Download The CPEIR Methodology - Low Emission Capacity Building

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Finance Clinic
Climate Public Expenditure and
Institutional Reviews (CPEIRs)
Rakshya Thapa
Regional Technical Specialist
UNDP
LECB Annual Global Meeting
25-27 October 2013, Hanoi
1
Overview
•
•
•
•
CPEIRs – Introduction (20 mins)
Q&A and Discussions (15 mins)
Group Exercise (45 mins)
Reporting on the Group Exercise (10)
2
Introduction
Objective: To review allocation, management and results of
public expenditures related to climate change
Core aspects:
• Assessment of current policy priorities related to climate
change
• Review of institutional arrangements
• Analysis of public expenditure and its relevance to
climate change
How to quantify & track climate change related expenditures
in the national budgetary system?
3
Policy, planning and budgeting cycle
Objective: To review allocation, management &
Policy
makingof
process
results
public expenditures related to climate
1. REVIEW POLICY
change
Key-question: How is climate change2.reflected
in
SET POLICY AND
PLANNING
6. EVALUATE AND AUDIT
national policies,
institutions & publicUNDERTAKE
expenditures?
ACTIVITY
Implementation: Led by government through cross
5. MONITOR activities and
3.
MOBILIZE AND
government steering
group
chaired by
Ministry
of
ACCOUNT for
expenditure
ALLOCATE RESOURCES
Finance or Planning
 CPEIRs build on WB methodology
for
4. IMPLEMENT PLANNED
ACTIVITIES
PER/PEIR/PEER
Budgetary process
 Add “climate-relevance” dimensions to analysis
4
The CPEIR Methodology
• Methodology builds upon the WB Public Expenditure
• The approach :
– compilation of relevant documentation derived from official
sources and public documents.
– Individual semi-structured interviews with key informants
– research largely at the national level but local analysis
included
• Studied led by a multidisciplinary team of researchers and
overseen by cross government steering group
5
The CPEIR Methodology
The analysis constitutes:
• Review of policies, institutional arrangement and public
expenditure across the whole of government
• Define what constitutes ‘climate relevant’ expenditure
• Classify public expenditure into categories of varying levels
of climate relevance
– Identify budget line codes with High, Medium and Low
relevance to climate change
• Composition of public expenditure may vary from country
to country comprising both budgetary and off budget
expenditures
6
Policy, institutional & expenditure
findings
• Link climate policy to budget, so climate strategies are
prioritized and costed
• Link budget to climate policy, so climate is part of budget
framework
• Coordination by finance & planning ministries with technical
input from environment and line ministries
• Large proportion of climate relevant’ expenditure embedded
in sectors with other primary objectives
• Local government also a key channel for climate finance
• Between 3-17% of the total budget deemed to be ‘climate
relevant’
7
Expenditures & sources
Climate relevant expenditures as a proportion of total expenditure & GDP
8
Few major players with local channels key
Highest climate relevant spending agencies as proportion of total ‘climate budget’9
Indonesia Case Study
Mitigation Fiscal Framework
• Assess the public expenditure to realized GHG reduction
target of 26% by 2020
• Reviews expenditure of climate change actions and its cost
effectiveness
• Focus sectors such as forestry, peatlands, energy, transport
• Current patterns of expenditure meet only 20% of the
national targets
• Therefore, further action and increase in financing required
• Inter-ministerial coordination necessary to institutionalize
and manage the MFF
• Considering the development of budget marking and scoring
system
10
Lessons Learned
• CPEIRs should not be a one off exercise. Periodic review
helpful on how response to climate change evolving.
• Need for internationally consistent methodology for defining
climate relevant expenditures
• Focus on the “dirty” expenditures which may undermine the
national climate response
• Climate Fiscal Framework be developed with Ministries of
Finance and Planning
– to identify potential sources of funding and how they can
be best accessed, combined and sequenced
– Outline role of different sectors of economy
11
Conclusions
CPEIRs important tool in public expenditure management
• Set a baseline and budget execution history against which
future expenditures can be measured and monitored
• Encourage a holistic & comprehensive view of climate
expenditures
• Functional markers to climate change expenditures to
track more easily over time
• Foundation to establish baseline and MRV framework for
financial support for LEDS
12
Thank you
For further information please contact
[email protected]
CPEIRs Methodological note & Asia-Pacific case studies:
www.aideffectiveness/climatechangefinance
13
Group Exercise (55 mins)
• Each working group assigns a note-taker/reporter and a
timekeeper
• Key questions - 45 mins
– How does your country track (or plan to track) climate finance?
What are the challenges you foresee in tracking climate finance?
– What do you think of the suitability of the CPEIR tool for MRV of
financial support (is it too granular/high level)?
– Do you think the CPEIR is suited to capturing both public and
private sector flows?
• Reporting back – 10 mins
14