Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Role of Preclinical Models to Identify Novel Therapeutics in Rare Cancers Peter J. Houghton, Ph.D. St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital How To Select New Agents for Clinical Trials? Rationale for the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program (PPTP) Drug Development NCI/Industry/Academia Phase I Phase II 400 new drugs in development • Prioritization of agents for phase I • Establish relevant models that encompass clinical heterogeneity • Rational decisions to advance/stop development • Potential to focus phase II trials • Potential to identify sensitive tumors Overview of the PPTP Screen Testing @ MTD Drug X Panel A Panel B Panel C Panel D Panel E Stage 1 Report 6 neuroblastomas Active in Model(s)? Yes Full Dose Response/PK No Other Tumor Models Available? Yes Yes No Final Report Houghton et al. Clin Cancer Res. (2002) Orthotopic Models Transgenic Models Why Do Preclinical Cancer Models Fail? • Tumor models do not recapitulate human cancer at the molecular level • Preclinical tumor models do not encompass clinical heterogeneity • Species Tolerance: Host tolerance leads to high systemic exposure to drug -overprediction. Low tolerance leads to low systemic exposure, and underprediction of drug activity. • Criteria for defining ‘activity’ is more stringent in clinical trials • Clinical trials design ignores preclinical data •Tumor models do not recapitulate human cancer at the molecular level Molecular Characterization of Xenograft Tumor Models • Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program (PPTP) -Affymetrix (U133A) -SNP analysis (100K) -CGH • Pediatric Oncology Preclinical Protein-Tissue Array Project (POPP-TAP) -cDNA arrays -Tissue/Protein arrays How well do xenograft tumors represent the respective clinical disease? Tumors Cluster Along Diagnostic Type by Unsupervised Clustering cDNA Array: all 38,789 Good Quality Genes RH1 ? EWS RH6 JHAN AS KCNR SC/Orthotopic Javed Khan -POPP-TAP (subnitted) Identify Xenografts That Recapitulate the Tumors of Origin. MDS 38,789 genes of primary/xeno/cell line: EWS/NB/RMS ANN trained on tumors predict xenografts PPTP Lines -Rh41 -Rh10 -Rh28 -Rh30 -Rh36 -Rh18 PPTP Lines -SK-N-AS -NB-1643 -NB-1691 -NB-1771 -NB-EB -NB-SD -NB-1382 • Preclinical tumor models do not encompass clinical heterogeneity Panels of Xenograft Tumors Accurately Reflect Clinical Responsiveness Tumor Line Histology Rh10 Rh12 Rh18 Rh28 Rh30 Rh35 Rh36 Rh39 IRS56 IRS68 Rh65 Rh66 ARMS ERMS ERMS ARMS ARMS ERMS ERMS ARMS ERMS ERMS ARMS ARMS Vincristine Cytoxan Dactinomyc in Topotecan MCR CR PR Vincristine 44% Cyclophosphamide 50% Actinomycin D 25% SD PD NO DATA Topotecan 50% clinical responses Comparison of Expression Profiles in Kidney Tumors and Their Derived Xenografts Models Clustering using 543 best classifiers >1Present (Affymetrix U133A) CCSK Fetal kidney HPLNR Wilms Xenograft Wilm’s Tumor Xenografts Cluster with Their Clinical Samples CCSK Fetal kidney HPLNR Wilms Xenograft • Criteria for defining ‘activity’ is more stringent in clinical trials Link Expression Profiles to Chemosensitivity of Kidney Chemosensitivity to Identify TumorofXenografts Biomarkers Response Tumor Line Tumor Line Histology Vincristine Cytoxan Dactinomyc in Topotecan Temozo lomid e CPT-11 MG1-114 BCNU VP-16 CDDP Doxorubi cin Taxol Expt 1 BMS247550 Expt 2 Expt 3 Expt 4 Expt 5 Expt 6 Expt 7 