Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
OVERVIEW 1 1 3 th A A O A n n u a l S e s s i o n OUTLINE U n rave l i n g a n A s s o c i at i o n b et we e n H y p o d o nt i a a n d E p i t h e l i a l O va r i a n C a n c e r 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Anna N Vu, DMD, MS Division of Orthodontics May 2013 U N I V E R S I T Y O F K E N T U C K Y C O L L E G E O F D E N T I S T R Y HYPODONTIA REVIEW HYPODONTIA & CANCER HYPODONTIA Defined as the developmental absence of one or more teeth as well as variations in size, shape, rate of dental development and eruption time. • Over 300 genes are involved in odontogenesis including MSX1, PAX9, and AXIN2 • Genes involved in dental development also have roles in other organs of the body • Mutation in several genes governing tooth development have already been associated with cancer • Mutations in AXIN2 cause familial tooth agenesis and predispose to colorectal cancer7 • AXIN2 gene is highly expressed in ovarian tissue so may play a role in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)8 Hypodontia is the agenesis of 6 or less teeth. Oligodontia is the agenesis of 6 or more teeth. Anodontia is the agenesis of all teeth. • Reduced expression of PAX9 can lead to hypodontia and has been correlated with increased malignancy of dysplastic and cancerous esophageal epithelium9 • RUNX transcription factor family (RUNX1, 2, and 3) are involved in odontogenesis and has been the most targeted genes in acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia10 78 2.6-11.3% reported prevelance worldwide. Women are affected more than males at a ratio of 3:2. • Both genetic and environmental explanations for hypodontia have been reported. RUNX2 is amplified in various cancers including osteosarcoma and may play a role in breast and prostate cancer WHAT IS OVARIAN CANCER? WHAT IS OVARIAN CANCER? OVARIAN CANCER • Mainly affects women over the age of 40 • Symptoms include: • • • • • Ovarian cancer is a gynecological cancer that begin in the ovaries. 70% Although ovarian cancer only ranks 8th in most common cancer in women…. Introduction Background Purpose Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer do not survive. …it is the 5th leading cause of cancer death in women. • Vaginal bleeding Pain or pressure in pelvic region or abdominal area Back pain Bloating Change in bathroom habits Increased risk of EOC is correlated with: • • • • • Family history of ovarian cancer Increasing age History of breast, uterine, or colorectal cancer Infertility Endometriosis Inside Knowledge: Ovarian Cancer. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, May 2010. OVARIAN CANCER IN THE LITERATURE OVARIAN CANCER IN THE LITERATURE PURPOSE • Supports a possible association between hypodontia and EOC • Suggests hypodontia may potentially become a risk marker for future cancer development JADA 2008; 139(2): 163-9. FINDINGS • Prevalence of hypodontia was 20% for EOC subjects (p< .001) • Reported family hx of hypodontia and ovarian cancer was higher in EOC subjects • EOC subjects were 8.1 times more likely to have hypodontia than women without EOC • Compare prevalence rates of hypodontia among epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) subjects and control subjects • • Improved genetic screenings to identify persons at high risk for developing EOC • Refer female patients to get earlier screenings for EOC Earlier EOC diagnosis and treatment could save many lives • Explore the possible genetic association between the two phenotypes GENE SELECTION: Locus 8q24 PURPOSE Susceptibility Loci for Ovarian Cancer • Previous genome wide association study (GWAS) identified a ovarian cancer susceptiblity loci at 9q22 and found a 20% reduction in risk with each copy of the minor alleles23 • Most recent GWAS identified two new susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer • 2q31 (p= 3.8 x 10-14): rs2072590 • 8q24 (p= 8.0 x 10-15): rs10088218, rs1519682 and rs10098821 • SNPs at these two loci showed strong support for an association with ovarian cancer with p-values < 0.001. • At locus 8q24, minor allele (A) of SNP rs10088218 was associated with a decreased risk for ovarian cancer PURPOSE To investigate whether SNP rs10088218 is genetically associated with hypodontia. NULL Hypothesis (HO) SNP rs10088218 is NOT associated with hypodontia. SNP rs10088218 is associated with hypodontia. ALTERNATIVE Hypothesis (HA) Goode EL, et al. Genome wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer at 2q31 and 8q24. Nat Genet 2010; 42(10): 874-81. MATERIALS AND METHODS Subject Population • 110 Caucasian subjects were recruited from the orthodontic clinic at the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry • • 67 females, 43 males Subjects were classified into two research groups: • Controls: patients without hypodontia • Subjects: patients with hypodontia MATERIALS AND METHODS Saliva Collection • 2-4 mm of saliva was collected from all study participants • Oragene-DNA Collection Kits (DNA Genotek Inc., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) • Preservatives in container will preserve DNA for 5+ years DNA Isolation • Genomic DNA extracted and resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, and stored at 20° C • DNA isolated and purified via ethanol precipitation • DNA concentrations measured on the NanoDrop-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Wilmington, DE) Ta q m a n ® G e n e A s s a y K i t s • Analysis of all SNPs were performed on the genomic DNA utilizing Taqman® Genotyping Assay Kits on Roche LightCycler 480® • Following RT-PCR amplification, each SNP allele was identified using allelic specific probes • VIC or FAM fluorescence • Analyze SNP rs10088218 MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS SNP rs10088218 Statistical Methods • • Genotyping of SNP rs10088218 was completed in all 30 subjects with NMT and 80 controls. The Chi-Square (x2) Analysis • • • Used to evaluate the potential association of each SNP with hypodontia Co-dominant mode on inheritance was utilized for potential association Significance set at an alpha of 5% (p<0.05) • No deviation from HWE was observed in either the controls or the entire cohort. • SNP rs10088218 was significantly associated with the presence of hypodontia in 25 individuals versus 80 controls (p=0.019) with an odds ratio (OR) of 11.