Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Petra Jo WJB Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, SC [email protected] 352-283-6923 August 31, 2012 AAO Residents Day – Case Report Clinical Findings, Diagnosis and Management of Adult-Onset Macular Vitelliform Dystrophy Abstract Adult-onset macular vitelliform dystrophy is a hereditary dystrophy, typically presenting in the 4th-6th decade with mild to moderate decrease in vision. This case report reviews the clinical findings, diagnosis and management of patients with such condition. Case History Patient demographics o 75-year-old white male presented as a new patient for an annual eye exam first in January 2007, and has been followed by our optometry clinic for the past five years Chief complaint o Initially complained of a gradual decrease in vision in both eyes Ocular, medical history o Unremarkable personal and family ocular history; no eye injuries, no eye surgeries o Systemic history positive for renal cell carcinoma, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, and nonspecific abnormal findings in stool content o Surgical history included nephrectomy, hydrocelectomy, and prostate laser surgery Medications o No ocular medications o Systemic medications as of 8/2012 Simvastatin 40mg for hyperlipidemia Glipizide 5mg for hyperglycemia Amlodipine 10mg/Benazepril HCl 20mg for hypertension Aspirin 81mg Clopidogrel bisulfate 75mg for coronary artery disease o No known drug allergies Other salient information: None Pertinent findings Clinical o Preliminary testing and visual acuity Pupils were round, equal, responsive to light with no APD; extraocular motility displayed full range of motion OU; confrontation fields were full to finger count OD/OS Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/25-2 OD and 20/40-2 OS, with subjective refraction of +5.00-2.50x100 OD and +3.25-2.75x085 OS (1/2007) BCVA was 20/40+ OD and 20/50- OS, with subjective refraction of +3.752.25x110 OD and +2.00-2.00x085 OS (8/2012) o Anterior segment evaluation Intraocular pressures were 17mmHg OD and OS with Goldmann tonometry Slit lamp exam revealed dermatochalasis OU, white and quiet bulbar and palpebral conjunctiva OU, mild corneal edema with diffuse pigment on endothelium OU, deep and quiet anterior chamber with no cells or flare OU, and flat and intact iris with no neovascularization OU Estimation of anterior chamber angles was 4/4 OU by Van Herrick method o Posterior segment evaluation Dilated with one drop of the following in both eyes: Tropicamide 1% and Phenylephrine 2.5% Dilated fundus exam revealed 2+ nuclear sclerosis of the lens OU, distinct optic nerve heads with no pallor and cup-to-disc ratios of 0.3/0.3 OU, normal vessels OU, and flat and intact peripheral retina OU Macula of the right eye was flat and intact with disruption of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) inferior to fovea, approximately one-half of disc diameter in size. Macula of the left eye displayed a yellow, wellcircumscribed lesion at fovea, approximately one-third of disc diameter in size and negative Watzke-Allen sign. No macular hemorrhage, exudates, drusen or choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM) were noted. Macular findings have appeared stable OU since 1/2007. Physical: None Laboratory studies: None Radiology studies: None Others: o Photos/Fluorescein angiography (FA): left eye showed no auto-fluorescence of the macular lesion, but displayed later hyperfluorescence corresponding to the subfoveal yellow lesion; no evidence of a CNVM OU (*color, red-free and FA photos to be included) o Multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG): great central response with pericentral abnormality OD; central and pericentral abnormality OS (*printouts to be included) o Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) of macula: normal macular scan with central thickness of 228 microns OD; subfoveal hyperreflective lesion within o the RPE and central macular thickness of 208 microns OS (*printout to be included) Cirrus OCT to be scheduled for 9/2012 Differential diagnosis Primary/leading o Adult-onset macular vitelliform dystrophy1 Presents in the 4-6th decade with bilateral, symmetrical, round or oval, slightly elevated subfoveal deposits about one-third of disc diameter in size Others o Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD)2,3,4 