Expt 8 Expt 9 RESPONSE KEY WT-1 FH WT-5 NU WT-6 FH* WT-7 FH WT-8 FH WT-9 FH WT-1 RESPONSE KEY MCR CR WT-5 FH NU Histology Vincristine Cytoxan Dactinomyc WT-10 in WT-11 Topotecan FH lomid e FH* Temozo CPT-11 MG1-114 BCNU VP-16 CDDP Doxorubi cin Taxol Expt 1 Expt 2 Expt 3 Expt 4 Expt 5 Expt 6 Expt 7 Expt 8 Expt 9 MCR PR WT-6 FH* WT-7 FH WT-12 Rhabdoid WT-8 FH WT-13 DA WT-9 FH WT-10 FH WT-11 FH* WT-14 Rhabdoid CR WT-12 Rhabdoid WT-16 Rhabdoid WT-13 DA WT-16 Rhabdoid SKNEP DA SKNEP DA PR SD WT-14 Rhabdoid SD PD PD Non-GBM Brain Tumors BT-29 BT-34 BT-45 BT-28 BT31 BT-32 BT-36 BT-41 ATRT ATRT MED MED ANAPL MED MED EPEND EPEND Tumor Line Histology Vincristine Topotecan Temozo lomid e CPT-11 MG1-114 BCNU VP-16 CDDP Cytoxan Doxorubi cin PS-341 BMS247550 AR(111) R-115777 Depsipeptid e 17AAG RESPONSE KEY Linking Chemosensitivty To Expression Profiling Tumor Line Histology Vincristine Cytoxan Dactinomyc in Topotecan Temozo lomid e CPT-11 MG1-114 BCNU VP-16 CDDP Doxorubi cin Taxol Expt 1 Expt 2 Expt 3 Expt 4 Expt 5 Expt 6 Expt 7 Expt 8 Expt 9 WT-1 FH RESPONSE KEY MC R CR PR SD NB-1382 NB-1643 NB-1691 NB-1771 NB-EB WT-6 FH* MCR WT-7 FH WT-8 FH WT-9 FH CR WT-10 FH WT-11 FH* PR WT-12 Rhabdoid WT-13 DA WT-14 Rhabdoid WT-16 Rhabdoid SD mor Line stology PD Rh10 Rh12 Rh18 Rh28 Rh30 Rh35 Rh36 Rh39 IRS56 IRS68 Rh65 Rh66 ARMS ERMS ERMS ARMS ARMS ERMS ERMS ERMS ARMS ARMS ncristine toxan ctinomyc in potecan mozo lomid e PT-11 PAM G1-114 CNU P-16 DDP xorubi cin -341 MS247550 R(111) 115777 psipeptid e AAG -713489 HA xol BT-751 AD001 D1839 6668 Osteosarcoma Glioblastoma BCNU VP-16 CDDP TOPOTECAN CPT-11 TEMOZOLOMIDE VINCRISTINE MGI-114 PS341 DOXORUBICIN CARBOPLATIN DEPSIPEPTIDE BMS247550 RII5777 SU6668 SKNEP DA Rhabdomyosarcoma NB-SD Vincristine Topotecan Temozo lomid e CPT-11 MG1-114 BCNU VP-16 CDDP Cytoxan Doxorubi cin PS-341 BMS247550 AR(111) R-115777 Depsipeptid e 17AA G Taxo l ABT-751 ZD1839 Drug WT-5 NU NO DATA PD Neuroblastoma Tumo r Line Kidney Tumors umor Line OS-1 OS-2 OS-17 OS-21 OS-29 OS-31 OS-32 OS-33 Respons e SJ-BT39 SJ-GBM2 Identifying Biomarkers For Predicting DrugResponsive Populations ncristine toxan ctinomyc in potecan mozo lomid e PT-11 G1-114 CNU P-16 DDP ARBO POPLAT XAL IPLAT xorubi cin -341 MS247550 R(111) 115777 psipeptid e AAG -713489 HA xol BT-751 AD 001 CI-779 RF1042 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 4-11-05 BT-39 SJ-GBM2 D-456 BT-56 D-212 BT-41 BT-36 OS-17 OS-2 OS-21 OS-1 NB-1643 Clustering method: UPGMA (unweighted average) NB-132 Similarity measure: Euclidean distance Ordering function: Average value BT-45 OS-164 OS-166 OS-187 ALL-19 SKNEP ---------------------------------Total no of records: Columns included: log2(dap086u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap110-u133v2_Signal), scores (1), log2(dap113-u133v2_2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap111-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap121u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap073-u133v2_Signal), scores (1), log2(dap078-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), EW-8 log2(dap077-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap074u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap075-u133v2_Signal), EW-5 WT-12 scores (1), log2(dap071-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap070-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap069WT-14 u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap084-u133v2_Signal), WT-13 