Download Powerpoint

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Role of Adaptive vs. Innate
Immune Activation in
non-AIDS Morbidity
Peter W. Hunt, MD
Associate Professor of Medicine
UCSF HIV/AIDS Division
A shift in focus…
• T cell activation as a target for
interventions in the pre-ART era
• Monocyte activation and inflammation a
target during treated HIV disease
• Why this shift is occurring
– Important caveats
• Implications for future clinical trials
Dec 10, 1981
Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and mucosal candidiasis in previously healthy
homosexual men: evidence of a new acquired cellular immunodeficiency
MS Gottlieb, R Schroff, HM Schanker, JD Weisman, PT Fan, RA Wolf, and A Saxon
Leu3=CD4
T10=CD38
CD8+ T cell activation predicts
survival better than VL
in patients with AIDS (CD4<200)
P=0.001
Janice Giorgi
P=0.02
Survival
Survival
Giorgi, JID, 1999 (see also: Giorgi, JAIDS, 2002)
T Cell Activation Declines with ART
Hunt et al, JID, 2003; PLoS One, 2011
But Remains Abnormally High During
ART-mediated Viral Suppresion
Hunt et al, JID, 2003; PLoS One, 2011
Is T cell activation a cause of
disease in treated HIV infection or
simply a marker for some other
process?
Important for identifying targets for novel
interventions
Low CD4 Count during ART
Predicts non-AIDS Death
Young et al for COHERE cohort, PLoS Med, 2012 (see also Baker, AIDS, 2008)
IL-2 Increases CD4 Counts in
Treated Patients
IL-2 also decreases HLA-DR
and CD38 expression
(Kovacs, NEJM, 1995)
Abrams et al, NEJM, 2009
However, IL-2 Had No Effect on
AIDS/Death
P=0.47
CD4 count (and CD38 / DR
expression) is not 100%
specific for the
pathophysiologic pathway
mediating disease.
P=0.55
Abrams et al, NEJM, 2009
Why didn’t IL-2 work?
• May have expanded the wrong type of
CD4+ T cells (regulatory cells).
– Impaired functional immune responses?
• Could CD4+ T cell count just be a marker
for some other immunologic process?
What Specific Immunologic Pathways
are Driving Disease during ART?
CD4
Lymphopenia
Innate Immune
Activation
(MØ/DC)
?
Inflammation
?
Coagulation
?
T and B Cell
Activation/
Dysfunction
?
Non-AIDS
Morbidity /
Mortality
What Specific Immunologic Pathways
are Driving Disease during ART?
CD4
Lymphopenia
Innate Immune
Activation
(MØ/DC)
?
Inflammation
?
Coagulation
?
T and B Cell
Activation/
Dysfunction
?
Non-AIDS
Morbidity /
Mortality
High T Cell Activation Associated with
Blunted CD4 Recovery during ART
Hunt et al, JID, 2003 (see also Goicoechea, JID, 2006; Gandhi, JAIDS, 2006)
Inflammation and Innate Immune
Activation are Increased in Patients with
Poor CD4+ T cell Recovery on ART
IL-6
CD4<350
CD4>500
sCD14
HIV-
CD4<350
CD4>500
HIV-
Lederman et al., JID, 2011
How do we get a better sense of
the specific immunlogic
pathways driving disease?
Abnormal CSF Neopterin Levels Persist
Despite 4 Years of VL Suppression
60%
Abnormal
Eden et al., JID , 2007 (see also: Burdo, AIDS, 2013; Lyons, JAIDS, 2011; Letendre, CROI 2012, Abstract #82)
CD8+ T Cell Activation is Not Persistently
Elevated in CSF During Suppressive ART
T cell activation in the CNS is unlikely to explain persistent neurocognitive
dysfunction in ART-suppressed individuals
Sinclair, JAIDS, 2008
Monocyte Activation Predicts Coronary
Artery Calcium Progression: SUN Study
T cell
Activation
Not Predictive
Baker, CROI 2013, Abstract #66LB
Do these markers predict
clinical events?
SMART: Inflammatory Markers Strongly
Associated with Mortality and CVD Events
Biomarker
All-Cause Mortality
(N=85)
Fatal or Non-fatal CVD
(N=136)
OR
P-value
OR
P-value
hs-CRP
3.1
0.02
1.6
0.20
IL-6
12.4
<0.0001
2.8
0.003
Amyloid A
3.1
0.05
1.6
0.12
Amyloid P
1.1
0.78
2.8
0.002
D-dimer
41.2
<0.0001
2.0
0.06
F1.2
1.3
0.64
0.8
0.56
Even after adjusting for CD4 count!
Kuller L et al. PLoS Med, 2008; Duprez, Atherosclerosis, 2009
Innate Immune Activation Predicts Mortality
More Strongly than T Cell Activation: SOCA
Gut Epithelial
Barrier Dysfunction
IDO-1 Induction
Monocyte Activation
Inflammation /
Coagulation
Matched for age, gender,
duration VL suppression,
CMV retinitis, nadir CD4
Hunt, CROI 2012, Abstr #278 (see also : Tenorio, CROI 2013, Abstr# 790)
Innate Markers Predict Mortality
Independent of Nadir AND Current CD4 count
Gut Epithelial
Barrier Dysfunction
IDO-1 Induction
Monocyte Activation
Inflammation /
Coagulation
Current CD4 count no longer
predictive of mortality after
adjusting for innate markers
Also
adjusted
for current
CD4
count
Hunt, CROI 2012, Abstr #278 (see also : Tenorio, CROI 2013, Abstr# 790)
Why does T cell “senescence”
not predict mortality in HIV
infection?
