Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Quality Improvement for Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Management Mark E. Pinchalk, MS, EMT-P Patient Care Coordinator City of Pittsburgh EMS Aggressive EMS QI Programs • Evidence based care • Employ best practices • Standardization of Care – Care Bundles – Performance Feedback IMPROVED PATIENT OUTCOMES Performance Improvement Performance Feedback Research New care practices Prehospital Phases of Cardiac Arrest for Quality Improvement • Pre-arrival • Intra-arrest • Post-arrest Pre-Arrival • • • • • Recognition 911 Access Bystander CPR Public Access AED availability & Use EMS Response Times Pre-arrival: Bystander CPR Bystander CPR Rate 24.8 – 43.3% (29.3%) Intra-Arrest QI Interventions • • • • • Minimally Interrupted CPR Strategy Early Defibrillation Early Vascular Access Early Medications Appropriate Advanced Airway Management Coronary Perfusion Pressure and ROSC in Human Cardiac Arrest Paradis (1990) P < 0.001 Adjusted OR of Survival 5 95% CI 0.87. 5.22 1.00, 5.08 1.20. 6.88 1.50, 7.26 Adjusted OR 4 3 2 1 2.13 2.26 21-40 41-60 2.88 3.3 1 0 0-20 61-80 81-100 CPR Fraction Adjusted for: bystander CPR, age, gender, time from 911 call to arrive at scene, chest compression rate, public location Improving Perfusion • High CPR Fractions – > 80% • Minimal Interruptions – < 10 seconds • Vasopressors – Early Epinephrine and CPP (Rosenberg, 1996) 375E5 Program - Training • CQI Training Initiative • Started Pilot Training January 2008 – Two (2) hour program – Small unit training 2-4 personnel per session • Phased in regular bureau training cycles for all personnel Spring 2008 375E5 Program - Training • 2 and 4 provider VF Cardiac Arrest Scenarios run for 5 minutes – Pretest – Performance Feedback – Post Test • CPR Fraction and pause times measured via qCPR ™ system in the Phillips Monitor 375E5 - 2 Rescuer Scenario Problem Mitigation Delay in initiating CCC Rapid ABC assessment and initiation of CCC; one rescuer CCC while monitor placed Pauses of CCC for rhythm analysis and defibrillation Brief pause for rhythm analysis; continue CPR until ready for shock, clear and then resume CCC immediately Pauses of CCC for advanced airway placement Defer until later in the arrest unless clinically indicated to do earlier or placement with interruption of CCC 375E5 - 2 Rescuer Scenario Problem Mitigation Delay in initiating IV One rescuer CPR while second rescuer starts IV; Defer advanced airway Delay in administering epinephrine One rescuer CPR while second rescuer administer epinephrine Number of 1 mg epinephrine administered 2 mg epinephrine IVP first dose then 1 mg q 3 minutes Pretest: 20 seconds to begin CCC Pretest: 30 second pause in CCC for rhythm analysis and defibrillation Post-test: 10 seconds to assess and start CCC; 7 second pause for rhythm analysis and defibrillation Post-test: 6 second pause for 2nd defibrillation Pretest: Beginning of a 50 second pause in CCC for ETI Training Results: 2 rescuer scenario Parameter CPR fraction Pretest Posttest P value 62.71% 71.33% < 0.001 Start CCC 26.54 sec 10.42 sec < 0.001 Defib pause time 21.39 sec 5.75 sec < 0.001 Time to IV 207.33 sec 116.06 sec < 0.001 Time to 1st EPI Number epi given 245.83 sec 144.39 sec < 0.001 0.29 2.13 < 0.001 Training Results: 4 Rescuer Scenario Parameter CPR fraction Pretest Posttest P value 68.45% 81.45% < 0.001 Start CCC 16.22 sec 9.50 sec < 0.001 Defib pause time 15.29 sec 4.68 sec < 0.001 Time to IV 132.43 sec 91.25 sec < 0.001 Time to 1st EPI Number epi given 210.70 sec 112.18 sec < 0.001 1.41 2.45 < 0.001 Total CPR % over time 90 80 70 60 50 CPR% 40 30 20 10 0 2010 9/30/2010 9/30/2011 1/31/2012 375E5 Patient Outcomes: Pulse on ED Arrival Arrests Pulse @ ED % with pulse 375E5 Patients 149 51 34.29% Standard Patients 225 69 23.47% P value 0.025 Time and Attempts to Secure Airway vs. ROSC P = 0.098 P = 0.245 Outcomes 2010-11 vs 2011-12 70 60 50 40 2010-11 30 2011-12 V-Fib IR 20 10 0 ROSC ED Surv ROSC: p = 0.219, OR = 1.140 (0.792 – 2.511) ROSC ED: p = 0.057, OR = 1.770 (0.954 – 3.292) Post Cardiac Arrest Care Integrated Post Arrest Care Integrated Post Arrest Care Questions? Mark E Pinchalk, MS, EMT-P Patient Care Coordinator City of Pittsburgh EMS 412-622-6930 [email protected]