Common misdiagnosis for adult-onset macular vitelliform dystrophy Differentiate from leading diagnosis by clinical findings, OCT and FA o Best’s disease1,5 Early/juvenile onset Larger macular “egg-yolk” lesion ranging from half to two disc diameters in size during childhood Differentiate from leading diagnosis by age of onset, larger lesion size and poorer visual prognosis o Impending macular hole1 Flattened foveal depression with an underlying yellow spot (stage 1a) Differentiate from leading diagnosis by OCT imaging o Central serous chorioretinopathy1 Typically presents as a unilateral dome-shaped detachment of sensory retina Differentiate from leading diagnosis by OCT and FA o Other pattern dystrophies1 Butterfly-shaped macular dystrophy: presents in the 2nd-3rd decade with yellow pigment at the fovea in triradiate manner Multifocal pattern dystrophy simulating fundus flavimaculutus: presents in the 4th decade with multiple, widely-scattered, yellow lesions Macroreticular pattern dystrophy: presents during early childhood with pigment granules and later reticular degeneration into periphery Differentiate from leading diagnosis by age of onset, clinical findings, OCT and FA o Other macular dystrophies1 Central areolar choroidal dystrophy: present in the 3rd-4th decade with foveal granularity and RPE atrophy, progressing to geographic atrophy and poor visual prognosis by 6-7th decade Differentiate from leading diagnosis by clinical findings and age of onset Diagnosis and discussion Elaborate on the condition Presents in the 4-6th decade with or without symptoms and bilateral, symmetrical, round or oval, slightly elevated, subfoveal deposits about one-third of disc diameter in size1 o May have associated retinal cuticular or large drusen1,6,7 o Condition has been genetically linked and may result from the mutation of RDS gene and BEST1 gene1 o The vitelliform lesions result from accumulation of lipofuscin and photoreceptor debris in the subretinal space8,9 o Progression involves disruption and alterations in the IS/OS interface, pigment migration, and fluid accumulation10,11 o May progress to geographic atrophy or present with rare complications including CNVM, full-thickness macular hole and retinal detachment 2,4,12 o Electrodiagnostic testing, including electroretinogram (ERG) and electrooculogram (EOG), may be normal or mildly abnormal2,13 o FA appearance varies depending on disease progression; initial stages show localized hyperfluorescence and later stages show the typical central hypofluorescence with surrounding rings of hyperfluorescence.1,2,14 The subfoveal, yellow lesion corresponds to area of hyperfluorescence on FA1 o OCT shows well-defined, central, subretinal thickening with hyperreflective dome-shaped deposit within or lying on the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) with slight separation between the RPE and photoreceptor layers2,3,10,13 No cascade or shadowing optical effects, which differs from ARMD where fibrosis results in shadowing2 Expound on unique features o The patient’s decreased visual acuity is likely from combination of macular findings, nuclear sclerosis and corneal edema secondary to Fuch’s corneal dystrophy o The patient’s condition is not bilaterally symmetrical Unilateral vitelliform maculopathy phenotypes have been reported15 The patient’s condition may by atypical or a variant of adult-onset macular vitelliform dystrophy o Treatment, management Treatment and response to treatment o Patient’s macular dystrophy continues to be monitored, with patient reporting good visual function as of 8/2012 o Fuch’s corneal dystrophy has been managed by sodium chloride 5% QID OU o Spectacles prescribed to correct refractive error/presbyopia o Cataracts have been monitored since 2007, and recent referral was made for cataract surgery consultation o Currently no effective treatment for adult-onset macular vitelliform dystrophy, however good visual prognosis2 o Patients should be monitored with home Amsler grid and annual, or twice per year, dilated fundus exams, OCT, photos, and possibly electrodiagnostics3 Low vision devices and therapy may be beneficial to patients with decreased vision from complications such as CNVM3,4 Refer to research where appropriate o Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections with ranibizumab or bevacizumab have been shown to improve BCVA, metamorphopsia symptoms, or the condition’s morphology in patients with misdiagnosed or suspected CNVM;2,4,16 however one case study did not find any improvements17 o Photocoagulation, corticosteroids, vitamins A, and vitamin E have not shown any treatment benefits4 o Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin has not shown any benefits and even showed negative long-term effects12,18, 19 Bibliography, literature review encouraged o 1. Kanski J, Bowling B. Clinical Ophthalmology: A Systematic Approach. 