Download On some classes of nearly open sets

Pacific Journal of
Mathematics
ON SOME CLASSES OF NEARLY OPEN SETS
O LAV N J ȧSTAD
Vol. 15, No. 3
November 1965
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS
Vol. 15, No. 3, 1965
ON SOME CLASSES OF NEARLY OPEN SETS
OLAV
NJASTAD
The open sets in a topological space are those sets A for
which A°=>A. Sets for which A0~°^A -"α-sets"- or A°~^A
-"β-sets"- may naturally be considered as more or less "nearly
open". In this paper the structure of these sets and classes of
sets are investigated, and some applications are given.
Topologies determining the same class of α-sets also determine the same class of β-sets, and vice versa. The class
of β-sets forms a topology if and only if the original topology
is extremally disconnected. The class of α-sets always forms
a topology, and topologies generated in this way-"α:-topolgies"are exactly those where all nowhere dense sets are closed.
The class of all topologies which determine the same α-sets
is convex in the ordering by inclusion, the ^-topology being
its finest member. Most topologies ordinary met with are
the coarsest members of their corresponding classes; in particular this is the case for all regular topologies.
All topologies determining the same α-sets also determine
the same continuous mappings into arbitrary regular spaces.
Since the paper was submitted, it has come to our attention that
Freud, in [5], has investigated problems which have a certain connection with parts of those here treated.
1* Let ^Γ be a topology (identified with its class of open sets)
on a set E, and let ° and ~ denote interior and closure with respect
to ^ \ We shall call a set A with the property A°~°ZDA an a-set
(with respect to j^"), and we shall denote the class of all such sets
^~«. A set B with the property B°~ z> B (or equivalents B°~ = B~)
shall be called a β-set (with respect to ^"), and the class of all such
sets denoted J7~β. A class consisting of exactly all the assets (resp.
β-sets) of some topology shall be called an a-structure (resp. βstructure). Evidently κ3Γa^r~(*c:^~β.
We notice that every nonempty
β-set has a nonempty interior. If all sets of the family {Bi}i€I are
jS-sets, then
C Uier ^ C (\Jiel £?)" C (U** e i
that is: A /9-structure is closed with respect to arbitrary unions.
We shall now characterize ^~* in terms of
Received September 18, 1963 and in revised form April 28, 1964.
961
962
OLAV NJASTAD
1. Let ^~ be a topology on E. ^r'a
β
exactly those sets A for which A p{Be^~ for all
PROPOSITION
consists of
β
Proof. Let Ae ^~«, Be ^~ , xe A n B and let U be an open
neighbourhood of x. Clearly U Π Ao~~° too is an open neighbourhood
0
0
of x, so V = (Uf)A -°)nB
is nonempty. Since 7 c A ° - this implies
u n (A° n B°) = F n A° ^ φ .
It follows that
β
i.e. A n # e .^.-Conversely, let i n δ e ^ for all Be^~ .
Then
Γβ
in particular Ae %3 . Assume xeAf] C(A°~°)(C denoting complement).
β
Then x e B~, where B = c(A°"). Clearly {x} U B e . ^ , and consequently
An({x}\J B)e^-β
.
But
A
n (M u s ) = {^},
hence {x} is open. As xe Λ°", this implies a; e A°~°, contrary to as0 0
sumption. Thus x e A implies x e A " , and A e ^~". This completes
the proof.
-Thus we have found that J^" is completely determined by ^ β ,
i.e.: all topologies with the same /3-structue also determine the same
α-structure, explicitly given by Prop. 1. We shall see that conversely
all topologies with the same α-structure determine the same /3-structure,
so that ^7~β is completely determined by
PROPOSITION
2. Every α-structure is a topology.
Proof. J7~β contains the empty set and is closed with respect to
arbitrary unions. A standard result gives that the class of those sets
A for which A Π Be^~β for all B e y β constitutes a topology, hence
the proposition.
