Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Ichthyoplankton Collected on the 2004 and 2009 Russian-American Long-Term Census of the Arctic Research Cruises Morgan S. Busby1, Brenda L. Norcross2, Brenda A. Holladay2, and Kathryn L. Mier1 Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NMFS, NOAA • Seattle, WA USA School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks • Fairbanks, AK USA 1 2 Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) 56 mm SL Introduction The Russian-American Long-Term Census of the Arctic (RUSALCA) is an interdisciplinary joint research effort conducted in U.S. and Russian territorial waters in the Bering Strait and Chukchi Sea. Goals of RUSALCA include making physical, chemical, and ecological observations, understanding impacts of climate variability in the Arctic ecosystem, and improving international Arctic science collaboration. Research cruises were conducted in 2004, 2009, and 2012. Here we present results on the taxonomic diversity of ichthyoplankton and the abundance, distribution, and lengths of Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) larvae and juveniles sampled during the 2009 survey and make comparisons with the 2004 survey. Methods R/V Professor Khromov, Chukchi Sea, September 2009 Cruises were conducted aboard the Russian R/V Professor Khromov. Ichthyoplankton samples were collected with a 60-cm bongo (0.505-mm mesh) in the Chukchi Sea at 18 stations 10–22 August 2004 and 31 stations 4–29 September 2009 (Figure 1a). Preserved samples were sorted and fishes identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible at the Plankton Sorting and Identification Center in Szczecin, Poland. Identifications were verified at the Alaska Fisheries Science Center (AFSC). Some fish were categorized into taxonomic groups (e.g., Liparis spp.) due to limitations associated with identifying larval stages to the species level. Fish were measured for standard length (SL) to the nearest 0.1 mm. Abundance was estimated by converting number of individuals caught to catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) = # individuals/10 m2 sea surface area. Results Thirty-five larval and juvenile fishes were collected (11 species in 7 families) in 2009 (Table 1). Arctic cod was the dominant species and accounted for 46% of the larvae and juvenile fishes caught. Abundance and taxonomic diversity in 2009 were lower than in the 2004 RUSALCA survey that used the same gear at fewer stations in a smaller geographic area. At the 13 stations sampled in both surveys (Figure 1a), no Arctic cod were collected in 2009 while 101 individuals were caught at 8 stations in 2004 (Figure 1b). Shannon diversity was significantly greater in 2004 than 2009. (p=0.03) (Table 2). Mean standard length of Arctic cod caught in 2009 was significantly greater than those caught at all stations in 2004 (p<0.001) (Figure 2, Table 2). The CPUE of Arctic cod over all stations was significantly greater in 2004 than in 2009 (p=0.002) (Table 2, Figure 1b). Table 1. Fish eggs, larvae, and juveniles collected in 60-cm bongo tows in 2004 and 2009. Bold indicates families (and/or taxa) present in both years. Scientific Name Common Name 2004 (n=18 stations) Eggs Larvae Juveniles unidentified Osmeridae 2009 (n=31 stations) Eggs Larvae Juveniles Arctic cod Eleginus gracilis saffron cod 3 301 4 6 10 1 3 Theragra chalcogramma walleye pollock whitespotted greenling Cottidae Gymnocanthus spp. unidentified Gymnocanthus 2 Gymnocanthus tricuspis Arctic staghorn sculpin 2 Hemilepidotus papilio butterfly sculpin 1 Icelus spatula spatulate sculpin 3 Stichaeidae Ammodytidae 3 50 1 Icelus spp. unidentified Icelus 1 alligatorfish 3 Ulcina olrikii Arctic alligatorfish 1 Liparis spp. unidentified Liparis 20 Liparis fabricii gelatinous seasnail 13 Liparis gibbus variegated snailfish 36 Liparis tunicatus kelp snailfish 1 Lumpenus spp. unidentified Lumpenus 7 Lumpenus fabricii slender eelblenny 4 1 Lumpenus maculatus daubed shanny 3 1 Stichaeus punctatus Arctic shanny 3 Ammodytes hexapterus Pacific sandlance 45 40 1 35 30 3 unidentified flatfish 4 3 14 Hippoglossus stenolepis Pacific halibut Hippoglossoides robustus Bering flounder 87 Limanda spp. unidentified Limanda 17 Limanda aspera yellowfin sole 67 Limanda proboscidea longhead dab 1 Pleuronectes quadrituberculatus 2 3 4 23 3 1 11 2 111 498 6 47 22 13 Table 2. Results of statistical analyses. 