7th ed. Edinburgh: Elselvier; 2011:531,629,665-70. o 2. Gallego-Pinazo R, Dolz-Marco R, Pardo-Lopez D, et al. Primary intravitreal ranibizumab for adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(3):455-8. o 3. Rodman J, Duchnowski E. Optical coherence tomography in adult-onset vitelliform dystrophy. Optometry. 2011;82(3):148-51. o 4. Montero JA, Ruiz-Moreno JM, De La Vega C. Intravitreal bevacizumab for adult-onset vitelliform dystrophy: a case report. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(6):983-6. o 5. Hodges VM, McGonigal WM. Adult vitelliform maculopathy management: from anti-VEGF to low vision. Review of Optometry. 2012. Available: http://www.revoptom.com/content/c/35171/. Accessed Aug 20, 2012. o 6. Finger RP, Issa PC, Kellner U, et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography in adult-onset vitelliform macular dystrophy with cuticular drusen. Retina. 2010;30(8):1455-64. o 7. Lima LH, Laud K, Freund KB, et al. Acquired vitelliform lesion associated with large drusen. Retina. 2012;32(4):647-51. o 8. Dubovy SR, Hairston RJ, Schatz H, et al. Adult-onset foveomacular pigment epithelial dystrophy. Retina. 2000;20(6):638-49. o 9. Arnold JJ, Sarks JP, Killingsworth MC, et al. Adult vitelliform macular degeneration: a clinicopathological study. Eye. 2003;17:717-26. o 10. Puche N, Querques G, Benhamou N, et al. High-Resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography features in adult onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(9):1190-6. o 11. Querques G, Forte R, Querques L, et al. Natural course of adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy: a spectral domain optical coherence tomography analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(2):304-13. o 12. Do P, Ferrucci S. Adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy. Optometry. 2006;77(4):156-66. o 13. Schatz P, Abrahamson M, Eksandh L, et al. Macular appearance by means of OCT and electrophysiology in members of two families with different mutations in RDS (the peripherin/RDS gene). Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81:500-7. o o o o o o o 14. Jarc-Vidmar M, Kraut A, Hawlina M. Fundus autofluorescence imaging in Best’s vitelliform dystrophy. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2003;220(12):861-7. 15. Subash M, Rotsos T, Wright GA, et al. Unilateral vitelliform maculopathy: a comprehensive phenotype study with molecular screening of BEST1 and PRPH2. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):719-22. 16. Lee JY, Lim J, Chung H, et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography in a patient with adult-onset vitelliform dystrophy treated with intravitreal bevacizumab. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009;40(3)319-21. 17. Kandula S, Zweifel S, Freund KB. Adult-onset vitelliform detachment unresponsive to monthly intravitreal ranibizumab. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;41(Suppl):S81-4. 18. Ergun E, Costa D, Slakter J, et al. Photodynamic therapy and vitelliform lesions. Retina. 2004;24(3):399-406. 19. Abengoechea-Hernandez S, Elizalde-Montagus J, Fideliz de la Paz-Dalisay M. Photodynamic therapy in adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2007;82(2):117-20. Conclusion Clinical pearls, take away points if indicated o Clinical findings of adult-onset macular vitelliform dystrophy include usually bilateral, symmetrical, small, subfoveal, yellow lesions; typically presents in the 4th-6th decade o Diagnosis is based on clinical appearance and diagnostic testing, which may include OCT, FA, and electrodiagnostics o No treatment available and patients should be monitored once or twice per year; anti-VEGF injection may be beneficial especially if CNVM is suspected; low vision devices and services should be offered to patients with severe vision loss