-Henceforth we shall also use the term a-topology for ^-structure.
Two topologies determining the same <x-structure shall be called
(^-equivalent, and the equivalence classes shall be called a-classes.
β
We may now characterize ^
in terms of jf* in the following
way:
PROPOSITION 3. Let ^ " be a topology on E. Then
and hence ^-equivalent topologies determine the same /3-structure.
ON SOME CLASSES OF NEARLY OPEN SETS
963
Proof. Let cl. and int. denote closure and interior with respect
β
to ^~*. If xeBe ^
and xe Ae j ^ " , then A°-° Π B° φ ψ since A°-°
is a neighbourhood oΐ x. So certainly B° meets A°~ and therefore
0
(being open) meets A , proving AP[B°Φφ, and a fortiori A Π int. B Φφ.
This means
cl. int. B-DB ,
aβ
β
i.e.: B e ^~ . -On the other hand let A e ^~« , ^ e i a n d ^ e Ve
As Ve^~a and α ecl. int. A, we have
V Π int. A Φ Φ ,
and there exists a nonempty set We ^
In other words:
such that W c V Π int. A c
and #eA°-. Thus we have verified ^ " ^ c ^ " " * , and the proof is
complete. -Combining Prop. 1 and Prop. 3 we get ^<*a = ^~a, or
1. A topology J7~ is an a-topology if and only if
— J7~ . Thus an a-topology belongs to the a-class of all its
determining topologies, and is the finest topology of this class.
COROLLARY
a
Evidently ^~β is a topology if and only if ^~" = JΓβ.
case S~** = J^~"β = J ^ , or
COROLLARY
In this
2. If a β-structure & is a topology, then
Before proceeding with our discussion we consider the following
EXAMPLE. Let & be the ordinary topology on the set of real
numbers R. Clearly the complement of a nowhere dense, not closed
set (such sets certainly exist) is a nonopen α-set
So & Φ &a.
β
Among the /3-sets are all intervals, so ^ ? * Φ & , and &β is not a
topology.
2* We proceed to give some results on the structure of α-topologies.
PROPOSITION 4. The α-sets with respect to a given topology are
exactly those sets which may be written as a difference between an
open set and a nowhere dense set.
Proof. If A e y * we have
964
OLAV NJASTAD
A = A°-° - (A0-0 - A) ,
where A°~° — A clearly is nowhere dense. Conversely, if A — B — N,
B G ^ 7 N nowhere dense, we easily see that A°~ z> B and consequently
So the proof is complete.
COROLLARY. A topology is an a-topology if
nowhere dense sets are closed.
and only if
all
For an α-topology may clearly be characterized as a topology where
the difference between an open set and a nowhere dense set is again
an open set, and this evidently is equivalent to the condition stated.
PROPOSITION 5. Topologies which are α-equivalent determine the
same class of nowhere dense sets.
Proof. Let N be a nowhere dense set with respect to J7~*. For
every nonempty A e J?~ there is a nonempty Be ^~a such that Be A
and B Π N = φ. As B° Φ Φ, it follows that N is not dense in A with
respect to S"> and consequently that N is nowhere dense with respect
to
jT".
Conversely, let N be nowhere dense with respect to j?~. N~
contains no nonempty set from J7~. As cl. NaN~ (cl. denotes closure
with respect to ^ ~ Ω J ) , cl. N contains no nonempty set from j7~*. So
N is nowhere dense with respect to ^ " α > , which completes the proof.
The converse of Prop. 5 is naturally not true, since both the
coarsest and the finest topology on a set are α-topologies, and neither
of them possesses any nonempty nowhere dense sets.
We observe that every /3-set- and a fortiori every α-set- is the
union of an open set and a nowhere dense set. This together with
the corollary to Prop. 4 implies
COROLLARY
sets are ^σ-sets,
1.
If the topology ^
then the topology ^
a
has the property that all open
has the same property.
