Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Vitamin D Deficiency is Common at Breast Cancer Diagnosis and is Associated with a Significantly Higher Risk of Distant Recurrence and Death in a Prospective Cohort Study of T1-3, N0-1, M0 Breast Cancer Goodwin, Pamela J.; Ennis, Marguerite; Pritchard, Kathleen I.; Koo, Jarley; Hood, Nicky Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute at Mount Sinai Hospital, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center and St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Funded by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation Vitamin D Deficiency in Breast Cancer Metabolism Ingraham B et al. Curr Med Res Opin 2006 Vitamin D Deficiency in Breast Cancer Objectives In a cohort of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: 1. To determine the frequency of vitamin D deficiency 2. To identify factors (patient, tumor) associated with vitamin D deficiency 3. To determine associations of vitamin D deficiency with distant disease-free survival and overall survival 4. To explore factors (patient, tumor) that modify the association of vitamin D with distant disease-free survival and overall survival Vitamin D Deficiency in Breast Cancer Locoregional Breast Cancer T1-3, N0-1, M0 • Dx 1989 to 1996 (Toronto - latitude 43 40) • n = 512 women, mean age 50.1 years Blood: frozen at -80C * Diet, Physical Activity, Clinical Data Systemic Treatment (if any) Annual Follow-up to 2007 • distant recurrence • death Mean 11.6 years * Analysed for 25-OH vitamin D in 2007 (RIA Diasorin – Stillwater, Minnesota) Vitamin D Deficiency in Breast Cancer 25-OH Vitamin D Levels at Diagnosis (Toronto – latitude 43 40) Mean: 58.1 ± 23.4 nmol/L Range: 8-177 nmol/L nmol/L ng/ml # % Deficient < 50 < 20 192 37.5 Insufficient 50-72 20-29 197 38.5 > 72-374 30-150 123 24.0 > 374 >150 0 0 Sufficient Toxic Vitamin D Deficiency in Breast Cancer Tumor and Treatment Related Factors Associated with Vitamin D Factor # Vitamin D (nmol/L) p-value Type of Surgery Mastectomy Lumpectomy 116 396 54.5 59.1 0.07 Tumor Stage 1 2 3 288 164 24 59.2 56.9 53.7 0.53 Nodal Involvement None ≥1 342 98 58.7 56.7 0.41 Tumor Grade 1 2 3 77 212 180 63.4 58.8 55.0 0.03 Estrogen Receptor Positive Negative 342 98 57.9 58.3 0.90 Adjuvant CXT No Yes 313 199 60.1 54.9 0.02 Adjuvant Hormone No Yes 312 200 57.2 59.5 0.25 Vitamin D Deficiency in Breast Cancer 1.0 Distant Disease-Free Survival Proportion distant disease free 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Sufficient Insufficient Deficient 0.0 p=0.02 0 2 4 6 8 Years since diagnosis 10 12 Deficient < 50 nmol/L Insufficient ≥ 50-72 nmol/L Sufficient > 72 nmol/L 1.94 (1.16-3.25) 1.37 (0.80-2.33) 1.0 5 year 82% 85% 88% 10 Year 69% 79% 83% HR (95% CI) Vitamin D Deficiency in Breast Cancer 1.0 Overall Survival Sufficient Proportion survived 0.4 0.6 0.8 Insufficient 0.2 Deficient 0.0 p=0.02 0 2 4 6 8 Years since diagnosis 10 12 Deficient < 50 nmol/L Insufficient ≥ 50-72 nmol/L Sufficient > 72 nmol/L 1.73 (1.05-2.86) 1.01 (0.59-1.73) 1.0 5 year 87% 93% 92% 10 Year 74% 85% 85% HR (95% CI) Vitamin D Deficiency in Breast Cancer 1 0 -1 Log hazard of death 2 Overall Survival Smoothed Log Hazard 50 100 150 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (nmol/L) Vitamin D Deficiency in Breast Cancer Conclusions 1. Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency was common at breast cancer diagnosis. Only 24% had levels considered sufficient. 2. Vitamin D deficiency was associated with higher grade tumors. 3. Vitamin D deficiency was associated with an increased risk of distant recurrence and death. 4. Replication is recommended; an RCT of vitamin D supplementation may be indicated if results are replicated. 5. Caution is recommended in applying these results in the clinical situation – it is premature to advise breast cancer patients to use vitamin D supplementation in doses higher than recommended for bone health. Consideration should be given to measuring vitamin D levels in blood to ensure they are in a healthy range. Natural History of the Disease ASCO 2008 Take Home Messages for Clinical Practice ! VITAMIN D ! There is “nothing to lose” in measuring/correcting vitamin D levels at BC diagnosis