scores (1), log2(dap079-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), WT-11 log2(dap085-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap083WT-10 u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap081-u133v2_Signal), scores (1), log2(dap076-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), Rh36 log2(dap082-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap068Rh10 u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap072-u133v2_Signal), scores (1), log2(dap080-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), Rh65 log2(dap092-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap093Rh41 u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap103-u133v2_Signal), Rh28 scores (1), log2(dap101-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), EW-1 log2(dap102-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap106u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap100-u133v2_Signal), Rh30 scores (1), log2(dap099-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), BT-29 log2(dap104-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap105WT-16 u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap089-u133v2_Signal), Rh18 scores (1), log2(dap095-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap094-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap096BT-46 BT-50 u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap097-u133v2_Signal), CHL-79 scores (1), log2(dap098-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), NB-1691 log2(dap091-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap090u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap109-u133v2_Signal), NB-EBc1 scores (1), log2(dap108-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), SK-N-AS log2(dap112-u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1), log2(dap107NB-1771 u133v2_Signal), Z-scores (1) NB-SD Empty values replaced by: 0 BT-28 Z- Z- Z- Z- Z- Z- Z- Z- Z- Z- Z- Hierarchical Clustering Trusted samples based on LogSignal CV 0.5 Max-Min>=100 at least 3 Present (1113 probesets) Group 1 versus Group 2 Osteosarcomas ( Probesets >4-fold Ttest FDR<0.01) keratin 18 keratin 19 cadherin 1, type 1, E-cad fibronectin 1 /// fibronec carboxypeptidase E Integrin-binding sialopro OS#1 OS#2 0501 Vincristine Not Determined 0502 0503 0504 0505 0506 0507 0508 Progressive Disease 0 Stable Disease 1 Partial Response 2 Complete Response 3 Maintained Complete Response 4 ALL-10 ALL-11 ALL-19 ALL-16 ALL-17 Osteosarcoma ALL-8 ALL-4 ALL-7 ALL-3 OS160 ALL-2 OS-21 OS187 OS164 OS166 OS-17 Neuroblastoma OS-1 OS-2 SK-N-AS NB-1643 NB-1382 CHLA-79 NB-1691 NB-EBc1 Glioblastoma NB-1771 NB-SD SJ-BT56 D212 D456 Non-GBM Brain Tumor SJ-BT39 D645 SJ-GBM2 BT-46 BT-50 BT-41 BT-45 BT-36 BT-32 Sarcoma BT-28 BT-31 Rh65 Rh36 Rh30 Rh41 Rh28 Kidney/Rhabdoid Rh10 Rh18 EW8(Rh1) EW1 EW5 WT-12 WT-14 WT-10 SKNEP WT-13 WT-16 WT-11 BT-29 Chemosensitivity of Tumors in the PPTP Panel ALL The PPTP • • • • • • • • • Richard Gorlick (osteosarcoma) John Maris (neuroblastoma) Henry Friedman (glioblastoma) Richard Lock (ALL) Pat Reynolds (in vitro testing) Malcolm Smith (CTEP) Javed Khan (NCI) Geoff Neale (St. Jude) Chris Morton (St. Jude; coordinator) Thanks Overview of the PPTP Screen Testing @ MTD Drug X Panel A Panel B Panel C Panel D Panel E Stage 1 Report Active in Model(s)? Yes Full Dose Response/PK No Other Tumor Models Available? Yes Yes No Final