A topology where no nonempty open set is of the first category
is called a Baire-topology (cf. [4, p. 109]). From what is said above
immediately follows
2. A topology J7~ is a Baire-topology if
only if JT"" is a Baire-topology.
COROLLARY
and only
ON SOME CLASSES OF NEARLY OPEN SETS
965
We shall comment on these corollaries later on.
A set A is called minimally hounded with respect to the topology
if A°~-ΏA, A-°(ZA
(cf. [1, p. 101]). (In the case of open sets,
minimal boundedness coincides with regularity in the sense of [2, p.
176]). Clearly this means A e ^~β, CA e ^~β.
PROPOSITION 6. Topologies which are α-equivalent determine the
same class of minimally bounded sets, and the same class of minimally
bounded open sets.
Proof. The first assertion is obvious.
Then we have
A°-° => A ,
Let A e J^~", CA e J3rβ.
(cA)°- => CA .
It follows that
A°-° = A~° = A .
So A e J7~, and the proposition follows.
We recall that a topology is called extremally
closure of every open set is open.
disconnected if the
PROPOSITION 7. If the /3-structure & is a topology, all topologies
^~ for which t 5 r ~ β = & are extremally disconnected. If & is not
a topology, no ^ for which ^ r β = & is extremally disconnected.
In particular: Either all or none of the topologies of an tf-class are
extremally disconnected.
Proof.
Let ^
β
— &, and suppose there is an A e y such that
A~ £ JT". Let xeA~ - A~°. With
B = {x} U A-°, C = C(A-°)
we have
B°~ 3 A-°- = A- 3 {x}, C°- = C(A-°) - C
Hence both β and C are in ^ " β . The intersection B Π C = {x} is not
open since xe A~ — A~°, hence not a /5-set. So ^ = ^ 7 ' β is not a
topology.
β
Now suppose & is not a topology, and ^~ = &.
There is a
β
r
5 G ^ " such that B <£ 3 «.
Asssume B°- e ^ " . Then
966
OLAV NJlSTAD
i.e. B G y ", contrary to assumption. Thus we have produced an open
set whose closure is not open, which completes the proof.
A topology J7~ is extremally disconnected if and
only if ^~ is a topology.
COROLLARY.
β
Proof evident.
We next give a result on the continuous mappings of the topological
space (E, ^) into a topological space (F,
PROPOSITION 8. All topologies of a given α-class on E determine
the same class of continuous mappings into an arbitrary regular topological space (F,
Proof. Let Jf be a topology on E and assume / continuous from
(E,^~") into the regular space (F, <%/). Let xeE, and let U be a
closed neighbourhood of f(x). There is a F e y * such that xeV
and f(V) c U. We may write V — A — N, where A e J7~', N is nowhere
dense (Prop. 4), NaA. Let yeN, and suppose f(y)& U. Then there
exists a We^« such that ye We: A and /(W) c C U. But as N is
nowhere dense we have W<£N. That is: W Π V Φ Φ, contrary to
assumption. Thus f(A) c U, hence / is continuous with respect to
and <%s and the proof is complete.
In this connection we mention that a mapping of the space (E,
into the space (F, <%?) is called quasicontiniious if for every xeEr
every neighbourhood V of x and U of f(x) there exists a nonempty
We^~ such that WaV and f{W)<zU (cf. [6, p. 184]). It is easily
seen that this is equivalent to the condition: For every
Hence we immediately get
PROPOSITION 9. All topologies of a given α-class on E determine
the same class of quasicontinuous mappings into an arbitrary topological space (F,
3* We shall now deduce some properties of the order structure
of the ^-classes. We first recall that every class contains a finest
element, namely its associated α-topology. Next we prove the following
10. Every α-class is convex in the set of topologies
on E ordered by inclusion. That is: ^ c ^ c y » implies
PROPOSITION
Proof. We assume ^~ c ^ c y * , and denote interior and closure
in J7~ (resp. ^ ) by °, ~ (resp. int., cl.). Using ~ to denote closure
ON SOME CLASSES OF NEARLY OPEN SETS
967
in ^7~α>, we have (for all A)
cl. int. A ZD (int. Ay 3 A0^ .
