Download Mock Codes: Two years in review

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Paris Hotel and Casino  Las Vegas, Nevada
Mock Codes Lead to real
Results
Presented by:
Bridgid G. Joseph BSN, MSN, CCNS
Presenter Disclosure
Information
Bridgid G. Joseph
Mock Codes Lead to Real Results
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE:
 No relevant financial relationship (s) exist
If you don’t use it, you
lose it
• Previous mock codes on units lasted over
an hour
• Simulation Center: 3 hour mock code team
training monthly
• Fewer actual Code Blue events within our
hospital
Background
• Created a New Formalized Mock Code
Program:
•
•
•
•
•
•
1 mock code on each unit monthly
All unannounced to floor staff
Covered all shifts
Mock codes consist of a training and debrief
Last a total of 10 minutes
Focused educational exercise
Intervention
• Start with an unresponsive patient
• Training Code cart available at site
• Fully stocked mimicking our code carts
• Training medications/bristojets used.
•
Patients in a shockable rhythm
• VFib, pulseless VTach
Mock Code Details
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Recognition of Arrest
Position of bed and patient
CPR
AED
Code Cart
Emergency Medications
Debrief
Mock Code Details
• Able to assess other hospital-wide initiatives
during the response to these exercises:
• Alarm Fatigue: Staff response to low level
telemetry alarms (leads off alarms)
• Hand hygiene: ensure all secondary responders used
cal STAT, gloves, appropriate PPE
• Teach code cart/code team policy changes during
debrief
• Team training: working together and
communicating
Expansion of Focus
2011 Results
3:40
2:35
0:40
Results 2011
Time to CPR
(minutes)
Time to
Defibrillation
0:00
Time to Epinephrine
Time to 1st
Responder
2011 Results
100.0%
85.7%
61.9%
59.5%
50.0%
50.0%
47.6%
14.3%
16.7%
2012 Results
4:00
Adjusted for time to first
responder
2:45
0:50
Time to CPR
(minutes)
0:50
Time to Defibrillation Time to Epinephrine
Time to 1st
Responder
2012 Results
94.2%
74.3%
65.7%
59.4%
42.3%
20.0% 24.2%
11.4% 11.4%
2013 Results
4:30
Adjusted for time to
first responder
3:10
1:50
1:35
Time to CPR
(minutes)
Time to Defibrillation Time to Epinephrine
Time to 1st
Responder
2013 Results
100.0%
83.9%
74.0%
61.8%
45.5%
30.3% 32.1% 32.1%
18.1%
2014 Results
4:10
Adjusted for time to
first responder
2:35
1:10
0:47
Time to CPR
(minutes)
Time to Defibrillation Time to Epinephrine
Time to 1st
Responder
2014 Results
96.2% 93.3%
67.9%
50.0% 53.6%
19.0%
41.4% 41.4%
27.6%
•
•
•
•
•
•
Time
Staff buy-in
Increased Census
Alarm Fatigue
Staff recognition
Off Shifts
Pitfalls
4:19
3:50
3:21
2:52
2:24
2011 Results
2012 Results
1:55
2013 Results
1:26
0:57
0:28
0:00
Time to CPR
(minutes)
Time to
Defibrillation
Time to
Epinephrine
Time to 1st
Responder
Overall a successful program:
• Improvements:
• Significant improvement in overall code cart knowledge, use
of AEDs, and medication location and use.
• Staff starting CPR immediately, able to defibrillate quickly,
and have epinephrine ready and administered quickly.
• Anecdotally:
•
•
•
•
Staff report feeling more confident
Working better as teams
Asking for mock codes
Sneers have turned to cheers!!
Conclusion