2004 2009 Mean diversity index 0.89 ± 0.15 0.32 ± 0.20 Shannon, 2-sample t-Test Mean Arctic cod length 16.3 ± 0.7 28.6 ± 1.9 2-sample t-Test Median Arctic cod CPUE 2004 2009 20 15 5 0 8/ 11 /0 8/ 4 12 B /0 S 8/ 4 2 12 C 8 / /04 S 4 13 /0 CS 4 8 8/ 14 CS 1 /0 8/ 4 2 15 C 8 / /04 L 3 16 /0 CL 4 6 8/ 16 CL 1 / 0 0 8/ 18 4 C / 8 / 04 L 8 21 N /0 o n e 8/ 4 21 HC / 3 0 9/ 4 5 07 /0 No ne 9 9/ C 08 E N / 9 / 09 5 10 L /0 S 9/ 9 3 22 S S / 9 / 09 4 23 S S /0 9 4 C S 8 total number of individuals 25 10 3 Alaska plaice total number of taxa Metric Our continuing work will focus on ichthyoplankton collected using bongo gear on the 2012 RUSALCA expedition. 1 Aspidophoroides monopterygius Pleuronectidae 60-cm bongo gear 1 Hexagrammos stelleri Liparidae A 5.3 m2 mouth opening Methot net with 2x3-mm oval mesh towed at 3.0-3.5 knots catches larger walleye pollock than a 60-cm bongo net (0.283 m2 mouth opening) with 0.505-mm mesh (Bailey and Shima 1994). Thus, we suggest that a Methot, or similar net may be more effective at catching larger larval and juvenile fish during late summer (September). In addition to the RUSALCA cruises, a 60-cm bongo with 0.505-mm mesh net was used to collect ichthyoplankton during other recent surveys of the Chukchi (2007, 2008, 2012) and Beaufort (2008) Seas, and we recommend continuing to use this gear as a consistent measure of CPUE for a long-term time series. Although survey continuity is highly desirable, we recognize it is not always possible. To successfully assess species presence and size range of fish larvae, we recommend that future late summer surveys should sample ichthyoplankton not only with bongo gear, but also with a Methot or similar net. 6 Hexagrammidae Agonidae Distinct ichthyoplankton species assemblages observed during the 2004 cruise were associated with different water masses (Norcross et al. 2010). Too few larval and juvenile fishes were caught during 2009 to make definitive statements regarding summer ichthyoplankton assemblages in the Chukchi Sea. 1 unidentified cods Boreogadus saida Conclusions 2 capelin Gadidae Taxonomic diversity and mean abundance of larval fishes were substantially higher in 2004 than in 2009. These values were likely higher in 2004 because the cruises were in different months (August versus September) and growth experienced by Arctic cod during the additional month allowed these larger individuals to avoid the bongo net in 2009. The central tendency, or median CPUE of Arctic cod for 2009 was zero because they were absent from 84% of the sampled stations (Table 2). Confounding factors may include oceanographic conditions, climate variability, and biotic influences such as prey availability and predation. The absence of flatfish larvae in 2009 is most likely due to settlement as late stage larvae and transforming individuals of the most common Arctic species, Bering flounder (Hippoglossoides robustus), yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera), and longhead dab (Limanda proboscidea), were present in the 2004 samples collected in August (Table 1). 47 unidentified smelts Mallotus villosus Figure 1 b. Stations where Arctic cod larvae and/or juveniles were caught. Discussion Length (mm) Family Figure 1 a. Bongo stations on 2004 and 2009 RUSALCA cruises. 9.3 0.0 Analyses Mann-Whitney U Date/Station p -value 0.03 <0.001 0.002 Figure 2. Boxplots of mean lengths of Arctic cod larvae and juveniles caught in bongo tows, 2004 and 2009. References Acknowledgements Bailey, K.L. and Shima, M. (1994) Comparative analysis of ichthyoplankton sampling gear for early life history stages of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma). Fish. Oceanogr. 3: 50-59. This research was sponsored by the Cooperative Institute for Alaska Research, (CIFAR) with funds from NOAA cooperative agreement NA08OAR4320870. We thank the NOAA Arctic Research Office, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, and the scientists, officers, and crew of the R/V Professor Khromov. Norcross, B.L., Holladay, B.A., Busby, M.S. and Mier, K.L. (2010) Demersal and larval fish assemblages in the Chukchi Sea. Deep-Sea Res. II. 57:57-70. The recommendations and general content presented in this poster do not necessarily represent the views or official position of the Department of Commerce, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the National Marine Fisheries Service. Methot net