Now A0"- is the closure of an open set in ^
in j^Γ* and so also in J7~. Hence
r a
, hence minimally bounded
so that
cl. int. A z> A°-° .
It follows that
int. cl. int. A Z) A0"0 .
Hence, if A e J^af
we have a fortiori
that
int. cl. int. A Z) A .
Thus
%/ c jT~" c ^ " .
Applying this result to the inclusion %/ c ^Γ* c ^/ we get
So the equality t ^ " Λ = <%/* is proved.
We shall now investigate in some detail the problem of a coarsest
topology in the α-class, and in this connection give conditions for an
α-topology to be the only topology of its class. To this end we make
the following definition: We shall say that the topology J7~ is quasiregular at a point x if the point has a fundamental system of minimally bounded open neighbourhoods, and call the topology quasi-regular
if it is quasi-regular at all points. It is easily seen that an equivalent
condition for quasi-regularity at the point x is that it has a fundamental
system of interiors of closed neighbourhoods. Clearly every topology
satisfying the separation axiom 0in of [3, p. 54] is quasi-regular, in
particular every regular topology. With this terminology we may
characterize those topologies which are the coarsest members of their
classes in the following way:
PROPOSITION 11. A topology ^
is the coarsest topology of its
α-class if and only if it is quasi-regular at all points which are closed
with respect to ^"*.
968
OLAV NJASTAD
a
a
Proof. All topologies <%s for which ^/ = ^~ determine the same
class of minimally bounded open sets, and therefore the neighbourhood
filter with respect to ^ is coarser than that with respect to ^/ at
points where ^~ is quasi-regular. Now assume that ^~ is quasi7 Ω5
regular at all points which are closed with respect to ^ " , and let x
be a point where J7~ is not quasi-regular. Then {x} is not nowhere
dense, i.e. int. cl. {x} Φ Φ (int. and cl. denote interior and closure with
Λ
respect to ^ ~ ) . Every nonempty α-set contained in int. cl. {x} clearly
contains x. Now every such set contains a nonempty set from ^ ,
which of course also contains x. It follows that the neighbourhood
filter with respect to ^ constitutes a fundamental system of neighbourhoods with respect to ^Γcc>. This means that all topologies of the
α-class possess the same neighbourhood filter at x. Thus the sufficiency
of the condition is demonstrated.
Now let {x} be closed with respect to J^Γ*, and suppose that J7~
(and hence ^~ α ) is not quasi-regular at x. Let ^~(x) denote the filter
generated by all minimally bounded open neighbourhoods of x, and
^"(y) the neighbourhood filter of y with respect to jT'" for y φ x.
It is easily verified that 3^(z) satisfies the requirements Vτ — VIV of
[3, p. 11-12] for all zeE.
Thus the filters 2^(s) determine a topology
^/ on E, which is not finer than ^", since the neighbourhood filter
of x with respect to ^/ is strictly coarser than that with respect to
^~. Obviously ^ c ^ * .
Let ~ and ° denote closure and interior with respect to ^ . Closures
with respect to ^^ and with respect to ^ of sets containing x clearly
are equal. Now assume A e ^Γa.
Our object is to prove A e <%s*.
Suppose this is false; then A £ ^ , so A is an open neighbourhood of
x with respect to S~*. Clearly A0 — A — {x}. Now from x e A0" would
follow
A°~ — cl. A Z) int. c\. AZDAZD
{X} .
Since int. cl. A is minimally bounded it belongs to %S, and we would
have
0 0
A " Z) int. cl. A
Ό
A
which means A e <%s*. Thus we conclude that x £ A°~. Then there is
a B € ^ containing x such that B Π (A — {x}) — φ. Since both A and
B are contained in j ^ Λ A Π Be ^».
