Download Mission Trajectory Step 1

Mission Trajectory Step 1
From planning to deployment
The SESAR concept
SESAR Steps are
capability-based
Step 3
Performance-based Operations
(not fixed in time)
Step 2
Trajectory-based Operations
Step 1
Time-based Operations
Deployment Baseline
(formerly: IP1)
SESAR : Business/Mission Trajectory
4D Mission Trajectory same principles as
Business Trajectory but enables complex military
operations:
• Airspace reservations part of trajectory
definition
• Synchronisation of multiple trajectories for
complex missions
• Formation flights with trajectory split/join
up
• Confidentiality & security requirements of
exchanges between WOC-NM-aircraft-ATC
4D Business Trajectories data
linked and negotiated between AOCNM-aircraft-ATC
Trajectory negotiation
4DT
4DT
4DT
4DT
4DT
4DT
Mission Trajectory
Business/Mission Trajectory
Not a new way to fulfill missions
- A new way to share information, negotiate
trajectories and allocate airspace during
planning cycles and execution phase,
- A new way for flights description, richer
than today’s Flight Plan
- A new way to provide Air Navigation
Services
- A new challenge for civil/military
coordination
Main Step 1 system changes
in support of Mission Trajectory & Network performance
Mission Trajectory requirements
• Civil military airspace management systems
•
to distribute planned airspace usage & airspace status
and to allow more modular airspace structures.
•
• Harmonised military flight planning &
aeronautical information systems to support
improved “Operational Air Traffic”
Unrestricted access to airspace for high
priority missions
Operational Air Traffic Transit Service
across Europe
Sufficient airspace for training
Confidentiality & security
Compatibility with FABs & NM
•
•
•
• Secure gateways to interconnect military systems
to the ATM network
• Uplink & downlink of trajectory data through
data link (Transport type only for time based operations)
• Enhanced airborne navigation and surveillance systems
(Transport type only for time based operations)
Network Shortcomings
•
•
Lack of Airspace management
flexibility (inability to exploit capacity
opportunities)
Lack of integration of Network,
ATC and AOC/WOC operations
Technical Enablers
(limited reliability of available information by
different actors) implies:
Limited predictability
overprotection in term of capacity,
Local actions with negative impact on
Network
•
2 hours gap between ATFM and
ATC (limited flexibility and reactivity)
Mission trajectory development
ASM local
simulation/negotiation
Baseline
Projects
7.5.2
13.2.1
ATC
ASM simulation/negotiation
Based on flight intents
Project
7.5.2
7.6.2
13.2.1
15.2.10
A/C
ATC
ATFCM
ASM simulation/negotiation
Based on Mission requests
Project
7.6.2
11.1.1
ATFCM
WOC
STEP 1
ATC
Meteo
Aircraft
Main challenges
Level 1
Master Plan
Network
Strategy Plan
Performances
& Maturity
Analysis,
Business
cases
Level 3
Common
Projects
CFT
(Business view)
Implementation
Projects
ESSIP
• Monitoring execution
• Ensuring Consistency
• Trigger and support
corrective actions
Level 2
7
ATM Master Plan 2012-Operational changes for MilitarySTEP 1 “full scope”
ANSP
Aeronautical Information Data sharing
Airspace Management Systems
Datalink systems and services
Enhanced local ATFCM tools for NOP & trajectories
Enhanced Flight data processing
Ground communication and information infrastructure
WOC
Aeronautical Information Data sharing
Airspace Management Systems
Enhanced WOC systems
Flight planning and demand data
Ground communication and information infrastructure
TRANSPORT
AIRCRAFT
ABAS capability
ASAS spacing capability
Datalink systems and services
FMS capability to support i4d operations
FMS upgrade for Lateral/Vertical NAV approach
Onboard D-Taxi management
Onboard situation awareness & alerts on ground
AIRPORT
Aeronautical Information Data sharing
Airport lighting system
Datalink systems and services
Ground communication and information infrastructure
Surface movement systems
Surveillance infrastructure
Planning exercise/No CBA
Prioritisation based on:
• Mission trajectory needs
•Network performance
• synchronisation
Interim Deployment
Programme
2012-2014
Reference
WP 2
Airspace
management
tools
interoperable with the network
AOM 19; FUA regulation
WP 2
Migration to European Aeronautical
Service EAD
AOM 13.1; LSSIP report;
regulation 73/2010; ITY
ADQ
WP 4
VDL 2 for Transport Aircraft
ITY AGDL; link 2000+
WP 5
Ground systems upgrade for Flight
Data Exchange
ITY COTR; FMTP
WP 6*
Avionics and procedures for RNP 1
performance
NAV 03; PBN mandate
WP 7*
Avionics and procedures for APV
baro/SBAS
NAV 10; ICAO spec; PBN
mandate
* maturity linked to PBN mandate
Military priorities
• deployment decision taken
• no need for Cost Benefit analysis
Deployment based on European ATM Master Plan
• Refined Performance needs
•Refined Cost Benefit Analysis
• Updated with R&D results and maturity checks
• With updated OIs/enablers/lines of action
Reference
Pilot “common project”
2015-2017
&
Deployment Programme
2015-2030
WP 1
Enhanced ASM/ATFCM/ATC ?
WP 2
Enhanced OAT FPL?
WP 3
AMHS?
WP 4
Secure
gateways
networks?
WP
..
with
IP