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-88.98) under an additive mode of inheritance (MOI). • SNP rs10088218 was also significantly associated with the presence of hypodontia in 30 individuals versus 80 controls (p=0.021; OR=4.37 n= 3 MOI. n= 0 95%CI: 1.25-15.35) under an additive Frequency of Missing Teeth • Same as previously reported • Maxillary lateral incisor was the most commonly missing tooth • The next most commonly missing tooth type included the mandibular second premolars followed by maxillary second premolars • Females affected more than males at a ratio of 3:1 RESULTS DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS SNP rs10088218 Number of individuals within the group with a given genotype (% of the total group) Group GG (%) AG (%) AA (%) Hypodontia Subjects Only n=25 24 (96.0) 1 (4.0) 0 (0) Controls n=80 54 (67.5) 23 (28.75) 3 (3.75) Hypodontia and Oligodontia Subjects n=30 27 (90.0) 3 (10.0) 0 (0) Controls n=80 54 (67.5) 23 (28.75) 3 (3.75) OR* (95% Confidence Interval) 11.51 (95% CI:1.49-88.98 ) Conclusions p-Value 0.019 • Hypodontia patients are 11.5x more likely to be homozygous for the G allele than controls • Odds ratio reduces with addition of oligodontia patients 4.37 (95% CI: 1.25-15.35) • Hypodontic teeth reported in this study are consistent with those previously reported missing in women diagnosed with EOC and hypodontia • The null hypothesis was rejected • SNP rs10088218 is significantly associated with the occurrence of hypodontia (p= 0.019) 0.021 FUTURE DIRECTION REFERENCES 1. 2. • Continue to expand the sample size in order to increase the power of the study • Test for association of SNP rs10088218 with ovarian cancer in EOC patients • Look at other potential markers • SNP rs2072590 that has been associated with an increased risk for ovarian caner • WNT 10A which has been associated with hypodontia and has a presence in ovarian tissue • Test these SNPs in ovarian cancer patients to find a common gene involved with both hypodontia and ovarian cancer Arte S and S Pirinen. Hypodontia. Orphanet Encyclopedia. 2004. Peck S et al. Site –specificity of tooth agenesis in subjects with maxillary canine malpositions. Angle Orthod 1996; 66: 473476. 3. Al-Nimri KS and E Bsoul. Maxillary palatal canine impaction displacement in subjects with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140(1): 81-86. 4. Jena AK and R Duggal. The pattern of maxillary canine impaction in relation to anomalous lateral incisors. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010; 35(1): 37-40. 5. DeCoster PJ et al. Dental Agenesis: Genetic and Clinical Perspectives. J Oral Pathol Med (2009). 38: 1-17. 6. Beeman CS. Prevalence of hypodontia in north america: regional and international comparisons. University of Kentucky. Lexington, KY 2009. Lecture. 7. Lammi L, et al. Mutations in AXIN2 cause familial tooth agenesis and predispose to colorectal cancer. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74(5): 1043-50. 8. Dong X, et al. Genomic structure, chromosome mapping and expression analysis of the human AXIN2 gene. Cytogenet Cell Genet 2001; 93 (1-2): 26-8. 9. Gerber JK, et al. Progressive loss of PAX9 expression correlates with increasing malignancy of dysplastic and cancerous epithelium of the human esophagus. J Pathol 2002; 197(3): 293-7. 10. Song H et al. A genome-wide association study identifies a new ovarian cancer susceptibility locus on 9p22.2. Nat Genet 2009; 41: 996-1000. REFERENCES 11. Ohno K and Ohmori I. Anodontia with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia in a young female: a case report. Pediatric Dentistry 2000; 22(1): 49-52. 12. Fleischmannova J et al. Formation of the tooth-bone interface. J Dent Res 2010;89:108-115. 13. Inside Knowledge: Ovarian Cancer. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, May 2010. 14. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2007 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2010. 15. Hoskins WJ. Prospective on ovarian cancer: why prevent? J Cell Biochem. 1995. S23: 189-99. 16. Chalothorn LA et al. Hypodontia as a risk marker for epithelial ovarian cancer: a case-controlled study. JADA 2008; 139(2): 163-169. 17. White SP. Evaluation of a common genetic etiology in ovarian cancer and tooth agenesis. Master’s Thesis, Texas A&M University System Health Sciences Center. Ann Arbor: ProQuest/UMI, 2008. (Publication No. UMI 1457516) 18. Venkatesh K et al. Regulation of bone mass by Wnt signaling. J Clin Invest 2006; 116(5): 1202-1209. 19. Kimori T et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 1997; 89(5): 755-764. 20. Camilleri S et al. Runx2 and dental development. European Journal of Oral Sciences 2006; 114(5): 361-373. 21. Aberg T et al. Phenotypic changes in dentition of Runx2 homozygote-null mutant mice. J Histochem Cytochem 2004; 52(1): 131-139. 22. Goode EL et al. Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer at 2q31 and 8q24. Nat Genet 2010; 42(10): 874-81. 23. Meyer KB et al. Allele-specific up-regulation of FGFR2 increases susceptiblity to breast cancer. PLoS Biol 2008; 6(5): 1098103. RESEARCH SUPPORT American Association of Women Dentists/Proctor & Gamble Research Scholarship Award Southern Association of Orthodontists E. Preston Hicks Endowed Chair (JKH)