Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
IRI Experience in Forecasting and Applications for the Mercosur Countries Purely Empirical (observational) approach Mason & Goddard, 2001, Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc. Prediction Systems: statistical vs. dynamical system ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Based on actual, real-world Depends on quality and observed data. Knowledge of length of observed data Stati- physical processes not needed. stical Does not fully account Many climate relationships for climate change, or quasi-linear, quasi-Gaussian new climate situations. ------- ------------------------------------ -----------------------------Some physical laws must Uses proven laws of physics. be abbreviated or statisDyna- Quality observational data not tically estimated, leading mical required (but helpful for valto errors and biases. idation). Can handle cases Computer intensive. that have never occurred. Dynamical Prediction System: 2-tiered vs. 1-tiered forecast system ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Two-way air-sea interaction, Model biases amplify as in real world (required (drift); flux corrections 1-tier Where fluxes are as important as large scale ocean dynamics) Computationally expensive ------- ------------------------------------- -----------------------------More stable, reliable SST in Flawed (1-way) physics, the prediction; lack of drift especially unacceptable 2-tier that can appear in 1-tier system in tropical Atlantic and Indian oceans (monsoon) Reasonably effective for regions impacted most directly by ENSO IRI DYNAMICAL CLIMATE FORECAST SYSTEM 2-tiered OCEAN ATMOSPHERE PERSISTED GLOBAL SST GLOBAL ATMOSPHERIC MODELS ANOMALY ECPC(Scripps) 10 24 10 Persisted SST Ensembles 3 Mo. lead ECHAM4.5(MPI) FORECAST SST TROP. PACIFIC: THREE (multi-models, dynamical and statistical) TROP. ATL, INDIAN (ONE statistical) EXTRATROPICAL (damped persistence) CCM3.6(NCAR) NCEP(MRF9) NSIPP(NASA) COLA2 GFDL 10 24 12 30 12 30 30 Forecast SST Ensembles 3/6 Mo. lead POST PROCESSING MULTIMODEL ENSEMBLING Method of Forming 3 SST Predictions for Climate Predictions damped persistence 0.25 -------------------------------------------------- IRI CCA (1) NCEP CFS (2) LDEO (3) CPC Constr Analog CPTEC CCA -------------------------------------------------damped persistence Method of Forming 4th SST Prediction for Climate Predictions (4)Anomaly persistence from most recently observed month (all oceans) Collaboration on Input to Forecast Production Sources of the Global Sea Surface Temperature Forecasts Tropical Pacific Tropical Atlantic Indian Ocean Extratropical Oceans NCEP Coupled LDEO Coupled Constr Analogue CPTEC Statistical Damped Persistence IRI Statistical Atmospheric General Circulation Models Used in the IRI's Seasonal Forecasts, for Superensembles Name Where Model Was Developed Where Model Is Run NCEP MRF-9 NCEP, Washington, DC QDNR, Queensland, Australia ECHAM 4.5 MPI, Hamburg, Germany IRI, Palisades, New York NSIPP NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD COLA COLA, Calverton, MD COLA, Calverton, MD ECPC SIO, La Jolla, CA SIO, La Jolla, CA CCM3.6 NCAR, Boulder, CO IRI, Palisades, New York GFDL GFDL, Princeton, NJ GFDL, Princeton, NJ Forecasts of the climate The tercile-based category system: Below, near, and above normal Probability: 33% 33% Below| Near | Below| Near | Below| Near | 33% Above Data: | || ||| ||||.| || | | || | | | . | | | | | | | | | | 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 Rainfall Amount (mm) (30 years of historical data for a particular location & season) Monthly issued probability forecasts of seasonal global precipitation and temperature Four lead times - example: JUL | Aug-Sep-Oct* Sep-Oct-Nov Oct-Nov-Dec Nov-Dec-Jan *probabilities of extreme (low and high) 15% issued also very good skill OND 1997 good skill OND 1998 somewhat negative skill fairly good skill OND 1999 OND 2000 Neutral (zero) skill OND 2001 good skill OND 2002 negative skill OND 2003 neutral (zero) skill OND 2004 Historical skill using actually observed SST Ensemble mean (10 members) Historical skill using actually observed SST Ensemble mean (24 members) OND JFM AMJ JAS Indonesia Australia/ Indonesia Europe South America North America Tropical Americas OND Precip 19502000 Some Themes in Customer Demands: 1. Higher skills in existing products: -Tighter range of possibilities 2. More usable and easily understood product 3. Expansion of repertoire of products beyond seasonally averaged climate Specifically, users consistently request: More concrete forecast format Direct use of physical units (inches, degr C) Best guess quantity, with comparison to average More flexibility in probabilistic forecast format More temporal detail than 3 month averages Outlooks for single months, even at long lead Rainy season (or monsoon) onset time Weather features within season (e.g. dry spells) Chance of extreme event (storm, flood, drought) Climate change nowcast (the new “normal”) Almost all users want reliable probabilities (probabilities that would match observed frequencies of occurrence over a large sample of identical forecasts). Even if reliable, users for some applications are not impressed with slight changes from the climatological precipitation probabilities. They are interested in forecasts having probabilities that deviate strongly from the neutral, climatological probabilities. OND 1997 Ranked Probability Skill Score (RPSS) 3 prob prob RPSfcst = (Fcsticat – Obsicat)2 icat=1 icat ranges from 1 (below normal) to 3 (above normal) icat is cumulative, from 1 to icat RPSS = 1 - (RPSfcst / RPSclim) RPSclim is RPS of forecasts of climatology (33%,33%,33%) Real-time Forecast Skill (from Goddard et al. 2003, BAMS, p1761) Real-time Forecast Skill (from Goddard et al. 2003, BAMS, p1761) Real-time Forecast Skill (from Goddard et al. 2003, BAMS, p1761 1998-2001 Reliability Diagram from Barnston et al. 2003, BAMS, p1783 Reliability Diagram longer “AMIP” period from Goddard et al. 2003 (EGS-AGU-EUG) IRI Forecast Information Pages on the Web IRI Home Page: http://iri.columbia.edu/ ENSO Quick Look: http://iri.columbia.edu/climate/ENSO/currentinfo/QuickLook.html IRI Probabilistic ENSO Forecast: http://iri.columbia.edu/climate/ENSO/currentinfo/figure3.html Current Individual Numerical Model Climate Forecasts http://iri.columbia.edu/forecast/climate/prec03.html Individual Numerical Model Hindcast Skill Maps http://iri.columbia.edu/forecast/climate/skill/SkillMap.html Current Multi-model Climate Forecasts http://iri.columbia.edu/forecast/climate/multi_model2003.html