A: Normal CD8+ T Cell Proliferation & Maturation
CD57-,
CD57+,
↑Telomere
↓Telomere
Length
Length
Antigen
B:
CD28- Memory CD8+ Cells
CD28+CD27+
Maturational/Proliferative
Defect in
HIV
CD27-CCR7-RACD27+CCR7-RACD27-CCR7-RA+
CCR7+RACentral Memory
Transitional
Effector Memory
TEMRA
Inflammatory
Cytokines
Antigen
IDO-1,
PD-1+ Monocytes
CD28+CD27+
CCR7+RACentral Memory
CD28- Memory CD8+ Cells
CD27+CCR7-RATransitional
CD27-CCR7-RAEffector Memory
CD27-CCR7-RA+
TEMRA
Lee, CROI 2013, #294
A: Normal CD8+ T Cell Proliferation & Maturation
CD57-,
CD57+,
↑Telomere
↓Telomere
Length
Length
Antigen
B:
CD28- Memory CD8+ Cells
CD28+CD27+
Maturational/Proliferative
Defect in
HIV
CD27-CCR7-RACD27+CCR7-RACD27-CCR7-RA+
CCR7+RACentral Memory
Transitional
Effector Memory
TEMRA
Inflammatory
Cytokines
Antigen
IDO-1,
PD-1+ Monocytes
CD28+CD27+
CCR7+RACentral Memory
CD28- Memory CD8+ Cells
CD27+CCR7-RATransitional
CD27-CCR7-RAEffector Memory
CD27-CCR7-RA+
TEMRA
Lee, CROI 2013, #294
HIV Disease Drives Expansion
of CD28- CD8+ T Cells . . .
% CD28of CD8+ T Cells
% CD28of CD8+ T cells
100
P=0.0002
P=0.10
80
60
40
20
0
HIV-
All CMV+
HIV+
ART+
VL<75
HIV+
ARTVL>10K
Lee, CROI 2013, #309
But CD57 is inappropriately low on
CD28- CD8+ T Cells in HIV infection
% CD57+
of CD28-CD8+ T Cells
% CD28of CD8+ T Cells
% CD57+
of CD28-CD8+ T cells
% CD28of CD8+ T cells
100
80
60
40
20
0
HIV-
All CMV+
HIV+
ART+
VL<75
HIV+
ARTVL>10K
P<0.0001
P=0.0003
100
80
60
40
20
0
HIV-
HIV+
ART+
VL<75
HIV+
ARTVL>10K
Lee, CROI 2013, #309
Low (Not High) CD57 on CD28- CD8+ T
Cells Predicts Mortality in Treated HIV
%CD57+ on
CD28-CD8+ T Cells
4th Quartile
3rd Quartile
1.0
1.14
4.41
2nd Quartile
4.97
1st Quartile
0.1
1
10
100
Odds of Mortality
(compared to 4th Quartile)
*Subjects matched on age, gender, duration of viral suppression,
presence of CMV retinitis, and nadir CD4+ cell count
Lee, CROI 2013, #309
Higher Monocyte Activation Associated with
the Low CD57 CD8+ T cell Defect
% CD57+
of CD28- CD8+ T Cell
SOCA
100
Spearman's rho: -0.24, P=0.002
80
60
Monocyte activation may
cause T cell proliferative
defects in HIV by:
• PD1-driven IL-10 release
40
(Said, Nat Med, 2010)
• IDO-1 induction
20
(Boasso, Blood, 2007)
0
900
1900
2900
3900
4900
sCD14 Level (ug/ml)
Lee, CROI 2013, #309
What Specific Immunologic Pathways
are Driving Disease during ART?
CD4
Lymphopenia
Innate Immune
Activation
(MØ/DC)
?
Inflammation
Non-AIDS
Morbidity /
Mortality
Coagulation
T and B Cell
Activation/
Dysfunction
?
Caveats…
T / B Cell Activation Predicts NHL (MACS)
Adjusted for age, duration HIV
infection, and CD4 count
Breen, Cancer Epi Bio, 2011
T Cell Activation may be an important
contributor to HIV reservoir size…
Hatano, JID, 2013
Implications for Clinical Trials
CD8 Activation is a Reproducible and
Responsive Marker
Placebo Arm
Std Dev
of ∆ Wk 0-24:
0.13 log10%
~35%
relative
change
Hunt, Blood, 2013
Lots of Within-subject Variability in IL-6
Std Dev
of ∆ Wk 0-24:
0.38
log10pg/ml
~2.4-fold
relative
change
Hunt, Blood, 2013
sCD14 is much better, comparable variability
to T cell activation
Std Dev
of ∆ Wk 0-24:
0.11
log10ug/ml
~29%
relative
change
Hunt, Blood, 2013
Summary
• Several immunologic defects predict disease in
treated HIV infection:
– Innate immune activation and inflammation
– CD4 lymphopenia
– T cell / B bell activation and dysfunction
• Innate immune activation and inflammation
independently predict disease, less consistent for
other markers.
• Interventions designed to decrease activation of
myeloid lineage cells may hold promise.
– Statins, ASA?
– Microbial Translocation interventions
– Treating co-infections?
Acknowledgements
SCOPE/OPTIONS/UCSF
Sulggi Lee
Steve Deeks
Jeff Martin
Hiroyu Hatano
Vivek Jain
Rebecca Hoh
Rick Hecht
CWRU
Wei Jiang
Michael Lederman
Nick Funderburg
Brian Claggett
U Minnesota
Jason Baker
NIAID
Jason Brenchley
Danny Douek
Irini Sereti
Core Immunology Lab/DEM
Elizabeth Sinclair
Lorrie Epling
Mike McCune
SOCA
Curtis Meinert
Mark Van Natta
ACTG
Heather Ribaudo
R56AI100765, 1R21AI087035,
1R21AI07877, DDCF CSDA
Related documents