Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Globalization, International Trade, and Outsourcing: Understanding Economic Growth and Polarization in America 25th Anniversary Montana Arbitration and Labor Relations Conference Barry Bluestone Northeastern University Bozeman, MT September 23, 2004 A n n u a l G ro w th Long-Term Real GDP Growth in the United States 1800-1995 6.0% 5.1% WW II 5.0% 4.5% 4.2% 4.5% 4.4% 4.1% 3.9% A v e ra g e 4.0% 2.9% 3.0% 2.0% D E P R E S S I O N 3.2% 3.0% 2.3% Glory Days 1.0% 0.1% 0.0% 1800-1840 1870-1890 1840-1870 1913-1929 1890-1913 1939-1949 1929-1939 1959-1969 1949-1959 Sources: David (1800-1840); Gallman (1840-1870); Maddison (1870-1929); CEA 1987 (1929-59); CEA 1997 Indicators" (1989-2000) 1979-1989 1969-1979 1989-1995 (1959-1989); "Economic The Post-War Glory Days 1947-1973 Rapid GDP Growth in the U.S.: Real Family Income doubles (+104%) Declining Unemployment 1950s: 3.9% 1960s: 4.4% 1970s: 3.2% Unemployment Rate declines to 3.8% -1966-1969 Rising Incomes for Most Families Real Average Hourly Earnings Total Private Sector ($1982) $9.00 1972 $8.50 2003 1959-72 $8.00 + 34% 1972-93 1982 $7.50 1993 - 16% $7.00 1993-03 + 10% 1959 $6.50 59 64 69 74 79 84 89 94 99 4 A n n u a l P e rc e n t C h a n g e How U.S. Family Income Grew 1947-1973 4% 3% 3.0% 2.6% 2.7% 2.7% 2.4% 2% 1% 0% Lowest 20% Middle Lower Middle Top 20% Upper Middle Why the U.S. Grew So Fast 1947-1973 Y= C+I+G+X-M Consumer Boom Pent up Savings & Pent up Demand Union collective bargaining gains Investment Boom Conversion to Civilian Production Government Spending Boom State & Local Spending on Urban Renewal, New Suburbs, New Regions Cold War Export Boom - Marshall Plan Import Implosion - Legacy of WWII Wage & Security-Led Growth Rise of Collective Bargaining 36% of American Workforce Unionized Another 1/3 or so benefit from “sympathetic” pressure Traditional Workplace Contract AIF/COLA Wage Formula “Fringe” Benefits Seniority System Grievance System Work Rules/Job Classifications Union Security Clause Management Rights Clause The Post World War II Virtuous Cycle Union Collective Bargaining Gains Pent-up Savings Pent-up Demand Wage & Benefit Growth Consumption Virtuous Cycle Public Sector Demand Stimulus Investment Output Growth Productivity Growth Growth in Labor Supply Technological Innovation Federal R&D Spending The End of Affluence ….. An Age of Diminished Expectations A v e r a g e A n n u a l G r o w th R a Revised GDP Growth Rates 1959-1995 5% 4.4% Declining Growth Rates 4% 3.2% 3.0% 3% 2.3% 2% 1% 0% 1959-1969 1969-1979 1979-1989 1989-1995 A n n u a l U n e m p lo y m e n t R a t e Average Unemployment Rate United States 1960-1989 8.0% 7.0% Rising Unemployment 7.3% 6.2% 6.0% 5.3% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 1960s Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Handbook of U.S. Labor Statistics 1970's 1980's Real Average Hourly Earnings Total Private Sector ($1982) $9.00 1972 $8.50 2003 1972-93 - 16% $8.00 1982 $7.50 1993 1993-03 $7.00 1959 $6.50 59 64 69 74 79 84 89 94 99 4 A n n u a l P e rc e n t C h a n g e How Family Income Grew 1973-1995 2% 1.3% 1% Increasing Income Inequality 0.5% 0.2% 0% -0.2% -0.6% -1% Lowest 20% Middle Lower Middle Source: U.S. Department of Labor Top 20% Upper Middle So Why Did the U.S. Growth Engine Sputter in the 1970s? Oil Crisis in the 1970s Business forced to focus on energy efficiency, not new products or new technologies Corporate Myopia and Arrogance in face of new competition Little emphasis on productivity, quality, and innovation Global Competitors stepped in Imports clobbered the economy Labor Productivity Growth A n n u a l G ro w th 1949-1995 1973-1995 1949-1973 3.5% 3.4% 3.0% 3.1% 3.1% 2.5% Plummeting Productivity A ve rag e 2.0% 1.5% 1.3% 1.0% 1.2% 1.1% 0.5% 0.0% 1949-1959 1959-1969 1969-1973 1973-1979 1979-1989 1989-1995 Imports as % of GDP Truman Eisenhower Kennedy Johnson Nixon Ford Carter Reagan Bush Clinton Bush W. 16% P e rc e n t 14% 12% 10% 8% 1929 Import/GDP Ratio 6% 4% 2% 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 U.S. Trade Balance Exports - Imports (Goods) Truman Eisenhower Kennedy Johnson Nixon Ford Carter Reagan Bush Clinton Bush W. 100 -100 -200 $ b illio n s 0 -300 -400 -500 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 