Report Houghton et al. Clin Cancer Res. (2002) Orthotopic Models Transgenic Models Model Systems for Drug Selection Drug Development NCI/Industry/Academia Phase I Phase II •Relevant models (panels). -molecular identity -encompass clinical heterogeneity •Rational decisions to advance/stop development based on PK parameters •Potential to focus phase II trials •Potential to identify biomarkers for patient selection Tumor Panel: 9-10-05 Brain Tu mor Panel (glioblastoma) SJ-GBM2 SJ-BT39 D645 D456 SJ-BT56 (extended panel) D212 (extended panel) Duke University School of Medicine Glio blastoma Glio blastoma Glio blastoma Glio blastoma Glio blastoma Glio blastoma Brain Tu mor Panel (non-glioblastoma) BT-28 BT-31 BT-32 BT-45 BT-36 BT-41 BT-46 (extended panel) BT-50 (extended panel) St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Sarcoma Panel EW1 EW5 EW8 RH10 RH1 8* RH28 RH3 0* RH4 1* RH3 6 (extended panel) RH6 5 (extended panel) St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Ewing sarcoma (relapse) Ewing sarcoma (diagnosis) Ewing sarcoma Rhabdo myosarcoma , alveolar (relapse) Rhabdo myosarcoma , embryonal (diagnosis) Rhabdo myosarcoma , alveolar (diagnosis) Rhabdo myosarcoma , alveolar (diagnosis) Rha bdomyosarcoma , alveolar (relapse) Rhabdo myosarcoma , embryonal (relapse) Rhabdo myosarcoma , alveolar (relapse) Osteosarcoma panel OS-1 OS-2 OS-17 OS-164 OS-166 OS-187 OS-21 (extended panel) OS-160 (extended panel) Albert Einstein College of Medicine Osteosarcoma (primary/untreated) Osteosarcoma (primary/untreated) Osteosarcoma (primary/untreated) Osteosarcoma (primary/previously treated) Osteosarcoma (osteoblastic primary/relapse) Osteosarcoma (primary/untreated) Osteosarcoma (primary/untreated) Osteosarcoma (lung metastasis/relapse) Medulloblastoma (diagnosis) Anaplastic medulloblastoma (diagnosis) Medulloblastoma (diagnosis) Medulloblastoma (diagnosis) Anaplastic Ependymoma (diagnosis) Ependymom a (relapse) Medulloblastoma (diagnosis) Medulloblastoma (diagnosis) Tumor Panel: 9-10-05 (cont.) Acute Lymphoblastic Leuke mia panel ALL-2 ALL-3 ALL-4 ALL-7 ALL-8 ALL-16 ALL-17 ALL-19 ALL-10 (extended panel) ALL-11 (extended panel) Children’s Cancer Institute of A ustralia Neuroblastoma panel NB-SD NB-1771 NB-1691 NB-EBc1* CHLA -79 NB-1643* NB-1382 (extended panel) SK-N-AS (extended panel) Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia MYCN amplified (pre viously treated) MYCN amplified (diagnosis) MYCN amplified (relapse) Not MYCN amp lified (relapse) Not MYCN amp lified (relapse) MYCN amplified (diagnosis) MYCN amplified (relapse) Not MYCN amp lified (diagnosis) Kid ney/rhabdoid tumor panel BT-29 WT-14 WT-11 WT-13 WT-16 SKNEP WT-10 (extended panel) WT-12 (extended panel) St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Atypical teratoid rhabdoid (CNS) (diagnosis) Rhabdoid , kidney (relapse) Wilms favorable histology (diagnosis) Wilms diffuse anaplastic (diagnosis) Rhabdoid , kidney (relapse) Wilms diffuse anaplastic (relapse) Wilms favorable histology (diagnosis) Rhabdoid , kidney (diagnosis) c-ALL /Relapse 3 (CR1 = 30 mos) Pre-B ALL /Diagnois (CR1 = 38 mos) Ph+ ALL /Dia gnosis (CR1 = 10 mos) Bip henotypic /Diag nosis (CR1 = 7 mos) T-ALL /Relapse 1 (CR1 = 17 mos) T-ALL /Diagnosis (CR1 = 103+ mos) c-ALL /Diagnosis (CR1 = 25 mos) c-ALL /Relapse 1 (CR1 = 4 mos) c-ALL /Diagnosis (CR1 = 57+ m os) c-ALL /Diagnosis (CR1 = 120+ mos) Volcano: Group OS1 vs Group OS2