Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cardiology for Finals Andrew C Rankin Cardiology for Finals • What do you need for Finals? • The knowledge and skills required to be a FY doctor • History, examination, investigations, treatments • Common conditions Cardiology for Finals OSCE • Clinical skills –History –Examination • Clinical Skills Website • ECG Cardiology for Finals Heart Failure Heart Failure • A 65 yr old man is admitted with heart failure • What 5 investigations would you do, and why? • ECG • CXR • Troponin • Full blood count • U&E’s • Echo Heart Failure • A 65 yr old man is admitted with heart failure • Name 4 drugs which should be prescribed at discharge from hospital • For each drug, state: – – – – Mechanisms of action? Why it is prescribed? Adverse effects? Drug class? Drugs for Heart Failure 1. Furosemide (frusemide) 2. Ramipril (and / or candesartan) 3. Carvedilol (or bisoprolol) 4. Spironolactone (or eplerenone) 5. Digoxin Diuretics Disease Modifying Therapy Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Sympathetic NS Renin Noradrenaline Na retention K excretion Fibrosis Aldosterone AT I ACE AT II ATII type I receptor vasoconstriction Adrenaline 1-adrenoreceptors HR vasosconstriction cardiotoxicity Symptomatic Heart Failure CONSENSUS I (NEJM 1987) SOLVD (T) (NEJM 1991) • • • • • • 253 NYHA IV Enalapril vs placebo Mean FU : 188 days 1 yr Mortality Enalapril Placebo 26% 44% P=0.002 2569 LVEF 35% + CHF Enalapril vs placebo Mean FU : 41.4 months 4 yr Mortality Enalapril Placebo 35% 40% P=0.0036 Carvedilol in severe CHF 2289 patients; NYHA IV Heart failure 100 All-cause mortality 90 Carvedilol 80 % Survival 70 60 Placebo P=0.00014 50 0 4 8 12 16 Months 20 24 28 Packer et al, NEJM 2001 Beta Blockers in Heart Failure “Start low, go slow” • carvedilol 3.125mg bd for 2 weeks - double every 2 weeks until 25mg/bd • bisoprolol 1.25mg od for 2 weeks - double every 2weeks until 10mg • diuretics may have to be increased Drug treatment of CHF SOLVD (1991) 15 CIBIS-II MERIT-HF (1999) 10 % death at 1 year 15.6 12.4 5 0 11.9 7.8 Diuretic digoxin Diuretic digoxin ACEI Diuretic Diuretic digoxin digoxin beta-blocker ACEI ACEI NICE 2010 - Heart Failure Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy RA pacing LV pacing (via cardiac vein) RV pacing CARE-HF Cleland et al. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1539-49. Cardiology for Finals Cardiomyopathy Cardiomyopathies Normal Hypertrophic Dilated From Davidson’s Principles & Practice of Medicine Cardiology for Finals Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Artery Disease • A 55 yr old man is admitted with severe central chest pain • What investigation would you do first, and why? • ECG • CXR • Troponin • Full blood count • U&E’s • Echo ST elevation ENHANCED REPERFUSION THERAPY FOR STEMI Patients presenting to SAS/DGH 2008 STEMI/Posterior MI Shock No Shock Call to balloon time >90 min Thrombolysis contraindicated Call to balloon time <90 min* PCI Centre Thrombolysis PCI Centre Primary PCI PCI Centre Primary PCI Reperfusion No reperfusion *Maximum journey time 40 min* Cath/PCI within 24hrs Rescue PCI Return to local DGH within 24hrs or when stable ISIS-2.Lancet 1988 Left anterior descending coronary artery in a patient with STEMI a b c a. Occluded LAD b. Post-thrombolysis c. Post-PCI Widimsky P Eur Heart J 2010;31:634-636 Thrombolysis vs Angioplasty for STEMI Danami-2 Study; 1572 patients with STEMI Busk et al, Eur Heart J 2008 Myocardial infarction redefined WHO definition: (2 of 3) • Typical symptoms (chest pain) • Typical ECG changes (Q waves) • Enzyme rise ESC/ACC redefinition 2000 • Troponin rise, with one of: • Chest pain • ECG changes (Q waves or ST segment) • PCI Acute Coronary Syndrome Presentation Working Diagnosis ECG Chest pain Acute coronary syndrome ST elevation No ST elevation + + - Troponin Final diagnosis STEMI NSTEMI Myocardial Infarction Unstable Angina Cardiology for Finals Evidence based medicine Evidence based Cardiology • Why do we use a treatment? • Because it saves lives! • Evidence of improved outcome Parachutes: Evidence Base Smith & Pell 2003 BMJ 327:1459-61 Cardiology for Finals Arrhythmias Cardiac Arrhythmias “Supraventricular” Atrial Junctional Ventricular Narrow or wide QRS? Irregular? AF Adenosine P waves? Terminates AV block SVT Atrial Supraventricular Tachycardia Accessory pathway AV reentry tachycardia Adenosine and SVT Accessory pathway Termination of AVRT Adenosine Carotid Sinus Massage Atrial Flutter Atrial Flutter Adenosine and Atrial Flutter Adenosine Radiofrequency ablation Ablation catheter Accessory pathway Atrial Fibrillation – an new epidemic • AF affects 1.0-1.5% of the population in the developed world • Life-time risk 1-in-4 for >40 year olds • Increased prevalence with age – 10% >80 years • 1% of health care budget in UK Algorithm for treatment of AF! Paroxysmal Persistent Permanent Peters N, et al. Lancet 2002 Atrial Fibrillation Risk of embolism Rhythm control Atrial fibrillation Rate control “Natural” time course of AF ESC AF Guidelines 2010 Rhythm vs Rate control in AFFIRM All-cause death at Year 5: 23.8 versus 21.3% for rhythm versus rate control Cumulative mortality (% patients) 30 25 20 Rhythm control 15 Rate control 10 5 (p=0.08; N=4060 ) 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years AFFIRM=Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Managem The AFFIRM Investigators. N Engl J Med 2002; 347(23): 1825–33 Amiodarone vs Sotalol for AF Singh et al (SAFE-T) NEJM 2005;352:1861 Warfarin prevents strokes in AF • Warfarin prevents 20-30 strokes per 1000 patient years • 6 - 8 serious bleeding episodes per 1000 patient years CHADS2 Score for Risk Assessment Cardiac C Failure Hypertension H Age A >75 Diabetes D Stroke S Score 0 1 2 Risk Low Medium High 1 1 1 1 2 Anticoagulation therapy Aspirin Aspirin or Warfarin (INR 2-3) Warfarin (INR 2-3) CHA2DS2-VASc and stroke rate • Previous stroke, TIA or systemic embolism • Age > 75 years • Heart failure or moderate to severe LV SD (e.g. EF <40%) • Hypertension • Diabetes • Female sex • Age 65-74 years • Vascular disease ESC AF Guidelines 2010 CHA2DS2-VASc and stroke rate ESC AF Guidelines 2010 CHA2DS2-VASc and therapy ESC AF Guidelines 2010 Pulmonary vein isolation for PAF NICE Guidance – Rate Control for AF Beta-blocker or CCB Digoxin added Management cascade for AF ESC AF Guidelines 2010 Wide-complex tachycardia Bundle branch block SVT OR VT ? Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial Post-MI; LVSD; NSVT Patients Without Event (%) 100 95 Placebo (n = 743) P = 0.001 90 Encainide or Flecainide (n = 755) 85 80 0 91 182 273 364 455 Days After Randomization Echt et al. NEJM 1991;324:781-788. Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Transvenous lead Pectoral device Shocking coils Bipolar endocardial sensing ICD for Secondary Prevention Meta-analysis of the ICD secondary prevention trials (AVID, CASH, CIDS) % Mortality Death Arrhythmic Death Amio ICD Amio ICD Years Years Connolly SJ, et al. Eur Heart J 2000;21:2071 Cardiology for Finals Hypertension Hypertension – NICE 2006 Hypertension – NICE 2011 NICE CG127 Hypertension 2011 NICE CG127 Hypertension 2011 NICE CG127 Hypertension 2011 Cardiology for Finals Conclusions • Cardiology will come up! • Official Revision Session • Work hard! • Do well!