YEAR So Why Did Inequality Explode? Skilled-Biased Technological Change Rise of Service-based Economy Industry Deregulation Declining Unionization Lean Production & Destruction of Job Ladders “Winner-Take-All” Labor Markets Growing International Trade Outsourcing & Capital Mobility Immigration Trade Deficits Surprise, Surprise! Prosperity Regained … 1995-2000 R A n n u a l G r o w th Revised GDP Growth Rates 1959-1999:III 5% 4.5% 4.4% 4% 3.2% 3.0% 3% A v e ra g e 2.3% 2% 1% 0% 1959-1969 1969-1979 1979-1989 1989-1995 1995-1999 A n n u a l U n e m p lo y m e n t R a t e Average Unemployment Rate United States 1960-1998(II) 8.0% 7.3% 7.0% 6.4% 6.2% 6.0% 5.3% 4.9% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1960s 1970's Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Handbook of U.S. Labor Statistics 1980's 1990-95 1996-98 Real Average Hourly Earnings Total Private Sector ($1982) $9.00 1972 $8.50 2003 1959-72 1993-03 $8.00 1982 $7.50 + 10% 1972-93 - 16% $7.00 1993 1959 $6.50 59 64 69 74 79 84 89 94 99 4 So Why did the U.S. Grow Again? The New Conventional Wisdom: The Wall Street Model Wall Street Model Weak Trade Unions kept wages and prices down Welfare Reform increased labor supply, keeping wages and prices low Tight monetary policy kept inflation under control and interest rates low Deficit Reduction/Surplus Generation raised aggregate savings rate, lowering interest rates Free Trade depressed wages, forced prices down, and kept inflation under control >>>>>> All leading to a stock market boom and new investment Subdued Inflation Increased Savings Wall Street Virtuous Cycle Increased Corporate Profit Falling Interest Rates Rising Stock Prices Improved Productivity Virtuous Cycle Technological Innovation Increased Wealth Increased Capital Investment Increased Spending Output Growth Falling Interest Rates Subdued Inflation Increased Savings So Who’s responsible for the new economic boom? Was it Bill Clinton … who got the deficit under control? Was it Alan Greenspan … who got inflation under control? Was it Ronald Reagan … who got government under control? Answer: None of the above .... Despite all the ballyhoo, the Wall Street Model does NOT explain the U.S. boom in the late 1990s It takes a little bit of history to understand America’s new prosperity... Long Lags in Technology/Productivity Cycle A n n u a l G ro w th R a te Revised Productivity Growth Statistics 4% 1949-1999:III 3.4% 3.1% 3.1% 3% Productivity Rebound began in the 1980s 3% 2.1% 2% A v e ra g e 1.7% 1.6% 1.5% 2% 1% 0.8% 1% 0% 1949-1959 1959-1969 1969-1973 1973-1977 1977-1981 1981-1989 1989-1993 1993-1999 "Learning Curves" Introduction of New Technologies 4.5 Technology Release 3.0 P r o d u c tiv ity 4 Technology Release 2.0 3.5 3 2.5 Technology Release 1.0 2 Actual Productivity Trend ----------- 1.5 1 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 Time 50 57 64 71 78 Productivity Growth during the British Industrial Revolution in % Figure 3.4 L a b o r P r o d u c tiv it y G r o w t h 1.2 1.1% 1.1 1 "Mature" Phase 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 "Pre-Revolution" Phase 0.5 0.5% 0.4% 0.4 "Diffusion/Learning" Phase 0.3 0.2% 0.2 0.1 0 "Initial" Phase 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 Source: Adapted from Jeremy Greenwood, 'The Third Industrial Revolution" 1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 in % Productivity Growth during the U.S. Antebellum Period G ro w th 1.6 1.40% L a b o r P r o d u c tiv it y 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.63% 0.6 "Diffusion/Learning" 0.4 0.30% 0.2 1800 1805 1810 1815 1820 1825 1830 1835 1840 1845 1850 1855 1860 1865 1870 Source: Adapted from Jeremy Greenwood, "The Third Industrial Revolution" New Technologies that spurred Economic Growth Steam Engine …. 