But AΠB = {x}9 and {x} is
closed with respect to ^~a. This would mean that ^~" is quasi-regular
at x, contrary to assumption. So we may conclude that A e <%". Thus
we have shown that ^"a^S*.
From ^ c J ' c F we conclude
<%/<* = j^r** = j?"* (Prop. 10). Thus if ^ is not quasi-regular at all
ON SOME CLASSES OF NEARLY OPEN SETS
969
points which are closed with respect to Jf*, it is not the coarsest
topology of its α:-class. This completes the proof.
COROLLARY
topology of its
1. A quasi-regular
a-class.
topology ^
is
the
coarsest
Obvious.
COROLLARY 2. If the topology ^~ is not an a-topology, then its
a-topology is not quasi-regular.
Obvious.
We see that from every topology which is itself not an α-topology
is deduced an α-topology which in a certain sense is rather pathological.
This may be of some interest, since J7~* also inherits some "nice"
properties from ^ .
Thus consider the most usual Baire-spaces: those
which are locally compact or deduced from a complete metric structure.
Many of these are not ^-topologies; in these cases the construction of
the associated ^-topology gives Baire-spaces which are not even uniformizable (cor. 2 to Prop. 5). And to every perfectly normal topology
is associated an (a-) topology which may be far from being perfectly
normal, but which nevertheless has the property that every open set
is an ^v-set (Cor. 1 to Prop. 5). According to Prop. 8 these two
topologies determine the same real valued continuous functions, only
the open sets of the first occurring as inverse images of open sets in R.
An α-class does not always possess a coarsest topology, as is shown
by the following
EXAMPLE. Let E be an infinite set, and let ^
consist of the
empty set and all complements of finite sets. This topology clearly
is an α-topology (and even a /5-structure), not quasi-regular at any
point. Here it is easily seen that the only topology which is coarser
than all topologies of the α-class determined by ^Γ is the coarsest
topology on E. This topology itself does not belong to the class.
PROPOSITION 12. An α:-topology jf
is the only topology of its
α-class if and only if it is quasi-regular at all closed points.
Proof evident.
As examples of α-topologies which are the only topologies of their
α-classes we may mention the discrete topology and the coarsest
970
OLAV NJASTAD
topology on E (both of which are quasi-regular). We have seen that
the α-topology deduced from the ordinary topology & on R is distinct
from &, so this topology is not quasi-regular.
REFERENCES
1. G. Aumann, Reelle Funktionen, Berlin-Gottingen-Heidelberg, 1954.
2. G. Birkhoff, Lattice Theory, 2. ed., New York 1948.
3. N. Bourbaki, Topologie Generate, Ch. I-II, Act. Sci. et Ind. 858-1142, Paris 1951.
4. N. Bourbaki, Topologie Generate, Ch. IX, Acta. Sci. et Ind. 1045, Paris 1958.
5. G. Freud, Ein Beitrag zu dem Satze von Cantor und Bendixson, Acta. Math. Acad.
Sci. Hung. 9 (1958), 333-336.
6. S. Kempisty, Sur les fonctions quasicontinues, Fund. Math. 19 (1932), 184-197.
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS
EDITORS
H. SAMELSON
J. DUGUNDJI
Stanford University
Stanford, California
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California 90007
R. M. BLUMENTHAL
*RlCHARD ARENS
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington 98105
University of California
Los Angeles, California 90024
ASSOCIATE EDITORS
E. F. BECKENBACH
B. H. NEUMANN
F. WOLF
K. YOSIDA
SUPPORTING INSTITUTIONS
UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA
NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON
OSAKA UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
*
*
*
AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY
CALIFORNIA RESEARCH CORPORATION
SPACE TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES
NAVAL ORDNANCE TEST STATION
Mathematical papers intended for publication in the Pacific Journal of Mathematics should
by typewritten (double spaced). The first paragraph or two must be capable of being used separately
as a synopsis of the entire paper. It should not contain references to the bibliography. No separate
author's resume is required. Manuscripts may be sent to any one of the four editors. All other
communications to the editors should be addressed to the managing editor, Richard Arens, at the
University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024.
