Download Quality Improvement for Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Management

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Quality Improvement for Prehospital
Cardiac Arrest Management
Mark E. Pinchalk, MS, EMT-P
Patient Care Coordinator
City of Pittsburgh EMS
Aggressive EMS QI Programs
• Evidence based care
• Employ best practices
• Standardization of Care
– Care Bundles
– Performance Feedback
IMPROVED
PATIENT
OUTCOMES
Performance Improvement
Performance Feedback
Research
New care practices
Prehospital Phases of Cardiac Arrest
for Quality Improvement
• Pre-arrival
• Intra-arrest
• Post-arrest
Pre-Arrival
•
•
•
•
•
Recognition
911 Access
Bystander CPR
Public Access AED availability & Use
EMS Response Times
Pre-arrival: Bystander CPR
Bystander CPR Rate 24.8 – 43.3% (29.3%)
Intra-Arrest QI Interventions
•
•
•
•
•
Minimally Interrupted CPR Strategy
Early Defibrillation
Early Vascular Access
Early Medications
Appropriate Advanced Airway Management
Coronary Perfusion Pressure and
ROSC in Human Cardiac Arrest
Paradis (1990)
P < 0.001
Adjusted OR of Survival
5
95% CI
0.87. 5.22
1.00, 5.08
1.20. 6.88
1.50, 7.26
Adjusted OR
4
3
2
1
2.13
2.26
21-40
41-60
2.88
3.3
1
0
0-20
61-80
81-100
CPR Fraction
Adjusted for: bystander CPR, age, gender,
time from 911 call to arrive at scene, chest compression rate, public location
Improving Perfusion
• High CPR Fractions
– > 80%
• Minimal Interruptions
– < 10 seconds
• Vasopressors
– Early
Epinephrine and CPP
(Rosenberg, 1996)
375E5 Program - Training
• CQI Training Initiative
• Started Pilot Training January 2008
– Two (2) hour program
– Small unit training 2-4 personnel per session
• Phased in regular bureau training cycles for all
personnel Spring 2008
375E5 Program - Training
• 2 and 4 provider VF Cardiac
Arrest Scenarios run for 5
minutes
– Pretest
– Performance Feedback
– Post Test
• CPR Fraction and pause
times measured via qCPR ™
system in the Phillips
Monitor
375E5 - 2 Rescuer Scenario
Problem
Mitigation
Delay in initiating CCC
Rapid ABC assessment and
initiation of CCC; one rescuer
CCC while monitor placed
Pauses of CCC for rhythm
analysis and defibrillation
Brief pause for rhythm analysis;
continue CPR until ready for
shock, clear and then resume
CCC immediately
Pauses of CCC for advanced
airway placement
Defer until later in the arrest
unless clinically indicated to do
earlier or placement with
interruption of CCC
375E5 - 2 Rescuer Scenario
Problem
Mitigation
Delay in initiating IV
One rescuer CPR while second
rescuer starts IV; Defer advanced
airway
Delay in administering epinephrine One rescuer CPR while second
rescuer administer epinephrine
Number of 1 mg epinephrine
administered
2 mg epinephrine IVP first dose
then 1 mg q 3 minutes
Pretest: 20 seconds to begin CCC
Pretest: 30 second pause in CCC for rhythm
analysis and defibrillation
Post-test: 10 seconds to assess and start CCC; 7
second pause for rhythm analysis and defibrillation
Post-test: 6 second pause for 2nd
defibrillation
Pretest: Beginning of a 50 second pause in
CCC for ETI
Training Results: 2 rescuer scenario
Parameter
CPR fraction
Pretest
Posttest
P value
62.71%
71.33%
< 0.001
Start CCC
26.54 sec
10.42 sec
< 0.001
Defib pause
time
21.39 sec
5.75 sec
< 0.001
Time to IV
207.33 sec 116.06 sec
< 0.001
Time to 1st
EPI
Number epi
given
245.83 sec 144.39 sec
< 0.001
0.29
2.13
< 0.001
Training Results: 4 Rescuer Scenario
Parameter
CPR fraction
Pretest
Posttest
P value
68.45%
81.45%
< 0.001
Start CCC
16.22 sec
9.50 sec
< 0.001
Defib pause
time
15.29 sec
4.68 sec
< 0.001
Time to IV
132.43 sec
91.25 sec
< 0.001
Time to 1st
EPI
Number epi
given
210.70 sec 112.18 sec
< 0.001
1.41
2.45
< 0.001
Total CPR % over time
90
80
70
60
50
CPR%
40
30
20
10
0
2010
9/30/2010
9/30/2011
1/31/2012
375E5 Patient Outcomes:
Pulse on ED Arrival
Arrests
Pulse @ ED % with pulse
375E5
Patients
149
51
34.29%
Standard
Patients
225
69
23.47%
P value
0.025
Time and Attempts to Secure Airway
vs. ROSC
P = 0.098
P = 0.245
Outcomes 2010-11 vs 2011-12
70
60
50
40
2010-11
30
2011-12
V-Fib IR
20
10
0
ROSC
ED
Surv
ROSC: p = 0.219, OR = 1.140 (0.792 – 2.511)
ROSC ED: p = 0.057, OR = 1.770 (0.954 – 3.292)
Post Cardiac Arrest Care
Integrated Post Arrest Care
Integrated Post Arrest Care
Questions?
Mark E Pinchalk, MS, EMT-P
Patient Care Coordinator
City of Pittsburgh EMS
412-622-6930
[email protected]
Related documents