Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
BME 1300 Problem 1 NewstetterGroup Haval Amedi Mollie Bryan Eric Flynn Peymaun Ghafouri-Kia Ryan Gleber Walter Kim Chelsea Proffitt Laini Whitton Problem Currently, non-small cell lung cancer is being detected at stages III and IV, causing a five year mortality rate of 86%. This is due to a lack of widespread lung cancer screening methods that have sensitivity and specificity greater than 60%. Evaluation of Current Methods • Data suggests no current implementation of screening • High mortality rate • Caught after symptoms develop—stages III and IV • X-rays and sputum cytology - have been proven ineffective in lowering mortality rate • Physical exam - ineffective for screening in early stages due to lack in symptoms • CT Scan – has only been proven effective for high risk patients • Bronchoscopy and biopsy – overly invasive and used primarily for detection Humphrey et al., Annals of Internal Medicine, 2004 Evaluation of Screening Procedure • Practically no screening done • Patients assessed for risk • • • • • • Smoker (10 pack years), occupation, family history If patient is high risk, some will screen, others will wait for symptoms X-rays followed by CT scans if abnormalities present CT followed by biopsy/treatment Sputum occasionally used Doctors very negative about screening situation Cayelli, et al., Phone Interview, 2011. Recommendations for Current Methods • Annual CT for high risk age 55-74 with 30 pack years • Biannual CT for other high risk patients not in 55-74/30 pack year category • Mathematical modeling available soon for other risk groups1 • Eliminate X-rays for high risk groups • Add PET to CT scan when available2 • Cell block and smear with sputum cytology3 1. Peres, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010 2. Pastorino, British Journal of Cancer, 2010 3. Erkiliç et al., Acta Cytol, 2003 Evaluation Numbers For Future Methods • Grading Scale for Future Methods • 2 x Sensitivity • 2 x Specificity • 1 x Invasiveness • 1 x Risk of Injury from Test Complications • 1 x Practicality (Ease of Analyzing and Collecting Data) • 1 x Implementation (Ease of Achieving Widespread Usage) • Each Ranked 1-5 with 5 being the highest rating Evaluation Numbers For Future Methods Sputum Biomarkers – 21/40 • Methylation of tumor suppression genes • 64% sensitivity and specificity4 • PPV = 11.72% Criteria Rating Serum Based miRNA – 28/40 • Both miR-1254 and miR-547-5p significantly increased in early stage NSCLC • 78% sensitivity/75% specificity5 Criteria Rating Sensitivity (x2) 4 Sensitivity (x2) 6 Specificity (x2) 4 Specificity (x2) 4 Invasiveness 4 Invasiveness 4 Risk 4 Risk 5 Practicality 5 Practicality 5 Implementation 4 Implementation 4 Total Score 21 Total Score 28 4. 5. Keller et al., BMC Cancer, 2009 Evaluation Numbers For Future Methods Circulating Tumor Cells – 29/40 • Blood test • 71% sensitivity/83% Specificity6 Criteria Rating Breath Biomarkers – 31/40 • Analyzes biomarkers in exhaled breath • 84% sensitivity/92% specificity7 Criteria Rating Sensitivity (x2) 4 Sensitivity (x2) 6 Specificity (x2) 6 Specificity (x2) 8 Invasiveness 4 Invasiveness 5 Practicality 5 Risk 5 Risk 5 Practicality 5 Implementation 5 Implementation 3 Total Score 29 Total Score 31 6. 7. Tanaka et al., Clin Cancer Res, 2009 Evaluation Numbers For Future Methods Protein Blood Biomarkers – 33/40 • Uses aptamers • 91% sensitivity/84% specificity6 Criteria Rating Bronchoscopy (Epithelial Cells) – 34/40 • Genetic testing of epithelial cells from endobronchial brushings • 95% sensitivity and specificity7 Criteria Rating Sensitivity (x2) 8 Sensitivity (x2) 10 Specificity (x2) 6 Specificity (x2) 10 Invasiveness 4 Invasiveness 3 Practicality 5 Practicality 4 Risk 5 Risk 3 Implementation 5 Implementation 4 Total Score 31 Total Score 34 Proof of Concept • Given a random population of 100,000 people, 6,9509 will be diagnosed with lung cancer. 6,04610 of these people will die. With our proposed future method of genetic testing in epithelial cells from endobronchial brushings, our new mortality rate is 53.07%7,10,11, saving 2,357 lives. 7. 9. 10. Problem Statement 11. Minna, Harrison’s Prin of Int Med, 2005 Final Recommendations • Screening methods in distant future • • • • Partial Wave Spectroscopy12 Urine Test Proteomics Spirometry 12. Backman, et al., Cancer Research, 2010