50 reprints per author of each article are furnished free of charge; additional copies may be
obtained at cost in multiples of 50.
The Pacific Journal of Mathematics is published quarterly, in March, June, September, and
December. Effective with Volume 13 the price per volume (4 numbers) is $18.00; single issues, $5.00.
Special price for current issues to individual faculty members of supporting institutions and to
individual members of the American Mathematical Society: $8.00 per volume; single issues $2.50.
Back numbers are available.
Subscriptions, orders for back numbers, and changes of address should be sent to Pacific
Journal of Mathematics, 103 Highland Boulevard, Berkeley 8, California.
Printed at Kokusai Bunken Insatsusha (International Academic Printing Co., Ltd.), No. 6,
2-chome, Fujimi-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
PUBLISHED BY PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION
The Supporting Institutions listed above contribute to the cost of publication of this Journal,
but they are not owners or publishers and have no responsibility for its content or policies.
Basil Gordon, Acting Managing Editor until February 1, 1966.
Pacific Journal of Mathematics
Vol. 15, No. 3
November, 1965
David R. Arterburn and Robert James Whitley, Projections in the space of
bounded linear operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Robert McCallum Blumenthal, Joram Lindenstrauss and Robert Ralph Phelps,
Extreme operators into C(K ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L. Carlitz, A note on multiple exponential sums . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Joseph A. Cima, A nonnormal Blaschke-quotient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paul Civin and Bertram Yood, Lie and Jordan structures in Banach algebras . . . .
Luther Elic Claborn, Dedekind domains: Overrings and semi-prime
elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Luther Elic Claborn, Note generalizing a result of Samuel’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
George Bernard Dantzig, E. Eisenberg and Richard Warren Cottle, Symmetric
dual nonlinear programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Philip J. Davis, Simple quadratures in the complex plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Edward Richard Fadell, On a coincidence theorem of F. B. Fuller . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Delbert Ray Fulkerson and Oliver Gross, Incidence matrices and interval
graphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Larry Charles Grove, Tensor products over H ∗ -algebras . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deborah Tepper Haimo, L 2 expansions in terms of generalized heat polynomials
and of their Appell transforms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I. Martin (Irving) Isaacs and Donald Steven Passman, A characterization of
groups in terms of the degrees of their characters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Donald Gordon James, Integral invariants for vectors over local fields . . . . . . . . . .
Fred Krakowski, A remark on the lemma of Gauss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marvin David Marcus and H. Minc, A subdeterminant inequality . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kevin Mor McCrimmon, Norms and noncommutative Jordan algebras . . . . . . . . .
Donald Earl Myers, Topologies for Laplace transform spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Olav Njstad, On some classes of nearly open sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Milton Philip Olson, A characterization of conditional probability . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Barbara Osofsky, A counter-example to a lemma of Skornjakov . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sidney Charles Port, Ratio limit theorems for Markov chains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
George A. Reid, A generalisation of W ∗ -algebras . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Robert Wells Ritchie, Classes of recursive functions based on Ackermann’s
function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thomas Lawrence Sherman, Properties of solutions of nth order linear
differential equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ernst Snapper, Inflation and deflation for all dimensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kondagunta Sundaresan, On the strict and uniform convexity of certain Banach
spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Frank J. Wagner, Maximal convex filters in a locally convex space . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Joseph Albert Wolf, Translation-invariant function algebras on compact
groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
739
747
757
767
775
799
805
809
813
825
835
857
865
877
905
917
921
925
957
961
971
985
989
1019
1027
1045
1061
1083
1087
1093