at shortage prices for very small changes in offered capacity Auction does not clear Auction clears at floor 4 Profile of Downward Sloping Demand Curve Objective: Profile of downward sloping demand curve must meet reliability objectives and manage price volatility • Demand curve will be downward sloping, but its slope is impacted by choices on the other elements within Demand Curve category • Profile of downward sloping demand curve can be straight through target or kinked • Willingness to pay incrementally more for capacity when below target, less when above target What are the considerations for having a different slope above and below the target capacity requirement? 5 Net Cost of New Entry (Net CONE) Objective: To establish a consistent and transparent estimate of Net CONE for positioning the demand curve against target capacity • CONE will be associated with the estimated cost of building a peaking power plant • Requires designation of a generic reference unit, assessment of its gross costs and net market revenues • Too low Net CONE could discourage efficient entry. Too high Net CONE could over-compensate cleared capacity What factors should be considered when determining the components of Net CONE? 6 Target Capacity Requirement Objective: Communicate the quantity of capacity that is targeted to be procured in the upcoming capacity auction • Determine the effective capacity needed to meet forecast net peak demand and reserve margin to satisfy reliability standards • Any individual auction may clear above or below the target, but on average should clear at the target – 1 in 10 Loss of Load Equivalent reliability standard – Reserve margin a function of system largest contingency 7 Maximum Clearing Price Objective: Establish the maximum price that capacity could reasonably cost • Price cap that the capacity auction could clear, reflecting upper bound of cost of capacity – Max price will be set as proportion of CONE as is done in other jurisdictions; i.e. 150% Net CONE, 100% Gross CONE • Setting of Net CONE requires estimates of reference unit, and its cost and net revenues. Individual projects will differ on these inputs and may have higher net cost What are the factors that could lead to higher net costs for a project that are greater than Net CONE? 8 Min/Max Cleared Capacity Limits Objective: Determine the range of capacity that is allowed to clear an auction • The maximum and minimum capacity above and below the target quantity that the auction will clear – Minimum is the least amount of capacity the ISO ‘s will clear for a single auction below target, typically set to meet 1 in 5 reliability standard – Maximum reflects the most auction will clear above target • Still need to clear at target on average to meet 1 in 10 standard • Width of Max – Min influences steepness of Demand Curve 9