Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Mission Trajectory Step 1 From planning to deployment The SESAR concept SESAR Steps are capability-based Step 3 Performance-based Operations (not fixed in time) Step 2 Trajectory-based Operations Step 1 Time-based Operations Deployment Baseline (formerly: IP1) SESAR : Business/Mission Trajectory 4D Mission Trajectory same principles as Business Trajectory but enables complex military operations: • Airspace reservations part of trajectory definition • Synchronisation of multiple trajectories for complex missions • Formation flights with trajectory split/join up • Confidentiality & security requirements of exchanges between WOC-NM-aircraft-ATC 4D Business Trajectories data linked and negotiated between AOCNM-aircraft-ATC Trajectory negotiation 4DT 4DT 4DT 4DT 4DT 4DT Mission Trajectory Business/Mission Trajectory Not a new way to fulfill missions - A new way to share information, negotiate trajectories and allocate airspace during planning cycles and execution phase, - A new way for flights description, richer than today’s Flight Plan - A new way to provide Air Navigation Services - A new challenge for civil/military coordination Main Step 1 system changes in support of Mission Trajectory & Network performance Mission Trajectory requirements • Civil military airspace management systems • to distribute planned airspace usage & airspace status and to allow more modular airspace structures. • • Harmonised military flight planning & aeronautical information systems to support improved “Operational Air Traffic” Unrestricted access to airspace for high priority missions Operational Air Traffic Transit Service across Europe Sufficient airspace for training Confidentiality & security Compatibility with FABs & NM • • • • Secure gateways to interconnect military systems to the ATM network • Uplink & downlink of trajectory data through data link (Transport type only for time based operations) • Enhanced airborne navigation and surveillance systems (Transport type only for time based operations) Network Shortcomings • • Lack of Airspace management flexibility (inability to exploit capacity opportunities) Lack of integration of Network, ATC and AOC/WOC operations Technical Enablers (limited reliability of available information by different actors) implies: Limited predictability overprotection in term of capacity, Local actions with negative impact on Network • 2 hours gap between ATFM and ATC (limited flexibility and reactivity) Mission trajectory development ASM local simulation/negotiation Baseline Projects 7.5.2 13.2.1 ATC ASM simulation/negotiation Based on flight intents Project 7.5.2 7.6.2 13.2.1 15.2.10 A/C ATC ATFCM ASM simulation/negotiation Based on Mission requests Project 7.6.2 11.1.1 ATFCM WOC STEP 1 ATC Meteo Aircraft Main challenges Level 1 Master Plan Network Strategy Plan Performances & Maturity Analysis, Business cases Level 3 Common Projects CFT (Business view) Implementation Projects ESSIP • Monitoring execution • Ensuring Consistency • Trigger and support corrective actions Level 2 7 ATM Master Plan 2012-Operational changes for MilitarySTEP 1 “full scope” ANSP Aeronautical Information Data sharing Airspace Management Systems Datalink systems and services Enhanced local ATFCM tools for NOP & trajectories Enhanced Flight data processing Ground communication and information infrastructure WOC Aeronautical Information Data sharing Airspace Management Systems Enhanced WOC systems Flight planning and demand data Ground communication and information infrastructure TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT ABAS capability ASAS spacing capability Datalink systems and services FMS capability to support i4d operations FMS upgrade for Lateral/Vertical NAV approach Onboard D-Taxi management Onboard situation awareness & alerts on ground AIRPORT Aeronautical Information Data sharing Airport lighting system Datalink systems and services Ground communication and information infrastructure Surface movement systems Surveillance infrastructure Planning exercise/No CBA Prioritisation based on: • Mission trajectory needs •Network performance • synchronisation Interim Deployment Programme 2012-2014 Reference WP 2 Airspace management tools interoperable with the network AOM 19; FUA regulation WP 2 Migration to European Aeronautical Service EAD AOM 13.1; LSSIP report; regulation 73/2010; ITY ADQ WP 4 VDL 2 for Transport Aircraft ITY AGDL; link 2000+ WP 5 Ground systems upgrade for Flight Data Exchange ITY COTR; FMTP WP 6* Avionics and procedures for RNP 1 performance NAV 03; PBN mandate WP 7* Avionics and procedures for APV baro/SBAS NAV 10; ICAO spec; PBN mandate * maturity linked to PBN mandate Military priorities • deployment decision taken • no need for Cost Benefit analysis Deployment based on European ATM Master Plan • Refined Performance needs •Refined Cost Benefit Analysis • Updated with R&D results and maturity checks • With updated OIs/enablers/lines of action Reference Pilot “common project” 2015-2017 & Deployment Programme 2015-2030 WP 1 Enhanced ASM/ATFCM/ATC ? WP 2 Enhanced OAT FPL? WP 3 AMHS? WP 4 Secure gateways networks? WP .. with IP