19th C. Electrification …. Early 20th C. Integrated Circuit …. Late 20th C. Computer Hardware Computer Software Internet e-commerce But each takes decades to impact productivity and growth Where did the new technology come from for the 1990s Boom? The Missile Race following Sputnik (‘50s/’60s) The Space Race with Russia (‘60s/’70s) From Government Spending on Defense to the Private Sector in a Quarter Century It was hideously expensive, terribly wasteful, but in a peculiar way it paid off decades later So who’s most responsible for U.S. Economic Boom? Nikita Khrushchev Public Sector + Private Sector Working Together Federal Government provided Basic Research funds Local, State, and Federal Government educated and trained a labor force to effectively use the new technology Private sector converted basic research to applied development .... and productivity soared Public Investment in the 1960s, 1970s, and early 1980s ... Basic Research Education (after Sputnik) Public Infrastructure (Interstate highways, airports, internet) ......PAID OFF IN THE LATE 1990s Since 2000 ..... Monthly Net Job Growth th o u s a n d s ) from Truman to George W. Bush 300 235.4 210.6 200 168.1 117.6 89.5 100 ( in 196.5 33.5 0 -100 -200 -93.6 -177.3 Hoover Eisenhower Nixon-Ford Roosevelt-Truman Kennedy-Johnson Reagan-Bush Carter Bush W. Clinton Duration of Job Loss Recession Years 1947-2003 ? 30 M o n th s 25 20 15 10 5 0 1953-54 1957-58 1960-61 1970-71 Months of Continous Loss 1974-75 1981-82 1990-91 2001- Months of Year-over-Year Loss Growth, Productivity, & Employment 2001-2003:III P e rc e n t C h a n g e 10 8.1 8 7.2 7.0 6 5.4 4 3.3 2.4 2.1 1.9 2 1.4 0.3 0.1 0 -0.1 -0.4 -2 -0.1 -1.3 2001 2002 Real GDP 2003:I Productivity 2003:II Employment 2003:III Percentage Point Change in Unemployment Rate 7% 6% 5% 6.0% “Democratizing” Unemployment 4.6% 4% 3.3% 3.2% 3% 1.9% 2% 2.3% 1.5% 1.4% 1.0% 1% 0% 2.0% 1.9% 2.1% Early 1980s' Recession Early 2000s' Recession Early 1990s' Recession Less than High School Grad High School Grads Some College College Grads Federal Outlays for Physical Capital, Research and Developm ent, and Education and Training: As a % of GDP 2.75 2.7% 2.25 1.75% 2 1.75 Year 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 1970 1968 1966 1964 1.5 1962 % of GDP 2.5 Year 2004 1.25 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 1970 1968 2.25 1966 1964 1962 % of GDP Federal Outlays For Research and Developm ent As a % of GDP 2% 2 1.75 1.5 1% 1 0.75 0.5 Federal Outlays for Non-Defense R&D As a % of GDP 1.20% 1% 0.80% 0.60% 0.4% 0.40% Year 20 04 20 01 19 98 19 95 19 92 19 89 19 86 19 83 19 80 19 77 19 74 19 71 19 68 19 65 0.20% 19 62 % of GDP 1.00% Federal Outlays for Research and Developm ent in National Defense As a % of GDP 1.40% 1.00% Reagan “Boomlet” 0.80% 0.60% Year 20 04 20 01 19 98 19 95 19 92 19 89 19 86 19 83 19 80 19 77 19 74 19 71 19 68 19 65 0.40% 19 62 % of GDP 1.20% Federal Outlays For General Science R&D As a % of GDP .75% 0.80% 0.70% 0.50% 0.40% 0.30% .10% 0.20% 0.10% Year 20 04 20 01 19 98 19 95 19 92 19 89 19 86 19 83 19 80 19 77 19 74 19 71 19 68 19 65 0.00% 19 62 % of GDP 0.60% Federal Outlays for Energy R&D As a % of GDP Energy Crisis .12% 0.14% 0.12% 0.08% 0.06% 0.04% .015% 0.02% Year 20 04 20 01 19 98 19 95 19 92 19 89 19 86 19 83 19 80 19 77 19 74 19 71 19 68 19 65 0.00% 19 62 % of GDP 0.10% Federal Outlays for Transportation R&D As a % of GDP 0.06% 0.05% 0.04% 0.03% .02% 0.02% Year 20 04 20 01 19 98 19 95 19 92 19 89 19 86 19 83 19 80 19 77 19 74 19 71 19 68 19 65 0.01% 19 62 % of GDP .04% Federal Outlays for Natural Resources and Environm ent R&D As a % of GDP 0.06% .05% 0.04% 0.03% .02% 0.02% Year 20 04 20 01 19 98 19 95 19 92 19 89 19 86 19 83 19 80 19 77 19 74 19 71 19 68 19 65 0.01% 19 62 % of GDP 0.05% Federal Outlays for Health R&D As a % of GDP 0.25% .25% 0.15% .10% 0.10% Year 20 04 20 01 19 98 19 95 19 92 19 89 19 86 19 83 19 80 19 77 19 74 19 71 19 68 19 65 0.05% 19 62 % of GDP 0.20% A Model of Growth for the 21st Century Regaining and Sustaining Prosperity Quick stimulus in short run Public investment in basic research, education, homeland security, and infrastructure in the long run Restoring Social Equity Higher Minimum Wage Labor Law Reform to Foster Unionization Fair Trade Invest in Public Schools Universal Health Care Coverage Expand Public Goods (e.g. Transportation, Day Care, Elder Care) 21st Century Main Street Model Virtuous Cycle Union Collective Bargaining Gains Federal Reserve Policy Wage & Benefit Growth Consumption Increased Minimum Wage Virtuous Cycle Investment Output Growth Productivity Growth Growth in Enhanced Labor Supply Technological Innovation Public Investment in Education & Training Public Investment in Infrastructure Public Investment in R&D